%PDF-1.2 % 2 0 obj << /Length 4647 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (205)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT /F6 1 Tf 0 7 -7 0 82.163 174.312 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.053 Tw (Fecha de recepci\363n:)Tj /F4 1 Tf 8.3314 0 TD 0.005 Tc 0.057 Tw (9 de mayode 2007)Tj /F6 1 Tf -8.3314 -1.2 TD 0.002 Tc 0.047 Tw (Fecha de aceptaci\363n:)Tj /F4 1 Tf 8.76 0 TD [( 14 de mayo de 2007)]TJ ET 1 g 1 G 1000 M 37.065 619.71 379.67 -44.32 re B* BT /F5 1 Tf 8 0 0 8 330.575 588.3 Tm 0 g 0.034 Tc (ISSN:1692-8156)Tj ET 0 G 10 M 76.535 141.54 m 161.615 141.54 l S BT 9 0 0 9 76.535 120.18 Tm 0 Tc 0.054 Tw [(*)-1700(Abogado y bachiller en filosof\355a javeriano, mag\355ster en Econom\355a y mag\355ster en)]TJ 2.2 -1.2133 TD -0.012 Tc -0.062 Tw (Derecho de la Universidad de Harvard. Profesor de c\341tedra de la Facultad de Ciencias)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.008 Tc [(Jur\355dicas. Lo expresado en este art\355culo es responsabilidad exclusiva de su autor y no)]TJ T* 0 Tc -0.002 Tw (constituye opini\363n institucional alguna ni la responsabilidad de una instituci\363n en)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD -0.008 Tc (particular/)Tj /F8 1 Tf 4.0133 0 TD -0.01 Tc -0.062 Tw (What is being expressed in this document is responsibility of its author and)Tj -4.0133 -1.2267 TD -0.001 Tc (it does not constitute any institutional opinion or the liability of an institution)Tj /F5 1 Tf 30.0933 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -32.2933 -1.5467 TD -0.057 Tw [(**)-1200(Calle 40 # 6-23 piso 6\260, Facultad de Ciencias Jur\355dicas, Bogot\341-Colombia.)]TJ 13 0 0 13 89.975 448.5 Tm -0.02 Tc -0.062 Tw [(EXTENSIVE CAPTURE: )27(THE HARMONIZA)109(TION OF)]TJ 1.0338 -1.2 TD -0.024 Tc -0.06 Tw [(INTERNA)105(TIONAL)31( INDUSTRIAL)31( REGULA)114(TION)]TJ 10 0 0 10 259.295 404.7 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 7 0 0 7 265.775 404.7 Tm -0.04 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 10 0 0 10 287.375 404.7 Tm -0.086 Tc ( P)Tj 7 0 0 7 294.335 404.7 Tm -0.039 Tc (ABLO)Tj 10 0 0 10 312.335 404.7 Tm -0.095 Tc ( M)Tj 7 0 0 7 322.535 404.7 Tm -0.036 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 10 0 0 10 349.415 404.7 Tm -0.081 Tc ( E)Tj 7 0 0 7 356.975 404.7 Tm -0.039 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj 10 0 0 10 383.375 404.7 Tm 0 Tc (*)Tj -12.936 -1.308 TD (P)Tj 7 0 0 7 259.295 391.62 Tm -0.042 Tc (ONTIFICIA)Tj 10 0 0 10 291.815 391.62 Tm -0.096 Tc ( U)Tj 7 0 0 7 300.215 391.62 Tm -0.041 Tc (NIVERSIDAD)Tj 10 0 0 10 340.055 391.62 Tm -0.087 Tc ( J)Tj 7 0 0 7 345.335 391.62 Tm -0.041 Tc [(A)132(VERIANA)]TJ 10 0 0 10 378.575 391.62 Tm -0.028 Tc (**)Tj 13 0 0 13 338.855 348.06 Tm 0 Tc (A)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 348.095 348.06 Tm -0.014 Tc (BSTRACT)Tj 12 0 0 12 104.855 318.9 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.125 Tw (This research project tries to show that a unified discourse and)Tj 0 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.066 Tw (a single global policy for liberalization and competition cuts)Tj T* -0.021 Tc -0.125 Tw (across the economic and legal theory of transnational regulations)Tj T* 0.012 Tc 0.25 Tw (of industry. The tension mediated by the concepts of)Tj T* -0.004 Tc -0.124 Tw [(harmonization, meaning that one regulation/standard is better)]TJ T* 0.019 Tc 0.25 Tw (that multiple regulations/standards, and the theory of)Tj T* -0.009 Tc -0.125 Tw (international liberalization, meaning deregulation is better that)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.102 Tw (regulation, brings many doubts about the phenomenon of)Tj T* -0.006 Tc -0.125 Tw (international industrial regulation. The core of this project is to)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.024 Tw (restate the problem of regulatory capture at a transnational)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.038 Tw (level and show how it is possible, and profitable, for large)Tj ET endstream endobj 3 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F6 6 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Length 3122 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (206)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 12 0 0 12 93.525 555.9 Tm -0.022 Tc -0.125 Tw (corporations to capture transnational regulators with multilateral)Tj 0 -1.2 TD 0 Tc -0.12 Tw (regulation or deregulation processes.)Tj /F8 1 Tf 0 -2.4 TD -0.038 Tw (Key words)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.21 0 TD 0.001 Tc (: International industrial regulation, international)Tj -4.21 -1.2 TD -0.011 Tc -0.125 Tw (law, soft law, hard law, harmonization, industrial organization,)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.056 Tw (law and economics.)Tj /F8 1 Tf 13 0 0 13 90.525 454.26 Tm -0.019 Tc -0.062 Tw [(CAPTURA)9( EXTENSA: LA)9( )21(ARMONIZACI\323N DE LA)]TJ 0.5538 -1.2 TD -0.024 Tc [(REGULACION INDUSTRIAL)22( INTERNACIONAL)]TJ 12 0 0 12 336.525 409.74 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (R)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 343.845 409.74 Tm (ESUMEN)Tj 12 0 0 12 65.205 381.06 Tm -0.032 Tw (Este proyecto de investigaci\363n intenta demostrar que un discurso)Tj T* -0.043 Tw (unificado y una \372nica pol\355tica global para la liberalizaci\363n de los)Tj T* -0.018 Tc -0.125 Tw (mercados y el incremento de la competencia corta la teor\355a econ\363mica)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.12 Tw (y legal la regulaci\363n transnacional de la industria. La tensi\363n)Tj T* 0.014 Tw (mediada por los conceptos de la armonizaci\363n, significando que)Tj T* -0.015 Tc -0.125 Tw (una \372nica regulaci\363n/est\341ndar es mejor que regulaciones/est\341ndares)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.156 Tw (m\372ltiples, y la teor\355a de la liberalizaci\363n internacional de los)Tj T* 0.201 Tw (mercados, significando que la desregulaci\363n es mejor que la)Tj T* -0.006 Tc -0.125 Tw (regulaci\363n, causa muchas dudas sobre el fen\363meno de la regulaci\363n)Tj T* -0.007 Tc (industrial internacional. El n\372cleo de este proyecto es exponer como)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.091 Tw (es posible modificar el an\341lisis del problema de la captura del)Tj T* -0.046 Tw (regulador en un nivel transnacional y demostrar c\363mo es posible,)Tj T* -0.009 Tc -0.125 Tw (y provechoso, para las grandes corporaciones capturar reguladores)Tj T* 0.004 Tc 0.25 Tw (transnacionales con procesos multilaterales de regulaci\363n o)Tj T* -0.008 Tc (desregulaci\363n.)Tj 0 -2.4 TD 0.001 Tc (Palabras clave: Regulaci\363n industrial internacional, derecho)Tj 0 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.181 Tw (internacional, soft law, hard law, armonizaci\363n, organizaci\363n)Tj T* -0.088 Tw (industrial, an\341lisis econ\363mico del derecho.)Tj ET endstream endobj 12 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 14 0 obj << /Length 6030 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (207)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 13 0 0 13 314.015 555.06 Tm 0 Tc (I)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 318.455 555.06 Tm 0.003 Tc (NTRODUCTION)Tj 7.6 0 0 7.6 384.575 559.5 Tm 0 Tc (*)Tj 12 0 0 12 76.535 525.9 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.022 Tw (The present of International Economic Law is the legal system of)Tj 0 -1.2 TD 0.186 Tw (international trade and the WTO. The future, however, is the)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.105 Tw (transnational regulation of industry. Certainly, since the 1980s,)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.073 Tw (regulations of different industries have had a transnational impact.)Tj T* -0.015 Tc -0.125 Tw (Regulation of financial markets and certain environmental regulation,)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.072 Tw (among others, are examples of this phenomenon, which rapidly)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.12 Tw (expanded to several other areas of industrial regulation after it)Tj T* -0.084 Tw (attracted the attention of legal and economic scholarship)Tj 7 0 0 7 341.015 429.06 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (1)Tj 12 0 0 12 346.175 425.1 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.05 Tw (. Despite)Tj -22.47 -1.2 TD 0.071 Tw (their interest, however, only a few scholars have been critically)Tj T* -0.004 Tc -0.125 Tw (concerned about one of the most important theoretical constructions)Tj T* 0.035 Tc 0.25 Tw (behind the expansion of industrial regulation: regulation)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.024 Tw (harmonization. Harmonization has been studied in the economic)Tj T* 0.013 Tw (literature, mostly related to financial, stock markets and antitrust)Tj T* -0.016 Tc -0.125 Tw (regulation, leading usually to conclusions highlighting the advantages)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0 Tw (of harmonization)Tj 7 0 0 7 158.975 328.26 Tm 0 Tc (2)Tj 12 0 0 12 164.255 324.3 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.003 Tw ( for liberalization, free trade and competition)Tj 7 0 0 7 380.015 328.26 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (3)Tj 12 0 0 12 385.295 324.3 Tm (.)Tj -25.73 -1.2 TD -0.015 Tc -0.125 Tw (Nevertheless, despite of the evident tension in concomitant discourses)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.141 Tw (for liberalization and regulation)Tj 7 0 0 7 234.215 299.46 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (4)Tj 12 0 0 12 239.495 295.5 Tm 0.084 Tw (, it is unbelievable how, when)Tj 10 0 0 10 76.535 252.54 Tm -0.009 Tc -0.039 Tw [(*)-1489(International Industrial Regulation. Research project linked to International)]TJ 1.98 -1.2 TD 0.032 Tc 0.125 Tw (Economic Law Research line. Partially financed by the Pontificia)Tj T* -0.009 Tc 0.052 Tw (Universidad Javeriana. Registration number pending.)Tj 9 0 0 9 76.535 214.26 Tm 0 Tc 0.018 Tw [(1)-1700(A)55( simple search in )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 9.9467 0 TD -0.001 Tc [(J-Stor)39(e)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 2.84 0 TD 0 Tc 0.02 Tw [( \(Business, Finance, Law)67(, Political Science and Public)]TJ -10.5867 -1.2133 TD -0.003 Tc -0.062 Tw (Policy\) of the words \223regulation\224 & \223harmonization\224 in title, abstract and text body)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.005 Tw (showed 23 articles from 1887 to 1945, 127 from 1946 to 1965, 406 from 1966 to)Tj T* -0.054 Tw (1985, and 794 from 1986 to 2002. In this last period, from 1986 to 1990 there were)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD -0.051 Tw (152 articles, 256 from 1991 to 1995, 289 from 1996 to 2000, and 156 from 2000 to)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.004 Tc -0.062 Tw (2001. The expansion of literature after 1985 indicates some correlation between the)Tj T* -0.02 Tc (promotion of \223world liberalization\224 by the US and UK government and the subsequent)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD -0.007 Tc (increase interest in harmonization and globalization.)Tj -2.2 -1.5467 TD 0 Tc 0.046 Tw [(2)-1700(Some authors say that it is certainly more convenient to be able to use the same)]TJ 2.2 -1.2133 TD -0.058 Tw (mobile phone in different countries, buy a wireless Internet link that can be sold all)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.053 Tw (over the world, it will generate more profits and presumably more jobs.)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD -0.028 Tw [(3)-1700(See R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 117.335 87.66 Tm [(OBER)57(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 137.615 87.66 Tm -0.033 Tc 0 Tw ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 144.575 87.66 Tm 0.001 Tc (AHRE)Tj 9 0 0 9 161.735 87.66 Tm 0 Tc -0.033 Tw [(, Leading Questions: How Hegemony )67(Af)13(fects )14(The International)]TJ -7.2667 -1.2267 TD -0.042 Tw [(Political Economy)67(, U. Mich., Press., 1999.)]TJ -2.2 -1.5467 TD -0.007 Tc [(4)-1707(See )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.8133 0 TD -0.006 Tc (infra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.9067 0 TD -0.007 Tc -0.061 Tw [( text pages 2 and 2. )60(Also see )-6(B)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.935 62.7 Tm -0.01 Tc (ETH)Tj 9 0 0 9 244.055 62.7 Tm -0.077 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 250.655 62.7 Tm -0.011 Tc (IMMONS)Tj 9 0 0 9 276.215 62.7 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.1733 0 TD -0.007 Tc -0.061 Tw (Capital Markets Regulation)Tj /F5 1 Tf 10.8667 0 TD -0.066 Tw (. 55)Tj -31.0267 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc -0.052 Tw [(Int)-13(.)-3( )11(Or)13(ganization. 589, 615-20 \(2001\) \(showing why the harmonization debate has)]TJ ET 76.535 270.42 m 150.215 270.42 l S endstream endobj 15 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Length 4766 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (208)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 12 0 0 12 65.205 555.9 Tm -0.005 Tc -0.125 Tw (referring to transnational regulation scholars seem to forget asking if)Tj 0 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.082 Tw (harmonization is a result of capture)Tj 7 0 0 7 230.205 545.46 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (5)Tj 12 0 0 12 235.485 541.5 Tm (.)Tj -14.19 -1.2 TD -0.118 Tw [( The goal in this research project is to show that a unified discourse)]TJ T* 0.001 Tc 0.015 Tw (and a single global policy for liberalization and competition cuts)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.125 Tw (across the economic and legal theory of transnational regulations of)Tj T* -0.04 Tw (industry, and this inherent tension reveals regulatory capture. The)Tj T* -0.014 Tc -0.125 Tw (evident tension is mediated by the concept of harmonization, meaning)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.146 Tw (that one regulation/standard is better that multiple regulations/)Tj T* 0.012 Tw (standards, and the theory of international liberalization, meaning)Tj T* -0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw (deregulation is better that regulation. The concept of harmonization)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.109 Tw (is mediating such tension since it is discriminately regarded as)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.105 Tw (beneficial for certain markets but prejudicial for other markets, and)Tj T* -0.123 Tw (this inconsistency is just an effect of capture. The core of my project)Tj T* -0.002 Tc -0.125 Tw (is to restate the problem of regulatory capture at a transnational level)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.076 Tw (and show how it is possible and profitable for large corporations to)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.111 Tw (capture transnational regulators with multilateral regulations or)Tj T* -0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw (deregulations. The premise is that internationalization of regulation)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.028 Tw (gives capture an extensive effect and makes it more profitable for)Tj T* -0.004 Tc -0.124 Tw (large corporations.)Tj T* -0.001 Tc [( What makes capture profitable is not the advertised positive effect)]TJ T* 0.001 Tc 0.09 Tw (of harmonization in competition and market efficiencies but its)Tj T* 0.143 Tw (incidence to enhance control over national regulators, national)Tj T* -0.011 Tc -0.125 Tw (regulation and international commercial regulation. Thus, the project)Tj T* -0.007 Tc (is trying to find a framework to explain why harmonization, as a legal)Tj T* -0.004 Tc (concept, is advertised and promoted as a way to improve the positive)Tj T* -0.007 Tc (effects of liberalization and competition, legitimizing just one model)Tj 9 0 0 9 85.005 142.02 Tm -0.017 Tc -0.062 Tw (been misleading and proposing a method to approach to the problem of harmonization)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD -0.007 Tc (in financial markets\).)Tj -1.9467 -1.5467 TD -0.02 Tc [(5)-1467(The word )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 5.76 0 TD -0.021 Tc [(captur)32(e)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 2.8667 0 TD -0.02 Tc [( here has several meanings in the literature. Here it follows )-7(H)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 348.285 117.18 Tm -0.028 Tc (ANSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 369.165 117.18 Tm -0.08 Tc [(\222s)-54(,)]TJ -31.5733 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (Y)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 91.365 106.26 Tm -0.029 Tc (OSIFON)Tj 9 0 0 9 113.085 106.26 Tm -0.021 Tc -0.053 Tw [(\222)59(s, B)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 128.085 106.26 Tm -0.027 Tc (ENFORADO)Tj 9 0 0 9 160.965 106.26 Tm -0.021 Tc -0.061 Tw [(\222)59(s)0( and )-8(C)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 187.965 106.26 Tm -0.028 Tc (HEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 200.325 106.26 Tm -0.02 Tc -0.063 Tw [(\222)46(s)0( work. Capture goes beyond the stiglerian meaning)]TJ -12.8133 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc -0.038 Tw (-as capture of the regulator due to the action of pressure groups- and goes to a new)Tj T* -0.004 Tc -0.062 Tw (appreciation called deep capture \226capture of the regulation by capturing knowledge)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc -0.009 Tw [(structures, social cognition, and behavior)53(. )26(W)77(e)0( will explain what is the meaning of)]TJ 0 -1.2267 TD -0.019 Tw (capture and the importance of the concept of capture for structuralism and critical)Tj T* -0.016 Tc (realism.)Tj ET 65.205 161.94 m 376.965 161.94 l S endstream endobj 18 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 20 0 obj << /Length 5957 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (209)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 12 0 0 12 76.535 555.9 Tm -0.025 Tc -0.125 Tw (of industrial regulation and delegitimizing the possibilities of regulatory)Tj 0 -1.2 TD -0.002 Tc (alternatives and regulatory competition.)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.11 Tw [( To explain the relevance for the legal and economic literature and)]TJ T* -0.053 Tw (the necessity of a realistic approach to the International Economic)Tj T* 0.02 Tw (Law of Industrial Regulation)Tj 7 0 0 7 216.455 502.26 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (6)Tj 12 0 0 12 221.615 498.3 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.013 Tw (, the project will be divided in two)Tj -12.09 -1.2 TD 0 Tc -0.113 Tw (parts, excluding introduction and conclusions. First, we explain the)Tj T* 0.02 Tw (basis and goals of the dissertation, including the methodology to)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.061 Tw (approach to the problem and its relevance for legal and economics)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.084 Tw (scholarship; second, we will show how the questions presented are)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.071 Tw (novel for scholarship in the field.)Tj 13 0 0 13 231.575 396.66 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.006 Tw (I. C)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 250.895 396.66 Tm (APTURE)Tj 13 0 0 13 286.175 396.66 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 289.295 396.66 Tm -0.002 Tc (AND)Tj 13 0 0 13 308.975 396.66 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 312.095 396.66 Tm -0.001 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 12 0 0 12 76.535 367.5 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.002 Tw ( The minimum theoretical background to understand the set of)Tj T* -0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw (hypothesis and the methodologies to address the problem of capture)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.098 Tw (in international regulation is based on showing how to \(re\)take)Tj T* (power)Tj 7 0 0 7 106.535 328.26 Tm 0 Tw (7)Tj 12 0 0 12 111.815 324.3 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.022 Tw [( seriously for studying capture in International Economic)]TJ -2.94 -1.2 TD 0.002 Tc (Law)Tj 7 0 0 7 97.895 313.86 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (8)Tj 12 0 0 12 103.175 309.9 Tm -0.04 Tw (. Concomitantly, we will explain why the analysis of power,)Tj -2.22 -1.2 TD 0.137 Tw (in structuralism and social psychology, provides an alternative)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.084 Tw (approach to study the problem of capture and harmonization in)Tj T* -0.104 Tw (transnational industrial regulation and, thus, arid perspective of the)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.005 Tw (dynamics of power in the international economic law of industry)Tj T* -0.012 Tc (regulation.)Tj 9 0 0 9 76.535 145.14 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (6)Tj /F8 1 Tf 2.2 0 TD 0.013 Tc (See)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.44 0 TD 0.137 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 117.935 145.14 Tm 0.026 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 135.695 145.14 Tm 0.141 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 147.335 145.14 Tm 0.023 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 173.855 145.14 Tm 0.019 Tc 0.128 Tw [( y )19(A)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 192.215 145.14 Tm 0.022 Tc (LFONSO)Tj 9 0 0 9 217.535 145.14 Tm 0.128 Tc 0 Tw ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 229.175 145.14 Tm 0.022 Tc (IRANDA)Tj 9 0 0 9 254.615 145.14 Tm 0.017 Tc 0.128 Tw (, \223Intervenci\363n p\372blica, regulaci\363n)Tj -17.5867 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc -0.042 Tw (administrativa y econom\355a: elementos para definir los objetivos de la regulaci\363n)Tj /F8 1 Tf 31.64 0 TD -0.006 Tc (\224,)Tj -31.64 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc (Vniversitas,)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.76 0 TD -0.044 Tw [( Ciencias Jur\355dicas \(indexada\), n\260 108, p\341gs. 71-118, Bogot\341, 2004.)]TJ -6.96 -1.5467 TD -0.005 Tc -0.062 Tw [(7)-1705( See )-6(J)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 116.015 109.26 Tm -0.015 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 125.015 109.26 Tm -0.065 Tc 0 Tw ( H)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 133.175 109.26 Tm -0.004 Tc (ANSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 154.655 109.26 Tm -0.005 Tc -0.061 Tw [( & )8(D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 171.335 109.26 Tm -0.003 Tc [(A)129(VID)]TJ 9 0 0 9 186.095 109.26 Tm -0.103 Tc 0 Tw ( Y)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 193.895 109.26 Tm -0.006 Tc (OSIFON)Tj 9 0 0 9 216.335 109.26 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4267 0 TD -0.005 Tc -0.062 Tw [(The Situation: an Intr)35(oduction to the Situational)]TJ -13.76 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc -0.045 Tw [(Character)107(, Critical Realism, Power Economics, and Deep Captur)27(e)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 26.3733 0 TD (. 152, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 2.4133 0 TD -0.047 Tw (U. PA. L.)Tj -28.7867 -1.2267 TD -0.003 Tc [(REV)117(.)-6( )]TJ /F5 1 Tf 2.32 0 TD 0 Tc 0.105 Tw [(129, 134-39 \(2003\) \(ar)27(guing that mainstream )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 18.92 0 TD 0.106 Tw (law and economics)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.88 0 TD 0.001 Tc 0.108 Tw [( has not)]TJ -29.12 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.039 Tw (developed an economic analysis of the rise of )Tj /F8 1 Tf 18.8133 0 TD (law and economics)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.7467 0 TD 0.04 Tw [( as a school of)]TJ -26.56 -1.2133 TD -0.044 Tw (thought and the possible inner tensions on it\).)Tj -2.2 -1.5467 TD -0.001 Tc -0.017 Tw [(8)-1701( See )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 4.12 0 TD -0.006 Tc (Id)Tj /F5 1 Tf 0.8267 0 TD 0 Tc (. at 193-98, 212-30.)Tj ET 76.535 175.5 m 142.535 175.5 l S endstream endobj 21 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 23 0 obj << /Length 6914 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (210)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 8.4 0 0 8.4 135.525 556.14 Tm 0 Tc (A)Tj 12 0 0 12 141.525 556.14 Tm -0.04 Tw (. W)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 158.445 556.14 Tm 0.001 Tc (HERE)Tj 12 0 0 12 180.405 556.14 Tm -0.021 Tc 0 Tw ( E)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 190.485 556.14 Tm -0.001 Tc (CONOMICS)Tj 12 0 0 12 234.765 556.14 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 237.525 556.14 Tm -0.004 Tc (AND)Tj 12 0 0 12 255.645 556.14 Tm -0.017 Tc ( R)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 266.445 556.14 Tm -0.001 Tc [(EGULA)113(TION)]TJ 12 0 0 12 313.965 556.14 Tm -0.019 Tc ( M)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 327.405 556.14 Tm 0.005 Tc (EET)Tj 12 0 0 12 342.885 556.14 Tm -0.026 Tc ( P)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 352.245 556.14 Tm 0 Tc (OWER)Tj 12 0 0 12 65.205 527.46 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.25 Tw (Structural philosophy)Tj 7 0 0 7 172.125 531.54 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (9)Tj 12 0 0 12 177.405 527.46 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.146 Tw [( and social psychology have been more)]TJ -9.35 -1.2 TD -0.004 Tc -0.125 Tw (conscious than neo-classical economics of the dynamics of power in)Tj T* -0.019 Tc (the interaction of human beings)Tj 7 0 0 7 204.285 502.74 Tm -0.023 Tc (10)Tj 12 0 0 12 212.685 498.66 Tm -0.011 Tc -0.073 Tw (. Indeed, the structure of institutions)Tj -12.29 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.012 Tw (and the architecture of human relations are governed by power)Tj 7 0 0 7 365.205 488.34 Tm -0.006 Tc (11)Tj 12 0 0 12 373.965 484.26 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -25.73 -1.2 TD -0.068 Tw (This analysis is relevant for this project since it deals with)Tj 10 0 0 10 79.365 442.74 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.027 Tw (\223how\205 [the] mechanisms of power\205have begun to become economically)Tj T* 0.125 Tw (advantageous and politically useful\224)Tj 5.8 0 0 5.8 229.245 434.1 Tm -0.007 Tc (12)Tj 10 0 0 10 236.565 430.74 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj 12 0 0 12 65.205 402.66 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.098 Tw (The latter is the main concern of F)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 222.885 402.66 Tm -0.001 Tc (OUCAULT)Tj 12 0 0 12 262.965 402.66 Tm 0 Tc -0.1 Tw (\222s structural philosophy,)Tj -16.48 -1.2 TD -0.058 Tw (which, using genealogy)Tj 7 0 0 7 177.525 392.34 Tm -0.006 Tc (13)Tj 12 0 0 12 186.285 388.26 Tm 0 Tc -0.035 Tw [( shows the \(cor\)relation between power,)]TJ -10.09 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.069 Tw (law and truth)Tj 7 0 0 7 126.885 377.94 Tm -0.006 Tc (14)Tj 12 0 0 12 135.645 373.86 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.026 Tw (. F)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 147.885 373.86 Tm -0.001 Tc (OUCAULT)Tj 12 0 0 12 187.965 373.86 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.07 Tw (\222s main problem is the )Tj /F8 1 Tf 8.86 0 TD 0 Tc (why)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.61 0 TD [( of the )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 2.6 0 TD 0.002 Tc (how)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.67 0 TD -0.001 Tc -0.071 Tw [( of)]TJ -24.97 -1.2 TD -0.02 Tc (power)Tj 7 0 0 7 94.005 363.54 Tm -0.023 Tc (15)Tj 12 0 0 12 102.525 359.46 Tm -0.011 Tc -0.073 Tw [(; this is the mechanisms related to the formal delimitation of)]TJ ET 65.205 331.5 m 145.965 331.5 l S BT 9 0 0 9 65.205 310.14 Tm 0 Tc -0.055 Tw [(9)-1700( Structuralism refers, broadly)67(, to the genealogy and structure of meaning in several)]TJ /F8 1 Tf 2.2 -1.2267 TD -0.006 Tc (epistemes)Tj /F5 1 Tf 3.84 0 TD -0.063 Tw (. Here we are not referring to the work of Saussure and others but the work)Tj -3.84 -1.2267 TD 0.001 Tc 0.046 Tw (of Michel F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 128.325 288.06 Tm [(OUCAUL)96(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 157.845 288.06 Tm 0 Tc 0.049 Tw [(. )14(W)77(e)0( are cataloguing F)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 240.525 288.06 Tm 0.001 Tc [(OUCAUL)96(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 270.045 288.06 Tm 0 Tc [( as structuralist despite of his)]TJ -20.56 -1.2133 TD -0.056 Tw (rejection to catalogue his work as structural. However, his early work, which is the)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.01 Tc -0.063 Tw (one I will use, is structural and there is no other reason but passion to reject it as a part)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.055 Tw (of XX century structuralism.)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD 0.069 Tw [(10)-1200( For an analysis form an architectural and surveillance perspectives, see: )-13(P)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 359.805 241.26 Tm 0.001 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 85.005 230.22 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 92.925 230.22 Tm -0.011 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 118.125 230.22 Tm (. )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.44 0 TD -0.007 Tc -0.062 Tw (El ojo ve, el poder mira: La arquitectura para la vigilancia y el final de la)Tj -4.12 -1.2133 TD -0.002 Tc (privacidad, )Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.7467 0 TD [(colecci\363n: Investigaciones, JA)130(VEGRAF: Bogot\341, 2004.)]TJ -6.9467 -1.5467 TD 0 Tc 0.029 Tw [(11)-1200( See Michel Foucault,)-6( )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 11.3467 0 TD 0.032 Tw (The Subject and Power)Tj /F5 1 Tf 9.4 0 TD 0.03 Tw [(, 8, 4 Critical Inquiry)53(, 777, 777-79)]TJ -18.5467 -1.2133 TD -0.055 Tw (Harvester, 1982.)Tj -2.2 -1.5467 TD -0.028 Tw [(1)7(2)-1207( Id. at 547a)]TJ 0 -1.5333 TD -0.013 Tc -0.062 Tw [(1)-13(3)-1213( Genealogy is defined as a form of knowledge that works by isolating the components)]TJ 2.2 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.095 Tw (and structures of a political mechanism tracing it back its roots. See Hubert L.)Tj T* -0.001 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Dreyfus &)6( Paul Rabinow)66(, Michel Foucault: beyond structualism and hermeneutics)]TJ 0 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (119, U. Chicago Press, 1982.)Tj -2.2 -1.5467 TD -0.009 Tc -0.054 Tw [(1)-9(4)-1209(Michel Foucault)-9(, )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 9.04 0 TD -0.008 Tc -0.062 Tw [(The histor)-8(y of sexuality: an intr)32(oduction)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 15.48 0 TD -0.007 Tc (, Penguin, 1978, \(showing)Tj -22.32 -1.2133 TD 0.006 Tc 0.125 Tw (how slight manipulations of science and the legal system lead to the modern)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.009 Tc -0.061 Tw [(construction of sexual identity\); )7(Society must be defended: lectures at the Coll\350ge de)]TJ T* -0.013 Tc [(France, 1975-76, 23-42 \(Mauro Bertani & )56(Alessandro Fontana, eds., 2003\) \(exposing)]TJ 0 -1.2133 TD -0.004 Tc (the genealogy of war and racism, and how the same discourse structure is evident in)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc -0.035 Tw (the new forms of racism\).)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD -0.001 Tc [(15)-1201(See )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.88 0 TD 0 Tc (supra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.28 0 TD -0.015 Tw [( note 11, and )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 5.36 0 TD -0.001 Tc (infra )Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.1733 0 TD 0 Tc -0.017 Tw (notes 16 and 20.)Tj ET endstream endobj 24 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 26 0 obj << /Length 5960 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (211)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 12 0 0 12 76.535 555.9 Tm -0.003 Tc -0.125 Tw [( power and the effect that truth produces and transmits. His question,)]TJ 0 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.073 Tw (relevant for our analysis of capture, is:)Tj 10 0 0 10 90.695 514.26 Tm 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw (\223what rules of right are implemented by the relations of power in the)Tj T* -0.009 Tc -0.062 Tw (production of discourses of truth?\224 \227or\227 \223what type of power is susceptible)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.027 Tw (of producing discourses of truth that in a society [as ours]\205 are endowed)Tj T* 0.05 Tw (with [legitimizing]\205effect?