Keywords
ecological restoration
social construction
social-ecological systems
How to Cite
Abstract
This research proposes a methodological model of ecological restoration as a strategy for the social construction in the district Chipautá, town of Guaduas. Four stages were defined: the first stage set the theoretical grounds required to build the model. The second stage consisted in the data collection out in the field with social cartographic techniques, semi-structured interviews, problem identification and meetings with social groups. It also included a systematic review of the bibliography dealing with ecological restoration experiences under a social approach, which allowed to obtain structuring elements that would contribute to the model. The third stage was intended to interpret and validate the results through the data triangulation. The final stage was the presentation of the methodological model itself. The proposed model contributed to the knowledge field of ecological restoration by setting out a new analytical framework enabling to recover degraded ecosystems and propose alternatives of both sustainable development and adaptative management to cope with the current environmental changes in the involved communities.
Cantillo, E., Lozada, A., y Pinzón, J. (2009). Caracterización sucesional para la restauración de la reserva forestal Cárpatos, Guasca, Cundinamarca. Colombia Forestal, 12, 103-118.
Barrera-Cataño, J., Contreras-Rodríguez, S., Garzón-Yepes, N., y Moreno-Cárdenas, A. (2010). Manual de restauración ecológica de los ecosistemas disturbados del Distrito Capital. Bogotá: Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente y Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
Clewell, A., Rieger, J., y Munro, J. (06 de 2000). Guidelines for Developing and Managing Ecological Restoration Projects. Society for Ecological Restoration (SER). Recuperado de http://www.iucnsscrsg.org/STORAGE/RSG%20CD/PDFs/SERGuide.pdf
Egan, D. (2003). Ecological Restoration and Sustainable Development. Ecological Restoration, 21(3), 161-162.
Gann, G., y Lamb, D. (2006). La restauración ecológica – un medio para conservar la biodiversidad y mantener los medios de vida. Recuperado de http://www1.inecol.edu.mx/repara/download/III_1_RestauracionEcologica_GannAndLamb2006.pdf
Gomá, R. (2008). La acción comunitaria: transformación social y construcción de ciudadanía. Revista de educación social, 7. Recuperado de http://www.eduso.net/res/?b=10&c=90&n=251
Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (MADR). (2003). Informe Final Proyecto Piloto de Zonas de Reserva Campesina: hacia una estrategia de la frontera de estabilización de la frontera agrícola con desarrollo humano. Bogotá: IICA Biblioteca Venezuela.
Hallett, L., Hobbs, R., y Mooney, H. (2011). Intervention Ecology: Applying Ecological Science in the Twenty-first Century. BioScience, 61(6), 442-450.
Hernández, S., Fernández, C., y Baptista, P. (2004). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.
Keenleyside, K., N. Dudley, S. C., Hall, C., y Stolton, S. (2014). Restauración Ecológica para Áreas Protegidas: Principios, directrices y buenas prácticas. Gland, Suiza: UICN.
Lozano, F. (Ed.). (2008). Herramientas de manejo para la conservación de la biodiversidad en paisajes rurales. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt.
Organización Internacional de las Maderas Tropicales (OIMT). (2002). Directrices de la OIMT para la restauración, ordenación y rehabilitación de bosques tropicales secundarios y degradados. Recuperado de http://www.itto.int/direct/topics/topics_pdf_download/topics_id=1540000&no=3&disp=inline
Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia (PNN). (2009). Recuperado el 23 de 04 de 2015, de http://www.parquesnacionales.gov.co/PNN/portel/libreria/pdf/AREAS_PROTEGIDAS_PAIS_2009_REPORTADAS_PNN.pdf
Román, F., Levy, S., Aguirre, J., y Sánchez, A. (2011). Arboles de la selva Lacandona útiles para la Restauración Ecológica. México D.F.: Comisión Nacional Forestal.
Ritchlin, J. (2001). Healing the Land… Healing Ourselves: A Guide to Ecological Resources for British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: BC Environmental Network Educational.
Skjong, R., y Wentworth, B. (2001). Expert Judgment and Risk Perception. Proceedings of the Eleventh (2001) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Norway: The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers
Subirats, J. (2010). Los grandes procesos de cambio y transformación social. Recuperado de https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/caplli/2010/119513/camsoccoosig_a2010p8.pdf
Ambiente y Desarrollo is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.