Publicado ene 14, 2019



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Kenneth Mølbjerg Jørgensen

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Resumen

This paper develops an ethical framework of leadership learning from Hannah Arendt’s writing. The intention is to identify important principles of a framework of leadership leading that help empower actors to lead themselves and to engage, interact, influence and inspire others through their appearances. It is argued that true leadership learning is directed initiating new beginnings through political actions. Such actions rely on spaces of freedom, which are spaces where people in organizations are answerable to each other and oneself. Three dimensions in this “spacing” are considered important: spaces of thinking, spaces of acting and spaces of judging They constitute three domains of freedom, which may help organizing and guiding leadership learning activities.

Keywords
References
Abildgaard, A. (2017). Viljen til Markedsgørelse – En Dispositionel og Diagnostisk Beskrivelse af Ureflekterede Sandheder, Subjektpositioner og Mulig Selv-formation i Offentlig-Privat Innovation (The Will to Marketization – A Dispositional and Diagnostic Description of Unreflected Truths, Subject Positions and Possible Self-formation in Public-Private Innovation. PhD thesis. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
Arendt, H. (1961). Politics and Freedom. In A. Hunold (ed.), Freedom and Serfdom (pp. 191-217). Dordrect: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Arendt, H. (2003). Responsibility and Judgment. New York: Schocken Books.
Arendt, H. (2006). What is Freedom. In H. Arendt (Ed. by Jerone Kohn), Between Past and Future (pp. 142-169). New York: Penquin.
Bager, A., Jørgensen, K. M. and Raudaskosski, P. (2016). Dialogue and Governmentality-in-Action: A Discourse Analysis of a Leadership Forum. In P. McIlvenny, J. Zhukova Klausen, L. Bang Lindegaard (Eds.), Studies of Discourse and Governmentality. New Perspectives and Methods (pp. 209-234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway – Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Barratt, E. (2008). The later Foucault in organization and management studies. Human Relations, 61 (4), 515–37.
Bell, E. and Taylor, S. (2003). The elevation of work: pastoral power and the new age work ethic. Organization, 10 (2), 329-349.
Benjamin, W. (1999). The Storyteller - Reflections on the Work of Nikolai Leskov. In W. Benjamin (Ed. by H. Arendt), Illuminations (pp. 83-107). London: Pimlico.
Boje, D. M. (2008a). Storytelling Organizations. London: Sage.
Boje, D. M. (2008b). Story Ethics. In D. M. Boje (Ed.), Critical Theory Ethics for Business and Public Administration (pp. 97-117). London, Sage.
Boje, D. M., Haley, U. and Saylors, R. (2016). Antenarratives of organizational change: the microstoria of Burger King’s storytelling in space, time and strategic context. Human Relations, 69 (2), 391–418.
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos – Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.
Bussolini J (2010) What is a dispositive? Foucault Studies 10, 85–107.
Butler, J. (2012). Can one lead a good life in a bad life? Radical Philosophy, 176, 9-18.
Butler, J. (2015). Notes Towards a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cunliffe, A. L. and Eriksen, M. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64 (11), 1425–1449.
Deleuze, G. (1992a). What is a Dispositif? In T. J. Armstrong (Ed.), Michel Foucault – Philosopher (pp. 159-168). New York, NY: Routledge.
Deleuze, G. (1992b). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October, 59, 3-7.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (2013). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury.
Drucker, P. F. (1974). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Harper & Row.
Edwards, R. (2008). Actively Seeking Subjects. In A. Fejes and K. Nicoll (Eds.), Foucault and Lifelong Learning – Governing the Subject (pp. 21-33). London, Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish - The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1980). The Confession of the Flesh. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other Writings 1972-1977 by Michel Foucault (pp. 194-228). New York, NY: Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In R. Martin, H. Gutman and P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self – A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16-49). Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.