\224)Tj 5.8 0 0 5.8 208.415 481.62 Tm -0.007 Tc (16)Tj 10 0 0 10 215.615 478.26 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj 12 0 0 12 76.535 450.3 Tm -0.123 Tw [( Indeed, in the case of industrial regulation, this power comes from)]TJ T* -0.011 Tw (knowledge produced, sponsored and legitimized by transnational)Tj T* 0.228 Tw [(corporations that is transformed in national and transnational)]TJ T* -0.058 Tw (regulation by harmonization. As F)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 238.895 407.1 Tm -0.001 Tc (OUCAULT)Tj 12 0 0 12 278.975 407.1 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.06 Tw [( concludes, the relation)]TJ -16.87 -1.2 TD -0.093 Tw (between power, truth and law is definitively economical since they)Tj 10 0 0 10 90.695 365.46 Tm -0.003 Tc -0.062 Tw (\223must produce truth as we must produce wealth\224, \227and\227 \223\205must produce)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.023 Tw (truth in order to produce wealth\224)Tj 5.8 0 0 5.8 223.415 356.82 Tm -0.007 Tc (17)Tj 10 0 0 10 230.615 353.46 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj 12 0 0 12 76.535 325.5 Tm -0.027 Tw (Truth and power produce law, because)Tj 10 0 0 10 90.695 298.26 Tm 0.017 Tc 0.125 Tw (\223we are\205 )Tj /F8 1 Tf 4.74 0 TD 0.018 Tc (subjected)Tj /F5 1 Tf 3.948 0 TD 0.019 Tc [( to truth in the sense in which it is truth that \205)]TJ -8.688 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.015 Tw ([legitimizes] the laws\205\224)Tj 5.8 0 0 5.8 191.135 289.62 Tm -0.007 Tc (18)Tj 10 0 0 10 198.455 286.26 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj 12 0 0 12 76.535 258.3 Tm -0.075 Tw [( In addition, F)]TJ 8.4 0 0 8.4 150.215 258.3 Tm -0.001 Tc (OUCAULT)Tj 12 0 0 12 190.295 258.3 Tm 0 Tc -0.076 Tw [( reads power as something \223employed and)]TJ -9.48 -1.2 TD -0.004 Tc -0.125 Tw (exercised\224 that works in a positive net-externality where individuals)Tj T* -0.02 Tc (act as \223vehicles\224)Tj 7 0 0 7 149.495 233.46 Tm -0.023 Tc (19)Tj 12 0 0 12 158.015 229.5 Tm -0.011 Tc -0.073 Tw (, in our case regulators can act as vehicles and ends)Tj -6.79 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.033 Tw (of regulation. In synthesis, power is understood as a practice, an)Tj T* -0.044 Tw (exercise, executed through knowledge and the law. The law, thus,)Tj T* -0.048 Tw (works just as a technology of )Tj /F8 1 Tf 11.66 0 TD (normalization)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 283.775 190.26 Tm -0.006 Tc (20)Tj 12 0 0 12 292.535 186.3 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj 9 0 0 9 76.535 151.74 Tm -0.077 Tw [(16)-1200( M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 105.815 151.74 Tm -0.022 Tc (ICHEL)Tj 9 0 0 9 123.575 151.74 Tm -0.077 Tc 0 Tw ( F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 129.935 151.74 Tm -0.026 Tc [(OUCAUL)69(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 158.375 151.74 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4 0 TD -0.016 Tc -0.063 Tw [(Power)104(, Right, T)64(ruth, in)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 8.5333 0 TD -0.017 Tc [( Contemporary Political Philosophy)63(,)-6( )9(C)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 370.055 151.74 Tm -0.026 Tc (OLLIN)Tj 9 0 0 9 96.335 140.7 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 102.695 140.7 Tm -0.022 Tc (ORDON)Tj 9 0 0 9 124.535 140.7 Tm -0.014 Tc -0.061 Tw (, \(ed.\) 543a, 1998, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 7.0267 0 TD (originally published, in)Tj /F5 1 Tf 8.8933 0 TD -0.06 Tw [( Power/Knowledge, C)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 344.015 140.7 Tm -0.021 Tc (OLIN)Tj 9 0 0 9 358.535 140.7 Tm -0.079 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 366.455 140.7 Tm -0.022 Tc (ORDON)Tj 9 0 0 9 96.335 129.66 Tm 0 Tc -0.028 Tw (\(ed.\) 92-108, Harvester, 1980.)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD -0.019 Tw [(17)-1200( Id. at 543b.)]TJ T* -0.049 Tw [(18)-1200( Id. at 543b [Italics out of original text].)]TJ 0 -1.5467 TD -0.028 Tw [(19)-1200( Id. at 546a)]TJ 0 -1.5333 TD -0.007 Tc -0.062 Tw [(2)-7(0)-1207( )8(The concept of normalization is essential in )6(F)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 255.095 74.34 Tm -0.01 Tc [(OUCAUL)104(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 284.135 74.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(\222)58(s)0( thought and in the so called,)]TJ /F8 1 Tf -20.8667 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 101.855 63.3 Tm -0.001 Tc (OUCAULT)Tj 9 0 0 9 130.535 63.3 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.033 Tw [( effect)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 2.4533 0 TD 0 Tc 0.037 Tw [( in social and political sciences. The word \223normal\224 refers to the)]TJ -6.2533 -1.2267 TD 0.111 Tw (categorization of people, cultures, legal systems, etcetera, as opposed to forms)Tj ET 76.535 169.26 m 150.815 169.26 l S endstream endobj 27 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 29 0 obj << /Length 7720 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (212)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 12 0 0 12 65.205 555.9 Tm 0 Tc 0.131 Tw [( Social psychology and social cognition, on the same hand,)]TJ 0 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc 0.044 Tw (provide evidence to the latter statements. Knowledge structures,)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.101 Tw (through categories, schemas and scripts determine)Tj 10 0 0 10 79.365 499.86 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.056 Tw (\223how we understand the limitless information with we are\205 confronted\224)Tj 5.8 0 0 5.8 367.245 503.22 Tm -0.007 Tc (21)Tj 10 0 0 10 374.445 499.86 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj 12 0 0 12 65.205 471.9 Tm -0.032 Tw (and therefore, they shape the way we give order to the \223world\224)Tj 7 0 0 7 363.165 475.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (22)Tj 12 0 0 12 371.925 471.9 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -25.56 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.044 Tw [( These findings are aligned with the criticism set by )10(F)]TJ 8.4 0 0 8.4 328.245 457.5 Tm -0.001 Tc (OUCAULT)Tj 12 0 0 12 368.325 457.5 Tm -0.002 Tc (\222s)Tj -25.26 -1.2 TD -0.004 Tc -0.125 Tw (structural philosophy, as social psychology proves that humans tend)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.021 Tw (to rely in knowledge structures to process information and, most)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.096 Tw (importantly, to draw conclusions about factual situations)Tj 7 0 0 7 330.885 418.26 Tm -0.006 Tc (23)Tj 12 0 0 12 339.645 414.3 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -22.87 -1.2 TD -0.078 Tw [( These knowledge structures, as shown by )10(H)]TJ 8.4 0 0 8.4 280.845 399.9 Tm -0.004 Tc (ANSON)Tj 12 0 0 12 309.765 399.9 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.079 Tw [( and )11(C)]TJ 8.4 0 0 8.4 339.165 399.9 Tm (HEN)Tj 7 0 0 7 356.445 403.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (24)Tj 12 0 0 12 365.205 399.9 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.046 Tw [( in)]TJ -25 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.078 Tw (the case of )Tj /F8 1 Tf 4.3 0 TD 0 Tc -0.079 Tw (Law and Economics)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.95 0 TD 0.001 Tc -0.08 Tw (, determine the cognitive processes)Tj 9 0 0 9 85.005 352.02 Tm 0 Tc -0.012 Tw [(considered \223abnormal\224. Definitely)67(, it is the result of incentives to standardize and)]TJ 0 -1.2133 TD -0.009 Tw (achieve conformity with determined norms/rules/regulation. Normalization is the)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.011 Tc -0.063 Tw [(product of governmentality)69(, this is the mentality of self govern or choose. )-12(F)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 342.285 330.06 Tm -0.014 Tc [(OUCAUL)100(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 371.085 330.06 Tm -0.066 Tc (\222s)Tj -31.7867 -1.2267 TD -0.005 Tc (work goes around this issue, the problem of normalization/standardizations through)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0.086 Tw (norms and rules. See M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 173.325 308.1 Tm 0.002 Tc (ICHEL)Tj 9 0 0 9 191.925 308.1 Tm 0.087 Tc 0 Tw ( F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 199.965 308.1 Tm 0.001 Tc [(OUCAUL)96(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 229.485 308.1 Tm -0.002 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5867 0 TD 0 Tc 0.087 Tw (Discipline and punish: the birth of the)Tj -16.64 -1.2267 TD 0.017 Tc (prison,)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.9333 0 TD 0.018 Tc 0.125 Tw [( Penguin, 1977 \(showing how normalization could be achieved with)]TJ -2.9333 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.004 Tw (technologies, as prison and surveillance, mediated by the law\); see )Tj /F8 1 Tf 26.9333 0 TD (supra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.28 0 TD -0.001 Tc 0.006 Tw [( note 13)]TJ -29.2133 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0.088 Tw (\(arguing that the construction of sexual identity was a function of political and)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD 0.087 Tw (economic forces that lead to a set of rules that shaped what is a )Tj /F8 1 Tf 26.6533 0 TD 0.001 Tc (normal)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.8933 0 TD 0 Tc 0.089 Tw [( sexual)]TJ -29.5467 -1.2267 TD 0.028 Tw (behavior\); see)Tj /F8 1 Tf 5.6667 0 TD 0.031 Tw [( supra )]TJ /F5 1 Tf 2.84 0 TD [(note 1)40(1)0( \(showing F)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.885 253.02 Tm 0.001 Tc [(OUCAUL)115(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 261.285 253.02 Tm 0 Tc [(\222)53(s)0( reconsideration of power as a)]TJ -19.5867 -1.2133 TD -0.057 Tw (matter of technologies of power and not as a matter of power itself\); see )Tj /F8 1 Tf 28.2533 0 TD (supra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.28 0 TD -0.001 Tc -0.061 Tw [( note)]TJ -30.5333 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.09 Tw [(14, at)-13( 1-42, 65-86 \(answering how is that truth came to function as an arm [of)]TJ T* (power].)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD 0.001 Tc -0.008 Tw [(21)-1199( See R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 108.405 206.22 Tm 0.004 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 117.525 206.22 Tm -0.01 Tc 0 Tw ( C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 125.685 206.22 Tm 0.001 Tc (HEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 138.645 206.22 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.01 Tw [( & J)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 153.405 206.22 Tm 0.004 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 162.525 206.22 Tm -0.012 Tc 0 Tw ( H)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 171.285 206.22 Tm 0.001 Tc (ANSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 192.885 206.22 Tm 0.004 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4933 0 TD 0 Tc -0.01 Tw (The Illusion of Law: The Legitimating Schemas of)Tj -12.48 -1.2267 TD -0.029 Tw (Modern Policy and Corporate Law)Tj /F5 1 Tf 14 0 TD -0.031 Tw (, 103 MICH. L. REV. 1, 1-2 \(2004\).)Tj -16.2 -1.5333 TD 0.001 Tc [(22)-1199(See )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.8933 0 TD 0 Tc (supra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.28 0 TD -0.012 Tw [( note 7.)]TJ -6.1733 -1.5467 TD [(23)-1200(R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 91.005 167.46 Tm -0.008 Tc (ONALD)Tj 9 0 0 9 112.725 167.46 Tm -0.064 Tc 0 Tw ( C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 120.405 167.46 Tm -0.008 Tc (HEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 133.125 167.46 Tm -0.005 Tc -0.058 Tw [( & J)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 146.925 167.46 Tm -0.015 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 155.925 167.46 Tm -0.008 Tc -0.061 Tw [( D. H)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 174.285 167.46 Tm -0.009 Tc (ANSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.645 167.46 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4267 0 TD -0.006 Tc (Categorically Biased: The Influence of Knowledge)Tj -12.72 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc [(Str)-13(uctur)40(es on the Law and Legal Theory)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 15.76 0 TD [(. 77 S. CAL. L. REV. 1)40(103, 1)27(125, 1217-18)]TJ -15.76 -1.2267 TD 0.001 Tc (\(2004\).)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD -0.001 Tc [(24)-1201(See )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.88 0 TD -0.006 Tc (Id)Tj /F5 1 Tf 0.8267 0 TD 0 Tc -0.026 Tw (. \(Showing how social psychology has offered a brad understanding of how)Tj -2.5067 -1.2267 TD 0.081 Tw (individuals use categories, schemas and scripts to make sense of the world and)Tj T* -0.02 Tw (showing the lack of attention that legal scholarship has given to this area of social)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD -0.005 Tc (science\). )Tj /F8 1 Tf 3.6667 0 TD -0.061 Tw (See Id.)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.6133 0 TD [( at 1145-66 \(explaining the categorization process and the effects of)]TJ -6.28 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc -0.048 Tw (categorization in human cognition\). See )Tj /F8 1 Tf 15.9867 0 TD -0.002 Tc (Id.)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.08 0 TD 0 Tc -0.049 Tw [( at 1228-39 \(showing the difficulties of)]TJ -17.0667 -1.2267 TD -0.042 Tw (controlling bias and debiasing cognition and the value of situational forces in such)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD 0.075 Tw (process\), at 1243-44 \(showing how situational forces \226seen and unseen- have a)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.056 Tw (strong effect on cognition and lead to a dispositional perspective of the world\). )Tj /F8 1 Tf 31.0533 0 TD -0.001 Tc (See)Tj ET 65.205 367.38 m 376.965 367.38 l S endstream endobj 30 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 32 0 obj << /Length 8362 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (213)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 12 0 0 12 76.535 555.9 Tm 0 Tc 0.017 Tw (of human behavior trough categories and schemas defined in the)Tj 0 -1.2 TD (different )Tj /F8 1 Tf 3.57 0 TD (epistemes)Tj /F5 1 Tf 3.89 0 TD -0.125 Tw [( \(knowledge structures\))]TJ 7 0 0 7 276.335 545.46 Tm -0.006 Tc (25)Tj 12 0 0 12 284.975 541.5 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -17.37 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.097 Tw (In addition, behavioralism has provided a great deal of evidence on)Tj T* -0.056 Tw (human behavior and the effect of power and situational forces)Tj 7 0 0 7 368.495 516.66 Tm -0.006 Tc (26)Tj 12 0 0 12 377.255 512.7 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -25.06 -1.2 TD 0.125 Tc ( H)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 103.175 498.3 Tm -0.004 Tc (ANSON)Tj 12 0 0 12 131.975 498.3 Tm 0 Tc 0.123 Tw [( and Y)]TJ 8.4 0 0 8.4 166.895 498.3 Tm -0.002 Tc (OSIFON)Tj 12 0 0 12 197.135 498.3 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.124 Tw [( show how the literature in behavioral)]TJ -10.05 -1.2 TD -0.055 Tw (studies has revealed that our dispositional character is as deep that)Tj T* -0.01 Tc -0.125 Tw (even in circumstances where situational factors are visible, countable)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.123 Tw (and acknowledged, we tend to be prone to disposition)Tj 7 0 0 7 323.255 459.06 Tm -0.006 Tc (27)Tj 12 0 0 12 332.015 455.1 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.073 Tw [( despite that)]TJ -21.29 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.04 Tw (situations are largely controlling. The authors are suggesting for)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.047 Tw (legal theory that individuals do not act with total freedom as it has)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.12 Tw [(been assumed in most the economic models explaining human)]TJ T* 0.048 Tw (behavior, and this is applicable to regulators, policy makers and)Tj T* 0.142 Tw (scholars. Rather, humans tend to choose moved by exogenous)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.09 Tw (forces, making the assumptions of legal economist questionable)Tj 7 0 0 7 376.055 372.66 Tm -0.006 Tc (28)Tj 12 0 0 12 384.815 368.7 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -25.69 -1.2 TD -0.005 Tc -0.125 Tw [( )-5(Why these notions of )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 8.77 0 TD (power)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.48 0 TD [( are useful and constitute an alternative)]TJ -11.25 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.078 Tw (for the analysis of economics and its relation with the international)Tj T* -0.008 Tw (law and policy of industrial regulation harmonization? Certainly,)Tj T* 0 Tc (understanding )Tj /F8 1 Tf 5.88 0 TD (power)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.5 0 TD -0.043 Tw [( as a matter of the technologies of power and)]TJ /F8 1 Tf -8.38 -1.2 TD (why)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.61 0 TD -0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw [( and )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 1.68 0 TD -0.003 Tc (how)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.66 0 TD [( the use of )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.87 0 TD -0.001 Tc (truth)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.94 0 TD -0.002 Tc [( \227knowledge structures as mainstream)]TJ -10.76 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.002 Tw (industrial organization theory\227 and law \227in this case industrial)Tj 9 0 0 9 96.335 227.94 Tm (also )Tj /F8 1 Tf 1.7867 0 TD -0.003 Tc (infra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.9333 0 TD -0.063 Tw [( note 28, at 1654-75 \(showing how/why humans are attribute behavior to)]TJ -3.72 -1.2267 TD 0.005 Tc 0.125 Tw (personal choice and its relation with situational motives\). In addition, social)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc -0.021 Tw (psychology has shown that several motives lead us to self-affirm and protect our)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD 0.089 Tw (acquired schemas. )Tj /F8 1 Tf 7.76 0 TD -0.001 Tc (See)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.4 0 TD 0.083 Tc 0 Tw ( Z)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 187.295 194.94 Tm -0.007 Tc [(IV)107(A)]TJ 9 0 0 9 197.615 194.94 Tm 0.095 Tc ( K)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 207.215 194.94 Tm 0.002 Tc (UNDA)Tj 9 0 0 9 225.455 194.94 Tm 0.006 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5867 0 TD 0 Tc 0.09 Tw (Making sense of people, social cognition)Tj /F5 1 Tf 16.7867 0 TD 0 Tw (,)Tj -31.72 -1.2267 TD -0.061 Tw (1991; J)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.015 183.9 Tm 0.003 Tc (OHN)Tj 9 0 0 9 135.695 183.9 Tm -0.117 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 143.375 183.9 Tm 0 Tc (NDERSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 173.135 183.9 Tm 0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.44 0 TD 0 Tc -0.061 Tw (Cognitive Psycology and its implications)Tj /F5 1 Tf 16.1333 0 TD -0.064 Tw (, 3ed., 1990.)Tj -27.3067 -1.5333 TD (25)Tj /F8 1 Tf 2.2 0 TD -0.006 Tc (See )Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.56 0 TD -0.069 Tw (also: P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 133.775 170.1 Tm (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 170.1 Tm -0.072 Tc 0 Tw ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 160.175 170.1 Tm -0.007 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 185.495 170.1 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4267 0 TD -0.006 Tc -0.061 Tw (Anotaciones sobre an\341lisis econ\363mico del derecho)Tj /F5 1 Tf 19.7067 0 TD [(, vol)7(.)]TJ -30.04 -1.2267 TD -0.001 Tc -0.013 Tw [(I, CEJA, )14(2005.)]TJ -2.2 -1.5333 TD -0.022 Tc [(2)-22(6)-1222(See)]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.5867 0 TD -0.019 Tc -0.061 Tw [( supra)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 2.36 0 TD [( note 7 149-179 \(summarizing the most important literature on behaviorism)]TJ -3.7467 -1.2267 TD -0.001 Tc (and the problem of situation and attribution error\). )Tj /F8 1 Tf 19.8667 0 TD (See)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.3867 0 TD -0.002 Tc [( also, )-15(H)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 314.255 134.22 Tm -0.004 Tc (ANSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 335.855 134.22 Tm 0.001 Tc (, J)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 343.295 134.22 Tm 0.004 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 352.415 134.22 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.064 Tw [( & )11(D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 369.215 134.22 Tm [(A)148(VID)]TJ 9 0 0 9 96.335 123.3 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (Y)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 102.815 123.3 Tm 0.002 Tc (OSIFON)Tj 9 0 0 9 125.615 123.3 Tm 0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.44 0 TD 0 Tc -0.063 Tw [(The Situational Character: )13(A)24( Critical Realist Perspective on the Human)]TJ -3.6933 -1.2267 TD 0.001 Tc (Animal)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.8933 0 TD 0 Tc -0.004 Tw (, 93 GEO. L. J. 1, 2004.)Tj -5.0933 -1.5333 TD 0.001 Tc [(27)-1199(See )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.96 0 TD -0.006 Tc (Id)Tj /F5 1 Tf 0.8267 0 TD 0 Tc 0.063 Tw (. at 157-159; )Tj /F8 1 Tf 5.5333 0 TD 0.001 Tc (see)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.2667 0 TD 0 Tc 0.064 Tw [( also L)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 206.495 98.46 Tm -0.003 Tc (EE)Tj 9 0 0 9 214.175 98.46 Tm 0.056 Tc 0 Tw ( R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 223.055 98.46 Tm -0.003 Tc (OSS)Tj 9 0 0 9 234.575 98.46 Tm 0.065 Tw [( & R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 253.175 98.46 Tm -0.001 Tc (ICHARD)Tj 9 0 0 9 277.415 98.46 Tm 0.055 Tc 0 Tw ( N)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 286.655 98.46 Tm 0 Tc (ISBETT)Tj 9 0 0 9 308.015 98.46 Tm -0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.56 0 TD 0 Tc 0.065 Tw (The person and the)Tj -24.08 -1.2267 TD -0.001 Tc (situation)Tj /F5 1 Tf 3.5067 0 TD 0 Tc -0.042 Tw [( 127, 1991.)]TJ -5.7067 -1.5467 TD -0.029 Tw [(28)-1200(This point is studied in )-13(H)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 186.335 73.5 Tm 0.001 Tc (ANSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 208.055 73.5 Tm 0 Tc -0.033 Tw (, B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 218.255 73.5 Tm 0.001 Tc (ENFORADO)Tj 9 0 0 9 252.575 73.5 Tm -0.028 Tw [( and )14(Y)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 275.975 73.5 Tm 0.002 Tc (OSIFON)Tj 9 0 0 9 298.775 73.5 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.031 Tw [(\222)54(s)0( article )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.6 0 TD -0.034 Tw [(Br)41(oken Scales)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 5.6267 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -31.72 -1.2133 TD 0.09 Tw (where they offer an explanation of two phenomena, first, why the problem of)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.045 Tw (obesity in the United States is usually addressed as a problem of choice and)Tj ET 76.535 250.62 m 388.295 250.62 l S endstream endobj 33 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 35 0 obj << /Length 5156 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (214)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 12 0 0 12 65.205 555.9 Tm 0 Tc 0.146 Tw (regulation\227, as mechanisms of discipline and )Tj /F8 1 Tf 19.64 0 TD (normalization)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 368.205 559.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (29)Tj 12 0 0 12 65.205 541.5 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.159 Tw (provide a critical explanation to the dynamics of international)Tj 0 -1.2 TD -0.061 Tw (economic law as a system of discipline mediated by capture)Tj 7 0 0 7 346.725 531.06 Tm -0.006 Tc (30)Tj 12 0 0 12 355.485 527.1 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -24.19 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.106 Tw [( All this literature is important for this research and constitutes the)]TJ T* 0 Tc 0.185 Tw (original thougs in this approach since it contributes to a new)Tj T* 0.13 Tw (understanding of why it is important to think about capture of)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.02 Tw (regulators involved in International Law policymaking that make)Tj T* -0.111 Tw (them prone to support and attach to those schemas of liberalization/)Tj T* -0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw (harmonization that are \223economically advantageous and politically)Tj T* -0.003 Tc (useful\224)Tj 7 0 0 7 99.525 430.26 Tm -0.006 Tc (31)Tj 12 0 0 12 108.285 426.3 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.072 Tw [( for large corporations.)]TJ -3.59 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.087 Tw [( )11(Certainly, capture, understood as the processes and technologies)]TJ T* 0 Tc -0.099 Tw (to align regulators goals and cognition with those favorable to third)Tj T* -0.006 Tc -0.125 Tw (parties, allows large commercial interest to promote and invest in the)Tj T* -0.001 Tc (production of law via knowledge structures. And social psychology)Tj T* 0.006 Tc 0.25 Tw (and structural philosophy contribute to shown that scholars,)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.102 Tw (policymakers, lawyers, legislatures, judges and others)Tj 10 0 0 10 79.365 313.14 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.125 Tw (\223are influenced by those schemas and scripts that shape our knowledge)Tj T* 0.004 Tc (structures\224)Tj 5.8 0 0 5.8 123.045 304.5 Tm 0.014 Tc (32)Tj 12 0 0 12 65.205 273.54 Tm 0 Tc 0.041 Tw (and, the product of their work is just the product of the interests)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.07 Tw (assumed, received and perceived by the dynamic trilogy of power,)Tj T* 0 Tc (truth and law)Tj 7 0 0 7 126.885 248.7 Tm -0.006 Tc (33)Tj 12 0 0 12 135.645 244.74 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.042 Tw [( that leads to the )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 6.61 0 TD 0 Tc (normalization)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.61 0 TD -0.073 Tw [( of cognition.)]TJ -18.09 -1.2 TD -0.012 Tw [( Thus, the effect of knowledge structures/truth is cognitive and)]TJ T* -0.009 Tc -0.125 Tw (legal, since they provide legitimization, scientific and juridical, to the)Tj 9 0 0 9 85.005 154.26 Tm 0 Tc -0.04 Tw (self-government and why it is not a problem of choice but a problem of situational)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.012 Tc -0.062 Tw [(forces manipulated to induce consumer behavior)55(. See A)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 276.525 143.22 Tm -0.024 Tc (DAM)Tj 9 0 0 9 290.805 143.22 Tm -0.063 Tc 0 Tw ( B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 298.365 143.22 Tm -0.016 Tc (ENFORADO)Tj 9 0 0 9 331.725 143.22 Tm -0.012 Tc -0.049 Tw (, J)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 338.925 143.22 Tm -0.015 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 347.805 143.22 Tm -0.077 Tc 0 Tw ( H)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 355.725 143.22 Tm -0.018 Tc (ANSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 85.005 132.3 Tm -0.007 Tc -0.041 Tw (& D)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 100.245 132.3 Tm -0.003 Tc [(A)129(VID)]TJ 9 0 0 9 115.125 132.3 Tm -0.077 Tc 0 Tw ( Y)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 123.285 132.3 Tm -0.002 Tc (OSIFON)Tj 9 0 0 9 145.845 132.3 Tm 0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.44 0 TD -0.002 Tc -0.061 Tw [(Br)51(oken Scales: Obesity and Justice in )11(America)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 18.2533 0 TD -0.06 Tw [(, 53 EMOR)65(Y)27( L. )9(J.)]TJ -25.4533 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (1645, 2004.)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD 0.001 Tc [(29)-1199(See )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.88 0 TD 0 Tc (supra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.28 0 TD -0.017 Tw [( note 14 at 45.)]TJ -6.16 -1.5467 TD 0.004 Tw [(30)-1200(As is used in )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 7.6133 0 TD (supra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.2667 0 TD 0.002 Tc ( note 7.)Tj -9.88 -1.5333 TD 0 Tc -0.028 Tw [(31)-1200(See supra note 21.)]TJ 0 -1.5467 TD 0.001 Tc [(32)-1199(See )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.88 0 TD 0 Tc (supra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.28 0 TD -0.017 Tw [( note 21 at 74.)]TJ -6.16 -1.5333 TD -0.001 Tc [(33)-1201(See)]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.6533 0 TD -0.003 Tc -0.011 Tw [( Id)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 1.0667 0 TD -0.001 Tc -0.017 Tw (, 1-72.)Tj ET 65.205 171.54 m 376.965 171.54 l S endstream endobj 36 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 38 0 obj << /Length 7812 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (215)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 12 0 0 12 76.535 555.9 Tm 0 Tc -0.073 Tw (goals of regulation, giving an order to events, and a script to derive)Tj 0 -1.2 TD -0.05 Tw (conclusions about the aim of the law and the legal system)Tj 7 0 0 7 347.495 545.46 Tm -0.006 Tc (34)Tj 12 0 0 12 356.255 541.5 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -23.31 -1.2 TD 0.018 Tw [( As \223the invisibility and blinding effect\224)]TJ 7 0 0 7 284.255 531.06 Tm -0.006 Tc (35)Tj 12 0 0 12 293.015 527.1 Tm 0 Tc 0.012 Tw [( of schemas give an)]TJ -18.04 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.029 Tw (advantage to those with the capacity/ability to create and produce)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.067 Tw (dominant knowledge and give to it the status of truth)Tj 7 0 0 7 323.135 502.26 Tm -0.006 Tc (36)Tj 12 0 0 12 331.895 498.3 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.042 Tw [( and, hence,)]TJ -21.28 -1.2 TD -0.015 Tc -0.125 Tw (the ability to turn it into legal institutions. This is the main presumption)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.069 Tw (of the critical realist perspective that we are using to challenge and)Tj T* -0.023 Tw (set limits to the assumption that harmonization is a mechanism to)Tj T* -0.009 Tc -0.124 Tw (achieve freedom, markets liberalization and, thus, prosperity)Tj 7 0 0 7 351.935 444.66 Tm -0.023 Tc (37)Tj 12 0 0 12 360.575 440.7 Tm -0.005 Tc -0.075 Tw [( when)]TJ -23.67 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.074 Tw (it is in constant tension.)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 137.855 397.74 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 12 0 0 12 143.375 397.74 Tm -0.017 Tw (. C)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 157.175 397.74 Tm -0.001 Tc (APTURE)Tj 12 0 0 12 189.815 397.74 Tm -0.003 Tc -0.016 Tw (, H)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 204.335 397.74 Tm 0 Tc (ARMONIZED)Tj 12 0 0 12 254.615 397.74 Tm -0.013 Tc 0 Tw ( I)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 261.455 397.74 Tm -0.001 Tc (NDUSTRIAL)Tj 12 0 0 12 308.975 397.74 Tm -0.017 Tc ( R)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 319.775 397.74 Tm -0.001 Tc [(EGULA)99(TION)]TJ 12 0 0 12 367.415 397.74 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 370.175 397.74 Tm -0.004 Tc (AND)Tj 12 0 0 12 317.015 383.7 Tm 0 Tc (L)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 324.455 383.7 Tm 0.005 Tc [(IBERALIZA)119(TION)]TJ 12 0 0 12 76.535 355.14 Tm 0 Tc 0.168 Tw [( The discourse of harmonization is in the core of a barely)]TJ T* 0.001 Tc 0.25 Tw (unidentified field; this is the field of International Industrial)Tj T* 0.052 Tw (Regulation, in International Economic Law)Tj 7 0 0 7 287.615 330.3 Tm -0.006 Tc (38)Tj 12 0 0 12 296.375 326.34 Tm 0 Tc 0.032 Tw (. As we said in our)Tj -18.32 -1.2 TD 0.105 Tw (hypothesis, this policy of standardization and harmonization of)Tj T* -0.01 Tc -0.125 Tw (regulation is the product of capture)Tj 7 0 0 7 233.015 301.5 Tm -0.023 Tc (39)Tj 12 0 0 12 241.655 297.54 Tm -0.006 Tc -0.073 Tw (. Few scholars have highlighted)Tj -13.76 -1.2 TD -0.014 Tc -0.125 Tw (such capture in several ways)Tj 7 0 0 7 203.015 287.1 Tm -0.023 Tc (40)Tj 12 0 0 12 211.655 283.14 Tm -0.008 Tc -0.073 Tw [( but what seems the way to reveal such)]TJ 9 0 0 9 76.535 255.42 Tm 0 Tc -0.028 Tw [(34)-1200(And mainstream )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 9.04 0 TD -0.03 Tw (Law and Economics)Tj /F5 1 Tf 8.0533 0 TD (, as a discipline, has also been studied as an)Tj -14.8933 -1.2133 TD 0.025 Tw (epistemic tool of legitimization of the protection of certain interests in the legal)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.017 Tw (system. See )Tj /F8 1 Tf 4.9467 0 TD (supra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.28 0 TD -0.018 Tw [( note 21 at 134-39 and 23 at 1122-25, 1243-51.)]TJ -9.4267 -1.5333 TD (35)Tj /F8 1 Tf 2.2 0 TD -0.001 Tc (See)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.3867 0 TD -0.037 Tc 0 Tw ( R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 116.735 219.66 Tm 0.004 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 125.855 219.66 Tm -0.037 Tc ( C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 133.775 219.66 Tm 0.001 Tc (HEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 146.615 219.66 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.045 Tw [( & )-15(J)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 160.895 219.66 Tm 0.004 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 170.015 219.66 Tm -0.05 Tc 0 Tw ( H)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 178.295 219.66 Tm 0.001 Tc (ANSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 200.015 219.66 Tm 0 Tc -0.044 Tw (. The Illusion of Law: The Legitimating Schemas of)Tj -11.52 -1.2267 TD -0.036 Tw [(Modern Policy and Corporate Law)67(, 103 )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 15.92 0 TD -0.001 Tc -0.038 Tw (Mich. L. Rev)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.0267 0 TD 0 Tc -0.037 Tw (. 1, 1-2, 2004.)Tj -23.1467 -1.5467 TD (36)Tj /F8 1 Tf 2.2 0 TD -0.001 Tc (See)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.3867 0 TD -0.023 Tc 0 Tw ( F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 115.775 194.7 Tm 0.001 Tc [(OUCAUL)96(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 145.295 194.7 Tm 0 Tc -0.037 Tw [(, note 1)40(1)-1( and 16.)]TJ -7.64 -1.5333 TD -0.031 Tw [(37)-1200(See note 21 at 66. See also reading list, section 1, subsection, )41(A)55( & B.)]TJ T* [(38)-1200(A)-6( )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.1333 0 TD -0.05 Tw (Google Scholar)Tj /F5 1 Tf 6.2533 0 TD [( search of international & industrial & regulation did not match)]TJ -7.1867 -1.2267 TD 0.028 Tw (any articles, and the same result was provided by )Tj /F8 1 Tf 20.1467 0 TD 0.001 Tc (J-Store)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.88 0 TD 0 Tc [( \(Economics, Finance,)]TJ -23.0267 -1.2267 TD 0.094 Tw [(Law)53(, Political Science, and General\). )66(A)55( search of the words \223global industrial)]TJ 0 -1.2133 TD -0.006 Tc -0.062 Tw (regulation\224 did not match any result in )Tj /F8 1 Tf 15.0267 0 TD (Google Scholar)Tj /F5 1 Tf 6.16 0 TD [( but matched one result in )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 10.08 0 TD -0.017 Tc (J-)Tj -31.2667 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc (Stor)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.6667 0 TD -0.001 Tw (, an article by Eun Sup L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 201.095 123.06 Tm -0.003 Tc (EE)Tj 9 0 0 9 208.775 123.06 Tm -0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4933 0 TD 0 Tc -0.002 Tw (Efficient regulation of the insurance industry to)Tj -12.9867 -1.2267 TD -0.002 Tc -0.062 Tw [(cope with global tr)38(ends of der)25(egulation and liberalization)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 22.56 0 TD -0.001 Tc [( \(13 )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 1.7067 0 TD -0.003 Tc (Bond L. Rev)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.76 0 TD -0.067 Tw (. 46-63,)Tj -29.0267 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0.015 Tw (June 2001\) \(arguing, among other issues, that a uniform regulation of insurance)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.053 Tw (industry not deregulation would lead to a more efficient risk dispersion and lower)Tj T* -0.001 Tc -0.061 Tw (insurance costs\).)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD 0 Tc -0.026 Tw [(39)-1200(In the meaning used by C)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 187.415 65.22 Tm 0.001 Tc (HEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 200.375 65.22 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.024 Tw [( & H)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 217.895 65.22 Tm 0.001 Tc (ANSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 239.615 65.22 Tm -0.006 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4667 0 TD 0 Tc (supra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.28 0 TD -0.028 Tw [( note 35.)]TJ -20.8667 -1.5467 TD [(40)-1200(See )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.8667 0 TD -0.006 Tc (Id)Tj /F5 1 Tf 0.84 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj ET 76.535 269.1 m 179.135 269.1 l S endstream endobj 39 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 43 0 obj << /Length 21337 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (216)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 12 0 0 12 65.205 555.9 Tm 0 Tc 0.213 Tw (problem is to find tensions between the global policy for an)Tj 0 -1.2 TD -0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw (international industrial regulation the economic and legal discourse)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.024 Tw (of the advantages of harmonization. These tensions constitute the)Tj T* 0.097 Tw (relationships between capture and harmonization that I want to)Tj T* -0.013 Tc (investigate.)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.244 Tw [( The academic discourses of transnational regulation and)]TJ T* 0.056 Tw (governance heavily rely on economic theory showing the social)Tj T* 0.1 Tw (benefits of harmonization of regulation)Tj 7 0 0 7 258.285 459.06 Tm -0.006 Tc (41)Tj 12 0 0 12 266.925 455.1 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.06 Tw (. Indeed, the academic)Tj -16.81 -1.2 TD -0.014 Tc -0.125 Tw (reasoning goes as follows: First, global markets require liberalization;)Tj 9 0 0 9 65.205 407.7 Tm -0.009 Tc 0.031 Tw [(4)-9(1)-1209(See also R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.685 407.7 Tm -0.006 Tc (AJ)Tj 9 0 0 9 129.525 407.7 Tm 0.03 Tc 0 Tw ( B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 137.925 407.7 Tm -0.011 Tc (HALA)Tj 9 0 0 9 155.085 407.7 Tm -0.01 Tc 0.035 Tw (, International Trade Law: Theory and Practice, \(2d ed. 2001\);)Tj -7.7867 -1.2133 TD -0.016 Tc -0.06 Tw (Joanne Gowa and E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 152.685 396.78 Tm -0.027 Tc [(DW)106(ARD)]TJ 9 0 0 9 175.005 396.78 Tm -0.016 Tc -0.064 Tw [( Mansfield. 1993. \223Power Politics and International )23(T)35(rade.\224)]TJ /F8 1 Tf -10 -1.2267 TD -0.02 Tc -0.061 Tw (American Political Science Review )Tj /F5 1 Tf 13.3467 0 TD -0.021 Tc -0.063 Tw [(87:2, pp. 408-420; )6(S)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 273.405 385.74 Tm -0.025 Tc (USAN)Tj 9 0 0 9 289.845 385.74 Tm -0.077 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 296.205 385.74 Tm -0.03 Tc (TRANGE)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.685 385.74 Tm -0.026 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.3867 0 TD -0.021 Tc -0.067 Tw [(T)95(e)-1(r)-8(ritor)6(y)50(,)0( State,)]TJ -26.5733 -1.2267 TD -0.01 Tc -0.022 Tw [(Authority and Economy: a new r)30(ealist ontology of Global Political Economy in)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 30.7067 0 TD -0.011 Tc -0.039 Tw [( The)]TJ -30.7067 -1.2133 TD -0.01 Tc -0.013 Tw (new realism :\240perspectives on multilateralism and world order \(Ed. R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 326.565 363.78 Tm -0.013 Tc [(OBER)63(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 346.365 363.78 Tm -0.009 Tc -0.028 Tw [( W)108(.)0( )-14(Cox,)]TJ -29.04 -1.2267 TD -0.01 Tc -0.029 Tw [(1996\); Martin )17(W)67(olf, )30(Why Globalization )17(W)81(orks, Chapters 1 & 2, \(Y)97(ale Press, 2005\).)]TJ 0 -1.5333 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 91.005 338.94 Tm 0.001 Tc (UAIRI)Tj 9 0 0 9 108.525 338.94 Tm 0.057 Tc ( B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 117.285 338.94 Tm 0.002 Tc (RUGHA)Tj 9 0 0 9 139.725 338.94 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.064 Tw [( and A)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 164.925 338.94 Tm 0.002 Tc (NTHONY)Tj 9 0 0 9 191.445 338.94 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.063 Tw [( B. Z)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 210.885 338.94 Tm -0.001 Tc (WI)Tj 9 0 0 9 218.925 338.94 Tm -0.007 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5733 0 TD 0 Tc 0.064 Tw (Regulation in the context of global health)Tj -15.4533 -1.2267 TD -0.062 Tw (markets, in Health policy in a globalizing world)Tj /F5 1 Tf 18.7867 0 TD 0.001 Tc (, \(ed.\) K)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.005 327.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (ELLEY)Tj 9 0 0 9 302.925 327.9 Tm -0.063 Tc 0 Tw ( L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 310.125 327.9 Tm -0.003 Tc (EE)Tj 9 0 0 9 317.805 327.9 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.062 Tw (, K)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 328.245 327.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (ENT)Tj 9 0 0 9 340.485 327.9 Tm -0.05 Tc 0 Tw ( B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 348.285 327.9 Tm -0.002 Tc (USE)Tj 9 0 0 9 360.165 327.9 Tm -0.066 Tw (, and)Tj -30.5733 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.285 316.86 Tm 0.043 Tc (UZANNE)Tj 9 0 0 9 117.885 316.86 Tm 0.15 Tc ( F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 126.765 316.86 Tm 0.046 Tc (USTUKIAN)Tj 9 0 0 9 161.205 316.86 Tm 0.031 Tc 0.125 Tw (, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002; J)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 362.805 316.86 Tm 0.041 Tc (OHN)Tj 9 0 0 9 85.005 305.94 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 91.005 305.94 Tm 0.001 Tc [(RAITHW)115(AITE)]TJ 9 0 0 9 129.885 305.94 Tm 0.003 Tc 0.08 Tw (, P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 140.085 305.94 Tm -0.002 Tc (ETER)Tj 9 0 0 9 155.925 305.94 Tm 0.083 Tc 0 Tw ( D)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 165.405 305.94 Tm 0 Tc (RAHOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 186.765 305.94 Tm -0.002 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5867 0 TD 0 Tc 0.088 Tw [(Global business r)27(egulation)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 10.9733 0 TD (, Cambridge, UK: New)Tj -22.8667 -1.2267 TD 0.056 Tw [(Y)95(ork, NY)133(, US : Cambridge University Press, 2000; D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 281.325 294.9 Tm -0.002 Tc (ANIEL)Tj 9 0 0 9 300.165 294.9 Tm 0 Tc 0.057 Tw [( C. Esty and Damien)]TJ -23.9067 -1.2267 TD (Geradin. )Tj /F8 1 Tf 3.6667 0 TD -0.06 Tw (Regulatory competition and the global coordination of labour standards,)Tj -3.6667 -1.2133 TD -0.018 Tc (in)Tj /F5 1 Tf 0.76 0 TD -0.012 Tc -0.063 Tw [( Regulatory competition and economic integration: comparative perspectives, \(ed.\))]TJ -0.76 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (D)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 91.485 261.9 Tm -0.002 Tc (ANIEL)Tj 9 0 0 9 110.325 261.9 Tm 0 Tc -0.061 Tw [( C. E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 127.485 261.9 Tm -0.002 Tc (STY)Tj 9 0 0 9 139.365 261.9 Tm -0.06 Tw [( and D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 162.165 261.9 Tm 0 Tc (AMIEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 182.685 261.9 Tm -0.065 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 190.965 261.9 Tm -0.005 Tc (ERADIN)Tj 9 0 0 9 214.605 261.9 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.062 Tw [(, Oxford; New )26(Y)108(ork: Oxford University Press,)]TJ -14.4 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.068 Tw [(2001. )40(Antitrust goes global: what future for transatlantic cooperation?; )13(S)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 351.525 250.86 Tm (IMON)Tj 9 0 0 9 368.325 250.86 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.073 Tw [( J.)]TJ -31.48 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.525 239.94 Tm 0.011 Tc (VENETT)Tj 9 0 0 9 115.485 239.94 Tm 0.004 Tc 0.118 Tw (, A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 127.725 239.94 Tm 0.011 Tc (LEXANDER)Tj 9 0 0 9 162.165 239.94 Tm 0.123 Tc 0 Tw ( L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 171.165 239.94 Tm 0.01 Tc (EHMANN)Tj 9 0 0 9 199.125 239.94 Tm 0.012 Tc 0.116 Tw (, B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 211.005 239.94 Tm (ENN)Tj 9 0 0 9 224.085 239.94 Tm 0.137 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 232.605 239.94 Tm 0.008 Tc (TEIL)Tj 9 0 0 9 246.525 239.94 Tm 0.007 Tc 0.126 Tw (, \(eds.\) London: Royal Institute of)Tj -17.9467 -1.2267 TD -0.011 Tc -0.062 Tw [(International )56(Af)16(fairs; )16(W)80(ashington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, c2000; E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 354.285 228.9 Tm -0.017 Tc [(D)-8(W)116(ARD)]TJ 9 0 0 9 85.005 217.86 Tm -0.004 Tc -0.057 Tw (M. G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 103.365 217.86 Tm -0.007 Tc (RAHAM)Tj /F8 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 126.525 217.86 Tm -0.005 Tc -0.062 Tw [(, Substantive conver)35(gence and pr)35(ocedural dissonance in mer)48(ger r)35(eview)88(,)]TJ -4.6133 -1.2133 TD -0.018 Tc (in)Tj /F5 1 Tf 0.76 0 TD -0.008 Tc [( )60(Antitrust goes global: what future for transatlantic cooperation? )-8(S)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 319.965 206.94 Tm -0.012 Tc (IMON)Tj 9 0 0 9 336.525 206.94 Tm -0.008 Tc -0.066 Tw [( J. E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 350.685 206.94 Tm -0.012 Tc (VENETT)Tj 9 0 0 9 374.685 206.94 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -32.1867 -1.2267 TD (A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 91.485 195.9 Tm (LEXANDER)Tj 9 0 0 9 125.445 195.9 Tm -0.01 Tc ( L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 133.125 195.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (EHMANN)Tj 9 0 0 9 160.725 195.9 Tm -0.003 Tc -0.014 Tw (, B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 171.045 195.9 Tm 0.001 Tc (ENN)Tj 9 0 0 9 184.005 195.9 Tm -0.023 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 191.085 195.9 Tm 0.002 Tc (TEIL)Tj 9 0 0 9 204.765 195.9 Tm 0 Tc -0.019 Tw (, \(eds.\), London: Royal Institute of International)Tj -13.3067 -1.2267 TD 0.044 Tw [(Af)13(fairs; )13(W)77(ashington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, c2000; )-14(M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 324.045 184.86 Tm 0.002 Tc [(A)114(TTLI)]TJ 9 0 0 9 341.565 184.86 Tm -0.003 Tc 0.053 Tw (, W)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 355.005 184.86 Tm -0.001 Tc [(AL)94(TER)]TJ 9 0 0 9 374.685 184.86 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -32.1867 -1.2133 TD -0.042 Tw (Global private governance for voluntary standards setting: national organizational)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.026 Tc (lega)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 99.045 162.9 Tm -0.037 Tc (CIES)Tj 9 0 0 9 111.765 162.9 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 113.205 162.9 Tm -0.035 Tc (AND)Tj 9 0 0 9 126.165 162.9 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 127.605 162.9 Tm -0.039 Tc [(INTERNA)94(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 174.885 162.9 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 176.325 162.9 Tm -0.039 Tc (INSTITUTIONAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 221.085 162.9 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.525 162.9 Tm -0.038 Tc (BIASES)Tj 9 0 0 9 242.925 162.9 Tm -0.026 Tc -0.062 Tw (. C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 252.045 162.9 Tm -0.039 Tc (ENTER)Tj 9 0 0 9 271.125 162.9 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 272.685 162.9 Tm -0.039 Tc (FOR)Tj 9 0 0 9 284.205 162.9 Tm -0.09 Tc ( B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 291.405 162.9 Tm -0.038 Tc (USINESS)Tj 9 0 0 9 315.285 162.9 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 316.725 162.9 Tm -0.035 Tc (AND)Tj 9 0 0 9 329.685 162.9 Tm -0.092 Tc ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 337.365 162.9 Tm -0.037 Tc (OVERNMENT)Tj 9 0 0 9 374.685 162.9 Tm 0 Tc (,)Tj -32.1867 -1.2267 TD (J)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 88.485 151.86 Tm 0.003 Tc (OHN)Tj 9 0 0 9 102.165 151.86 Tm -0.08 Tc 0.047 Tw [( F.)-84( )-7(K)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 119.205 151.86 Tm 0.001 Tc (ENNEDY)Tj 9 0 0 9 145.125 151.86 Tm -0.033 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 152.085 151.86 Tm 0.001 Tc (CHOOL)Tj 9 0 0 9 173.685 151.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.725 151.86 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 183.765 151.86 Tm -0.039 Tc ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 192.285 151.86 Tm 0.001 Tc (OVERNMENT)Tj 9 0 0 9 231.765 151.86 Tm 0.004 Tc -0.03 Tw (, H)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 242.565 151.86 Tm 0.002 Tc [(AR)97(V)114(ARD)]TJ 9 0 0 9 267.885 151.86 Tm -0.039 Tc 0 Tw ( U)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 276.285 151.86 Tm 0 Tc (NIVERSITY)Tj 9 0 0 9 309.525 151.86 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.03 Tw (, 2001; C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 342.285 151.86 Tm (HARLES)Tj 9 0 0 9 366.765 151.86 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.091 Tw [( A.)]TJ -31.3067 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (J)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 88.485 140.94 Tm -0.005 Tc (AMES)Tj 9 0 0 9 105.885 140.94 Tm 0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.44 0 TD 0 Tc (I)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 112.725 140.94 Tm -0.003 Tc [(NTERNA)35(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 157.365 140.94 Tm -0.077 Tc ( A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 164.325 140.94 Tm -0.004 Tc (NTITRUST)Tj 9 0 0 9 192.525 140.94 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 194.085 140.94 Tm -0.01 Tc (IN)Tj 9 0 0 9 200.325 140.94 Tm -0.059 Tc ( T)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 206.925 140.94 Tm 0 Tc (HE)Tj 9 0 0 9 215.325 140.94 Tm -0.063 Tw [( 21)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 225.885 140.94 Tm -0.008 Tc (ST)Tj 9 0 0 9 232.485 140.94 Tm -0.064 Tc 0 Tw ( C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 240.165 140.94 Tm -0.006 Tc [(ENTUR)13(Y)]TJ 9 0 0 9 263.325 140.94 Tm -0.007 Tc -0.063 Tw (: C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 273.885 140.94 Tm -0.004 Tc [(OOPERA)34(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 312.285 140.94 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 313.965 140.94 Tm -0.01 Tc (AND)Tj 9 0 0 9 326.445 140.94 Tm -0.064 Tc ( C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 334.125 140.94 Tm -0.005 Tc (ONVERGENCE)Tj /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.685 140.94 Tm 0 Tc (,)Tj -32.1867 -1.2267 TD -0.004 Tc -0.062 Tw (U.S. D)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 109.125 129.9 Tm [(EP)110(A)14(R)34(TMENT)]TJ 9 0 0 9 145.605 129.9 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 147.285 129.9 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 155.325 129.9 Tm -0.066 Tc ( J)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 160.365 129.9 Tm -0.007 Tc (USTICE)Tj 9 0 0 9 182.325 129.9 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw (, OECD G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 218.685 129.9 Tm -0.005 Tc (LOBAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 239.565 129.9 Tm -0.073 Tc 0 Tw ( F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 246.285 129.9 Tm -0.003 Tc (ORUM)Tj 9 0 0 9 265.005 129.9 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 266.685 129.9 Tm -0.015 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 275.685 129.9 Tm -0.077 Tc ( C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.365 129.9 Tm -0.004 Tc (OMPETITION)Tj 9 0 0 9 321.525 129.9 Tm -0.062 Tw (, P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 330.405 129.9 Tm (ARIS)Tj 9 0 0 9 344.685 129.9 Tm (, F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 353.565 129.9 Tm (RANCE)Tj 9 0 0 9 374.685 129.9 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -32.1867 -1.2267 TD (O)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 91.485 118.86 Tm -0.005 Tc [(CT)14(OBER)]TJ 9 0 0 9 116.085 118.86 Tm -0.004 Tc -0.061 Tw [( 17, 2001, )]TJ ET 0.315 w 167.925 118.23 m 152.325 118.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 152.325 118.86 Tm -0.008 Tc (HTTP)Tj ET 0.45 w 175.365 117.96 m 167.925 117.96 l S BT 9 0 0 9 167.925 118.86 Tm -0.004 Tc (://)Tj ET 0.315 w 193.005 118.23 m 175.245 118.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.245 118.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (WWW)Tj ET 0.45 w 195.285 117.96 m 193.005 117.96 l S BT 9 0 0 9 193.005 118.86 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj ET 0.315 w 212.325 118.23 m 195.285 118.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 195.285 118.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (OECD)Tj ET 0.45 w 214.485 117.96 m 212.205 117.96 l S BT 9 0 0 9 212.205 118.86 Tm 0 Tc (.)Tj ET 0.315 w 227.685 118.23 m 214.485 118.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 214.485 118.86 Tm -0.008 Tc (ORG)Tj ET 0.45 w 230.205 117.96 m 227.685 117.96 l S BT 9 0 0 9 227.685 118.86 Tm 0 Tc (/)Tj ET 0.315 w 238.365 118.23 m 230.085 118.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 230.085 118.86 Tm -0.015 Tc (DA)Tj ET 241.725 118.23 m 238.485 118.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 238.485 118.86 Tm 0 Tc (T)Tj ET 263.325 118.23 m 241.725 118.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 241.725 118.86 Tm -0.004 Tc (AOECD)Tj ET 0.45 w 322.125 117.96 m 263.325 117.96 l S BT 9 0 0 9 263.325 118.86 Tm (/62/57/2438935.)Tj ET 0.315 w 333.525 118.23 m 322.005 118.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.005 118.86 Tm -0.003 Tc (PDF)Tj 9 0 0 9 333.405 118.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 335.085 118.86 Tm -0.008 Tc (LAST)Tj 9 0 0 9 350.685 118.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 352.365 118.86 Tm -0.008 Tc (VIEWED)Tj 9 0 0 9 85.005 107.94 Tm 0 Tc (M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 92.925 107.94 Tm -0.024 Tc (ARCH)Tj 9 0 0 9 109.725 107.94 Tm -0.016 Tc -0.061 Tw [( 28, 2006; )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.92 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 152.325 107.94 Tm -0.027 Tc (AKAN)Tj 9 0 0 9 167.805 107.94 Tm -0.079 Tc ( D)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.725 107.94 Tm -0.024 Tc (ELRAHIM)Tj 9 0 0 9 201.525 107.94 Tm -0.09 Tc ( I)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 205.965 107.94 Tm -0.026 Tc [(NTERNA)31(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 248.925 107.94 Tm -0.09 Tc ( A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 255.765 107.94 Tm -0.025 Tc (NTITRUST)Tj 9 0 0 9 282.885 107.94 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 284.445 107.94 Tm -0.029 Tc (AND)Tj 9 0 0 9 296.565 107.94 Tm -0.09 Tc ( I)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 300.885 107.94 Tm -0.025 Tc (NTELLECTUAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 341.205 107.94 Tm -0.088 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 348.045 107.94 Tm -0.025 Tc [(ROPER)-6(TY)]TJ 9 0 0 9 373.965 107.94 Tm 0 Tc (:)Tj -32.1067 -1.2267 TD (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 91.005 96.9 Tm 0.001 Tc (HALLENGES)Tj 9 0 0 9 126.045 96.9 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 128.565 96.9 Tm 0.001 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 137.325 96.9 Tm 0.021 Tc ( T)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 144.765 96.9 Tm 0 Tc (HE)Tj 9 0 0 9 153.165 96.9 Tm 0.032 Tc ( R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 161.205 96.9 Tm 0.001 Tc (OAD)Tj 9 0 0 9 174.165 96.9 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 176.685 96.9 Tm -0.023 Tc (TO)Tj 9 0 0 9 184.605 96.9 Tm 0.03 Tc ( C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 193.125 96.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (ONVERGENCE)Tj /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 234.045 96.9 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.029 Tw (, D)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 245.325 96.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (EPUTY)Tj 9 0 0 9 265.605 96.9 Tm -0.023 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 274.125 96.9 Tm 0 Tc [(SSIST)76(ANT)]TJ 9 0 0 9 303.045 96.9 Tm -0.023 Tc ( A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 311.565 96.9 Tm 0 Tc [(TT)19(ORNEY)]TJ 9 0 0 9 340.845 96.9 Tm 0.028 Tc ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 349.845 96.9 Tm 0 Tc (ENERAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 374.685 96.9 Tm (,)Tj -32.1867 -1.2267 TD (P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 89.925 85.86 Tm -0.02 Tc (RESENTED)Tj 9 0 0 9 121.005 85.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.565 85.86 Tm -0.132 Tc (AT)Tj 9 0 0 9 130.005 85.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 131.565 85.86 Tm -0.02 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 143.445 85.86 Tm -0.13 Tc ( A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 150.885 85.86 Tm -0.022 Tc (MERICAN)Tj 9 0 0 9 178.965 85.86 Tm -0.077 Tc ( B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 186.405 85.86 Tm -0.018 Tc (AR)Tj 9 0 0 9 194.925 85.86 Tm -0.143 Tc ( A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 85.86 Tm -0.022 Tc [(SSOCIA)111(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 237.765 85.86 Tm -0.017 Tc -0.062 Tw (, S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 246.285 85.86 Tm -0.021 Tc (ECTION)Tj 9 0 0 9 268.605 85.86 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 270.165 85.86 Tm -0.021 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 277.965 85.86 Tm -0.143 Tc ( A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 285.285 85.86 Tm -0.021 Tc (NTITRUST)Tj 9 0 0 9 314.685 85.86 Tm -0.074 Tc ( L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 321.645 85.86 Tm -0.093 Tc (AW)Tj 9 0 0 9 331.365 85.86 Tm -0.012 Tc -0.063 Tw (, C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 340.965 85.86 Tm -0.022 Tc (ONFERENCE)Tj -40.6286 -1.7333 TD -0.015 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 93.765 74.94 Tm -0.13 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 101.085 74.94 Tm -0.026 Tc (NTITRUST)Tj 9 0 0 9 130.245 74.94 Tm -0.02 Tc -0.062 Tw [( & I)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 142.965 74.94 Tm -0.027 Tc (NTELLECTUAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 185.925 74.94 Tm -0.086 Tc 0 Tw ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 192.285 74.94 Tm -0.025 Tc [(ROPER)89(T)-6(Y)]TJ 9 0 0 9 219.285 74.94 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 223.245 74.94 Tm -0.029 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 235.005 74.94 Tm -0.09 Tc ( C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 242.325 74.94 Tm -0.026 Tc [(OUR)69(TS)]TJ 9 0 0 9 261.645 74.94 Tm -0.024 Tc (, )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 265.245 74.94 Tm -0.029 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 277.005 74.94 Tm -0.074 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.845 74.94 Tm -0.025 Tc (NFORCERS)Tj 9 0 0 9 315.045 74.94 Tm -0.011 Tc (, )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 318.765 74.94 Tm -0.026 Tc (AND)Tj 9 0 0 9 331.845 74.94 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 333.285 74.94 Tm -0.029 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 345.045 74.94 Tm -0.077 Tc ( B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 352.485 74.94 Tm -0.025 Tc (USINESS)Tj 9 0 0 9 85.005 63.9 Tm 0 Tc (W)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 93.525 63.9 Tm 0.001 Tc (ORLD)Tj 9 0 0 9 110.685 63.9 Tm 0.007 Tc ( S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 118.005 63.9 Tm 0.004 Tc (AN)Tj 9 0 0 9 127.125 63.9 Tm -0.006 Tc ( F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 134.325 63.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (RANCISCO)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.125 63.9 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.004 Tw (, C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 176.685 63.9 Tm 0 Tc (ALIFORNIA)Tj 9 0 0 9 210.645 63.9 Tm -0.003 Tc (, M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 223.125 63.9 Tm -0.093 Tc (AY)Tj 9 0 0 9 231.645 63.9 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.003 Tw ( 21, 2004, )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 270.045 63.9 Tm -0.007 Tc (IN)Tj 9 0 0 9 276.645 63.9 Tm 0.003 Tc (, )Tj ET 296.925 63.27 m 281.205 63.27 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 281.205 63.9 Tm -0.002 Tc (HTTP)Tj ET 0.45 w 304.365 63 m 296.925 63 l S BT 9 0 0 9 296.925 63.9 Tm -0.004 Tc (://)Tj ET 0.315 w 322.365 63.27 m 304.485 63.27 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 304.485 63.9 Tm 0.003 Tc (WWW)Tj ET 0.45 w 324.645 63 m 322.365 63 l S BT 9 0 0 9 322.365 63.9 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj ET 0.315 w 344.085 63.27 m 324.525 63.27 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 324.525 63.9 Tm -0.002 Tc (USDOJ)Tj ET 0.45 w 346.485 63 m 344.205 63 l S BT 9 0 0 9 344.205 63.9 Tm 0 Tc (.)Tj ET 0.315 w 360.165 63.27 m 346.485 63.27 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 346.485 63.9 Tm 0.003 Tc (GOV)Tj ET 0.45 w 362.565 63 m 360.045 63 l S BT 9 0 0 9 360.045 63.9 Tm 0 Tc (/)Tj ET 0.315 w 366.405 63.27 m 362.565 63.27 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 362.565 63.9 Tm (A)Tj ET 374.445 63.27 m 366.405 63.27 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 366.405 63.9 Tm -0.002 Tc (TR)Tj ET 0.45 w 376.965 63 m 374.445 63 l S BT 9 0 0 9 374.445 63.9 Tm 0 Tc (/)Tj ET 0.315 w 106.725 52.23 m 85.005 52.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 85.005 52.86 Tm -0.018 Tc (PUBLIC)Tj ET 0.45 w 109.245 51.96 m 106.845 51.96 l S BT 9 0 0 9 106.845 52.86 Tm 0 Tc (/)Tj ET 0.315 w 139.245 52.23 m 109.245 52.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 109.245 52.86 Tm -0.016 Tc (SPEECHES)Tj ET 0.45 w 170.205 51.96 m 139.245 51.96 l S BT 9 0 0 9 139.245 52.86 Tm -0.011 Tc (/205629.)Tj ET 0.315 w 183.885 52.23 m 170.205 52.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 170.205 52.86 Tm -0.016 Tc (HTM)Tj ET 0.45 w 187.725 51.96 m 184.005 51.96 l S BT 9 0 0 9 184.005 52.86 Tm -0.011 Tc (, )Tj ET 0.315 w 203.085 52.23 m 187.725 52.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 187.725 52.86 Tm -0.014 Tc (LAST)Tj ET 0.45 w 204.645 51.96 m 203.085 51.96 l S BT 9 0 0 9 203.085 52.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj ET 0.315 w 228.885 52.23 m 204.645 52.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 204.645 52.86 Tm -0.015 Tc (VIEWED)Tj ET 0.45 w 230.445 51.96 m 228.885 51.96 l S BT 9 0 0 9 228.885 52.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj ET 0.315 w 253.125 52.23 m 230.445 52.23 l S BT 6.3 0 0 6.3 230.445 52.86 Tm -0.012 Tc (MARCH)Tj ET 0.45 w 265.725 51.96 m 253.125 51.96 l S BT 9 0 0 9 253.125 52.86 Tm -0.013 Tc -0.062 Tw [( 28.)]TJ ET 0.48 w 65.205 423.42 m 142.245 423.42 l S endstream endobj 44 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 46 0 obj << /Length 11445 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (217)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 12 0 0 12 76.535 555.9 Tm -0.015 Tc -0.125 Tw (liberalization increases transnational competition; more transnational)Tj 0 -1.2 TD 0 Tc -0.097 Tw (competition induces firms to take more risks; and thus there is need)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.25 Tw (of harmonized sophisticated transnational regulation. Second,)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.125 Tw (harmonization of regulation leads to improvements in the control of)Tj T* -0.001 Tc (transnational industrial activity because, according to the economic)Tj T* -0.012 Tc (literature, neither regulatory competition nor coordination of national)Tj T* -0.003 Tc (policies)Tj 7 0 0 7 113.495 473.46 Tm -0.006 Tc (42)Tj 12 0 0 12 122.255 469.5 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.072 Tw [( conducted to optimal control of industrial activity)]TJ 7 0 0 7 356.615 473.46 Tm -0.006 Tc (43)Tj 12 0 0 12 365.255 469.5 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -24.06 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc 0.043 Tw [( These conclusions highlight the advantages of regulation and)]TJ T* 0.039 Tw (harmonization \227one regulation fits all economies\227, but do not)Tj T* 0.007 Tc 0.25 Tw (provide an explanation of the tension between the goals of)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.044 Tw (globalization \227essentially free markets are good and regulation)Tj T* -0.007 Tc -0.125 Tw (bad\227 and the macroscript of harmonization \227a single transnational)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.101 Tw (regulation is better than multiple regulations\227. The strong interest)Tj T* -0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw (for favoring harmonization in a global economy, despite the tension)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.059 Tw (between a model of liberalization and a model of regulation, gives)Tj T* -0.075 Tw (indicia to ask the question of capture of transnational regulators)Tj 7 0 0 7 374.495 343.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (44)Tj 12 0 0 12 383.255 339.9 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj 9 0 0 9 76.535 298.86 Tm [(42)-1200( )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 2.4667 0 TD (S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 103.295 298.86 Tm -0.003 Tc (EE)Tj 9 0 0 9 110.975 298.