Foucault, M. (1997). The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom. In M. Foucault (Ed. by Paul Rabinow), Ethics – Subjectivity and Truth (pp. 281-302). London: Allen Lane.
Foucault, M. (2000). The Subject and Power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault – Power – Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954 - 1984 - Volume 3 (326-348). London: Penguin.
Hardy, C. and Clegg, S. R. (1996). Some Dare Call It Power. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (Eds.). Handbook of Organization Studies (621-641). London: Sage.
Hersted, L. (2016). Relational Leading and Dialogic Process. PhD thesis. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
Hill, L. (2003). Becoming a Manager: How New Managers Master the Challenges of Leadership. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
Ibarra-Colado, E., Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C. and Kornberger, M. (2006). The ethics of managerial subjectivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 45-55.
Anonymous 2010. Details omitted for peer reviewing.
Anonymous 2012. Details omitted for peer reviewing.
Anonymous 2014. Details omitted for peer reviewing.
Anonymous 2017. Details omitted for peer reviewing.
Anonymous 2018. Details omitted for peer reviewing.
Keladu, Y. (2015). Ethics of worldliness: The ethical character of Arendt’s political thought. Kritike, 9 (1), 68–85.
Kirkeby, O. Hede, T. D., Mejlhede, M. and Larsen, J. (2010). Protreptik. Filosofisk Coaching i Ledelse. København: Samfundslitteratur.
Kotter, J. P. (1990). What Leaders Really Do. Harvard Business Review, 68 (3), 103-111
Ledelseskommissionen (2017). 3 Temaer, 13 Teser (The Leadership Commission, 3 Themes 13 Theses). Retrieved from https://www.ledelseskom.dk/sites/ledelseskom.dk/files/media/documents/170613_ledelseskommissionen_13_teser.pdf
Machlachlan, S. (2006). An ethics of plurality: Reconciling politics and morality in Hannah Arendt. IWM Junior Visiting Fellows’ Conferences, XXI(7).
Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. Sociological Review, 47 (1), 74-85.
Newton, T. (1998). Theorizing subjectivity in organizations: The failure of foucauldian studies? Organization Studies, 19 (3), 415–47.
Nicoll, K. and Fejes, A. (2008). Mobilizing Foucault in Studies of Lifelong Learning. In A. Fejes and K. Nicoll (Eds.) Foucault and Lifelong Learning: Governing the Subject (pp. 1-18). London: Routledge.
O’Connor, E. (1999). The politics of management thought: A case study of the Harvard Business School and the Human Relations School. The Academy of Management Review, 24 (1), 117-131.
Painter-Morland, M., Kirk, S., Deslandes, G. and Tansley, C. (2018). Talent management: The good, the bad and the possible. European Management Review.
Raffnsøe, S., Gudmand-Høyer, M. and Thaning, M. S. (2016). Foucault’s dispositive: The perspicacity of dispositive analytics in organizational research. Organization, 23 (2), 272-298.
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and Narrative – Volume One. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Spector, P. (2016). Discourse on Leadership – A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Starkey, K. P. and Hatchuel, A. (2002). The long detour: Foucault’s history of desire and pleasure. Organization 9 (4), 641–56.
Strand, A. M. C. (2012). Enacting the Between – On Dis/continuous Intra-active Becoming of/through an Apparatus of Material Storytelling. PhD thesis, Aalborg: Aalborg University.
Taguchi, H. L. (2010). Going Beyond the Theory/Practice Divide in Early Childhood Education – Introducing and Intra-active Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
Todd, S. (2009). Toward an Imperfect Education – Facing Humanity, Rethinking Cosmopolitanism. London: Paradigm Publishers.
Townley, B. (1994). Reframing Human Resource Management: Power, Ethics and the Subject at Work. London: Sage.
Townley, B. (1995). ‘Know Thyself’: Self-awareness, Self-formation and Managing. Organization, 2 (2), 271-289.
Turner, K. (2014). Towards an Analytics of the Contemporary. PhD thesis: Aalborg: Aalborg University.
Välikangas, A. and Seeck, H. (2011). Exploring the Foucauldian interpretation of power and subject in organizations. Journal of Management and Organization, 17, 812-827.
Wilson, S. (2016). Thinking Differently About Leadership. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Cómo citar
Jørgensen, K. M. (2019). Las políticas del espacio: un marco arendtiano para el desarrollo del liderazgo. Cuadernos De Administración, 31(57), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao31-57.tpsa
Sección
Artículos