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 113.375 298.86 Tm -0.003 Tc (ALSO)Tj /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 128.375 298.86 Tm 0.016 Tc ( B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 136.775 298.86 Tm 0.001 Tc (OB)Tj 9 0 0 9 145.535 298.86 Tm 0.028 Tc ( J)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 151.535 298.86 Tm -0.003 Tc (ESSOP)Tj 9 0 0 9 170.375 298.86 Tm 0 Tc 0.02 Tw (, 1997, C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 203.735 298.86 Tm [(APIT)76(ALISM)]TJ 9 0 0 9 236.855 298.86 Tm 0 Tw ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 239.255 298.86 Tm 0.003 Tc (AND)Tj 9 0 0 9 252.935 298.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 255.335 298.86 Tm 0.002 Tc (ITS)Tj 9 0 0 9 264.815 298.86 Tm 0.021 Tc ( F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 272.255 298.86 Tm 0 Tc (UTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 293.255 298.86 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.02 Tw (: R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 304.175 298.86 Tm 0.001 Tc (EMARKS)Tj 9 0 0 9 330.455 298.86 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 332.855 298.86 Tm 0.004 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 341.975 298.86 Tm 0.016 Tc ( R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 350.375 298.86 Tm 0 Tc [(EGULA)114(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 386.015 298.86 Tm (,)Tj -32.1867 -1.2267 TD (G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 102.815 287.82 Tm 0.001 Tc (OVERNMENT)Tj 9 0 0 9 142.415 287.82 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 145.295 287.82 Tm 0.003 Tc (AND)Tj 9 0 0 9 158.975 287.82 Tm 0.068 Tc ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.335 287.82 Tm -0.001 Tc (OVEMANCE)Tj 9 0 0 9 203.975 287.82 Tm -0.009 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5733 0 TD 0 Tc (R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 214.655 287.82 Tm -0.002 Tc (EVIEW)Tj 9 0 0 9 233.495 287.82 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 236.375 287.82 Tm (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 244.775 287.82 Tm 0.07 Tc ( I)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 250.655 287.82 Tm 0.001 Tc [(NTEMA)39(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 292.775 287.82 Tm 0.072 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 301.175 287.82 Tm -0.001 Tc (OLITICAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 328.415 287.82 Tm 0.072 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 336.815 287.82 Tm 0.001 Tc (CONOMY)Tj /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 363.095 287.82 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.07 Tw (, 4 \(3\),)Tj -29.64 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 102.815 276.78 Tm -0.002 Tc (UTUMN)Tj 9 0 0 9 125.975 276.78 Tm 0 Tc -0.046 Tw (, 561-81; K)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 166.415 276.78 Tm 0.003 Tc (IZZA)Tj 9 0 0 9 180.695 276.78 Tm -0.001 Tc (, J)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 188.375 276.78 Tm (OSEPH)Tj 9 0 0 9 208.295 276.78 Tm -0.046 Tc 0 Tw ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 218.135 276.78 Tm -0.001 Tc (IGGA)Tj 9 0 0 9 233.855 276.78 Tm 0 Tc -0.047 Tw [( & J)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 248.015 276.78 Tm -0.002 Tc (EFFERSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 279.575 276.78 Tm 0 Tc (, N.C. C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 308.495 276.78 Tm (IVILIZING)Tj 9 0 0 9 338.255 276.78 Tm 0 Tw ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 340.055 276.78 Tm -0.001 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 352.295 276.78 Tm -0.05 Tc ( I)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 357.095 276.78 Tm 0 Tc (NTERNET)Tj 9 0 0 9 385.775 276.78 Tm (:)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 96.335 265.86 Tm -0.034 Tc (GLOBAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 265.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.135 265.86 Tm -0.033 Tc (CONCERNS)Tj 9 0 0 9 154.175 265.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 155.615 265.86 Tm -0.035 Tc (AND)Tj 9 0 0 9 168.695 265.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 170.135 265.86 Tm -0.035 Tc [(EFFOR)41(T)-11(S)]TJ 9 0 0 9 195.215 265.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 196.775 265.86 Tm -0.038 Tc [(TO)9(W)114(ARD)]TJ 9 0 0 9 222.335 265.86 Tm -0.023 Tc -0.063 Tw [( regulation. \(Kizza.: McFarland, c1998\); C)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 364.895 265.86 Tm -0.035 Tc (HARLES)Tj 9 0 0 9 96.335 254.82 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 102.695 254.82 Tm -0.021 Tc [(OODHAR)55(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 132.215 254.82 Tm -0.012 Tc -0.062 Tw (, D)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 142.295 254.82 Tm -0.022 Tc [(A)129(VID)]TJ 9 0 0 9 156.695 254.82 Tm -0.077 Tc 0 Tw ( L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 163.655 254.82 Tm -0.018 Tc [(LEWELL)115(YN)]TJ 9 0 0 9 196.175 254.82 Tm -0.017 Tc -0.062 Tw (, P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 204.815 254.82 Tm -0.02 Tc (HILIP)Tj 9 0 0 9 220.175 254.82 Tm -0.079 Tc 0 Tw ( H)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.095 254.82 Tm -0.024 Tc (ARMANN)Tj 9 0 0 9 255.335 254.82 Tm -0.017 Tc -0.062 Tw (, S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 263.855 254.82 Tm -0.019 Tc (TEVEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 283.775 254.82 Tm -0.016 Tc -0.059 Tw [( R W)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 301.175 254.82 Tm -0.021 Tc (EISBROD)Tj 9 0 0 9 327.215 254.82 Tm -0.018 Tc -0.058 Tw [( & L)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 342.575 254.82 Tm -0.022 Tc (ILIANA)Tj 9 0 0 9 363.455 254.82 Tm -0.09 Tc 0 Tw ( R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 370.775 254.82 Tm -0.022 Tc (OJAS)Tj 9 0 0 9 385.295 254.82 Tm 0 Tc (-)Tj -32.1067 -1.2267 TD (S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 101.255 243.78 Tm -0.024 Tc (U\301REZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 121.535 243.78 Tm -0.017 Tc -0.061 Tw [(,\240Financial Regulation: )11(Why)63(, How and )24(Where Now?, Routledge, 2003; D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 370.055 243.78 Tm -0.026 Tc (ANIEL)Tj 9 0 0 9 96.335 232.86 Tm -0.003 Tc -0.058 Tw (C., E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 113.975 232.86 Tm (STY)Tj 9 0 0 9 125.735 232.86 Tm -0.005 Tc -0.062 Tw [( and )-19(D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 148.415 232.86 Tm (AMIEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 169.055 232.86 Tm -0.063 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 177.215 232.86 Tm -0.005 Tc (ERADIN)Tj 9 0 0 9 200.855 232.86 Tm 0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4267 0 TD -0.003 Tc -0.062 Tw (Regulatory competition and the global coordination)Tj -12.04 -1.2267 TD 0.026 Tc 0.124 Tw (of labour standards, in)Tj /F5 1 Tf 10.1333 0 TD 0.127 Tw [( Regulatory competition and economic integration:)]TJ -10.1333 -1.2267 TD -0.003 Tc -0.06 Tw (comparative perspectives, \(ed.\) D)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 215.015 210.78 Tm (ANIEL)Tj 9 0 0 9 233.735 210.78 Tm 0 Tc -0.061 Tw [( C. E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 250.775 210.78 Tm -0.002 Tc (STY)Tj 9 0 0 9 262.655 210.78 Tm -0.005 Tc [( and )-6(D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 285.335 210.78 Tm (AMIEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 305.855 210.78 Tm -0.065 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 314.015 210.78 Tm -0.005 Tc (ERADIN)Tj 9 0 0 9 337.655 210.78 Tm -0.004 Tc -0.064 Tw (, Oxford; New)Tj -26.8133 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0.001 Tw [(Y)95(ork: Oxford University Press, 2001; Competition policy in the global economy:)]TJ 0 -1.2267 TD 0.01 Tw (modalities for co-operation \(ed.\) L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 221.495 188.82 Tm 0.001 Tc (EONARD)Tj 9 0 0 9 247.775 188.82 Tm 0.003 Tc 0 Tw ( W)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 258.575 188.82 Tm -0.002 Tc [(A)130(VERMAN)]TJ 9 0 0 9 289.655 188.82 Tm -0.004 Tc 0.015 Tw (, W)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 302.735 188.82 Tm 0.001 Tc (ILLIAM)Tj 9 0 0 9 324.815 188.82 Tm 0.002 Tc 0.011 Tw [( S. )15(C)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 342.695 188.82 Tm -0.001 Tc (OMANOR)Tj 9 0 0 9 370.775 188.82 Tm 0.001 Tc (, and)Tj -30.4933 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 103.055 177.78 Tm 0.03 Tc (KIRA)Tj 9 0 0 9 119.135 177.78 Tm 0.148 Tc ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 129.335 177.78 Tm 0.03 Tc (OTO)Tj 9 0 0 9 142.775 177.78 Tm 0.02 Tc 0.126 Tw (, 1997; Ogus, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 6.2933 0 TD 0.127 Tw (Competition Between National Legal Systems: A)Tj -11.4533 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc -0.033 Tw [(Contribution of Economic )14(Analysis to Comparative Law)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 22.3467 0 TD -0.034 Tw (, 2 ICLQ 48, 410, 1999.)Tj -24.5467 -1.5467 TD 0.02 Tw [(43)-1200(I agree with the latter statement but not with the conclusion which leads to favor)]TJ 2.2 -1.2267 TD 0.083 Tw (global harmonization as the best mechanism to control industrial and corporate)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD -0.014 Tc [(behavior)53(.)]TJ -2.2 -1.5467 TD 0 Tc [(44)-1200(S)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 101.255 117.06 Tm -0.018 Tc (IMMONS)Tj 9 0 0 9 126.455 117.06 Tm -0.013 Tc -0.063 Tw [( gives a game theoretical model to explaining why dominant regulators think)]TJ -3.3467 -1.2133 TD -0.008 Tc [(strategically)72(, since they know that how other regulators will react to its regulation. In)]TJ 0 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.068 Tw (addition show how the regulatory pressures that US regulators have over world)Tj T* 0.002 Tw (agencies is so huge that has the potentiality to change significantly the context of)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD -0.055 Tw (regulation in the rest of the world. See B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 238.655 73.14 Tm -0.001 Tc (ETH)Tj 9 0 0 9 250.895 73.14 Tm -0.05 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 257.615 73.14 Tm 0.001 Tc (IMMONS)Tj 9 0 0 9 283.535 73.14 Tm -0.004 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4533 0 TD 0 Tc -0.055 Tw (The International Politics of)Tj -21.2533 -1.2267 TD -0.007 Tc -0.062 Tw (Harmonization: The Case of Capital Markets Regulation)Tj /F5 1 Tf 22.08 0 TD -0.067 Tw [(. )-6(55 I)-7(n)11(t)-7(.)5( )-13(Or)33(ganization. 589,)]TJ -22.08 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (615-20, 2001.)Tj ET 76.535 316.26 m 150.815 316.26 l S endstream endobj 47 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 49 0 obj << /Length 4495 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (218)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 12 0 0 12 65.205 555.9 Tm 0 Tc -0.054 Tw [( Unfortunately, several questions like is international regulatory)]TJ 0 -1.2 TD 0.142 Tw (harmonization moving up to more rigorous standards or down)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.244 Tw (toward greater laxity, control the debate, but the question if)Tj T* -0.011 Tc -0.125 Tw (harmonization is moved by political or market pressures, or questions)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.133 Tw (about the different uses of the advantages of harmonization in)Tj T* -0.015 Tc -0.125 Tw (different markets, or the role of international institutions, international)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.093 Tw [(regulators and dominant producers, and the reception of regulation)]TJ T* -0.066 Tw (trough harmonization, have not been raised yet.)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.09 Tw [( )11(To further evidence our hypothesis and its tensions, we are going)]TJ T* 0.001 Tc 0.175 Tw (to study how convergence, international law and international)Tj T* (standardization)Tj 7 0 0 7 138.645 415.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (45)Tj 12 0 0 12 147.405 411.9 Tm 0 Tc 0.126 Tw [( have a strong tendency to propose or impose)]TJ -6.85 -1.2 TD -0.009 Tc -0.125 Tw (harmonization of regulation on its different stages. The methodology)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.011 Tw (we will use is to analyze the inner tensions in these policies. As a)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.108 Tw (matter of fact, comparing harmonized regulations and its goals)Tj T* -0.118 Tw (indicate the contradictions that the metatheory of )Tj /F8 1 Tf 19.07 0 TD 0 Tc -0.121 Tw (global regulatory)Tj -19.07 -1.2 TD -0.006 Tc (governance)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.6 0 TD -0.007 Tc -0.125 Tw [( with the )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.31 0 TD (normalized regulation)Tj /F5 1 Tf 8.65 0 TD -0.006 Tc [( of certain industries. We)]TJ -16.56 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.072 Tw (expect to prove that the growth of the economics of harmonization)Tj T* -0.004 Tc -0.125 Tw (of regulation is linked with transnational corporate interest to extend)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.223 Tw (the gains of regulatory/deregulatory production in hegemonic)Tj T* -0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw (countries. Legal economists in international economic law began to)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.029 Tw (support it as the new best option for international regulation and)Tj T* 0.067 Tw (development of industry in a globalized world but such support)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.045 Tw (comes from those advocating for the extension of liberalization,)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.07 Tw (which usually are big corporations.)Tj T* [( Several questions arise related to the legal specific discourses of)]TJ T* 0.025 Tc 0.25 Tw (harmonization. Why there is a differentiated discourse of)Tj T* -0.01 Tc -0.125 Tw (harmonization for certain industry regulation as antitrust, intellectual)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.083 Tw (property and financial markets but it is not applicable for other)Tj T* -0.013 Tc -0.125 Tw (regulation as environmental and labor? Does convergence of antitrust)Tj T* -0.009 Tc (laws increase industry concentration? Do capital adequacy standards)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.075 Tw (enhance large financial corporations\222 power in the international)Tj 9 0 0 9 66.885 73.5 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.062 Tw [(45)-1202( These different but attached discourses are the law as convergence \227spontaneous)]TJ 2.2 -1.2267 TD -0.016 Tc (international harmonized order\227, and multilateral regulatory policy via international)Tj T* 0 Tc (treaties \227)Tj /F8 1 Tf 4.08 0 TD [(har)40(d law)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 3.48 0 TD [( and international regulatory )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 11.3733 0 TD 0.001 Tc [(standar)41(ds)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 3.8933 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (\227)Tj /F8 1 Tf 1 0 TD -0.001 Tc -0.064 Tw [( soft law)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 3.2667 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj ET 65.205 93.3 m 140.925 93.3 l S endstream endobj 50 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 52 0 obj << /Length 4708 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (219)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 12 0 0 12 76.535 555.9 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.062 Tw (financial markets? Does a single regime of intellectual property)Tj 0 -1.2 TD 0.084 Tw (promote general or just intellectual property producers growth?)Tj T* -0.124 Tw (Does global corporate governance increases the power of corporate)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.026 Tw (boards and managers over stockholders in internationalized stock)Tj T* -0.016 Tc (markets?)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.03 Tw [( We have exposed why there is enough evidence to assume that)]TJ T* -0.065 Tw (it is possible to show how capture is a tool to understand the recent)Tj T* 0.02 Tc 0.25 Tw (phenomena of )Tj /F8 1 Tf 6.69 0 TD 0.019 Tc (harmonization of industrial regulation)Tj /F5 1 Tf 16.9 0 TD 0.021 Tc (. The)Tj -23.59 -1.2 TD -0.003 Tc -0.125 Tw (aforementioned architecture of the concept of harmonization shows)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.098 Tw (that an extensive capture of regulation/regulators is in play, and the)Tj T* -0.056 Tw (increasing idea of a selective global legal harmonization has a key)Tj T* -0.111 Tw (role in the escalating size of transnational corporations. Indeed, it is)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.116 Tw (not that harmonized legal systems require big corporations, but that)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.106 Tw (big corporations require harmonized legal systems.)Tj 13 0 0 13 153.575 339.06 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.013 Tw (II. G)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 177.815 339.06 Tm (LOBAL)Tj 13 0 0 13 208.055 339.06 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 211.175 339.06 Tm -0.001 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 13 0 0 13 265.655 339.06 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 268.655 339.06 Tm -0.002 Tc (POLICY)Tj 13 0 0 13 301.415 339.06 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 304.535 339.06 Tm -0.002 Tc (AND)Tj 13 0 0 13 324.215 339.06 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 327.215 339.06 Tm -0.001 Tc [(REGULA)118(TION)]TJ 13 0 0 13 384.695 339.06 Tm 0 Tc (:)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 260.015 323.46 Tm -0.002 Tc (OXYMORONIC)Tj 13 0 0 13 322.655 323.46 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 326.255 323.46 Tm -0.002 Tc (COEXISTENCE)Tj 12 0 0 12 76.535 294.3 Tm 0 Tc -0.015 Tw [( Why this discourse becomes interesting for a study of a barely)]TJ T* -0.022 Tc -0.125 Tw (unidentified field in international economic law, this is the international)Tj T* -0.006 Tc (industrial regulation? The answer is not simple. As I stated in the first)Tj T* 0 Tc (paragraphs, the international economic policy of standardization of)Tj T* -0.008 Tc (industrial regulation is the product of false impressions that lead to an)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.113 Tw (illusion. The theory has highlighted such illusion in several ways)Tj 7 0 0 7 376.535 226.26 Tm -0.006 Tc (46)Tj 12 0 0 12 385.295 222.3 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -25.73 -1.2 TD -0.066 Tw (but what seems to be more interesting is how it is possible to find a)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.031 Tw (correlated tension between several free trade policies, most of the)Tj T* -0.118 Tw (analysis of a global policy for an international industrial regulation,)Tj T* 0.039 Tw (the discourse in economic and legal theory about the benefits of)Tj T* -0.108 Tw (harmonized or normalized regulation, and the sustained increase in)Tj T* -0.007 Tc -0.125 Tw (industrial concentrations.)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.111 Tw [( The main point is the tension in the meta-theory free-markets and)]TJ T* -0.01 Tc -0.125 Tw (the theory standardized industrial regulation. Indeed, the coexistence)Tj 9 0 0 9 76.535 51.06 Tm -0.003 Tc -0.062 Tw [(46)-1203( Books criticizing globalization, Kennedy\222)50(s syllabus..)]TJ ET 76.535 72.06 m 152.135 72.06 l S endstream endobj 53 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 55 0 obj << /Length 6035 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (220)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 12 0 0 12 65.205 555.9 Tm -0.004 Tc -0.125 Tw (of markets and freedom is and )Tj /F8 1 Tf 11.52 0 TD -0.005 Tc (ordoliberal)Tj 7 0 0 7 257.565 559.86 Tm (47)Tj /F5 1 Tf 12 0 0 12 266.325 555.9 Tm -0.003 Tc [( idea)]TJ 7 0 0 7 287.565 559.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (48)Tj 12 0 0 12 296.325 555.9 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.073 Tw [( where the role of)]TJ -19.26 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.072 Tw (the State is simply to organize markets and not direct or plan them,)Tj T* -0.016 Tc -0.125 Tw (since such intervention goes against freedom. Here, we can emphasize)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.087 Tw (a theoretical tension between the Austrian or libertarian model,)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.018 Tw (where freedom and institutions are not to be designed, but should)Tj T* -0.033 Tc -0.124 Tw (arise through cooperation)Tj 7 0 0 7 175.005 487.86 Tm -0.04 Tc (49)Tj 12 0 0 12 183.285 483.9 Tm -0.019 Tc -0.073 Tw (. Thus, the neoclassical faith in institutional)Tj -9.84 -1.2 TD 0 Tc -0.102 Tw (design and the libertarian idea of a spontaneous order show the first)Tj T* 0.022 Tw (tension in the discourse of these models. If freedom leads to self)Tj T* -0.079 Tw (regulation, why markets must be regulated?)Tj T* -0.016 Tw [( On the other hand, the discourses of global regulations seem to)]TJ T* 0.006 Tc 0.25 Tw (rely on the economic theory showing the social benefits of)Tj T* -0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw (harmonization. As we have highlighted, there is enough evidence to)Tj T* -0.007 Tc (distrust of the theoretical constructions and the knowledge structures)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.001 Tw (and schemas that have aroused from the contemporary economic)Tj T* -0.007 Tc -0.125 Tw (discourse. Not only its highly dispositional constructions, but also its)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.103 Tw (lack of attention to its possible bias leads to distrust on the results of)Tj T* -0.002 Tc -0.125 Tw (such theoretical constructions)Tj 7 0 0 7 204.285 329.46 Tm -0.006 Tc (50)Tj 12 0 0 12 212.925 325.5 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj 13 0 0 13 148.965 295.86 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.002 Tw (III. E)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 176.205 295.86 Tm (VIDENCING)Tj 13 0 0 13 226.725 295.86 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 229.845 295.86 Tm -0.002 Tc (INNER)Tj 13 0 0 13 257.565 295.86 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 260.805 295.86 Tm -0.002 Tc (CONTRADICTIONS)Tj 13 0 0 13 340.485 295.86 Tm -0.005 Tc (: )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 347.205 295.86 Tm -0.002 Tc (LEGAL)Tj -17.9077 -1.7143 TD (CONVERGENCE)Tj 13 0 0 13 251.805 280.26 Tm (, )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 257.925 280.26 Tm (SOFT)Tj 13 0 0 13 280.125 280.26 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 283.005 280.26 Tm -0.001 Tc [(LA)78(W)]TJ 13 0 0 13 302.925 280.26 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 305.925 280.26 Tm -0.002 Tc (AND)Tj 13 0 0 13 325.485 280.26 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 328.485 280.26 Tm -0.004 Tc (HARD)Tj 13 0 0 13 354.165 280.26 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 357.045 280.26 Tm -0.001 Tc [(LA)91(W)]TJ 12 0 0 12 65.205 251.1 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.132 Tw [( To evidence the latter statements, we will study three of the)]TJ 0 -1.2 TD -0.004 Tc -0.125 Tw (different theoretical meanings given to the word )Tj /F8 1 Tf 18.47 0 TD -0.002 Tc (law)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.43 0 TD -0.004 Tc [( in International)]TJ -19.9 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.103 Tw (Economic Law and how they have a meaning in a global regulatory)Tj T* -0.015 Tc -0.125 Tw (policy. These are the )Tj /F8 1 Tf 7.76 0 TD (law as convergence)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.36 0 TD [( \227spontaneous international)]TJ -15.12 -1.2 TD 0.018 Tc 0.25 Tw (harmonized order\227, and multilateral regulatory policy via)Tj T* 0.002 Tc (international treaties \227)Tj /F8 1 Tf 9.98 0 TD 0.001 Tc (hard law)Tj /F5 1 Tf 3.84 0 TD 0.002 Tc [( and international regulatory)]TJ 9 0 0 9 65.205 137.22 Tm 0 Tc [(47)-1200( )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 2.5333 0 TD -0.001 Tc [(Or)39(do-liberalism)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 6.4533 0 TD 0 Tc 0.083 Tw [( assumes that the State is a designer)53(. )66(As designer)27(, the State)]TJ -6.7867 -1.2267 TD 0.02 Tw (creates all the institutional circumstances to maintain a healthy level to foster)Tj 0 -1.2133 TD -0.007 Tc -0.063 Tw (competition according to market principles.)Tj -2.2 -1.5467 TD 0 Tc -0.023 Tw [(48)-1200( M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 95.085 101.34 Tm 0.002 Tc (ICHEL)Tj 9 0 0 9 113.565 101.34 Tm -0.037 Tc 0 Tw ( F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 120.525 101.34 Tm 0.001 Tc [(OUCAUL)96(T)]TJ 9 0 0 9 150.045 101.34 Tm 0 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4667 0 TD -0.034 Tw (R\351sum\351 des cours)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.0933 0 TD -0.033 Tw [(, 1970-1982, 1)27(19, Julliard, 1989, cited by)]TJ -14.7867 -1.2267 TD -0.001 Tc -0.027 Tw (Id. at 57.)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD 0.001 Tc -0.028 Tw [(49)-1199( See L)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 107.565 76.5 Tm (UDWIG)Tj 9 0 0 9 129.285 76.5 Tm -0.05 Tc 0 Tw ( V)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 137.565 76.5 Tm 0.004 Tc (ON)Tj 9 0 0 9 146.685 76.5 Tm -0.032 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 156.645 76.5 Tm 0 Tc (ISES)Tj 9 0 0 9 169.605 76.5 Tm -0.006 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4667 0 TD 0 Tc -0.047 Tw (Human Action)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.76 0 TD -0.03 Tw (, 2003, Mises Institute, 2004; Friedrick)Tj -15.6267 -1.2267 TD -0.028 Tw (Hayek, Road to Serfdom, 1993.)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD -0.06 Tw [(50)-1200(See supra note 23 and accompanying text.)]TJ ET 65.205 156.54 m 149.925 156.54 l S endstream endobj 56 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 58 0 obj << /Length 7354 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (221)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT /F8 1 Tf 12 0 0 12 76.535 555.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (standards)Tj /F5 1 Tf 3.94 0 TD 0 Tc (\227)Tj /F8 1 Tf 1 0 TD -0.115 Tw [( soft law)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 3.16 0 TD 0.001 Tc -0.116 Tw (. As it is evident, these three phenomena imply)Tj -8.1 -1.2 TD -0.059 Tw (an immense amount of industrial regulation, the objective, in each)Tj T* 0.005 Tc 0.25 Tw (case, will be study one among several problems. Hence, in)Tj /F8 1 Tf T* 0.001 Tc (convergence)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.06 0 TD 0 Tc 0.026 Tw (, we will study the nowadays called )Tj /F8 1 Tf 14.69 0 TD 0.029 Tw (global antitrust)Tj -19.75 -1.2 TD 0.003 Tc (law)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.44 0 TD 0 Tc -0.012 Tw (; second, in )Tj /F8 1 Tf 4.8 0 TD -0.013 Tw (hard law)Tj /F5 1 Tf 3.58 0 TD 0.001 Tc -0.014 Tw [( we will study the internationalization of)]TJ -9.82 -1.2 TD -0.007 Tc -0.125 Tw (intellectual property rights true international treaties and third, in )Tj /F8 1 Tf 24.56 0 TD -0.008 Tc (soft)Tj -24.56 -1.2 TD 0.003 Tc (law)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.44 0 TD 0.001 Tc -0.089 Tw (, we will study the case the capital accords in financial markets.)Tj -1.44 -1.2 TD 0 Tc -0.119 Tw [( The methodology we will use to study the inherent contradictions)]TJ T* -0.01 Tc -0.125 Tw (in this policy and the harmonized regulations and its effect \227markets)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.08 Tw (concentration\227. We want to reveal and scrutinize the common)Tj T* 0.063 Tw (meta-theory of the global regulation policy inherent in )Tj /F8 1 Tf 22.54 0 TD (Austrian)Tj /F5 1 Tf -22.54 -1.2 TD -0.096 Tw (economics and )Tj /F8 1 Tf 6.04 0 TD 0 Tc (neo-classical)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.28 0 TD -0.1 Tw [( economics)]TJ 7 0 0 7 265.535 401.46 Tm -0.006 Tc (51)Tj 12 0 0 12 274.295 397.5 Tm 0 Tc -0.057 Tw (. Then, show the macro-)Tj -16.48 -1.2 TD -0.016 Tc -0.125 Tw (theory of each of the examples \227economics of industrial organization)Tj T* -0.013 Tc (and regulation\227. After that, analyze the micro-script. And, following)Tj T* -0.006 Tc (such study, we will highlight the tensions and non-theoretical effects)Tj T* (of such regulation in international and national markets. Evidence of)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.006 Tw (such phenomenon will be theoretical, showing the contradictions)Tj T* -0.075 Tw (between the discourses and the regulation, and empirical, showing)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.09 Tw (the effect with economic data)Tj 7 0 0 7 214.415 300.66 Tm -0.006 Tc (52)Tj 12 0 0 12 223.175 296.7 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.055 Tw [( and econometric analysis.)]TJ 8.4 0 0 8.4 176.855 268.14 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (A)Tj 12 0 0 12 182.855 268.14 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.025 Tw (. C)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 196.535 268.14 Tm (ONVERGENCE)Tj 12 0 0 12 253.415 268.14 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 256.175 268.14 Tm -0.004 Tc (AND)Tj 12 0 0 12 274.295 268.14 Tm -0.032 Tc ( G)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 285.575 268.14 Tm -0.001 Tc (LOBAL)Tj 12 0 0 12 313.655 268.14 Tm -0.08 Tc ( A)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 324.335 268.14 Tm -0.001 Tc (NTITRUST)Tj 12 0 0 12 364.895 268.14 Tm -0.021 Tc ( L)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 374.975 268.14 Tm -0.079 Tc (AW)Tj /F8 1 Tf 12 0 0 12 76.535 239.46 Tm -0.016 Tc (Convergence)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.11 0 TD -0.015 Tc -0.125 Tw [( has been an interesting suggestion in )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 13.71 0 TD -0.016 Tc (law and economics)Tj /F5 1 Tf -18.82 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc (literature)Tj 7 0 0 7 119.975 229.14 Tm -0.006 Tc (53)Tj 12 0 0 12 128.735 225.06 Tm 0 Tc 0.084 Tw [( from a long time but, suspiciously, the convergence)]TJ 9 0 0 9 76.535 178.86 Tm 0.012 Tw [(51)-1200( Principally explained by R. B)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 205.895 178.86 Tm 0.002 Tc (ORK)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.215 178.86 Tm -0.004 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5067 0 TD 0 Tc 0.001 Tw [(The Antitrust )-13(Paradox)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 8.96 0 TD 0.013 Tw [( 90-91, 107-1)40(15, 1978,)]TJ -23.12 -1.2133 TD -0.023 Tc -0.062 Tw (\(asserting that antitrust laws promote wealth-maximization at the sacrifice of consumer)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.011 Tc (welfare\).)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD 0 Tc -0.043 Tw [(52)-1200( I cannot continue without highlighting the problem with data: who to rely on data)]TJ 2.2 -1.2267 TD -0.01 Tc (provided?)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD 0 Tc [(53)-1200( )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 2.3867 0 TD -0.007 Tc (See)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.36 0 TD -0.063 Tc 0 Tw ( L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 117.335 118.26 Tm -0.009 Tc [(ARR)67(Y)]TJ 9 0 0 9 134.135 118.26 Tm -0.077 Tc ( C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 141.695 118.26 Tm -0.132 Tc [(AT)-132(\301)]TJ 9 0 0 9 153.695 118.26 Tm -0.064 Tc ( B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 161.255 118.26 Tm -0.014 Tc (ACKER)Tj 9 0 0 9 182.255 118.26 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4133 0 TD -0.009 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Harmonizing law in an era of globalization: conver)31(gence,)]TJ -9.96 -1.2267 TD -0.019 Tc (divergence and resistance)Tj /F5 1 Tf 9.8533 0 TD [(, Carolina Press, 2005; )-6(R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 268.655 107.22 Tm -0.028 Tc (ICHARD)Tj 9 0 0 9 291.695 107.22 Tm -0.077 Tc 0 Tw ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 298.175 107.22 Tm -0.029 Tc (OSNER)Tj 9 0 0 9 317.975 107.22 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4 0 TD -0.019 Tc -0.067 Tw (Economic Analysis)Tj -25.0267 -1.2267 TD -0.005 Tc -0.061 Tw (of Law)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.68 0 TD -0.003 Tc [(, 8 ed. 1998, \(supporting that the common law is more ef)24(ficient than the civil)]TJ -2.68 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc (law and therefore, the legal systems will converge to the common law institutional)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD 0.125 Tw (system\); See M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 74.22 Tm 0.002 Tc (ARK)Tj 9 0 0 9 167.975 74.22 Tm -0.001 Tc [( J. R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 186.455 74.22 Tm 0 Tc (OE)Tj 9 0 0 9 194.855 74.22 Tm -0.01 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6133 0 TD 0 Tc 0.126 Tw (Chaos and Evolution in Law and Economics,)Tj /F5 1 Tf 18.84 0 TD 0.001 Tc 0.128 Tw [( 109)]TJ /F8 1 Tf -30.4 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.088 Tw [(Harvar)40(d L. Rev)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 6.3867 0 TD 0 Tw (.)Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.2533 0 TD -0.002 Tc (, )Tj /F5 1 Tf 0.5867 0 TD 0 Tc 0.09 Tw (641, 1996, \(evaluating the classical paradigm of evolution of)Tj -7.2267 -1.2133 TD -0.011 Tc -0.062 Tw [(institutions and ef)16(ficiency)56(, and including chaos theory and mostly path dependency\).)]TJ ET 76.535 201.06 m 164.375 201.06 l S endstream endobj 59 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 61 0 obj << /Length 9289 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (222)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 12 0 0 12 65.205 555.9 Tm -0.01 Tc (discourse)Tj 7 0 0 7 109.485 559.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (54)Tj 12 0 0 12 118.125 555.9 Tm -0.073 Tw [( is regularly proposed by tending to )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 13.76 0 TD -0.01 Tc -0.125 Tw (expand common law)Tj /F5 1 Tf -18.17 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc (regimes)Tj 7 0 0 7 103.245 545.46 Tm -0.006 Tc (55)Tj 12 0 0 12 112.005 541.5 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.065 Tw (. In competition policy )Tj /F8 1 Tf 9.11 0 TD (convergence)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.07 0 TD -0.113 Tw [( refers to reaching)]TJ 10 0 0 10 79.365 514.26 Tm -0.027 Tw [(\223consistency in antitrust law)73(, policy)61(, processes and economic theory across)]TJ 0 -1.2 TD 0.005 Tc 0.125 Tw (jurisdictional lines\224)Tj 5.8 0 0 5.8 160.245 505.62 Tm -0.007 Tc (56)Tj 10 0 0 10 167.565 502.26 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj 12 0 0 12 65.205 474.3 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.056 Tw [( The reasons are several for the recurrence of a transnational)]TJ T* -0.071 Tw [(policy and the global antitrust law has increased in the last years)]TJ 7 0 0 7 365.205 463.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (57)Tj 12 0 0 12 373.965 459.9 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -25.73 -1.2 TD -0.007 Tc -0.125 Tw (but most policymakers and legal economists argue for consistency in)Tj T* -0.005 Tc (procedures, fairness in legal application and reduction of transaction)Tj T* -0.007 Tc (costs)Tj 7 0 0 7 88.725 420.66 Tm -0.006 Tc (58)Tj 12 0 0 12 97.485 416.7 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -2.69 -1.2 TD -0.011 Tc -0.126 Tw [( Some International Organizations have recommended the initiation)]TJ T* 0.001 Tc 0 Tw (of national efforts to implement a set of best practices in order to)Tj T* -0.1 Tw (achieve those ends, increase social wealth and guarantee consumer)Tj 9 0 0 9 65.205 316.38 Tm 0 Tc -0.063 Tw [(54)-1200( E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 92.205 316.38 Tm -0.008 Tc [(DW)106(ARD)]TJ 9 0 0 9 115.245 316.38 Tm -0.064 Tc -0.026 Tw [( T.)-65( )-16(S)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 130.485 316.38 Tm -0.002 Tc [(W)123(AINE)]TJ 9 0 0 9 150.645 316.38 Tm 0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.44 0 TD -0.002 Tc -0.061 Tw [(The Local Law of Global )11(Antitrust)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 13.4133 0 TD 0 Tc [(, 43 )13(W)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 298.365 316.38 Tm -0.006 Tc (ILLIAM)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.205 316.38 Tm 0.002 Tc [( & )15(M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 338.565 316.38 Tm 0.001 Tc [(AR)77(Y)]TJ 9 0 0 9 351.405 316.38 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.1867 0 TD -0.004 Tc -0.067 Tw [(L. Rev)63(.)]TJ /F5 1 Tf -29.7867 -1.2267 TD -0.01 Tc -0.061 Tw [(627, 641-46, 2001. )-10(W)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 160.605 305.34 Tm -0.014 Tc (ILLIAM)Tj 9 0 0 9 182.085 305.34 Tm -0.011 Tc -0.065 Tw [( E. K)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 199.125 305.34 Tm -0.015 Tc [(OV)118(ACIC)]TJ 9 0 0 9 222.045 305.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4133 0 TD -0.01 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Getting Started: Cr)43(eating New Competition)]TJ -15.64 -1.2267 TD -0.007 Tc [(Policy Institutions in T)60(ransition Economies)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 16.7733 0 TD (, 23 Brook. J. Int\222l L. 403, 403-08 \(1997\))Tj -16.7733 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0.083 Tw (\(describing creation of competition policy systems as element of law reform in)Tj 0 -1.2267 TD -0.002 Tc -0.06 Tw (transition economies\). T)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 171.285 272.34 Tm -0.004 Tc (IMOTHY)Tj 9 0 0 9 196.245 272.34 Tm -0.001 Tc [( J. M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 213.285 272.34 Tm -0.004 Tc (URIS)Tj 9 0 0 9 227.565 272.34 Tm 0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.44 0 TD -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw (Competition Agencies in a Market-Based)Tj -16.28 -1.2267 TD -0.012 Tc -0.061 Tw (Global Economy )Tj /F5 1 Tf 6.6933 0 TD -0.063 Tw [(\(Brussels, Belgium, July 23, 2002\) \(Prepared remarks at the )54(Annual)]TJ -6.6933 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc [(Lecture of the European Foreign )53(Af)13(fairs Review\), )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 19.76 0 TD -0.064 Tw (available at )Tj ET 0.45 w 346.965 249.48 m 306.645 249.48 l S BT /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 306.645 250.38 Tm -0.001 Tc (http://www)Tj ET 374.565 249.48 m 347.085 249.48 l S BT 9 0 0 9 347.085 250.38 Tm 0 Tc [(.ftc.gov)13(/)]TJ ET 201.045 238.44 m 85.005 238.44 l S BT 9 0 0 9 85.005 239.34 Tm 0.109 Tw [(speeches/muris/020723/brussels)-13(. E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 212.205 239.34 Tm 0.002 Tc (DUARD)Tj 9 0 0 9 234.645 239.34 Tm 0.128 Tw [( M G)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 256.005 239.34 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (R)Tj 9 0 0 9 260.205 239.34 Tm (A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 266.685 239.34 Tm -0.005 Tc (HAM)Tj 9 0 0 9 281.325 239.34 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.127 Tw [( & J. DA)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 317.325 239.34 Tm -0.003 Tc (VID)Tj 9 0 0 9 328.485 239.34 Tm 0.123 Tc 0 Tw ( R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 337.965 239.34 Tm 0.002 Tc (ICHARDSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 374.685 239.34 Tm 0 Tc (,)Tj /F8 1 Tf -32.1867 -1.2267 TD -0.005 Tc -0.061 Tw (Competition Policies for the Global Economy)Tj /F5 1 Tf 17.7733 0 TD -0.007 Tc -0.066 Tw [(, 1997)-7(.)]TJ -19.9733 -1.5333 TD -0.004 Tc -0.063 Tw [(55)-1204( The production of economic theory and legal theory are usually leaded by common)]TJ 2.2 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.05 Tw (law countries. )Tj /F8 1 Tf 5.96 0 TD -0.001 Tc (See)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.3867 0 TD 0.057 Tc 0 Tw ( C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 159.885 203.46 Tm 0.001 Tc [(HIST)20(OPH)]TJ 9 0 0 9 186.405 203.46 Tm 0.055 Tc ( K)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 195.525 203.46 Tm 0 Tc (ERN)Tj 9 0 0 9 208.125 203.46 Tm -0.003 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.56 0 TD 0 Tc 0.051 Tw (Between Formalization and Simplification of)Tj -14.24 -1.2133 TD -0.001 Tc (Justice)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.7867 0 TD 0 Tc -0.06 Tw [(, 2007 on file with the author)67(.)]TJ -4.9867 -1.5467 TD 0.001 Tc 0.049 Tw [(56)-1199(See E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 106.245 178.62 Tm -0.003 Tc (INER)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.885 178.62 Tm 0.059 Tc 0 Tw ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 129.165 178.62 Tm 0.001 Tc (LHAUGE)Tj 9 0 0 9 155.085 178.62 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.055 Tw [( & D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 174.045 178.62 Tm 0 Tc (AMIEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 194.685 178.62 Tm 0.055 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 203.925 178.62 Tm -0.001 Tc (ERADIN)Tj 9 0 0 9 227.805 178.62 Tm -0.003 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5467 0 TD 0 Tc 0.056 Tw (Global Antitrust Law And Economics)Tj /F5 1 Tf 15.2267 0 TD 0.05 Tc 0 Tw ( 2)Tj -31.64 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc -0.06 Tw (\(unpublished manuscript -on file with the authors\).)Tj -2.2 -1.5467 TD 0.01 Tw [(57)-1200(As well as the number of mergers of big transnational corporations as Miller and)]TJ 2.2 -1.2133 TD -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw [(Bavaria, Procter and Gable and Gillette, among many other)51(.)]TJ -2.2 -1.5467 TD 0.001 Tc -0.045 Tw [(58)-1199(See E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 105.405 128.94 Tm 0.002 Tc [(D)11(W)116(ARD)]TJ 9 0 0 9 128.445 128.94 Tm -0.078 Tc 0.015 Tw [( T.)-79( )-29(S)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 144.045 128.94 Tm -0.002 Tc [(W)104(AINE)]TJ 9 0 0 9 164.325 128.94 Tm 0.003 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4533 0 TD 0 Tc -0.048 Tw [(The Local Law of Global )13(Antitrust)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 13.5467 0 TD -0.001 Tc [(, 43 )-14(W)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 313.725 128.94 Tm 0.001 Tc (ILLIAM)Tj 9 0 0 9 335.805 128.94 Tm 0.002 Tc [( & M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 354.525 128.94 Tm 0.001 Tc [(AR)58(Y)]TJ 9 0 0 9 367.485 128.94 Tm 0.003 Tc -0.05 Tw [( L.)]TJ -31.3867 -1.2267 TD 0.001 Tc 0.124 Tw [(Rev)68(. 627, 641-46 \(2001\). W)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 190.845 117.9 Tm (ILLIAM)Tj 9 0 0 9 212.925 117.9 Tm [( E. K)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 233.925 117.9 Tm 0.004 Tc [(OV)137(ACIC)]TJ 9 0 0 9 257.325 117.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6267 0 TD 0.001 Tc [(Getting Started: Cr)28(eating New)]TJ -19.7733 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc -0.05 Tw [(Competition Policy Institutions in T)53(ransition Economies)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 22.28 0 TD -0.052 Tw (, 23 Brook. J. Int\222l L. 403,)Tj -22.28 -1.2267 TD -0.005 Tc -0.062 Tw (403-08 \(1997\) \(describing creation of competition policy systems as element of law)Tj T* -0.019 Tc [(reform in transition economies\). )-6(T)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 200.685 84.9 Tm -0.026 Tc (IMOTHY)Tj 9 0 0 9 224.805 84.9 Tm -0.018 Tc -0.064 Tw [( J. M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 241.125 84.9 Tm -0.029 Tc (URIS)Tj 9 0 0 9 254.685 84.9 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4 0 TD -0.019 Tc -0.063 Tw (Competition Agencies in a Market-)Tj -19.2533 -1.2133 TD -0.007 Tc -0.061 Tw (Based Global Economy )Tj /F5 1 Tf 9.3733 0 TD -0.063 Tw (\(Brussels, Belgium, July 23, 2002\) \(Prepared remarks at the)Tj -9.3733 -1.2267 TD 0.002 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Annual Lecture of the European Foreign )55(A)-10(f)15(fairs Review\), )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 24.5067 0 TD (available at, )Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.5333 0 TD (http://)Tj -30.04 -1.2267 TD -0.004 Tc [(www)63(.ftc.gov/speeches/muris/020723/brussels.)]TJ ET 0.48 w 65.205 336.18 m 137.445 336.18 l S endstream endobj 62 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 64 0 obj << /Length 8411 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (223)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 12 0 0 12 76.535 555.9 Tm 0 Tc (sovereignty)Tj 7 0 0 7 132.575 559.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (59)Tj 12 0 0 12 141.335 555.9 Tm 0 Tc -0.029 Tw (. Some scholars have suggested that such process of)Tj -5.4 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.067 Tw (convergence has started)Tj 7 0 0 7 189.695 545.46 Tm -0.006 Tc (60)Tj 12 0 0 12 198.455 541.5 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.039 Tw [( in the competition policy of the UE and)]TJ -10.16 -1.2 TD -0.046 Tw (the US since the biggest market transactions have been developed)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.125 Tw (among corporations based in such geographical locations. But,)Tj T* 0.158 Tw (according to other authors, this aspired convergence will only)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.111 Tw (increase corporate power and will make national industrial policies)Tj T* -0.055 Tw (just a chimera of the past)Tj 7 0 0 7 193.775 473.46 Tm -0.006 Tc (61)Tj 12 0 0 12 202.535 469.5 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -10.5 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.123 Tw [( The questions are: Is harmonization of antitrust regulation a profit)]TJ T* 0.004 Tc 0.25 Tw (maximizing mechanism or a cost minimizing instrument? Is)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.04 Tw (harmonization a shared industrial interest that could lead to cost)Tj T* -0.027 Tw (minimization of corporate growth? \(Or is harmonization a way to)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.009 Tw (reduce the costs of concentration and market power?\) As we said)Tj T* -0.008 Tc -0.125 Tw (before, capture is a technology of power and economics has provided)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.052 Tw (a barely un-criticized knowledge structure that acknowledges that)Tj T* -0.009 Tc -0.125 Tw (the \223realities of economics are common among nations\224 and scholars)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.086 Tw (cannot ignore that)Tj 10 0 0 10 90.695 312.66 Tm 0.005 Tc 0.125 Tw (\223part of a )Tj /F8 1 Tf 4.452 0 TD (global community)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.404 0 TD [( and that ideas generated on one continent)]TJ -11.856 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc 0.04 Tw (cannot safely be cabined and ignored on the others\224)Tj 5.8 0 0 5.8 301.415 304.02 Tm -0.007 Tc (62)Tj 10 0 0 10 308.615 300.66 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj 9 0 0 9 76.535 235.02 Tm -0.015 Tc -0.062 Tw [(5)-15(9)-1215( Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development [OECD]. )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 29.16 0 TD -0.016 Tc -0.066 Tw (Best Practices)Tj -26.96 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc -0.056 Tw [(for the Formal Exchange of Information Between Competition )13(Authorities in Har)40(d)]TJ 0 -1.2133 TD 0.018 Tc 0.125 Tw (Core Cartel Investigations)Tj /F5 1 Tf 11.3867 0 TD 0.126 Tw [( \(2005\), OECD, )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 7.3067 0 TD 0.019 Tc (Recommendation of the Council)Tj -18.6933 -1.2267 TD -0.023 Tc -0.061 Tw (concerning merger review)Tj /F5 1 Tf 9.88 0 TD -0.063 Tw [( \(2005\); OECD, )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 6.12 0 TD (Recommendation of the Council concerning)Tj -16 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.003 Tw (structural separation in regulated industries)Tj /F5 1 Tf 17.7867 0 TD 0.001 Tw ( \(2001\); OECD, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 6.68 0 TD 0.005 Tw (Recommendation of)Tj -24.4667 -1.2133 TD -0.003 Tw (the Council concerning effective action against hard core cartels)Tj /F5 1 Tf 26.04 0 TD -0.006 Tw [( \(1998\); OECD,)]TJ /F8 1 Tf -26.04 -1.2267 TD -0.014 Tc -0.062 Tw (Recommendation of the Council concerning co-operation between member countries)Tj T* -0.004 Tc (on anticompetitive practices affecting international trade)Tj /F5 1 Tf 22.36 0 TD -0.005 Tc -0.066 Tw [( \(1995\).)]TJ -24.56 -1.5333 TD 0 Tc [(60)-1200(E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 102.095 144.18 Tm 0.031 Tc (LEANOR)Tj 9 0 0 9 128.855 144.18 Tm 0.024 Tc 0.125 Tw [( M. )11(F)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 151.895 144.18 Tm (OX)Tj 9 0 0 9 161.375 144.18 Tm 0.018 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6667 0 TD 0.023 Tc 0.126 Tw (US and EU Competition Law: A Comparison)Tj /F5 1 Tf 19.76 0 TD 0.026 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6667 0 TD 0.022 Tc (in)Tj /F5 1 Tf 0.8267 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4 0 TD 0.023 Tc (Global)Tj -29.5467 -1.2267 TD -0.005 Tc -0.061 Tw (Competition Policy)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.6 0 TD [( \(ed.\), J. )8(D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 200.495 133.14 Tm -0.012 Tc [(A)120(VID)]TJ 9 0 0 9 215.255 133.14 Tm -0.063 Tc 0 Tw ( R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.815 133.14 Tm -0.008 Tc (ICHARDSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 259.175 133.14 Tm -0.005 Tc -0.062 Tw [( and )-6(E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 280.775 133.14 Tm -0.008 Tc [(DW)106(ARD)]TJ 9 0 0 9 303.695 133.14 Tm [( M. )-8(G)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 323.615 133.14 Tm -0.007 Tc (RAHAM)Tj 9 0 0 9 346.775 133.14 Tm -0.006 Tc -0.064 Tw [( \(1997\). )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.24 0 TD -0.007 Tc (See)Tj /F5 1 Tf -31.0667 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 101.735 122.1 Tm -0.016 Tc (INER)Tj 9 0 0 9 116.015 122.1 Tm -0.074 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.975 122.1 Tm -0.014 Tc (LHAUGE)Tj 9 0 0 9 148.295 122.1 Tm -0.011 Tc -0.062 Tw [( & D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 164.735 122.1 Tm -0.014 Tc (AMIEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 184.895 122.1 Tm -0.079 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 192.815 122.1 Tm -0.016 Tc (ERADIN)Tj 9 0 0 9 216.095 122.1 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4133 0 TD -0.061 Tw (global antitrust law and economics)Tj /F5 1 Tf 13.4667 0 TD -0.066 Tw [( \(unpublished)]TJ -27.1867 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc -0.061 Tw (manuscript -on file with the authors\).)Tj -2.2 -1.5467 TD -0.007 Tc -0.054 Tw [(6)-7(1)-1207(See D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 117.335 97.26 Tm (OUGLAS)Tj 9 0 0 9 142.535 97.26 Tm -0.008 Tc -0.062 Tw [( E. )-9(R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 159.455 97.26 Tm (OSENTHAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 192.215 97.26 Tm -0.005 Tc [( & )8(P)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 207.455 97.26 Tm (HENDON)Tj 9 0 0 9 233.735 97.26 Tm -0.063 Tc 0 Tw ( N)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 241.775 97.26 Tm -0.01 Tc (ICOLAIDES)Tj 9 0 0 9 274.535 97.26 Tm 0 Tc (,)Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.2533 0 TD -0.006 Tc -0.062 Tw [( Harmonizing Antitrust: the less)]TJ -20.0533 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc -0.036 Tw [(effective way to pr)27(omote international competition)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 20.04 0 TD 0.006 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4533 0 TD -0.005 Tc (in)Tj /F5 1 Tf 0.7867 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.2133 0 TD -0.039 Tw (Global Competition Policy)Tj /F5 1 Tf 10.6933 0 TD 0 Tw (,)Tj -32.1867 -1.2267 TD 0.001 Tc -0.036 Tw (\(ed.\) J. D)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 129.215 75.3 Tm -0.003 Tc [(A)129(VID)]TJ 9 0 0 9 144.215 75.3 Tm -0.05 Tc 0 Tw ( R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 152.015 75.3 Tm -0.001 Tc (ICHARDSON)Tj 9 0 0 9 188.855 75.3 Tm 0 Tc -0.039 Tw [( and E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 211.175 75.3 Tm 0.002 Tc [(D)11(W)116(ARD)]TJ 9 0 0 9 234.215 75.3 Tm 0 Tc [( M. G)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 254.735 75.3 Tm -0.002 Tc (RAHAM)Tj 9 0 0 9 278.255 75.3 Tm 0.001 Tc [(,)11( 1997.)]TJ -22.4133 -1.5333 TD 0 Tc [(62)-1200(E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 102.095 61.5 Tm 0.035 Tc (INER)Tj 9 0 0 9 117.695 61.5 Tm 0.139 Tc 0 Tw ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 127.055 61.5 Tm 0.035 Tc (LHAUGE)Tj 9 0 0 9 154.295 61.5 Tm 0.027 Tc 0.127 Tw [( & D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.535 61.5 Tm 0.038 Tc (AMIEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 197.255 61.5 Tm 0.148 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 207.575 61.5 Tm 0.033 Tc (ERADIN)Tj 9 0 0 9 232.775 61.5 Tm 0.026 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.68 0 TD 0.025 Tc 0.126 Tw (Global antitrust law and economics)Tj /F5 1 Tf 15.6933 0 TD 0.157 Tc 0 Tw ( 2)Tj -31.5333 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc -0.06 Tw (\(unpublished manuscript -on file with the authors\).)Tj ET 76.535 258.54 m 162.935 258.54 l S endstream endobj 65 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 67 0 obj << /Length 6598 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (224)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 12 0 0 12 65.205 555.9 Tm 0 Tc -0.101 Tw [( Deep capture of scholars and deep capture of policymakers seem)]TJ 0 -1.2 TD -0.019 Tc -0.125 Tw (to go hand by hand)Tj 7 0 0 7 147.165 545.46 Tm -0.023 Tc (63)Tj 12 0 0 12 155.685 541.5 Tm -0.011 Tc -0.073 Tw [( and this research is aiming to theoretically show)]TJ -7.54 -1.2 TD 0 Tc -0.125 Tw (how policy and regulation are in an inner tension \227highlighting the)Tj T* -0.061 Tw (findings of structuralism and social and behavioral psychology\227,)Tj T* -0.018 Tc -0.125 Tw (and econometrically why goals of policy are not attained by regulation.)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 129.525 469.74 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 12 0 0 12 135.045 469.74 Tm 0.004 Tc -0.038 Tw (. V)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 149.325 469.74 Tm -0.002 Tc [(OLUNT)69(AR)55(Y)]TJ 12 0 0 12 194.445 469.74 Tm -0.016 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 203.925 469.74 Tm -0.002 Tc [(T)80(ANDARDIZA)98(TION)]TJ 12 0 0 12 277.365 469.74 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 280.125 469.74 Tm -0.007 Tc (OF)Tj 12 0 0 12 290.925 469.74 Tm -0.019 Tc ( M)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 304.365 469.74 Tm 0 Tc (INIMUM)Tj 12 0 0 12 336.885 469.74 Tm -0.017 Tc ( C)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 347.805 469.74 Tm -0.003 Tc [(APIT)68(AL)]TJ 12 0 0 12 253.245 455.7 Tm 0 Tc (R)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 261.285 455.7 Tm (EQUIREMENTS)Tj 12 0 0 12 320.445 455.7 Tm ( )Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 323.805 455.7 Tm 0.002 Tc (IN)Tj 12 0 0 12 332.685 455.7 Tm 0.023 Tc ( B)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 343.965 455.7 Tm -0.003 Tc (ANKING)Tj 12 0 0 12 65.205 427.14 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.104 Tw [( The idea of capital adequacy in banking and financial institutions)]TJ T* 0 Tc -0.095 Tw (law has been grounded in the idea of systemic risk \227credit, market)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0 Tw (and operational risk\227 and public safety)Tj 7 0 0 7 257.685 402.3 Tm -0.006 Tc (64)Tj 12 0 0 12 266.445 398.34 Tm 0.001 Tc (. The idea of minimum)Tj -16.77 -1.2 TD -0.063 Tw (capital requirements and capital adequacy has gained relevancy in)Tj T* -0.1 Tw (the international regulation and international industrial policy with)Tj T* -0.05 Tw (the extension of markets, the partial liberalization of money flows)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.101 Tw (and cross-border operation of financial institutions. This relevancy)Tj T* 0.003 Tw (has struggled with two opposite propositions about the dynamics)Tj T* 0.235 Tw (and process of industrial regulation, this is harmonization or)Tj T* -0.014 Tc (competition.)Tj /F8 1 Tf T* -0.001 Tc -0.004 Tw ( Regulatory competition)Tj /F5 1 Tf 10.4 0 TD 0 Tc -0.005 Tw ( has been an issue in several debates of)Tj -10.4 -1.2 TD -0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw (industries\222 regulation. Fiscal and financial paradises are the product)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.01 Tw [(of such idea and the growth of a few small countries)]TJ 7 0 0 7 317.925 258.3 Tm -0.006 Tc (65)Tj 12 0 0 12 326.685 254.34 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.008 Tw [( and many)]TJ -21.79 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.234 Tw (banking corporations has been its product. )Tj /F8 1 Tf 18.61 0 TD (Harmonization)Tj /F5 1 Tf 6.05 0 TD 0.237 Tw [( of)]TJ -24.66 -1.2 TD -0.005 Tc -0.125 Tw (regulation, on the other hand, competes with the idea of competition,)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.102 Tw (since, according to the authors defending such idea, it leads to a fair)Tj T* -0.049 Tw (and easy flow of capitals and public safety)Tj 7 0 0 7 265.725 200.7 Tm -0.006 Tc (66)Tj 12 0 0 12 274.485 196.74 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj 9 0 0 9 65.205 148.5 Tm (63)Tj /F8 1 Tf 2.2 0 TD -0.033 Tw (Supra notes)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.72 0 TD -0.039 Tw [( 7, 21 and 23 and accompanying text.)]TJ -6.92 -1.5333 TD [(64)-1200(H)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 91.485 134.7 Tm (AL)Tj 9 0 0 9 99.765 134.7 Tm -0.073 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 106.485 134.7 Tm -0.007 Tc (COTT)Tj 9 0 0 9 122.685 134.7 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4267 0 TD -0.005 Tc -0.061 Tw (International Finanace)Tj /F5 1 Tf 9.12 0 TD [( Chapter Seven, 1 )7(\(Forthcomming\) )7(\(On file with)]TJ -13.7333 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.108 Tw (the author\). See )Tj /F8 1 Tf 6.88 0 TD (Jo\343o A. C. Santos,)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.7067 0 TD 0 Tw ( )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.36 0 TD 0.108 Tw (Bank Capital Regulation in Contemporary)Tj -14.9467 -1.2133 TD -0.005 Tc -0.062 Tw (Banking Theory: A Review of the Literature)Tj /F5 1 Tf 16.9867 0 TD (, 10, 2 Financial Markets, Institutions &)Tj -16.9867 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc -0.028 Tw (Instruments 41\240\(May 2001\).)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD -0.001 Tc -0.062 Tw [(65)-1201(As Switzerland, Caiman Islands, Panama, etc.)]TJ 0 -1.5467 TD -0.028 Tc -0.06 Tw [(6)-28(6)-1228(See P C)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 110.685 73.98 Tm -0.037 Tc (OOKE)Tj 9 0 0 9 127.245 73.98 Tm -0.026 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.3867 0 TD -0.028 Tc -0.061 Tw (Capital Bank Adequacy)Tj /F5 1 Tf 8.8 0 TD -0.027 Tc [( \(1991\); T)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 242.925 73.98 Tm -0.041 Tc (HOMAS)Tj 9 0 0 9 264.405 73.98 Tm -0.09 Tc 0 Tw ( H)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 272.085 73.98 Tm -0.04 Tc (ELLMANN)Tj 9 0 0 9 301.125 73.98 Tm -0.026 Tc -0.048 Tw (, K)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 310.965 73.98 Tm -0.04 Tc (EVIN)Tj 9 0 0 9 325.005 73.98 Tm -0.027 Tc -0.061 Tw [( C. M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 343.485 73.98 Tm -0.037 Tc (URDOCK)Tj 9 0 0 9 368.565 73.98 Tm -0.095 Tc 0 Tw ( &)Tj -31.5067 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc (J)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 88.365 63.06 Tm -0.03 Tc (OSEPH)Tj 9 0 0 9 107.325 63.06 Tm -0.017 Tc -0.059 Tw [( E. S)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.685 63.06 Tm -0.029 Tc (TIGLITZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 145.485 63.06 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4 0 TD -0.02 Tc -0.062 Tw (Liberalization,moral hazard in banking, and prudential regulation:)Tj -7.12 -1.2267 TD -0.053 Tw (Are capital requirements enough?)Tj /F5 1 Tf 12.8933 0 TD -0.019 Tc -0.055 Tw [( 90 )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 1.32 0 TD -0.02 Tc (American Economic Review)Tj /F5 1 Tf 10.68 0 TD [( 147, 2000.)]TJ ET 65.205 165.06 m 148.245 165.06 l S endstream endobj 68 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 70 0 obj << /Length 7123 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (225)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 12 0 0 12 76.535 555.9 Tm 0 Tc 0.145 Tw (However, the Bank of International Settlements worried about)Tj 0 -1.2 TD -0.006 Tc -0.125 Tw (cross-national banking supervision, the possibilities of systemic risk)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.102 Tw (and its consequences for the global economy, set up the Committee)Tj T* -0.006 Tc -0.125 Tw (on Banking and Supervisory Practices \(with 10 members\), called the)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.233 Tw (Basel Committee)Tj 7 0 0 7 162.455 502.26 Tm -0.006 Tc (67)Tj 12 0 0 12 171.215 498.3 Tm 0 Tc 0.139 Tw [( on Banking Supervision. The goal of such)]TJ -7.89 -1.2 TD -0.004 Tc -0.125 Tw (committee is to provide a \223forum for regular cooperation on banking)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.12 Tw (supervisory matters\224)Tj 7 0 0 7 174.815 473.46 Tm -0.006 Tc (68)Tj 12 0 0 12 183.575 469.5 Tm 0 Tc -0.071 Tw [( but this forum is more than an advisory and)]TJ -8.92 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc 0.017 Tw (has become in a global regulator and global think tank of capital)Tj T* 0.066 Tw (requirements and capital adequacy. Its members are the Central)Tj T* -0.057 Tw (Banks of the ten richest countries in the World \(G10\))Tj 7 0 0 7 326.375 430.26 Tm -0.006 Tc (69)Tj 12 0 0 12 335.015 426.3 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.033 Tw [( and home-)]TJ -21.54 -1.2 TD 0 Tc -0.092 Tw (base of the world\222s biggest financial institutions.)Tj T* -0.12 Tw [( After describing these approaches, several questions arise. Based)]TJ T* -0.054 Tw (in the global analysis, the metascript of markets is grounded in the)Tj T* -0.027 Tw (idea of freedom and competition. If it is so, why not to maintain a)Tj T* -0.125 Tw (market approach where only those disciplined financial institutions)Tj T* -0.061 Tw (survive? Why, if the consumer is sovereign, there must be just one)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.053 Tw (regulation concerning to capital regulation? In the answer to these)Tj T* 0 Tc 0.236 Tw (questions we can find the inner tensions in the discourse of)Tj T* -0.012 Tc -0.124 Tw (international industrial regulation of Banking)Tj 7 0 0 7 281.255 300.66 Tm -0.023 Tc (70)Tj 12 0 0 12 289.775 296.7 Tm -0.007 Tc -0.073 Tw (. Risk seems to be the)Tj -17.77 -1.2 TD -0.004 Tc -0.125 Tw (main concern of scholars and the industry)Tj 7 0 0 7 266.015 286.26 Tm -0.006 Tc (71)Tj 12 0 0 12 274.775 282.3 Tm -0.003 Tc -0.073 Tw (, but in certain way what)Tj -16.52 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc 0.25 Tw (capital adequacy does is increase concentrations and impede)Tj T* 0.055 Tw (competition. Thus, the highly appreciated freedom in the global)Tj 9 0 0 9 76.535 208.98 Tm 0 Tc -0.052 Tw [(67)-1200( See J)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 116.375 208.98 Tm 0.003 Tc (OHN)Tj 9 0 0 9 130.055 208.98 Tm -0.054 Tw [( D W)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 148.655 208.98 Tm -0.001 Tc (AGSTER)Tj 9 0 0 9 173.135 208.98 Tm 0.003 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4533 0 TD 0 Tc (Impact of the 1988 Basel Accord on international banks)Tj /F5 1 Tf 22.0133 0 TD -0.001 Tc -0.056 Tw (, 51)Tj -31 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc -0.039 Tw [(Journal of Finance 1321-1346, \(1996\). P)27( )11(C)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 248.375 197.94 Tm 0.001 Tc (OOKE)Tj 9 0 0 9 265.895 197.94 Tm 0.006 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4667 0 TD 0 Tc [(Capital Bank )27(Adequacy)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9.4 0 TD -0.001 Tc (, 1991.)Tj -30.9067 -1.5333 TD 0 Tc 0.037 Tw [(68)-1200(About the Basel Committee. )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 13.9867 0 TD 0.039 Tw (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision)Tj /F5 1 Tf 16.7733 0 TD -0.006 Tc (. )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5333 0 TD 0 Tc (Bank Of)Tj -29.0933 -1.2267 TD -0.005 Tc -0.061 Tw (International Settlements)Tj /F5 1 Tf 9.8933 0 TD -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4267 0 TD -0.005 Tc (in)Tj /F5 1 Tf 0.7733 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj ET 0.45 w 237.695 172.2 m 197.735 172.2 l S BT 9 0 0 9 197.735 173.1 Tm -0.005 Tc (http://www)Tj ET 259.655 172.2 m 237.695 172.2 l S BT 9 0 0 9 237.695 173.1 Tm (.bis.or)Tj ET 321.095 172.2 m 259.655 172.2 l S BT 9 0 0 9 259.655 173.1 Tm -0.063 Tw (g/bcbs/index.htm, viewed March 28,)Tj -18.1467 -1.2267 TD 0.001 Tc (2006.)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD 0 Tc 0.045 Tw [(69)-1200(Belgium, Canada, France, Germany)67(, Italy)67(, Japan, Luxembour)13(g, the Netherlands,)]TJ 2.2 -1.2267 TD -0.052 Tw (Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States.)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD 0.005 Tc 0.126 Tw [(70)-1195(Several scholars have found these tensions. See )-8(R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 286.055 123.42 Tm 0.01 Tc (OJAS)Tj 9 0 0 9 301.295 123.42 Tm 0.004 Tc (-S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 309.455 123.42 Tm 0.005 Tc (U\301REZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 330.575 123.42 Tm 0.007 Tc 0.128 Tw (, L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 341.975 123.42 Tm 0.009 Tc (ILIANA)Tj 9 0 0 9 363.935 123.42 Tm 0.005 Tc (, \223Can)Tj -29.7333 -1.2267 TD -0.004 Tc -0.062 Tw (International Capital Standards Strengthen Banks In Emerging Markets?\224, Institute)Tj 0 -1.1867 TD 0 Tc -0.058 Tw [(for International Economics )14(W)77(orking Paper No. 01-10. )54(A)69(vailable at SSRN:)]TJ ET 212.135 87.12 m 96.335 87.12 l S BT 9 0 0 9 96.335 88.02 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.062 Tw [(http://ssrn.com/abstract=300895)-15( or DOI:\240)]TJ ET 318.815 87.12 m 243.695 87.12 l S BT 9 0 0 9 243.695 88.02 Tm (10.2139/ssrn.300895;)Tj -18.5733 -1.5333 TD -0.007 Tc -0.054 Tw [(7)-7(1)-1207(See P)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 115.775 74.22 Tm -0.012 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 132.695 74.22 Tm -0.072 Tc 0 Tw ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 142.175 74.22 Tm -0.011 Tc (ARQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 167.375 74.22 Tm (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4267 0 TD -0.007 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Cost Benefit )7(Analysis, Statistical V)126(alue of Life and Regulation:)]TJ -8.32 -1.2267 TD -0.004 Tc [(Pr)36(ospective Challenges,)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9.5333 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.1867 0 TD -0.003 Tc (Vniversitas)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.4533 0 TD -0.004 Tc -0.062 Tw [( Ciencias Jur\355dicas \(Indexada\), n\260 1)36(13, Bogot\341,)]TJ -14.1733 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc -0.019 Tw (2007 - en prensa.)Tj ET 0.48 w 76.535 226.5 m 154.415 226.5 l S endstream endobj 71 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 74 0 obj << /Length 8518 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (226)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 12 0 0 12 65.205 555.9 Tm 0 Tc -0.102 Tw (money flow discourse is in a constant tension with the regulation of)Tj 0 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.047 Tw (capital adequacy, and many other regulations concerning banking)Tj T* -0.086 Tw (and financial services. The reality that I plan to explore here is why)Tj T* 0.004 Tw (and how the harmonization capital adequacy favors international)Tj T* -0.006 Tc -0.125 Tw (financial institutions minimization of costs, and why there is a strong)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.108 Tw (interest in developing a transnational structure of capital adequacy.)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 160.965 455.34 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 12 0 0 12 166.605 455.34 Tm 0.003 Tc -0.039 Tw (. I)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 176.085 455.34 Tm -0.001 Tc [(NTERNA)113(TIONAL)]TJ 12 0 0 12 240.525 455.34 Tm -0.043 Tc 0 Tw ( I)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 247.005 455.34 Tm 0 Tc (NTELLECTUAL)Tj 12 0 0 12 306.765 455.34 Tm -0.036 Tc ( P)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 316.005 455.34 Tm -0.003 Tc [(ROPER)54(TY)]TJ 12 0 0 12 353.685 455.34 Tm -0.041 Tc ( L)Tj 8.4 0 0 8.4 363.645 455.34 Tm -0.079 Tc (AW)Tj 12 0 0 12 65.205 426.66 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.002 Tw ( For several years regulation of intellectual property has have a)Tj T* -0.019 Tc -0.125 Tw (transnational pattern. The arguments for an international of intellectual)Tj T* -0.005 Tc (property regime do not vary much from the traditional arguments for)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.182 Tw (the protection of intellectual property rights; both rely on the)Tj T* -0.014 Tc -0.125 Tw (advantages of property to incentive free trade and economic growth)Tj 7 0 0 7 365.445 373.14 Tm -0.023 Tc (72)Tj 12 0 0 12 373.965 369.06 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -25.73 -1.2 TD 0.125 Tw (These seem to be the same reasons for every single regime of)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.004 Tw (industrial regulation that we have highlighted. Freedom, markets)Tj T* 0.009 Tc 0.25 Tw (and prosperity \227in the words of wealth, growth or profits)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.107 Tw (maximization\227 are attached as an )Tj /F8 1 Tf 13.57 0 TD 0 Tc (ordoliberal)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.56 0 TD 0.001 Tc [( mentality.)]TJ -18.13 -1.2 TD -0.087 Tw [( )11(In fact, as special as intellectual property is, its main justification)]TJ T* 0 Tc -0.105 Tw (is based in its effect on growth and its supposedly clear incidence in)Tj T* -0.125 Tw (innovative activity)Tj 7 0 0 7 153.405 272.34 Tm -0.006 Tc (73)Tj 12 0 0 12 162.165 268.26 Tm 0 Tc -0.073 Tw (. Indeed, many authors assure that intellectual)Tj 9 0 0 9 66.525 220.86 Tm 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw [(7)11(2)-1202(See G.J. )11(M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 129.645 220.86 Tm 0.015 Tc (OSSINGHOFF)Tj 9 0 0 9 169.485 220.86 Tm 0.004 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.64 0 TD 0.011 Tc 0.126 Tw [(The importance of intellectual pr)38(operty pr)51(otection in)]TJ -9.8667 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0.111 Tw (international trade)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.6933 0 TD [(, 7 B. C. INT)67(. & COM. L. REV)133(.)10(,)0( 235-249 \(1984\), )-15(W)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 354.885 209.82 Tm 0.001 Tc (ILLIAM)Tj 9 0 0 9 86.445 198.9 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (N)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 92.805 198.9 Tm -0.025 Tc (ORDHAUS)Tj 9 0 0 9 122.085 198.9 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4133 0 TD -0.018 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Invention, Gr)49(owth, and W)89(elfar)35(e: a Theor)35(etical T)62(r)38(eatment of T)89(echnological)]TJ -4.3733 -1.2267 TD -0.012 Tc (Change)Tj /F5 1 Tf 3.04 0 TD [( 3-7 \(1969\); Dasgupta, )14(P)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 197.565 187.86 Tm -0.018 Tc (ARTHA)Tj 9 0 0 9 218.685 187.86 Tm -0.013 Tc [( S. and J)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 246.525 187.86 Tm -0.02 Tc (OSEPH)Tj 9 0 0 9 265.845 187.86 Tm -0.013 Tc [( E. S)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 281.445 187.86 Tm -0.02 Tc (TIGLITZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 304.725 187.86 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4267 0 TD -0.013 Tc -0.067 Tw (Industrial Structure)Tj -24.68 -1.2267 TD 0.009 Tc 0.125 Tw [(and the Natur)36(e of Innovative )8(Activity)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 15.7067 0 TD 0.01 Tc (, 90 )Tj /F8 1 Tf 2.0533 0 TD 0.009 Tc 0.122 Tw (Economic Journal)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.6267 0 TD 0.128 Tw (, 266-93 \(1980\),)Tj -25.3867 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 92.445 165.9 Tm 0.001 Tc (EINGANUM)Tj 9 0 0 9 126.765 165.9 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.005 Tw (, J)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 134.685 165.9 Tm 0.001 Tc (ENNIFER)Tj 9 0 0 9 161.325 165.9 Tm -0.004 Tc -0.002 Tw [( F)89(., )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 1.4533 0 TD 0 Tc -0.011 Tw (Innovation and Industry Evolution)Tj /F5 1 Tf 13.7733 0 TD (, 100 Q)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 324.885 165.9 Tm [(UAR)76(TERL)95(Y)]TJ 9 0 0 9 357.405 165.9 Tm [( J. Of)]TJ -30.1067 -1.2267 TD 0.081 Tw (Econ., 81-99 \(1985\); G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 172.365 154.86 Tm (ERALD)Tj 9 0 0 9 193.365 154.86 Tm -0.002 Tc [( J. )-16(M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 213.045 154.86 Tm 0 Tc (OSSINGHOFF)Tj 9 0 0 9 251.925 154.86 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.083 Tw [( and V)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 277.485 154.86 Tm 0.002 Tc (IVIAN)Tj 9 0 0 9 295.245 154.86 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.081 Tw [( S. K)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 314.925 154.86 Tm 0.004 Tc (UO)Tj 9 0 0 9 324.045 154.86 Tm 0 Tc 0.07 Tw [(, W)77(orld )-13(Patent)]TJ -26.4 -1.2267 TD -0.009 Tw [(System Circa 20xx, )53(A.D, 38 IDEA)53( 529 \(1998\); D.M. G)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 284.685 143.82 Tm 0.001 Tc (OULD)Tj 9 0 0 9 302.205 143.82 Tm -0.004 Tc -0.003 Tw [( y)-7( )16(W)100(.C. )-11(G)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 337.725 143.82 Tm 0 Tc (RUBEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 359.085 143.82 Tm 0.004 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4933 0 TD -0.003 Tc (The)Tj -30.7867 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0.019 Tw [(r)42(ole of IPR in economic gr)40(owth)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 12.6533 0 TD 0.018 Tw (, 48 J. Develop. ECON. 323-350. P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 328.605 132.9 Tm -0.002 Tc (ETER)Tj 9 0 0 9 344.325 132.9 Tm 0.017 Tc 0 Tw ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 354.765 132.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (ENELL)Tj 9 0 0 9 374.685 132.9 Tm 0 Tc (,)Tj -32.0267 -1.2267 TD -0.022 Tc -0.062 Tw (Intellectual Property: General Theories, in )Tj /F8 1 Tf 15.8933 0 TD (Encyclopedia Of Law & Economics)Tj /F5 1 Tf 13.4133 0 TD -0.067 Tw [( \(2000\);)]TJ -29.3067 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (K)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 92.805 110.82 Tm -0.016 Tc (EITH)Tj 9 0 0 9 106.725 110.82 Tm -0.013 Tc -0.061 Tw [( E. )-13(M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 125.445 110.82 Tm -0.018 Tc (AKUS)Tj 9 0 0 9 142.125 110.82 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4267 0 TD -0.063 Tw [(Lessons Fr)42(om Studying the International Economics of Intellectual)]TJ -6.6133 -1.2133 TD 0 Tc 0.001 Tw [(Pr)40(operty Rights)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 6.32 0 TD 0.001 Tc 0.003 Tw (, 53 )Tj /F8 1 Tf 1.76 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(V)118(and. L. Rev)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 5.0533 0 TD 0.002 Tw (. 2219-2239 \(2000\); S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 284.205 99.9 Tm (AKAKIBARA)Tj 9 0 0 9 322.005 99.9 Tm 0.003 Tc 0 Tw ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 332.325 99.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (ARIKO)Tj 9 0 0 9 352.245 99.9 Tm 0.003 Tw ( & L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 369.285 99.9 Tm -0.003 Tc (EE)Tj 9 0 0 9 86.445 88.86 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 92.445 88.86 Tm -0.001 Tc (RANSTETTER)Tj 9 0 0 9 132.645 88.86 Tm 0.004 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.56 0 TD 0 Tc 0.06 Tw [(Do Str)27(onger Patents Induce Mor)40(e Innovation? Evidence fr)53(om the)]TJ -5.6933 -1.2267 TD -0.013 Tw (1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms)Tj /F5 1 Tf 14.3333 0 TD (, 32 Rand J. OF ECON. 77, 2001.)Tj -16.5467 -1.5333 TD -0.015 Tc -0.073 Tw [(7)-15(3)-1228(See P)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 105.405 64.02 Tm -0.025 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 121.845 64.02 Tm -0.072 Tc 0 Tw ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 131.205 64.02 Tm -0.026 Tc (ARQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 155.805 64.02 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4 0 TD -0.018 Tc -0.063 Tw [(Critical )22(Analysis of the Justification and Economic Foundations)]TJ -8.1067 -1.2267 TD -0.01 Tc [(of the Intellectual Pr)43(oper)-10(ty Rights System. Revista Der)43(echo y Sociedad)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 27.0933 0 TD -0.067 Tw (, Universidad)Tj ET 65.205 239.34 m 139.485 239.34 l S endstream endobj 75 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 77 0 obj << /Length 12515 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (227)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 12 0 0 12 76.535 555.9 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.148 Tw (property enforcement leads to higher product and productivity)Tj 0 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.144 Tw (growth, higher foreign direct investment rates and many other)Tj T* -0.011 Tc (advantages)Tj 7 0 0 7 128.495 531.06 Tm -0.023 Tc (74)Tj 12 0 0 12 137.015 527.1 Tm -0.007 Tc -0.073 Tw (. On the other hand, theoretical and empirical studies)Tj 7 0 0 7 379.655 531.06 Tm -0.023 Tc (75)Tj 12 0 0 12 76.535 512.7 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.083 Tw (have proven that, not in every case, enforcement of intellectual)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.063 Tw (property rights leads to growth or higher foreign direct investment)Tj T* -0.042 Tc (rates)Tj 7 0 0 7 96.575 487.86 Tm -0.04 Tc (76)Tj 12 0 0 12 104.735 483.9 Tm -0.025 Tc -0.072 Tw [( and on the opposite, internationally, they increase the likelihood)]TJ -2.35 -1.2 TD 0 Tc -0.03 Tw (to innovate and, following their own assumptions, to growth)Tj 7 0 0 7 363.815 473.46 Tm -0.006 Tc (77)Tj 12 0 0 12 372.575 469.5 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.021 Tw (. In)Tj -24.67 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc 0.169 Tw (addition, the mere fact that intellectual property is based in a)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.033 Tw (monopolistic privileges structure makes its effects differ from the)Tj T* 0.085 Tw (effects derived from the structure of property based in physical)Tj T* -0.079 Tw (appropriation of goods)Tj 7 0 0 7 184.055 415.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (78)Tj 12 0 0 12 192.815 411.9 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -9.69 -1.2 TD 0.001 Tc -0.089 Tw [( In any case, the debate over the convenience or inconvenience of)]TJ T* -0.012 Tc -0.125 Tw (international intellectual property regimes is over, since almost all the)Tj 9 0 0 9 96.335 331.14 Tm -0.026 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Cat\363lica del Per\372. Lima, Per\372, n\260 25, 2005; )-13(E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 244.535 331.14 Tm -0.036 Tc [(D)-8(W)116(ARD)]TJ 9 0 0 9 266.495 331.14 Tm -0.027 Tc [( C. H)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.415 331.14 Tm -0.037 Tc (ETTINGER)Tj 9 0 0 9 312.335 331.14 Tm -0.026 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.3867 0 TD -0.067 Tw (Justifying Intellectual)Tj -24.3867 -1.2267 TD [(Pr)41(operty)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 3.3067 0 TD -0.062 Tw (, P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 134.375 320.1 Tm -0.033 Tc (HIL)Tj 9 0 0 9 144.215 320.1 Tm -0.027 Tc (. & P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 160.655 320.1 Tm -0.037 Tc (UB)Tj 9 0 0 9 168.935 320.1 Tm -0.026 Tc -0.128 Tw (. A)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 178.175 320.1 Tm (FF)Tj 9 0 0 9 184.655 320.1 Tm -0.025 Tc -0.065 Tw (. \(1989\); L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 219.575 320.1 Tm -0.037 Tc [(A)75(WRENCE)]TJ 9 0 0 9 248.615 320.1 Tm -0.027 Tc -0.061 Tw [( C. B)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 265.055 320.1 Tm -0.034 Tc (ECKER)Tj /F8 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 284.495 320.1 Tm -0.027 Tc (, Deserving to Own Intellectual)Tj -20.9067 -1.2133 TD -0.001 Tc [(Pr)39(opert)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 3.0533 0 TD 0 Tc [(y)73(,)0( 68 )13(C)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 148.175 309.18 Tm -0.007 Tc (HI)Tj 9 0 0 9 154.775 309.18 Tm 0.004 Tc (.-)Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5733 0 TD -0.003 Tc (Kent. L. Rev)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.7867 0 TD -0.06 Tw [(.)7( 609 \(1993\); E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 255.455 309.18 Tm (JAN)Tj 9 0 0 9 266.975 309.18 Tm -0.072 Tc 0 Tw ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 276.575 309.18 Tm -0.003 Tc [(ACKAA)111(Y)]TJ 9 0 0 9 302.735 309.18 Tm 0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4267 0 TD -0.003 Tc -0.064 Tw (Economic incentives in)Tj -23.36 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc -0.034 Tw (markets for information and innovation)Tj /F5 1 Tf 15.7067 0 TD -0.001 Tc -0.032 Tw (, 13 H)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 259.295 298.14 Tm 0.001 Tc [(AR)77(V)]TJ 9 0 0 9 272.135 298.14 Tm 0 Tc -0.034 Tw (. J. L. & P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 307.655 298.14 Tm 0.001 Tc (UB)Tj 9 0 0 9 316.415 298.14 Tm 0.003 Tc (. P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 325.535 298.14 Tm 0 Tc (OL)Tj 9 0 0 9 333.935 298.14 Tm 0 Tw (\222)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 336.935 298.14 Tm (Y)Tj 9 0 0 9 341.495 298.14 Tm -0.036 Tw [( 867, 1990.)]TJ -29.44 -1.5333 TD 0.001 Tc [(74)-1199(See )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.8933 0 TD 0 Tc (supra)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.28 0 TD -0.011 Tw [( note 72.)]TJ -6.1733 -1.5467 TD [(75)-1200(P)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 101.375 270.42 Tm 0.001 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 118.535 270.42 Tm 0.061 Tc 0 Tw ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 129.335 270.42 Tm 0 Tc (ARQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 154.895 270.42 Tm 0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5733 0 TD 0 Tc 0.071 Tw [(V)64(iolaci\363n a los der)40(echos de pr)53(opiedad intelectual: un enfoque)]TJ -7.08 -1.2133 TD 0.02 Tc 0.125 Tw (alternativo aplicado a la pirater\355a de software)Tj /F5 1 Tf 20.2933 0 TD (, colecci\363n: Investigaciones,)Tj -20.2933 -1.2267 TD 0 Tc -0.022 Tw [(JA)120(VEGRAF)80(, Bogot\341, 2004.)]TJ -2.2 -1.5333 TD [(76)-1200(T)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 101.855 234.66 Tm 0.008 Tc (OM)Tj 9 0 0 9 112.055 234.66 Tm 0.057 Tc 0 Tw ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 119.855 234.66 Tm 0.001 Tc (ALMER)Tj 9 0 0 9 141.935 234.66 Tm (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5733 0 TD 0 Tc 0.071 Tw [(Ar)40(e Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of)]TJ -5.64 -1.2267 TD -0.001 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Pr)39(operty Rights and Ideal Objects,)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 13.64 0 TD -0.004 Tc [( 13 H)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 237.815 223.62 Tm -0.018 Tc [(AR)39(V)]TJ 9 0 0 9 250.655 223.62 Tm -0.002 Tc (. J. L. & P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 284.975 223.62 Tm 0.001 Tc (UB)Tj 9 0 0 9 293.615 223.62 Tm 0.003 Tc (. P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 302.615 223.62 Tm 0 Tc (OL)Tj 9 0 0 9 311.015 223.62 Tm 0 Tw (\222)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 314.015 223.62 Tm (Y)Tj 9 0 0 9 318.455 223.62 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.063 Tw (. 817 \(1990\); F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 370.535 223.62 Tm -0.005 Tc (RANK)Tj 9 0 0 9 96.335 212.58 Tm -0.004 Tc -0.061 Tw (H. E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 112.175 212.58 Tm -0.006 Tc (ASTERBROOK)Tj 9 0 0 9 153.695 212.58 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4267 0 TD -0.006 Tc [(Intellectual Pr)34(oper)7(ty Is Still Pr)34(oper)-6(ty)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 14.4533 0 TD -0.06 Tw (, 13 H)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 308.495 212.58 Tm -0.018 Tc [(AR)58(V)]TJ 9 0 0 9 321.095 212.58 Tm -0.006 Tc -0.062 Tw (. J. L. & P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 355.055 212.58 Tm -0.018 Tc (UB)Tj 9 0 0 9 363.695 212.58 Tm -0.004 Tc (. P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 372.575 212.58 Tm 0 Tc (OL)Tj 9 0 0 9 380.855 212.58 Tm 0 Tw (\222)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 383.735 212.58 Tm (Y)Tj 9 0 0 9 96.335 201.66 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.022 Tw [(108 \(1990\); )-14(E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 146.015 201.66 Tm (DMUND)Tj 9 0 0 9 169.775 201.66 Tm -0.023 Tc 0 Tw ( K)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 178.295 201.66 Tm -0.003 Tc (ITCH)Tj /F8 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 193.055 201.66 Tm 0 Tc -0.022 Tw [(, T)93(aking Stock: The Law and Economics of Intellectual)]TJ -10.7467 -1.2267 TD 0.064 Tw [(Pr)40(oper)-13(ty Rights: Elementary and Persistent Err)42(ors in the Economic )13(Analysis of)]TJ T* -0.039 Tw [(Intellectual Pr)27(operty)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 8.2933 0 TD 0.001 Tc -0.044 Tw [(, 53 )15(V)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 192.335 179.58 Tm 0.003 Tc (AND)Tj 9 0 0 9 206.015 179.58 Tm 0 Tc (. L. R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 225.695 179.58 Tm (EV)Tj 9 0 0 9 234.095 179.58 Tm -0.043 Tw (. 1727 \(2000\); S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 291.455 179.58 Tm 0.001 Tc [(HA)134(VELL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 315.815 179.58 Tm -0.046 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.775 179.58 Tm 0 Tc (TEVEN)Tj 9 0 0 9 343.415 179.58 Tm -0.044 Tw [( and T)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 365.615 179.58 Tm 0.002 Tc (ANGUY)Tj -42.7429 -1.7333 TD -0.112 Tc [(VA)-116(N)]TJ 9 0 0 9 109.175 168.66 Tm -0.063 Tc 0 Tw ( Y)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 117.335 168.66 Tm 0.001 Tc (PERSELE)Tj 9 0 0 9 143.975 168.66 Tm 0 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4667 0 TD -0.03 Tw [(Rewar)40(ds versus Rights)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9.0133 0 TD [(, 44 )14(J. L. & E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 276.335 168.66 Tm 0.002 Tc (CON)Tj 9 0 0 9 289.655 168.66 Tm 0 Tc -0.017 Tw [(, 525-547, )16(2001.)]TJ -23.68 -1.5467 TD [(77)-1200(M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 104.375 154.74 Tm -0.002 Tc (ICHAEL)Tj 9 0 0 9 127.415 154.74 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.064 Tw [( A. )-50(H)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 146.495 154.74 Tm -0.002 Tc (ELLER)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.055 154.74 Tm 0.002 Tc -0.015 Tw [( & R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 183.335 154.74 Tm 0 Tc (EBECCA)Tj 9 0 0 9 208.175 154.74 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.014 Tw [( S. E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 225.215 154.74 Tm (ISENBERG)Tj 9 0 0 9 255.935 154.74 Tm 0.004 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4933 0 TD 0 Tc -0.015 Tw (Can Patents Deter Innovation? The)Tj -18.2267 -1.2267 TD -0.012 Tc -0.061 Tw (Anticommons in Biomedical Research, )Tj /F5 1 Tf 15.08 0 TD -0.013 Tc [(280 Science 698 \(1998\); S)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.535 143.7 Tm -0.019 Tc (AKAKIBARA)Tj 9 0 0 9 359.375 143.7 Tm -0.072 Tc 0 Tw ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 368.855 143.7 Tm -0.02 Tc (ARIKO)Tj 9 0 0 9 96.335 132.78 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.057 Tw (& L)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 110.615 132.78 Tm -0.003 Tc (EE)Tj 9 0 0 9 118.295 132.78 Tm -0.063 Tc 0 Tw ( B)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 125.975 132.78 Tm -0.001 Tc (RANSTETTER)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.295 132.78 Tm 0 Tc -0.058 Tw (, Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from)Tj -7.7733 -1.2267 TD -0.005 Tw (the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms, 32 RAND J. OF ECON. 77, 2001.)Tj -2.2 -1.5333 TD 0.001 Tc -0.045 Tw [(78)-1199(See R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 117.215 107.94 Tm (UTH)Tj 9 0 0 9 130.175 107.94 Tm -0.052 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 138.455 107.94 Tm 0.003 Tc (ANA)Tj 9 0 0 9 152.135 107.94 Tm -0.002 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4533 0 TD 0 Tc -0.049 Tw [(Has Cr)40(eativity Died in the Thir)40(d W)80(orld? Some Implications of the)]TJ -6.6533 -1.2267 TD 0.063 Tw [(Internationalization of Intellectual Pr)27(operty)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 17.7867 0 TD -0.001 Tc 0.067 Tw [(, 24 )-14(D)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 279.935 96.9 Tm 0.001 Tc (ENV)Tj 9 0 0 9 292.895 96.9 Tm 0 Tc 0.065 Tw (. K. I)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 312.575 96.9 Tm (NT)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.975 96.9 Tm 0 Tw (\222)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 323.975 96.9 Tm (L)Tj 9 0 0 9 327.815 96.9 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.065 Tw [( L. & P)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 356.015 96.9 Tm 0 Tc (OL)Tj 9 0 0 9 364.415 96.9 Tm 0 Tw (\222)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 367.415 96.9 Tm (Y)Tj 9 0 0 9 371.975 96.9 Tm -0.003 Tc 0.073 Tw [( 109)]TJ -30.6267 -1.2267 TD -0.011 Tc -0.063 Tw (\(1995\); M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 131.615 85.86 Tm -0.017 Tc (ICHAEL)Tj 9 0 0 9 154.175 85.86 Tm -0.014 Tc -0.116 Tw [( A. )-56(H)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 171.695 85.86 Tm -0.016 Tc (ELLER)Tj 9 0 0 9 190.775 85.86 Tm -0.011 Tc -0.062 Tw [( & R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 206.735 85.86 Tm -0.019 Tc (EBECCA)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.975 85.86 Tm -0.012 Tc [( S. E)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 246.575 85.86 Tm -0.018 Tc (ISENBERG)Tj 9 0 0 9 276.575 85.86 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4133 0 TD (Can Patents Deter Innovation?)Tj -20.44 -1.2133 TD -0.016 Tc (The Anticommons in Biomedical Research)Tj /F5 1 Tf 16.1467 0 TD -0.018 Tc -0.075 Tw [(,)-11( 280 )-14(S)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 264.695 74.94 Tm -0.021 Tc (CIENCE)Tj 9 0 0 9 286.655 74.94 Tm -0.017 Tc -0.058 Tw [( 698 )13(\(1998\); R)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 335.615 74.94 Tm -0.024 Tc (OBERT)Tj 9 0 0 9 355.535 74.94 Tm -0.077 Tc 0 Tw ( F)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 361.895 74.94 Tm -0.024 Tc (EINBERG)Tj 9 0 0 9 96.335 63.9 Tm -0.022 Tc -0.052 Tw (y D)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 108.575 63.9 Tm -0.032 Tc (ONALD)Tj 9 0 0 9 129.575 63.9 Tm -0.077 Tc 0 Tw ( R)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 136.895 63.9 Tm -0.031 Tc (OUSSIANG)Tj 9 0 0 9 167.255 63.9 Tm 0 Tc (,)Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.2267 0 TD -0.022 Tc -0.062 Tw [( The economic effects of intellectual pr)45(oper)5(ty right infringements)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 24.08 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -32.1867 -1.2267 TD 0.011 Tw (63, 1 J. Business, 79, 1990.)Tj ET 76.535 347.46 m 388.295 347.46 l S endstream endobj 78 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 80 0 obj << /Length 5244 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (228)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 12 0 0 12 65.205 555.9 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw (states have subscribed the multilateral treaties)Tj 7 0 0 7 278.325 559.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (79)Tj 12 0 0 12 287.085 555.9 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.073 Tw [( that oblige them to)]TJ -18.49 -1.2 TD -0.001 Tc -0.125 Tw (comply and harmonize their intellectual property legislation. And it)Tj T* 0 Tc (is not a surprise that such regime follows the structure established in)Tj T* -0.012 Tc (the group of countries that have an intensive production of intellectual)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.116 Tw (property. Why this harmonization was required? Some assert that it)Tj T* -0.004 Tc -0.124 Tw (makes easier trade and technology transfers)Tj 7 0 0 7 265.365 487.86 Tm -0.006 Tc (80)Tj 12 0 0 12 274.005 483.9 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.074 Tw [( but, why is there such)]TJ -17.4 -1.2 TD -0.009 Tc -0.125 Tw (a strong interest, \227shared interest\227, of international corporations to)Tj T* -0.001 Tc (harmonize legal regimes? Why such industrial regime should be the)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.031 Tw (one already defined in countries as the UK and the US?)Tj 13 0 0 13 94.965 411.06 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.011 Tw [(IV)128(. C)]TJ 9.1 0 0 9.1 121.965 411.06 Tm -0.002 Tc (ONCLUSION)Tj 13 0 0 13 174.405 411.06 Tm -0.007 Tc (: )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 181.125 411.06 Tm -0.001 Tc (DISCURSIVE)Tj 13 0 0 13 234.525 411.06 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 237.645 411.06 Tm -0.002 Tc [(CORRELA)104(TIONS)]TJ 13 0 0 13 305.805 411.06 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 308.805 411.06 Tm -0.002 Tc (AND)Tj 13 0 0 13 328.485 411.06 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 331.605 411.06 Tm -0.002 Tc (EVIDENCE)Tj 12 0 0 12 65.205 381.9 Tm 0 Tc 0.13 Tw (We hope we have exposed why there is sufficient evidence to)Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.012 Tw (assume that it is possible to talk about an international regime of)Tj T* -0.032 Tw (industrial regulation. The architecture of such regime could make)Tj T* -0.084 Tw (capture of international regulators easier and the increasing idea of)Tj T* -0.002 Tc -0.125 Tw (a global legal harmonization plays a key role in the escalating size of)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.056 Tw (corporations in the whole world.)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.12 Tw [( What make interesting and evident the problems and ideas we just)]TJ T* 0.038 Tw (highlighted is the theoretical tensions that freedom, markets and)Tj T* -0.094 Tw (regulation have. The inner contradictions in the different industrial)Tj T* 0.04 Tw (regimes lead to just one final effect, higher concentrations. Two)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.113 Tw (questions arise here: is harmonization of a shared industrial interest)Tj T* -0.077 Tw (that leads to prosperity - wealth and growth? Or is harmonization a)Tj T* -0.067 Tw (way to reduce the costs of concentration and market power? In our)Tj T* 0.001 Tc -0.056 Tw (perspective, legal harmonization is set as a mechanism to increase)Tj T* -0.007 Tc -0.125 Tw (freedom, smooth international trade and control market power but its)Tj T* -0.019 Tc (result is simply more and easier mechanism to industry concentrations.)Tj /F8 1 Tf T* 0 Tc 0.114 Tw (Convergence of antitrust laws increase industry concentration)Tj /F5 1 Tf 25.7 0 TD 0 Tw (;)Tj 9 0 0 9 65.205 101.46 Tm -0.023 Tc -0.062 Tw [(7)-23(9)-1223( )45(About the insignificance of international treaties on IPR violation )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 26.64 0 TD -0.026 Tc (see:)Tj /F5 1 Tf 1.52 0 TD -0.09 Tc 0 Tw ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 324.885 101.46 Tm -0.037 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 341.205 101.46 Tm -0.086 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 350.445 101.46 Tm -0.034 Tc (ARQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 374.685 101.46 Tm 0 Tc (,)Tj /F8 1 Tf -32.1867 -1.2133 TD -0.005 Tw [(T)49(ratados Multilaterales y la Pr)40(otecci\363n a los Der)40(echos de Pr)40(opiedad Intelectual:)]TJ 0 -1.2267 TD -0.057 Tw [(Evidencia entr)40(e Pa\355ses)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9.0133 0 TD -0.004 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.44 0 TD 0 Tc -0.061 Tw (International Law)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.2 0 TD -0.059 Tw [( \(indexada\), n\260 5, Bogot\341, 2004.)]TJ -18.8533 -1.5333 TD -0.013 Tc -0.061 Tw [(8)-13(0)-1213(G.J. M)]TJ 6.3 0 0 6.3 108.525 65.7 Tm -0.019 Tc (OSSINGHOFF)Tj 9 0 0 9 146.205 65.7 Tm -0.012 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4133 0 TD -0.013 Tc -0.063 Tw [(The impor)14(tance of intellectual pr)40(operty pr)40(otection in international)]TJ -7.2133 -1.2267 TD -0.001 Tc (trade)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.12 0 TD 0 Tc -0.007 Tw [(, 7 )12(B. C. INT)67(. & COM. L. REV)133(., 235-249, 1984.)]TJ ET 65.205 130.14 m 148.725 130.14 l S endstream endobj 81 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 83 0 obj << /Length 8953 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (229)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT /F8 1 Tf 12 0 0 12 76.535 555.9 Tm 0 Tc 0.133 Tw (capital adequacy of financial institutions beget greater market)Tj 0 -1.2 TD -0.006 Tc (concentrations)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.86 0 TD -0.003 Tc (; )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.39 0 TD -0.006 Tc -0.125 Tw (the whole idea intellectual property as a mechanism)Tj -6.25 -1.2 TD 0 Tc -0.076 Tw (to promote growth, cause concentrations)Tj /F5 1 Tf 16.12 0 TD 0.001 Tc -0.077 Tw (; In addition, the idea of a)Tj -16.12 -1.2 TD -0.005 Tc -0.125 Tw (global corporate governance, increases the likelihood to concentrate)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.04 Tw (and maintain the global structure of corporations. We could go on)Tj T* 0.068 Tw (and on reviewing literature and market effects to show how the)Tj T* -0.007 Tc -0.125 Tw (contradiction of freedom, markets and regulations are just a chimera,)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.09 Tw (where the law produced by the State, or a league of States, is just an)Tj T* 0.215 Tw (illusion and the knowledge structures behind them are just a)Tj T* -0.005 Tc -0.125 Tw (normalization technology.)Tj 13 0 0 13 317.855 396.66 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 326.495 396.66 Tm 0.001 Tc (IBLIOGRAPHY)Tj 11 0 0 11 76.535 368.34 Tm 0 Tc (A)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 84.815 368.34 Tm 0.051 Tc [(CHAR)51(Y)118(A)]TJ 11 0 0 11 118.295 368.34 Tm 0.032 Tc 0.113 Tw (, V)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 134.015 368.34 Tm 0.048 Tc (IRAL)Tj 11 0 0 11 153.455 368.34 Tm 0.034 Tc 0.126 Tw [( )17(V)123(., Is the International Conver)23(gence of Capital)]TJ -5.7055 -1.2 TD 0.002 Tc 0.125 Tw [(adequacy Regulation Desirable? L)100(VIII )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 16.2545 0 TD (J. of Finance)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.5309 0 TD [( 2745, 2003.)]TJ -23.0727 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.855 339.06 Tm 0.003 Tc (ARFIELD)Tj 11 0 0 11 116.615 339.06 Tm 0.119 Tc ( C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 128.015 339.06 Tm 0.002 Tc (LAUDE)Tj 11 0 0 11 154.175 339.06 Tm 0.127 Tw [( E., )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 1.8764 0 TD 0.125 Tw (International financial markets: harmonization)Tj -7.6473 -1.2 TD 0.01 Tc 0.123 Tw (versus competition)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.8327 0 TD 0.011 Tc 0.127 Tw [(,)6( )54(AEI Press, 1996.)]TJ -9.12 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.975 309.78 Tm 0.008 Tc (ASEDOW)Tj 11 0 0 11 117.215 309.78 Tm 0.007 Tc 0.123 Tw (, J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 128.615 309.78 Tm 0.008 Tc (\334RGEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 155.495 309.78 Tm 0.005 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6436 0 TD 0.007 Tc 0.126 Tw [(Limits and contr)40(ol of competition with a view to)]TJ -6.5345 -1.2 TD 0.017 Tc 0.123 Tw (international harmonization)Tj /F5 1 Tf 11.9018 0 TD 0.018 Tc 0.127 Tw (, The Hague, 2002.)Tj -13.1891 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.975 280.5 Tm 0.007 Tc [(AUMGAR)54(TNER)]TJ 11 0 0 11 138.335 280.5 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.109 Tw [(, T)67(.)-7( )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 1.7891 0 TD 0.005 Tc 0.123 Tw (et al.)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.16 0 TD 0.126 Tw [(, Relational Control: )16(The Human Structuring)]TJ -8.28 -1.2 TD 0.015 Tc 0.125 Tw (of Cooperation and Conflict, 19 )Tj /F8 1 Tf 14.1055 0 TD 0.126 Tw (Journal of Conflict Resolution)Tj /F5 1 Tf -14.1055 -1.2 TD 0.031 Tc 0.127 Tw (417-440, 1975.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 84.095 238.14 Tm 0.033 Tc (ERKOWITZ)Tj 11 0 0 11 126.455 238.14 Tm 0.02 Tc 0.123 Tw (, D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 142.055 238.14 Tm 0.033 Tc (ANIEL)Tj 11 0 0 11 166.415 238.14 Tm 0.027 Tc (, K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 182.015 238.14 Tm 0.035 Tc [(A)102(THARINA)]TJ 11 0 0 11 223.415 238.14 Tm 0.154 Tc 0 Tw ( P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 234.215 238.14 Tm 0.037 Tc [(IST)21(O)-8(R)]TJ 11 0 0 11 257.615 238.14 Tm 0.025 Tc 0.127 Tw [( & )-8(J)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 279.815 238.14 Tm 0.032 Tc (EAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 296.495 238.14 Tm 0.016 Tc (-F)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 306.695 238.14 Tm 0.035 Tc (RAN\307OIS)Tj 11 0 0 11 342.455 238.14 Tm 0.143 Tc 0 Tw ( R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 354.455 238.14 Tm 0.034 Tc (ICHARD)Tj 11 0 0 11 385.535 238.14 Tm 0 Tc (,)Tj -26.8036 -1.2 TD 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Economic Development, Legality)66(, and the )22(T)44(ransplant Ef)22(fect, 47)]TJ /F8 1 Tf T* 0.007 Tc [(Eur)116(. Econ. Rev)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 6.2945 0 TD 0.008 Tc (. 165, 2003.)Tj -7.5818 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.855 195.66 Tm -0.003 Tc [(HAGW)106(A)111(T)6(I)]TJ 11 0 0 11 118.895 195.66 Tm 0.003 Tc 0.109 Tw (, J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 129.815 195.66 Tm -0.001 Tc (AGDISH)Tj 11 0 0 11 158.975 195.66 Tm 0.002 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.112 Tw (In Defense of Globalization)Tj /F5 1 Tf 11.4218 0 TD -0.001 Tc [(, OUP)97(, 2005.)]TJ -19.5164 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.975 179.58 Tm 0.009 Tc (HALA)Tj 11 0 0 11 105.695 179.58 Tm 0.01 Tc 0.122 Tw (, R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 120.095 179.58 Tm 0.011 Tc (AJ)Tj 11 0 0 11 128.855 179.58 Tm 0.005 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6436 0 TD 0.008 Tc 0.127 Tw [(International T)63(rade Law: Theor)-14(y and Practice)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 19.6364 0 TD 0.009 Tc (, 2)Tj 6.4 0 0 6.4 364.655 183.3 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (d)Tj 11 0 0 11 367.895 179.58 Tm 0.008 Tc 0.128 Tw [( ed.,)]TJ -25.2 -1.2 TD 0.051 Tc (2001.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.855 150.3 Tm 0.001 Tc (OTERO)Tj 11 0 0 11 109.535 150.3 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.036 Tw (, J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 118.895 150.3 Tm 0 Tc (UAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 135.575 150.3 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.04 Tw (, S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 146.735 150.3 Tm (IMEON)Tj 11 0 0 11 171.935 150.3 Tm -0.043 Tc 0 Tw ( D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 182.135 150.3 Tm -0.002 Tc (JANKOV)Tj 11 0 0 11 212.975 150.3 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.04 Tw (, R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 225.335 150.3 Tm 0.001 Tc [(AF)79(AEL)]TJ 11 0 0 11 249.575 150.3 Tm -0.032 Tc 0 Tw ( L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 258.575 150.3 Tm 0 Tc (A)Tj 11 0 0 11 264.215 150.3 Tm -0.043 Tc ( P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 272.615 150.3 Tm -0.002 Tc [(OR)60(T)79(A)]TJ 11 0 0 11 292.415 150.3 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.029 Tw (, F)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 303.575 150.3 Tm (LORENCIO)Tj 11 0 0 11 342.575 150.3 Tm -0.043 Tc 0 Tw ( L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 351.575 150.3 Tm -0.002 Tc (\323PEZ)Tj 11 0 0 11 370.775 150.3 Tm 0 Tc (-)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 374.375 150.3 Tm -0.008 Tc (DE)Tj 11 0 0 11 384.695 150.3 Tm 0 Tc (-)Tj -26.7273 -1.2 TD (S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 96.815 137.1 Tm -0.003 Tc (ILANES)Tj 11 0 0 11 124.055 137.1 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.062 Tw [( & )11(A)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 144.575 137.1 Tm -0.004 Tc (NDREI)Tj 11 0 0 11 167.975 137.1 Tm -0.065 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 176.135 137.1 Tm -0.005 Tc (HLEIFER)Tj 11 0 0 11 207.575 137.1 Tm (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4364 0 TD -0.002 Tc -0.062 Tw (The Regulation of Labor)Tj /F5 1 Tf 9.6327 0 TD [(, working paper)42(,)]TJ -20.6945 -1.2 TD 0.051 Tc (2004.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.855 107.94 Tm -0.002 Tc (OWMAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 114.575 107.94 Tm 0.004 Tc 0.038 Tw (, W)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 131.015 107.94 Tm -0.004 Tc (ARD)Tj 11 0 0 11 147.215 107.94 Tm 0 Tc 0.068 Tw [( S., )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 1.6909 0 TD [(Patent and )11(Antitrust Law: )22(A)22( Legal and Economic)]TJ -6.8291 -1.2 TD 0.022 Tc (Appraisal,)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.4182 0 TD 0.127 Tw [( 1973.)]TJ -5.7055 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 84.335 78.66 Tm 0.067 Tc [(RAITHW)98(AITE)]TJ 11 0 0 11 137.015 78.66 Tm 0.045 Tc 0.123 Tw (, J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 149.735 78.66 Tm 0.062 Tc (OHN)Tj 11 0 0 11 167.975 78.66 Tm 0.049 Tc (, P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 182.495 78.66 Tm 0.071 Tc (ETER)Tj 11 0 0 11 203.855 78.66 Tm 0.165 Tc 0 Tw ( D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 216.935 78.66 Tm 0.068 Tc (RAHOS)Tj 11 0 0 11 245.615 78.66 Tm 0.049 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.7309 0 TD 0.048 Tc 0.127 Tw [(Global business r)37(egulation)]TJ -14.8145 -1.2 TD 0.024 Tc (Cambridge)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.7127 0 TD 0.125 Tw [(, Cambridge University Press, UK, New )35(Y)102(ork, NY)122(,)]TJ -4.7127 -1.2 TD 0.018 Tc 0.127 Tw (USA, 2000.)Tj ET endstream endobj 84 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 86 0 obj << /Length 10213 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (230)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 11 0 0 11 65.205 556.74 Tm 0 Tc (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 72.885 556.74 Tm 0.043 Tc (RODLEY)Tj 11 0 0 11 106.125 556.74 Tm 0.029 Tc 0.122 Tw (, J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 118.245 556.74 Tm 0.042 Tc (OSEPH)Tj 11 0 0 11 144.285 556.74 Tm 0.03 Tc 0.125 Tw [( F)85(., )7(The economic goals of antitrust: ef)8(ficiency)74(,)]TJ -5.9018 -1.2 TD 0.013 Tc (consumer welfare, and technological progress, 62 )Tj /F8 1 Tf 21.4909 0 TD [(NYU L. Rev)78(.)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 5.3127 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -26.8036 -1.2 TD 0.033 Tc 0.127 Tw (1020-1053, 1987.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 72.525 514.26 Tm -0.003 Tc (RONCKERS)Tj 11 0 0 11 113.445 514.26 Tm 0 Tc -0.059 Tw (, M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 128.085 514.26 Tm -0.001 Tc (ARCO)Tj 11 0 0 11 149.445 514.26 Tm -0.063 Tw [( and R)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 176.685 514.26 Tm -0.003 Tc (EINJARD)Tj 11 0 0 11 208.605 514.26 Tm -0.065 Tc 0 Tw ( Q)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 218.565 514.26 Tm -0.004 Tc (UICK)Tj 11 0 0 11 237.285 514.26 Tm -0.005 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4364 0 TD -0.001 Tc -0.063 Tw [(New dir)43(ections in international)]TJ -14.7927 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.123 Tw (economic law: essays in honour of J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 247.725 501.06 Tm -0.004 Tc (OHN)Tj 11 0 0 11 263.925 501.06 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.124 Tw [( H. J)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 287.805 501.06 Tm 0 Tc (ACKSON)Tj /F5 1 Tf 11 0 0 11 317.325 501.06 Tm 0.001 Tc (, The Hague,)Tj -21.6327 -1.2 TD 0.051 Tc (2000.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 72.525 471.78 Tm -0.004 Tc (RUGHA)Tj 11 0 0 11 99.765 471.78 Tm -0.003 Tc -0.059 Tw (, R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 111.885 471.78 Tm -0.005 Tc (UAIRI)Tj 11 0 0 11 133.125 471.78 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.063 Tw [( and A)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 161.085 471.78 Tm -0.006 Tc (NTHONY)Tj 11 0 0 11 193.365 471.78 Tm -0.002 Tc -0.06 Tw [( B. Z)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 214.125 471.78 Tm -0.015 Tc (WI)Tj 11 0 0 11 223.965 471.78 Tm 0 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4255 0 TD -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw (Regulation in the context of global)Tj -13.5709 -1.2 TD 0.026 Tc 0.125 Tw (health markets, in Health policy in a globalising world)Tj /F5 1 Tf 24.4145 0 TD 0.025 Tc 0.128 Tw (, \(ed.\))Tj -24.4145 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 87.645 445.38 Tm 0.046 Tc (ELLEY)Tj 11 0 0 11 113.685 445.38 Tm 0.165 Tc ( L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 125.325 445.38 Tm 0.04 Tc (EE)Tj 11 0 0 11 135.405 445.38 Tm 0.027 Tc 0.133 Tw (, K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 151.245 445.38 Tm 0.049 Tc (ENT)Tj 11 0 0 11 167.325 445.38 Tm 0.165 Tc 0 Tw ( B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 179.565 445.38 Tm 0.045 Tc (USE)Tj 11 0 0 11 195.165 445.38 Tm 0.034 Tc 0.126 Tw (, and S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 230.685 445.38 Tm 0.044 Tc (UZANNE)Tj 11 0 0 11 264.525 445.38 Tm 0.154 Tc 0 Tw ( F)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 275.445 445.38 Tm 0.045 Tc (USTUKIAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 317.565 445.38 Tm 0.033 Tc 0.127 Tw (, Cambridge)Tj -21.6545 -1.2 TD 0.014 Tc 0.126 Tw (University Press, Cambridge, 2002.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 72.645 416.1 Tm 0.017 Tc (HEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 88.845 416.1 Tm 0.015 Tc 0.123 Tw (, R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 103.485 416.1 Tm 0.021 Tc (ON)Tj 11 0 0 11 114.885 416.1 Tm 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw [( & )-11(J)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 136.605 416.1 Tm 0.021 Tc (ON)Tj 11 0 0 11 148.005 416.1 Tm 0.143 Tc 0 Tw ( H)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 160.365 416.1 Tm 0.016 Tc (ANSON)Tj 11 0 0 11 187.605 416.1 Tm 0.013 Tc 0.126 Tw (, The Illusion of Law: The Legitimating)Tj -9.84 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.068 Tw [(Schemas of Modern Policy and Corporate Law)65(, 103 )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 21.5564 0 TD (Mich. L. Rev)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.2473 0 TD 0 Tw (.)Tj -26.8036 -1.2 TD 0.016 Tc 0.125 Tw (1, 1-2, 2004.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 72.885 373.74 Tm 0.047 Tc (LARKE)Tj 11 0 0 11 100.485 373.74 Tm 0.034 Tc 0.123 Tw (, J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 112.725 373.74 Tm 0.048 Tc (ULIAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 138.405 373.74 Tm 0.035 Tc 0.126 Tw [( L., S)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 167.325 373.74 Tm 0.046 Tc (IMON)Tj 11 0 0 11 189.285 373.74 Tm 0.035 Tc 0.124 Tw [( J. E)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 213.165 373.74 Tm 0.048 Tc (VENETT)Tj 11 0 0 11 245.325 373.74 Tm 0.035 Tc [( and K)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 279.645 373.74 Tm 0.052 Tc [(RIST)83(A)]TJ 11 0 0 11 303.165 373.74 Tm 0.165 Tc 0 Tw ( L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 314.805 373.74 Tm 0.046 Tc (UCENTI)Tj 11 0 0 11 345.285 373.74 Tm 0.035 Tc 0.06 Tw (, Anti-)Tj -24.1745 -1.2 TD 0.004 Tc 0.126 Tw [(competitive Practices and Liberalising Markets in Latin )59(America)]TJ T* 0.007 Tc 0.125 Tw (and the Caribbean, in: )Tj /F8 1 Tf 9.7418 0 TD 0.126 Tw (Competition Laws: Latin America & The)Tj -9.7418 -1.2 TD 0.03 Tc (Caribbean)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.5491 0 TD 0.127 Tw (, 1029-1056.)Tj -5.8364 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 72.525 318.06 Tm 0.002 Tc (OLEMAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 105.525 318.06 Tm 0.132 Tc ( W)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 120.165 318.06 Tm 0.001 Tc (ILLIAM)Tj 11 0 0 11 147.285 318.06 Tm 0.003 Tc 0.125 Tw [( D., Banking, interest intennediation, and political)]TJ -6.1745 -1.2 TD 0.022 Tc [(power)44(, )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 3.2291 0 TD 0.023 Tc [(Eur)34(opean Journal of Political Resear)34(ch)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 17.28 0 TD 0.022 Tc 0.126 Tw (, 1994, 26: 31-)Tj -20.5091 -1.2 TD 0.057 Tc (58.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 73.725 275.58 Tm 0.077 Tc (ANDEKER)Tj 11 0 0 11 114.645 275.58 Tm 0.053 Tc 0.123 Tw (, C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 130.725 275.58 Tm 0.077 Tc [(HRIST)15(OPHER)]TJ 11 0 0 11 184.005 275.58 Tm 0.049 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.7418 0 TD 0.055 Tc 0.127 Tw (Surveillance, Power and Modernity:)Tj -10.2545 -1.2 TD 0.063 Tc 0.212 Tw [(Bur)41(ocracy and discipline fr)41(om 1700 to the pr)41(esent day)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 26.8036 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -26.8036 -1.2 TD 0.016 Tc 0.125 Tw (MacMillian, London, 1984.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 73.125 233.1 Tm -0.002 Tc (ANIEL)Tj 11 0 0 11 96.165 233.1 Tm 0 Tc 0.05 Tw [( C. E)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 119.565 233.1 Tm -0.002 Tc (STY)Tj 11 0 0 11 134.085 233.1 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.051 Tw [( and D)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 164.685 233.1 Tm -0.001 Tc (AMIEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 189.885 233.1 Tm 0.053 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 201.045 233.1 Tm -0.001 Tc (ERADIN)Tj 11 0 0 11 230.085 233.1 Tm 0.002 Tc (. )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5564 0 TD 0 Tc 0.052 Tw (Regulatory competition and the)Tj -14.2582 -1.2 TD 0.063 Tc 0.287 Tw [(global coor)41(dination of labour standar)41(ds, in Regulatory)]TJ T* 0.002 Tc 0.126 Tw (competition and economic integration: comparative perspectives)Tj /F5 1 Tf 26.8036 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -26.8036 -1.2 TD -0.027 Tw (\(ed.\) D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 110.205 193.5 Tm -0.002 Tc (ANIEL)Tj 11 0 0 11 133.245 193.5 Tm 0.002 Tc -0.03 Tw [( C. )12(E)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 154.845 193.5 Tm -0.002 Tc (STY)Tj 11 0 0 11 169.485 193.5 Tm 0.001 Tc [( and )11(D)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 198.165 193.5 Tm -0.001 Tc (AMIEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 223.365 193.5 Tm -0.023 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 233.685 193.5 Tm -0.001 Tc (ERADIN)Tj 11 0 0 11 262.725 193.5 Tm 0 Tc -0.03 Tw (, Oxford University Press,)Tj -16.6691 -1.2 TD 0.01 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Oxford; New )42(Y)99(ork: 2001.)]TJ -1.2873 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 73.125 164.34 Tm (AS)Tj 11 0 0 11 82.965 164.34 Tm -0.002 Tc 0.009 Tw (, J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 92.925 164.34 Tm -0.001 Tc [(A)98(YOTI)]TJ 11 0 0 11 116.085 164.34 Tm -0.003 Tc 0.012 Tw (; S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 128.085 164.34 Tm 0 Tc (TEPHEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 157.605 164.34 Tm [( B. D)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 181.365 164.34 Tm 0 Tw (E)Tj 11 0 0 11 186.045 164.34 Tm (L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 192.765 164.34 Tm 0.001 Tc (OACH)Tj 11 0 0 11 214.605 164.34 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.012 Tw [( and L)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 242.925 164.34 Tm (INDSEY)Tj 11 0 0 11 271.125 164.34 Tm 0.012 Tc 0 Tw ( C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 281.325 164.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (ONLEY)Tj 11 0 0 11 307.365 164.34 Tm 0 Tc 0.011 Tw (, Power Politics)Tj -20.7273 -1.2 TD 0.002 Tc 0.124 Tw (and International T)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 166.845 151.14 Tm 0.001 Tc (HOMAS)Tj 11 0 0 11 194.805 151.14 Tm 0.004 Tc 0.123 Tw [( G. E)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 220.605 151.14 Tm 0.005 Tc [(V)135(ANS)]TJ 11 0 0 11 240.645 151.14 Tm 0.003 Tc 0.125 Tw (, International accounting and)Tj -14.6618 -1.2 TD 0.031 Tc (reporting, 1994, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 7.4509 0 TD 0.123 Tw [(Labor Standar)31(d)-7(s)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 7.3091 0 TD 0.126 Tw [(, )9(W)80(orking paper)42(, March 15,)]TJ -14.76 -1.2 TD 0.051 Tc (2004.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 73.125 108.66 Tm 0.001 Tc (EAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 88.965 108.66 Tm 0 Tc 0.095 Tw (, M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 105.285 108.66 Tm (ITCHEL)Tj 11 0 0 11 132.645 108.66 Tm 0.005 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5891 0 TD 0 Tc (Governmentality: power and rule in modern society)Tj /F5 1 Tf 21.3709 0 TD 0 Tw (,)Tj -26.8036 -1.2 TD 0.022 Tc 0.127 Tw (Sage, 2003.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 73.845 79.38 Tm (E)Tj 11 0 0 11 79.125 79.38 Tm (S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 85.965 79.38 Tm 0.089 Tc (OMBRE)Tj 11 0 0 11 116.805 79.38 Tm 0.059 Tc 0.123 Tw (, E)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 132.405 79.38 Tm 0.088 Tc (LIZABETH)Tj 11 0 0 11 175.485 79.38 Tm 0.062 Tc 0.128 Tw [( R., )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 2.2255 0 TD 0.125 Tw [(Domestic Sour)30(ces of International)]TJ -10.9636 -1.2 TD 0 Tc -0.006 Tw [(Envir)44(onmental Policy: Industr)-11(y)62(,)0( Envir)33(onmentalists, and U.S)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 24.0109 0 TD -0.009 Tw (. Power)Tj -24.0109 -1.2 TD 0.007 Tc 0.125 Tw (\(MIT Press, 2000.)Tj ET endstream endobj 87 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 89 0 obj << /Length 11446 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (231)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 11 0 0 11 76.535 556.74 Tm 0 Tc (D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 84.695 556.74 Tm 0.034 Tc (UNOFF)Tj 11 0 0 11 111.335 556.74 Tm 0.023 Tc 0.123 Tw (, J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 123.215 556.74 Tm 0.035 Tc (EFFREY)Tj 11 0 0 11 153.575 556.74 Tm 0.023 Tc 0.125 Tw [( L. & J)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 190.055 556.74 Tm 0.033 Tc (OEL)Tj 11 0 0 11 205.775 556.74 Tm -0.076 Tc 0.219 Tw [( P.)-103( )-6(T)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 229.775 556.74 Tm 0.035 Tc (RACHTMAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 275.975 556.74 Tm 0.024 Tc 0.125 Tw [(, Economic )56(Analysis of)]TJ -16.8436 -1.2 TD 0.008 Tc [(International Law)63(, 24 )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 9.3818 0 TD 0.126 Tw [(The Y)84(ale Journal of International Law)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 16.2655 0 TD 0.01 Tc 0.127 Tw (, 1,)Tj -25.6473 -1.2 TD 0.051 Tc (1999.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.975 514.26 Tm 0.091 Tc (ARL)Tj 11 0 0 11 101.375 514.26 Tm 0.059 Tc 0.168 Tw (, P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 116.855 514.26 Tm 0.086 Tc (ETER)Tj 11 0 0 11 138.815 514.26 Tm 0.063 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.7964 0 TD (Behavioural Economics and the Economics of)Tj -5.1709 -1.2 TD 0 Tc (Regulation)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.3855 0 TD 0.053 Tw (, Briefing paper prepared for the New Zealand Ministry)Tj -4.3855 -1.2 TD 0.02 Tc 0.125 Tw (of Economic Development.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.255 471.78 Tm -0.001 Tc (VENETT)Tj 11 0 0 11 113.135 471.78 Tm -0.003 Tc -0.036 Tw (, S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 124.295 471.78 Tm 0 Tc (IMON)Tj 11 0 0 11 144.815 471.78 Tm -0.04 Tw [( J., A)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 167.135 471.78 Tm -0.002 Tc (LEXANDER)Tj 11 0 0 11 208.655 471.78 Tm -0.043 Tc 0 Tw ( L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 217.655 471.78 Tm -0.002 Tc (EHMANN)Tj 11 0 0 11 251.375 471.78 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.04 Tw (, B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 263.855 471.78 Tm 0.001 Tc (ENN)Tj 11 0 0 11 279.575 471.78 Tm -0.032 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 287.975 471.78 Tm 0 Tc (TEIL)Tj 11 0 0 11 304.655 471.78 Tm -0.005 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4691 0 TD 0 Tc -0.041 Tw [(Antitr)11(ust policy in)]TJ -19.92 -1.2 TD 0.016 Tc 0.125 Tw (an evolving global marketplace, in Antitrust goes global: what)Tj T* 0 Tc -0.004 Tw [(futur)33(e for transatlantic cooperation?)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 14.7055 0 TD -0.009 Tw (, S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 263.975 445.38 Tm (IMON)Tj 11 0 0 11 284.495 445.38 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.005 Tw ( J. E)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 303.575 445.38 Tm -0.001 Tc (VENETT)Tj 11 0 0 11 333.575 445.38 Tm 0 Tc -0.009 Tw (, A)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 346.895 445.38 Tm -0.002 Tc (LEXANDER)Tj 11 0 0 11 90.695 432.18 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 97.415 432.18 Tm -0.002 Tc (EHMANN)Tj 11 0 0 11 131.135 432.18 Tm -0.047 Tw (, B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 143.375 432.18 Tm 0.001 Tc (ENN)Tj 11 0 0 11 159.215 432.18 Tm -0.054 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 167.495 432.18 Tm 0 Tc (TEIL)Tj 11 0 0 11 184.175 432.18 Tm -0.052 Tw [(, \(eds.\), Royal Institute of International )54(Af)22(fairs,)]TJ -8.4982 -1.2 TD 0.014 Tc 0.125 Tw [(London; Brookings Institution Press, )14(W)85(ashington, D.C., c2000.)]TJ -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (F)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 82.655 402.9 Tm -0.001 Tc [(OUCAUL)93(T)]TJ 11 0 0 11 118.655 402.9 Tm 0.064 Tw (, M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 134.615 402.9 Tm 0 Tc (ICHEL)Tj 11 0 0 11 157.295 402.9 Tm [(, Governmentality)65(, in: )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 9.2182 0 TD -0.001 Tc 0.065 Tw (The F)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 285.335 402.9 Tm 0.001 Tc [(OUCAUL)32(T)]TJ 11 0 0 11 320.255 402.9 Tm 0 Tc [( Effect: Studies)]TJ -20.8691 -1.2 TD 0.032 Tw (in Governmentality)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.7891 0 TD 0.001 Tc [(, G. )12(B)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 203.375 389.7 Tm 0 Tc (URCHELL)Tj 11 0 0 11 238.775 389.7 Tm 0.034 Tw [(, C. )-11(G)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 265.895 389.7 Tm (ORDON)Tj 11 0 0 11 293.255 389.7 Tm 0.032 Tw [( and P)109(.)-3( )11(M)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 335.855 389.7 Tm 0.001 Tc (ILLER)Tj 11 0 0 11 357.695 389.7 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.037 Tw [( \(eds.\),)]TJ -24.2727 -1.2 TD 0.019 Tc 0.125 Tw (Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (F)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 82.775 360.54 Tm 0.015 Tc [(OUCAUL)77(T)]TJ 11 0 0 11 119.735 360.54 Tm 0.013 Tc 0.123 Tw (, M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 136.775 360.54 Tm 0.016 Tc (ICHEL)Tj 11 0 0 11 160.175 360.54 Tm (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6545 0 TD 0.013 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Power)111(, Right, T)68(r)-2(uth, in Contemporar)-9(y Political)]TJ -6.9709 -1.2 TD -0.001 Tc (Philosophy)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.4945 0 TD 0.002 Tc -0.002 Tw (, C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 152.975 347.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OLLIN)Tj 11 0 0 11 176.015 347.34 Tm 0.001 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 186.815 347.34 Tm 0 Tc (ORDON)Tj 11 0 0 11 214.175 347.34 Tm 0.001 Tw (, \(ed.\) 543a, 1998, originally published,)Tj -11.2255 -1.2 TD 0.026 Tc 0.123 Tw (in Power/Knowledge, C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 205.535 334.14 Tm 0.035 Tc (OLIN)Tj 11 0 0 11 224.975 334.14 Tm 0.154 Tc 0 Tw ( G)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 237.695 334.14 Tm 0.035 Tc (ORDON)Tj 11 0 0 11 266.495 334.14 Tm 0.026 Tc 0.126 Tw [( \(ed.\), Harvester)37(, 92-108,)]TJ -15.9818 -1.2 TD 0.051 Tc (1980.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (F)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 82.895 304.86 Tm 0.037 Tc (OX)Tj 11 0 0 11 94.415 304.86 Tm 0.023 Tc 0.125 Tw (, E.M., Harmonization of law and procedures in a globalized)Tj -0.3382 -1.2 TD 0.004 Tc [(world: )15(Why)69(, what and how?, 60 )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 13.8982 0 TD 0.005 Tc [(Antitr)16(ust Law Journal)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9.1636 0 TD 0.004 Tc 0.127 Tw [( 593-598,)]TJ -23.0618 -1.2 TD 0.051 Tc (1999.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (G)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 84.935 262.38 Tm 0.063 Tc (ILPIN)Tj 11 0 0 11 107.135 262.38 Tm 0.048 Tc 0.123 Tw (, R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 122.855 262.38 Tm 0.067 Tc [(OBER)67(T)]TJ 11 0 0 11 150.215 262.38 Tm 0.049 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.7091 0 TD 0.046 Tc 0.126 Tw (Global Political Economy: Understanding the)Tj -6.12 -1.2 TD 0.013 Tc 0.125 Tw [(International Economic Or)46(der)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 12.8073 0 TD 0.126 Tw [( \(Chapter 7\), 2001.)]TJ -14.0945 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (G)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 84.575 233.1 Tm 0.017 Tc [(OODHAR)48(T)]TJ 11 0 0 11 122.855 233.1 Tm 0.015 Tc 0.123 Tw (, C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 137.495 233.1 Tm 0.02 Tc (HARLES)Tj 11 0 0 11 168.335 233.1 Tm 0.016 Tc (, D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 183.575 233.1 Tm 0.015 Tc [(A)114(VID)]TJ 11 0 0 11 202.415 233.1 Tm 0.143 Tc 0 Tw ( L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 213.575 233.1 Tm 0.018 Tc [(LEWELL)96(YN)]TJ 11 0 0 11 255.815 233.1 Tm 0.016 Tc 0.122 Tw (, P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 269.375 233.1 Tm 0.02 Tc (HILIP)Tj 11 0 0 11 289.775 233.1 Tm 0.141 Tc 0 Tw ( H)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 302.135 233.1 Tm 0.021 Tc (ARMANN)Tj 11 0 0 11 337.295 233.1 Tm 0.014 Tc 0.127 Tw (, S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 350.735 233.1 Tm 0.018 Tc (TEVEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 376.655 233.1 Tm 0.141 Tc 0 Tw ( R)Tj -25.9964 -1.2 TD 0 Tc (W)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 101.015 219.9 Tm -0.007 Tc (EISBROD)Tj 11 0 0 11 133.655 219.9 Tm -0.005 Tc -0.058 Tw [( & L)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 152.855 219.9 Tm -0.009 Tc (ILIANA)Tj 11 0 0 11 179.015 219.9 Tm -0.066 Tc 0 Tw ( R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 188.375 219.9 Tm -0.007 Tc (OJAS)Tj 11 0 0 11 206.615 219.9 Tm -0.005 Tc (-S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 216.215 219.9 Tm -0.007 Tc (U\301REZ)Tj 11 0 0 11 241.655 219.9 Tm -0.005 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4364 0 TD -0.062 Tw [(Financial Regulation: Why)50(, How)]TJ -14.16 -1.2 TD 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw [(and Wher)33(e Now?)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 7.32 0 TD (, Routledge, 2003.)Tj -8.6073 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (G)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 84.695 190.74 Tm 0.027 Tc (ORDON)Tj 11 0 0 11 113.015 190.74 Tm 0.021 Tc 0.122 Tw (, C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 127.895 190.74 Tm 0.026 Tc (OLLIN)Tj 11 0 0 11 152.015 190.74 Tm 0.019 Tc 0.126 Tw [(, Introduction, in the )8(F)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 261.575 190.74 Tm 0.027 Tc [(OUCAUL)105(T)]TJ 11 0 0 11 299.015 190.74 Tm 0.019 Tc 0.125 Tw [( Ef)8(fect: Studies on)]TJ -18.9382 -1.2 TD 0.034 Tc [(Governmentality 44, Harvester)45(, 1991. )-11(M)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 289.175 177.54 Tm 0.047 Tc (ICHEL)Tj 11 0 0 11 313.775 177.54 Tm 0.154 Tc 0 Tw ( F)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 324.695 177.54 Tm 0.049 Tc [(OUCAUL)96(T)]TJ 11 0 0 11 363.455 177.54 Tm 0.038 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6873 0 TD 0.035 Tc (The)Tj -25.4836 -1.2 TD 0.007 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Subject and Power)105(,)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 8.0618 0 TD 0.006 Tc 0.126 Tw [( 8, 4 Critical Inquiry)61(, 777, Harvester)50(, 1982.)]TJ -9.3491 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (G)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 84.935 148.26 Tm 0.063 Tc (RAHAM)Tj 11 0 0 11 116.015 148.26 Tm 0.043 Tc 0.123 Tw (, E)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 131.135 148.26 Tm 0.066 Tc [(DW)128(ARD)]TJ 11 0 0 11 161.735 148.26 Tm 0.045 Tc 0.126 Tw [( M., Substantive conver)12(gence and procedural)]TJ -6.4582 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.036 Tw [(dissonance in mer)22(ger review)55(, in: )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 13.3855 0 TD 0.038 Tw [(Antitrust goes global: what futur)44(e)]TJ -13.3855 -1.2 TD 0.036 Tc 0.125 Tw (for transatlantic cooperation?)Tj /F5 1 Tf 13.4509 0 TD 0.165 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 249.695 121.86 Tm 0.052 Tc (IMON)Tj 11 0 0 11 271.775 121.86 Tm 0.035 Tc 0.124 Tw [( J. E)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 295.775 121.86 Tm 0.051 Tc (VENETT)Tj 11 0 0 11 328.055 121.86 Tm 0.038 Tc 0.122 Tw (, A)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 344.015 121.86 Tm 0.052 Tc (LEXANDER)Tj 11 0 0 11 90.695 108.66 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 98.015 108.66 Tm 0.089 Tc (EHMANN)Tj 11 0 0 11 135.935 108.66 Tm 0.063 Tc 0.16 Tw (, B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 152.615 108.66 Tm 0.087 Tc (ENN)Tj 11 0 0 11 170.495 108.66 Tm 0.241 Tc 0 Tw ( S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 182.615 108.66 Tm 0.088 Tc (TEIL)Tj 11 0 0 11 202.055 108.66 Tm 0.063 Tc 0.17 Tw (, \(eds.\), London: Royal Institute of)Tj -10.1236 -1.2 TD 0.023 Tc 0.125 Tw [(International )55(Af)23(fairs; Brookings Institution Press, )12(W)83(ashington,)]TJ T* 0.022 Tc 0.127 Tw (D.C., c2000.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (H)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 84.455 66.18 Tm (ANSON)Tj 11 0 0 11 110.975 66.18 Tm 0.003 Tc 0.109 Tw (, J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 122.015 66.18 Tm -0.01 Tc (ON)Tj 11 0 0 11 133.055 66.18 Tm -0.001 Tc [( & D)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 157.415 66.18 Tm 0 Tc [(A)130(VID)]TJ 11 0 0 11 175.655 66.18 Tm 0.11 Tc 0 Tw ( Y)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 187.535 66.18 Tm 0.001 Tc (OSIFON)Tj 11 0 0 11 215.375 66.18 Tm 0 Tc 0.11 Tw [(, )21(The Situation: an Introduction to the)]TJ -11.3345 -1.2 TD 0.008 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Situational Character)41(, Critical Realism, Power Economics, and)]TJ ET endstream endobj 90 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 92 0 obj << /Length 9728 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (232)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 11 0 0 11 79.365 556.74 Tm 0.006 Tc 0.125 Tw (Deep Capture, 152)Tj /F8 1 Tf 7.8764 0 TD (, U. Pa. L. Rev)Tj /F5 1 Tf 6.48 0 TD 0.126 Tw (., 129, 134-39, 2003.)Tj -15.6436 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (H)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 73.725 540.66 Tm 0.068 Tc (ELLMANN)Tj 11 0 0 11 115.005 540.66 Tm 0.049 Tc 0.122 Tw (, T)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 130.125 540.66 Tm 0.067 Tc (HOMAS)Tj 11 0 0 11 160.605 540.66 Tm 0.049 Tc 0.133 Tw (, K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 177.165 540.66 Tm 0.066 Tc (EVIN)Tj 11 0 0 11 197.565 540.66 Tm 0.048 Tc 0.125 Tw [( C. )-7(M)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 228.405 540.66 Tm 0.069 Tc (URDOCK)Tj 11 0 0 11 264.165 540.66 Tm 0.049 Tc 0.122 Tw [( & J)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 287.325 540.66 Tm 0.069 Tc (OSEPH)Tj 11 0 0 11 314.445 540.66 Tm 0.047 Tc 0.127 Tw [( E. )-8(S)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 341.085 540.66 Tm 0.068 Tc (TIGLITZ)Tj 11 0 0 11 374.205 540.66 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -26.8036 -1.2 TD 0.053 Tw (Liberalization, moral hazard in banking, and prudential regulation:)Tj T* 0.081 Tw (Are capital requirements enough? 90 )Tj /F8 1 Tf 15.4364 0 TD 0.082 Tw [(American Economic Review)76(,)]TJ /F5 1 Tf -15.4364 -1.1236 TD 0.029 Tc 0.127 Tw (147, 2000.)Tj -1.2873 -1.3527 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (H)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 73.125 487.02 Tm -0.002 Tc (OEKMAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 106.845 487.02 Tm 0 Tc 0.109 Tw (, B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 120.885 487.02 Tm 0.001 Tc (ERNARD)Tj 11 0 0 11 152.565 487.02 Tm 0.002 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6109 0 TD 0 Tc [(Str)33(engthening the Global T)65(rade )11(Ar)44(chitectur)33(e for)]TJ -7.2655 -1.0909 TD 0.031 Tc (Development)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.6073 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (.)Tj -6.8945 -1.4291 TD (K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 73.125 459.3 Tm 0.004 Tc (AHLER)Tj 11 0 0 11 98.925 459.3 Tm 0.002 Tc 0.123 Tw (, M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 115.605 459.3 Tm (ILES)Tj 11 0 0 11 131.925 459.3 Tm 0.005 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6327 0 TD 0.002 Tc 0.126 Tw (International Institutions and the Political Economy)Tj -5.4109 -1.2 TD 0.012 Tc 0.122 Tw (of Integration)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.8145 0 TD 0.127 Tw [(, Brookings Institution, )13(W)83(ashington, DC, 1995.)]TJ -7.1018 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 73.125 430.14 Tm -0.001 Tc (AUPPI)Tj 11 0 0 11 95.325 430.14 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.059 Tw (, M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 111.285 430.14 Tm -0.004 Tc (ARK)Tj 11 0 0 11 127.605 430.14 Tm 0 Tc [( )25(V)122(.)0( and P)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 168.885 430.14 Tm 0.001 Tc (AUL)Tj 11 0 0 11 184.725 430.14 Tm [( R. )12(V)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 209.565 430.14 Tm -0.002 Tc (IOTTI)Tj 11 0 0 11 229.605 430.14 Tm (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5564 0 TD 0 Tc (International Relations Theory:)Tj -14.2145 -1.2 TD 0.017 Tc 0.125 Tw (Realism, Pluralism, Globalism and Beyond)Tj /F5 1 Tf 18.5236 0 TD 0.018 Tc [(, 3rd ed., )62(Allyn and)]TJ -18.5236 -1.2 TD 0.02 Tc (Bacon, Boston, 1999.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 71.925 387.66 Tm -0.006 Tc (EE)Tj 11 0 0 11 81.285 387.66 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.118 Tw (, K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 96.045 387.66 Tm -0.001 Tc (ELLEY)Tj 11 0 0 11 120.405 387.66 Tm 0.004 Tc 0.103 Tw (, S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 133.245 387.66 Tm -0.002 Tc (UZANNE)Tj 11 0 0 11 164.925 387.66 Tm 0.121 Tc 0 Tw ( F)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 175.125 387.66 Tm -0.002 Tc (USTUKIAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 214.365 387.66 Tm 0 Tc 0.118 Tw [( and K)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 246.285 387.66 Tm 0.002 Tc (ENT)Tj 11 0 0 11 261.285 387.66 Tm 0.121 Tc 0 Tw ( B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 272.685 387.66 Tm -0.002 Tc (USE)Tj 11 0 0 11 287.325 387.66 Tm 0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6109 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw [(An intr)33(oduction to)]TJ -19.5164 -1.2 TD 0.089 Tw (global health policy in Health policy in a globalising world)Tj /F5 1 Tf 24.6109 0 TD 0.001 Tc 0.091 Tw (, \(ed.\))Tj -24.6109 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 87.645 361.26 Tm 0.046 Tc (ELLEY)Tj 11 0 0 11 113.685 361.26 Tm 0.165 Tc ( L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 125.325 361.26 Tm 0.04 Tc (EE)Tj 11 0 0 11 135.405 361.26 Tm 0.027 Tc 0.133 Tw (, K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 151.245 361.26 Tm 0.049 Tc (ENT)Tj 11 0 0 11 167.325 361.26 Tm 0.165 Tc 0 Tw ( B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 179.565 361.26 Tm 0.045 Tc (USE)Tj 11 0 0 11 195.165 361.26 Tm 0.034 Tc 0.126 Tw (, and S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 230.685 361.26 Tm 0.044 Tc (UZANNE)Tj 11 0 0 11 264.525 361.26 Tm 0.154 Tc 0 Tw ( F)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 275.445 361.26 Tm 0.045 Tc (USTUKIAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 317.565 361.26 Tm 0.033 Tc 0.127 Tw (, Cambridge)Tj -21.6545 -1.2 TD 0.014 Tc 0.126 Tw (University Press, Cambridge, 2002.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 71.925 331.98 Tm -0.001 Tc (LOYD)Tj 11 0 0 11 93.285 331.98 Tm 0.091 Tw (, P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 105.885 331.98 Tm -0.002 Tc (ETER)Tj 11 0 0 11 125.085 331.98 Tm 0.002 Tc 0.094 Tw [( & C)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 148.605 331.98 Tm -0.001 Tc (HRIS)Tj 11 0 0 11 166.125 331.98 Tm 0.099 Tc 0 Tw ( M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 179.685 331.98 Tm 0 Tc (ILNER)Tj 11 0 0 11 202.365 331.98 Tm 0.005 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.096 Tw (Global trade policy 2002)Tj /F5 1 Tf 10.3745 0 TD 0.001 Tc (, Blackwell,)Tj -22.1564 -1.2 TD 0.025 Tc 0.127 Tw (Oxford, 2003.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 72.525 302.7 Tm 0.074 Tc (OHR)Tj 11 0 0 11 90.525 302.7 Tm 0.055 Tc 0.125 Tw (, L., and B. K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 164.325 302.7 Tm 0.08 Tc (RISSOFF)Tj 11 0 0 11 199.005 302.7 Tm 0.055 Tc (, Consumer effects of harmonizing)Tj -10.8764 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.07 Tw [(international standards for trade in or)22(ganic foods, in: )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 21.8509 0 TD -0.001 Tc 0.073 Tw (Global Food)Tj -21.8509 -1.2 TD 0.005 Tc 0.125 Tw [(T)59(rade and Consumer Demand for Quality)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 17.5418 0 TD 0.123 Tw (, \(ed.\) B. K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 326.565 276.3 Tm 0.007 Tc (RISSOFF)Tj 11 0 0 11 357.405 276.3 Tm 0.004 Tc 0.127 Tw (, M.)Tj -25.2764 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 86.685 263.1 Tm -0.001 Tc (OHMEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 114.885 263.1 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.125 Tw [( and J.A. )-9(C)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 168.405 263.1 Tm 0.003 Tc (ASWELL)Tj 11 0 0 11 199.725 263.1 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.127 Tw (, 209-228, 2002.)Tj -12.2291 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 74.925 247.14 Tm 0.002 Tc (AKUS)Tj 11 0 0 11 95.925 247.14 Tm -0.002 Tc 0.036 Tw (, K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 109.725 247.14 Tm -0.001 Tc (EITH)Tj 11 0 0 11 127.245 247.14 Tm 0 Tc 0.041 Tw [( E., Lessons from Studying the International Economics)]TJ -4.3527 -1.2 TD 0.067 Tw (of Intellectual Property Rights, 53 )Tj /F8 1 Tf 14.2145 0 TD 0.068 Tw [(V)109(and. L. Rev)65(.)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 5.3782 0 TD [( 2219-2239, 2000.)]TJ -20.88 -1.4618 TD 0 Tw (M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 74.925 217.86 Tm [(A)99(TTLI)]TJ 11 0 0 11 96.405 217.86 Tm 0.001 Tc 0.098 Tw (, W)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 113.445 217.86 Tm -0.002 Tc [(A)-9(L)92(TER)]TJ 11 0 0 11 137.685 217.86 Tm -0.01 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6218 0 TD 0.001 Tc 0.127 Tw [(Global private governance for voluntary standar)45(ds)]TJ -5.9236 -1.2 TD 0.052 Tc 0.125 Tw [(setting: national or)41(ganizational legacies and international)]TJ T* 0.014 Tc 0.123 Tw (institutional biases)Tj /F5 1 Tf 7.9855 0 TD 0.015 Tc 0.125 Tw [(, Center for Business and Government, John)]TJ -7.9855 -1.2 TD 0.013 Tc 0.126 Tw [(F)89(.)0( Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University)57(, 2001.)]TJ -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 74.925 162.18 Tm [(ER)47(T)19(O)10(N)]TJ 11 0 0 11 100.005 162.18 Tm -0.002 Tc 0.004 Tw (, R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 112.965 162.18 Tm -0.001 Tc [(OBER)61(T)]TJ 11 0 0 11 137.685 162.18 Tm 0.002 Tc 0.003 Tw ( C. and Z)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 178.845 162.18 Tm -0.011 Tc (VI)Tj 11 0 0 11 186.885 162.18 Tm 0.012 Tc 0 Tw ( B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 197.085 162.18 Tm -0.001 Tc (ODIE)Tj 11 0 0 11 215.445 162.18 Tm -0.003 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5018 0 TD 0 Tc 0.006 Tw [(Financial infrastructur)33(e and public)]TJ -12.8727 -1.2 TD 0.013 Tc 0.124 Tw (policy: a functional perspective)Tj /F5 1 Tf 13.4291 0 TD 0.127 Tw (, Division of Research, Harvard)Tj -13.4291 -1.2 TD 0.015 Tc 0.126 Tw (Business School, Boston, 1995.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 74.925 119.7 Tm -0.002 Tc (ILJKOVIC)Tj 11 0 0 11 109.605 119.7 Tm 0 Tc 0.109 Tw (, D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 124.245 119.7 Tm (RAGAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 151.605 119.7 Tm 0.113 Tw [(, )22(The Law of One Price in International )11(T)44(rade: )55(A)]TJ -6.5673 -1.2 TD 0.101 Tw [(Critical Review)65(, 21, )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 8.5418 0 TD -0.001 Tc 0.095 Tw [(Rev)64(. Agricultural )-10(Econ)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9.3709 0 TD 0 Tc 0.103 Tw (., 126, 126-139, 1999.)Tj -19.2 -1.4509 TD 0 Tw (M)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 75.285 90.54 Tm 0.039 Tc (ILNER)Tj 11 0 0 11 99.525 90.54 Tm 0.026 Tc 0.123 Tw (, H)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 115.125 90.54 Tm 0.042 Tc (ELEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 136.125 90.54 Tm 0.028 Tc 0.126 Tw [(, )28(The Political Economy of International )17(T)39(rade, 2)]TJ /F8 1 Tf -5.16 -1.2 TD 0.01 Tc 0.125 Tw (Annual Review of Political Science)Tj /F5 1 Tf 14.9018 0 TD 0.011 Tc [(, 91-1)44(14, 1999.)]TJ ET endstream endobj 93 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 95 0 obj << /Length 9114 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 141.575 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 374.375 588.06 Tm 0.03 Tc (233)Tj -32.1733 -0.08 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 90.215 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (XTENSIVE)Tj 9 0 0 9 120.695 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 122.375 587.34 Tm -0.007 Tc (CAPTURE)Tj 9 0 0 9 150.695 587.34 Tm -0.012 Tc (: )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 154.655 587.34 Tm -0.01 Tc (THE)Tj 9 0 0 9 166.775 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 168.455 587.34 Tm -0.009 Tc [(HARMONIZA)105(TION)]TJ 9 0 0 9 220.655 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 222.215 587.34 Tm -0.002 Tc (OF)Tj 9 0 0 9 230.255 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 231.815 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(INTERNA)106(TIONAL)]TJ 9 0 0 9 281.615 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 283.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc (INDUSTRIAL)Tj 9 0 0 9 320.495 587.34 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 322.175 587.34 Tm -0.008 Tc [(REGULA)125(TION)]TJ ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 84.455 585.54 m 362.855 585.54 l S BT 11 0 0 11 76.535 556.74 Tm 0 Tc (N)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 84.455 556.74 Tm 0.002 Tc (ADER)Tj 11 0 0 11 105.575 556.74 Tm -0.01 Tc 0.142 Tw (, R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 119.735 556.74 Tm 0.002 Tc (ALPH)Tj 11 0 0 11 139.895 556.74 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.3818 0 TD 0.002 Tc 0.127 Tw (et al.)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.1382 0 TD -0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6218 0 TD 0.002 Tc 0.126 Tw [(The case against \223fr)35(ee trade\224: GA)35(TT)78(, NAFT)78(A,)]TJ -7.6145 -1.2 TD 0.006 Tc [(and the globalization of corporate power)115(,)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 17.4982 0 TD [( North )61(Atlantic Books,)]TJ -17.4982 -1.2 TD 0.051 Tc (1993.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0.061 Tc 0.209 Tw (O. A)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 102.935 514.26 Tm 0.087 Tc (LAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 120.815 514.26 Tm 0.063 Tc [(,)8( Sykes, Regulatory Protectionism and the Law of)]TJ -2.7382 -1.2 TD 0.005 Tc 0.125 Tw [(International )27(T)38(rade, 66 U. )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 11.2473 0 TD (Chicago L. Rev)Tj /F5 1 Tf 6.5236 0 TD (. 1, 1999.)Tj -19.0582 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 82.895 484.98 Tm 0.029 Tc (ADERANGA)Tj 11 0 0 11 127.895 484.98 Tm 0.021 Tc 0.122 Tw (, C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 142.775 484.98 Tm 0.024 Tc [(A)91(YET)55(ANO)]TJ 11 0 0 11 180.215 484.98 Tm 0.022 Tc 0.126 Tw [( Jr)55(. Monetary policy in the emer)22(ging world)]TJ -8.1382 -1.2 TD 0.021 Tc 0.125 Tw (environment, in )Tj /F8 1 Tf 7.1673 0 TD (Coming to grips with globalization,)Tj /F5 1 Tf 15.5018 0 TD [( edited by)]TJ -22.6691 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 98.015 458.58 Tm 0.001 Tc [(A)100(YET)79(ANO)]TJ 11 0 0 11 133.895 458.58 Tm 0.066 Tc ( P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 143.495 458.58 Tm 0 Tc (ADERANGA)Tj 11 0 0 11 186.575 458.58 Tm 0.071 Tw [(, Jr)55(. Diliman, Quezon City: University of the)]TJ -8.7164 -1.2 TD 0.032 Tc 0.125 Tw (Philippines, Center for Integrative and Development Studies,)Tj T* 0.048 Tc (c2000.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.015 416.1 Tm 0.054 Tc (AHRE)Tj 11 0 0 11 105.575 416.1 Tm 0.037 Tc 0.123 Tw (, R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 121.055 416.1 Tm 0.056 Tc [(OBER)72(T)]TJ 11 0 0 11 147.815 416.1 Tm 0.038 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.7091 0 TD 0.037 Tc 0.126 Tw [(Leading Questions: How Hegemony )15(Affects the)]TJ -5.9018 -1.2 TD 0.007 Tc 0.125 Tw (International Political Economy)Tj /F5 1 Tf 13.4182 0 TD 0.008 Tc (, U. Mich., Press., 1999.)Tj -14.7055 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 82.655 386.94 Tm -0.001 Tc (ALAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 104.015 386.94 Tm 0.003 Tc -0.027 Tw (, R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 116.495 386.94 Tm -0.001 Tc (ONEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 137.855 386.94 Tm 0.001 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.4691 0 TD 0 Tc -0.031 Tw [(New tr)44(ends in global political theory)51(, in Global political)]TJ -4.7564 -1.2 TD 0.005 Tc 0.125 Tw (economy: contemporary theories)Tj /F5 1 Tf 13.6036 0 TD 0.004 Tc 0.123 Tw (, \(ed.\) R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 279.575 373.74 Tm (ONEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 301.055 373.74 Tm 0.132 Tc 0 Tw ( P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 311.375 373.74 Tm 0.004 Tc (ALAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 332.975 373.74 Tm 0.005 Tc 0.127 Tw (, Routledge,)Tj -22.0255 -1.2 TD 0.013 Tc 0.126 Tw [(London; New )35(Y)102(ork, 2000.)]TJ -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 82.895 344.46 Tm 0.037 Tc (ALMER)Tj 11 0 0 11 111.215 344.46 Tm 0.034 Tc 0.098 Tw (, T)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 125.495 344.46 Tm 0.041 Tc (OM)Tj 11 0 0 11 138.455 344.46 Tm 0.026 Tc 0.126 Tw [( G., Intellectual property: a non-posnerian Law and)]TJ -4.3418 -1.2 TD 0.011 Tc (Economics approach, 12 )Tj /F8 1 Tf 10.7345 0 TD 0.125 Tw (Hamline l. Rev)Tj /F5 1 Tf 6.3818 0 TD 0.128 Tw (., 1989.)Tj -18.4036 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 82.655 315.18 Tm [(E)6(L)94(TZMAN)]TJ 11 0 0 11 118.655 315.18 Tm 0.002 Tc 0.086 Tw (, S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 131.255 315.18 Tm -0.006 Tc (AM)Tj 11 0 0 11 143.615 315.18 Tm -0.002 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5891 0 TD 0 Tc 0.091 Tw [(Review of The Handbook of Industrial Or)33(ganization,)]TJ -5.4 -1.2 TD 0.003 Tc 0.125 Tw (The Journal of Political Economy)Tj /F5 1 Tf 14.1491 0 TD 0.126 Tw (, vol. 99, n\260 1, Feb., 1991, pp.)Tj -14.1491 -1.2 TD 0.043 Tc (201-217.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 82.655 272.7 Tm (HILLIPS)Tj 11 0 0 11 111.215 272.7 Tm 0.003 Tc 0.082 Tw (, R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 125.015 272.7 Tm 0 Tc (ICHARD)Tj 11 0 0 11 154.535 272.7 Tm -0.004 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5782 0 TD 0 Tc (Use and misuse of power analysis in international)Tj -6.3818 -1.2 TD 0.117 Tw [(theory)62(,)0( in Global political economy: contemporar)-11(y theories)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 24.5782 0 TD 0.118 Tw (, \(ed.\))Tj -24.5782 -1.2 TD 0 Tw (R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 98.015 246.3 Tm 0.004 Tc (ONEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 119.495 246.3 Tm 0.121 Tc ( P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 129.695 246.3 Tm 0.004 Tc (ALAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 151.175 246.3 Tm 0.002 Tc 0.127 Tw [(, Routledge, London, New )24(Y)102(ork, 2000.)]TJ -6.7855 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 82.895 230.34 Tm 0.029 Tc [(IST)13(OR)]TJ 11 0 0 11 106.175 230.34 Tm 0.02 Tc 0.123 Tw (, K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 121.655 230.34 Tm 0.029 Tc [(A)112(THARINA)]TJ 11 0 0 11 162.935 230.34 Tm 0.022 Tc 0.126 Tw [(,)-7( )22(The Standardization of Law and its Ef)22(fect on)]TJ -6.5673 -1.2 TD 0.009 Tc 0.125 Tw (Developing Economies, 50 )Tj /F8 1 Tf 11.7164 0 TD 0.126 Tw (Am. J. Comp. L.)Tj /F5 1 Tf 6.9818 0 TD 0.01 Tc 0.127 Tw [( 97, 2002.)]TJ -19.9855 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 82.655 201.06 Tm -0.002 Tc [(OR)60(TER)]TJ 11 0 0 11 107.375 201.06 Tm 0.001 Tc -0.023 Tw (, R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 119.975 201.06 Tm 0.002 Tc (OGER)Tj 11 0 0 11 140.975 201.06 Tm -0.001 Tc -0.03 Tw [( B., )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 1.6036 0 TD 0 Tc [(Efficiency)55(, equity)55(, and legitimacy: the global trading)]TJ -6.1745 -1.2 TD 0.042 Tc 0.124 Tw [(system in the twenty-first century)61(,)1( in Efficiency)42(, equity)64(, and)]TJ T* 0.027 Tc (legitimacy: the multilateral trading system at the millennium)Tj /F5 1 Tf 26.8036 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -26.8036 -1.2 TD 0.056 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Center for Business and Government, Harvard University)67(,)]TJ 0 -1.1564 TD 0.013 Tc [(Brookings Institution Press, )13(W)84(ashington, DC, c2001.)]TJ -1.2873 -1.44 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.855 132.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (OSENTHAL)Tj 11 0 0 11 124.415 132.9 Tm 0.002 Tc -0.059 Tw (, D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 137.255 132.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (OUGLAS)Tj 11 0 0 11 168.455 132.9 Tm 0 Tc -0.062 Tw [( E. & P)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 198.815 132.9 Tm -0.003 Tc (HENDON)Tj 11 0 0 11 231.215 132.9 Tm -0.054 Tc 0 Tw ( N)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 241.295 132.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (ICOLAIDES)Tj 11 0 0 11 281.855 132.9 Tm 0 Tc -0.063 Tw [(, Harmonizing )55(Antitrust:)]TJ -17.3782 -1.2 TD 0.015 Tc 0.125 Tw (the less effective way to promote international competition, in:)Tj /F8 1 Tf T* 0 Tc 0.034 Tw (Global Competition Policy)Tj /F5 1 Tf 10.8436 0 TD 0.036 Tw (, \(ed.\) J. D)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 257.615 106.5 Tm [(A)130(VID)]TJ 11 0 0 11 275.855 106.5 Tm 0.034 Tc 0 Tw ( R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 286.295 106.5 Tm -0.001 Tc (ICHARDSON)Tj 11 0 0 11 331.175 106.5 Tm 0 Tc 0.036 Tw [( and E)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 360.095 106.5 Tm -0.004 Tc [(D)-6(W)105(ARD)]TJ 11 0 0 11 90.695 93.3 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.119 Tw (M. G)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 115.175 93.3 Tm 0.001 Tc (RAHAM)Tj 11 0 0 11 143.855 93.3 Tm 0 Tc (, 1997.)Tj -6.12 -1.4618 TD 0 Tw (S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 83.015 77.22 Tm 0.056 Tc (ACHS)Tj 11 0 0 11 105.455 77.22 Tm 0.04 Tc 0.122 Tw (, J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 117.935 77.22 Tm 0.06 Tc (EFFREY)Tj 11 0 0 11 149.375 77.22 Tm 0.041 Tc 0.126 Tw [( D., )63(Assessing the ef)19(ficiency gains from further)]TJ -5.3345 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.032 Tw (liberalization, in )Tj /F8 1 Tf 6.8618 0 TD [(Efficiency)55(, equity)55(, and legitimacy: the multilateral)]TJ -6.8618 -1.2 TD 0.056 Tc 0.125 Tw (trading system at the millennium)Tj /F5 1 Tf 15.4145 0 TD 0.057 Tc [( Center for Business and)]TJ ET endstream endobj 96 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 98 0 obj << /Length 7546 >> stream BT /F4 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 65.205 28.38 Tm 0 g /GS1 gs 0.004 Tc 0.033 Tw [(Int. Law: Rev)73(. Colomb. Derecho Int. Bogot\341 \(Colombia\) N\260 9: 205-234, mayo de 2007)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 65.205 588.18 Tm 0.03 Tc (234)Tj 11.6133 -0.0267 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 175.605 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (ARLOS)Tj 9 0 0 9 195.765 587.94 Tm -0.073 Tc ( P)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 202.365 587.94 Tm -0.018 Tc (ABLO)Tj 9 0 0 9 219.045 587.94 Tm -0.072 Tc ( M)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 228.525 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (\301RQUEZ)Tj 9 0 0 9 253.485 587.94 Tm -0.061 Tc ( E)Tj 6.3 0 0 6.3 260.565 587.94 Tm -0.015 Tc (SCOBAR)Tj ET 0 G 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d 1 i 169.245 585.66 m 286.245 585.66 l S BT 11 0 0 11 79.365 556.74 Tm 0.026 Tc 0.125 Tw (Government, Brookings Institution Press, Harvard University;)Tj 0 -1.2 TD 0.02 Tc [(W)80(ashington, DC., c2001.)]TJ /F8 1 Tf -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 70.725 527.46 Tm 0.016 Tc (HY)Tj 11 0 0 11 80.925 527.46 Tm 0.009 Tc 0.123 Tw (, O)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 96.045 527.46 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (Z)Tj 11 0 0 11 100.485 527.46 Tm 0.011 Tc 0.127 Tw (, Industrial)Tj /F5 1 Tf 4.7018 0 TD 0.126 Tw [( Or)11(ganization, )22(Theory and )54(Applications, 1996.)]TJ -7.9091 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 71.325 511.38 Tm 0.001 Tc (IMMONS)Tj 11 0 0 11 102.885 511.38 Tm 0 Tc 0.12 Tw (, B)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 117.045 511.38 Tm 0.002 Tc (ETH)Tj 11 0 0 11 132.045 511.38 Tm 0.064 Tw [( A., )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 1.9091 0 TD 0 Tc 0.122 Tw (The International Politics of Harmonization: The)Tj -6.6982 -1.2 TD 0.061 Tw (Case of Capital Market Regulation)Tj /F5 1 Tf 14.3018 0 TD 0.064 Tw [(, 55 International Or)22(ganization,)]TJ -14.3018 -1.2 TD 0.053 Tc (589.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 71.325 468.9 Tm (KLAIR)Tj 11 0 0 11 94.845 468.9 Tm 0.122 Tw (, L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 108.405 468.9 Tm 0.001 Tc (ESLIE)Tj 11 0 0 11 129.405 468.9 Tm 0.125 Tw [(, )11(TNCs as Political )55(Actors, in: A)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 280.365 468.9 Tm -0.001 Tc (NKIE)Tj 11 0 0 11 298.725 468.9 Tm 0.13 Tc 0 Tw ( H)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 310.845 468.9 Tm 0.001 Tc [(OOGVEL)79(T)]TJ 11 0 0 11 346.605 468.9 Tm 0 Tc ( )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.3709 0 TD 0.002 Tc 0.127 Tw (et al.,)Tj -24.6655 -1.2 TD 0.02 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Debate: T)64(ransnational Corporations\222)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 15.9927 0 TD [(, New Political Economy)75(,)]TJ -15.9927 -1.2 TD 0.012 Tc [(3 \(2\), July)67(, 280-92, 1998.)]TJ -1.2873 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 71.325 426.54 Tm -0.001 Tc (PRUYT)Tj 11 0 0 11 96.525 426.54 Tm 0 Tc 0.087 Tw (, H)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 110.925 426.54 Tm -0.001 Tc (ENDRIK)Tj 11 0 0 11 139.965 426.54 Tm 0.003 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.5891 0 TD 0 Tc 0.086 Tw [(Globalization and theories of r)44(egulation, in Global)]TJ -6.0982 -1.2 TD 0.022 Tc 0.126 Tw (political economy: contemporary theories)Tj /F5 1 Tf 18.0545 0 TD 0.125 Tw (, \(ed.\) R)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 318.885 413.34 Tm 0.03 Tc (ONEN)Tj 11 0 0 11 341.205 413.34 Tm 0.143 Tc 0 Tw ( P)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 351.885 413.34 Tm 0.03 Tc (ALAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 374.205 413.34 Tm 0 Tc (,)Tj -26.8036 -1.2 TD 0.015 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Routledge, London, New )37(Y)93(ork, 2000.)]TJ -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 71.325 384.06 Tm 0.003 Tc (TIGLER)Tj 11 0 0 11 98.925 384.06 Tm 0.004 Tc 0.123 Tw (, G)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 113.805 384.06 Tm (EORGE)Tj 11 0 0 11 139.605 384.06 Tm 0.003 Tc 0.126 Tw [( J., )58(A)49( )19(Theory of Oligopoly)58(, 72 )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 13.1673 0 TD 0.125 Tw (J. Pol. Econ)Tj /F5 1 Tf 5.1818 0 TD 0.127 Tw (, 44-61,)Tj -23.8255 -1.2 TD 0.01 Tc 0.125 Tw [(1964, reprinted in )21(The Or)21(ganization of Industry 39, G. S)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 346.125 370.86 Tm 0.015 Tc (TIGLER)Tj 11 0 0 11 374.205 370.86 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (,)Tj -26.8036 -1.2 TD 0.022 Tc 0.127 Tw (\(ed.\), 1968.)Tj -1.2873 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 71.325 341.58 Tm 0.005 Tc (TIGLITZ)Tj 11 0 0 11 101.205 341.58 Tm 0.125 Tc ( J)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 109.725 341.58 Tm 0.007 Tc (OSEPH)Tj 11 0 0 11 134.325 341.58 Tm 0.005 Tc 0.126 Tw [( E. and )-6(A)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 180.525 341.58 Tm 0.007 Tc (NDREW)Tj 11 0 0 11 209.085 341.58 Tm 0.132 Tc 0 Tw ( C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 220.725 341.58 Tm 0.007 Tc [(HARL)101(T)10(O)2(N)]TJ 11 0 0 11 256.965 341.58 Tm 0.005 Tc (, )Tj /F8 1 Tf 0.6327 0 TD 0.126 Tw [(Fair T)49(rade for )16(All: How)]TJ -16.7782 -1.2 TD 0.014 Tc [(T)57(rade Can Pr)36(omote Development,)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 14.4764 0 TD 0.013 Tc 0.128 Tw [( 2005.)]TJ -15.7636 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 71.325 312.3 Tm -0.001 Tc (TRANGE)Tj 11 0 0 11 102.525 312.3 Tm -0.002 Tc 0.05 Tw (, S)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 114.645 312.3 Tm 0.002 Tc (USAN)Tj 11 0 0 11 135.525 312.3 Tm -0.001 Tc 0.04 Tw [(, T)65(erritory)64(, )-11(State, )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 7.1127 0 TD 0 Tc 0.051 Tw [(Authority and Economy: New r)44(ealist)]TJ -12.2182 -1.2 TD 0.053 Tc 0.125 Tw [(ontology of Global Political Economy in the new r)42(ealism:)]TJ T* 0.002 Tc [(perspectives on multilateralism and world or)35(der)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 20.04 0 TD 0.001 Tc [( \(ed.\) R)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 335.925 285.9 Tm 0.005 Tc [(OBER)67(T)]TJ 11 0 0 11 360.885 285.9 Tm -0.082 Tc 0.181 Tw [( W.)]TJ -25.5927 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (C)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 86.805 272.7 Tm 0.005 Tc (OX)Tj 11 0 0 11 98.085 272.7 Tm 0.01 Tc 0.127 Tw (, 1996.)Tj -2.9891 -1.4509 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (V)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 73.245 256.74 Tm 0.021 Tc (ANDEVELDE)Tj 11 0 0 11 121.365 256.74 Tm 0.015 Tc 0.123 Tw (, K)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 136.605 256.74 Tm 0.02 Tc (ENNETH)Tj 11 0 0 11 168.405 256.74 Tm 0.015 Tc 0.127 Tw [( J., Investment Liberalization and Economic)]TJ -8.0945 -1.2 TD 0 Tc 0.09 Tw [(Development: the role of bilateral Investment )21(T)33(reaties, 36 )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 24.1418 0 TD -0.001 Tc (Colum.)Tj -24.1418 -1.2 TD 0.009 Tc 0.124 Tw [(J. T)64(ransnat\222l L.)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 6.5455 0 TD 0.008 Tc [( 501, 1998.)]TJ -7.8327 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (W)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 75.525 214.26 Tm -0.002 Tc [(A)6(L)76(TER)]TJ 11 0 0 11 99.645 214.26 Tm 0 Tc -0.009 Tw (, A)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 113.085 214.26 Tm -0.001 Tc (NDREW)Tj 11 0 0 11 141.285 214.26 Tm 0 Tc [(, Do )22(They Really Rule the )22(W)82(orld? in A)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 312.405 214.26 Tm -0.001 Tc (NKIE)Tj 11 0 0 11 330.765 214.26 Tm -0.012 Tc 0 Tw ( H)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 341.325 214.26 Tm -0.002 Tc [(OOGVEL)76(T)]TJ /F8 1 Tf 11 0 0 11 79.365 201.06 Tm 0.055 Tc 0.123 Tw (et al.,)Tj /F5 1 Tf 2.76 0 TD 0.057 Tc 0.126 Tw [( Debate: )24(T)35(ransnational Corporations\222, )]TJ /F8 1 Tf 18.0109 0 TD 0.127 Tw (New Political)Tj -20.7709 -1.2 TD 0.011 Tc (Economy)Tj /F5 1 Tf 3.7964 0 TD 0.126 Tw [(, 3 \(2\), July)55(, 1998, 280-92.)]TJ -5.0836 -1.4618 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (W)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 75.885 171.78 Tm 0.041 Tc (HITE)Tj 11 0 0 11 94.725 171.78 Tm 0.027 Tc 0.122 Tw (, L)Tj 7.7 0 0 7.7 109.125 171.78 Tm 0.041 Tc [(A)77(WRENCE)]TJ 11 0 0 11 148.845 171.78 Tm 0.029 Tc 0.126 Tw (, International regulation of securities markets:)Tj -6.3164 -1.2 TD 0.018 Tc [(Competition or harmonization?, )63(A. L)]TJ 7.7 0 0 7.7 254.925 158.58 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (O)Tj 11 0 0 11 260.685 158.58 Tm 0.018 Tc 0.126 Tw (, \(ed.\) in: )Tj /F8 1 Tf 4.5164 0 TD 0.127 Tw (The Industrial)Tj -21 -1.2 TD 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Or)33(ganization of Securities Markets)]TJ /F5 1 Tf 14.7927 0 TD (, Chicago Press, 1996.)Tj ET endstream endobj 99 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F4 4 0 R /F5 5 0 R /F8 7 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 8 0 R >> >> endobj 100 0 obj << /Type /Halftone /HalftoneType 1 /HalftoneName (Default) /Frequency 60 /Angle 45 /SpotFunction /Round >> endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /SA false /OP false /HT /Default >> endobj 101 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 0 /CapHeight 0 /Descent 0 /Flags 4 /FontBBox [-86 -241 996 909] /FontName /BOOLFC+Times.New.Roman058.313 /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 0 /CharSet (/G66/G76/G116/G225/G67/G57/G176/G97/G48/G58/G68/G78/G108/G118/G98/G49/G99/G109/G119/G40/G50/G100/G110/G41/G51/G101/G111/G32/G121/G52/G82/G53/G73/G103/G44/G104/G114/G45/G55/G105/G46) /FontFile3 102 0 R >> endobj 102 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 5653 /Subtype /Type1C >> stream HtmPSWsBrs߂x\^CHBY,"2Y Dd] l\cÛ4 e\*fhwY]]qm]wZ.#vNAj~ϙsν #''kg۹GTd(+J1t7ϻWgϻsUJ_4P$8Ozx7nmm:V xuMЈom%"5Q/
RQw9TUQ]qX_9`C-O$\'Qrx2*1yĖ~<2hE>NV
@pf)=@.pX `DƉ4s|`?
{Om
o0{-++>\/Z5B_5%kkOZ
Fo'