Rastreo y seguimiento del impacto de un mercado contemporáneo: el caso del mercado de Āgenskalns
HTML Full Text (Inglés)
PDF (Inglés)
XML (Inglés)

Palabras clave

impacto;
multifuncionalidad;
mercados de barrio;
salud y bienestar;
investigación participativa

Cómo citar

Kilis, E., Mileiko, I., Braslins, M., Tisenkopfs, T., Meiberga, U., Trizna, D., & Cimdins, R. (2025). Rastreo y seguimiento del impacto de un mercado contemporáneo: el caso del mercado de Āgenskalns. Cuadernos De Vivienda Y Urbanismo, 18. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cvu18.ttic
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Resumen

La transformación de los mercados tradicionales de barrio en centros comunitarios multifuncionales es un ejemplo de creación de espacios inclusivos, sostenibles y estéticamente agradables que cumplen múltiples funciones más allá de su propósito principal. En este artículo, se examina el enfoque multifuncional adoptado en el proyecto de renovación del mercado de Āgenskalns en Riga (Letonia) y se estudia cómo este tipo de transformaciones pueden repercutir en el bienestar de la comunidad y en la inclusión social, al tiempo que se subraya la necesidad de creatividad metodológica para garantizar que el impacto pueda captarse adecuadamente. El documento sostiene que, a pesar de sus limitaciones, los datos sugieren que se han producido multitud de cambios, y la importancia relativa y el impacto del mercado parecen ser significativos para la salud y el bienestar de los residentes locales. Además, el estudio subraya la necesidad de reconocer formas inesperadas de impacto y, al mismo tiempo, estar preparados para ajustar los repertorios metodológicos a fin de evitar la imposición de métricas inadecuadas a una situación compleja.

HTML Full Text (Inglés)
PDF (Inglés)
XML (Inglés)

Affre, L., Guillaumie, L., Dupéré, S., Mercille, G. & Fortin-Guay, M. (2024). Citizen Participation Practices in the Governance of Local Food Systems: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 16(14), 5990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145990

Alomoto, W., Niñerola, A., & Pié, L. (2022). Social impact assessment: A systematic review of literature. Social Indicators Research, 161, 225-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02809-1

Alvarez-Galvez, J., & Salvador-Carulla, L. (2013). Perceived Discrimination and Self-Rated Health in Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey (2010). PLoS ONE, 8(9), e74252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074252

Béjaoui, F. (2022). The Central Market in Tunis: Fondouk Al-Ghalla. In H. Neveen (Ed.), Architecture and Urban Transformation of Historical Markets: Cases from the Middle East and North Africa (1st ed., pp. 52-66). Routledge.

Bilić, B., & Šmit, K. (2024). Evaluation of the New European Bauhaus in urban plans by land use occurrence indicators: A case study in Rijeka, Croatia. Buildings, 14(4), 1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14041058

Cheung, S. Y. S., Lei, D., Chan, F. Y. F., & Tieben, H. (2022). Public Space Usage and Well-Being: Participatory Action Research with Vulnerable Groups in Hyper-Dense Environments. Urban Planning, 7(4), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5764

Coles, B. (2021). Making Markets Making Place. Geography, Topo/graphy and the Reproduction of an Urban Marketplace. Palgrave Pivot Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72865-6

Corburn, J. (2005). Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6494.001.0001

Davila, F., Maughan, N., Rixen, T., & Visser, M. (2022). The Multifunctionality of Urban Agriculture Projects in Brussels. Acta Horticulturae, 1356, 219-232.

De Backer, M., & Pavoni, A. (2018). Through Thick and Thin: Young People’s Affective Geographies in Brussels’ Public Space. Emotion, Space and Society, 27, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.02.005

European Commission: Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion & Clifford, J. (2014). Proposed Approaches to Social Impact Measurement in European Commission Legislation and in Practice Relating to EuSEFs and the EaSI : GECES Sub-Group on Impact Measurement 2014. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/28855

European Commission: Joint Research Centre, Lourenço, P. B., Maloutas, T., Romano, E., Santamouris, M., Negro, P., Widera, B., Ansaloni, F., Balaras, C., Katurić, I., Kolokotsa, D., Rossetto, T., Senatore, G., Tomaszewicz, A., Medeiros, E., Gkatzogias, K., Pohoryles, D., Acri, M., Becerik-Gerber, B., … Vecco, M. (2024). A practical Guide to the New European Bauhaus self-assessment method and tool (Romano, E., Negro, P., Gkatzogias, K., Eds.). Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/9581060

European Commission. (n.d.). About the initiative. New European Bauhaus. Author. https://new-european-bauhaus.europa.eu/about/about-initiative_en

Fuertes, P., & Gomez-Escoda, E. M. (2022). Supplying Barcelona: The Role of Public Market Halls in the Construction of the Urban Food System. Journal of Urban History, 48(5), 1121-1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144220971821

Greenwood, D. J., Whyte, W. F., & Harkavy, I. (1993). Participatory Action Research as a Process and as a Goal. Human Relations, 46(2), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600203

Grivins, M., Keech, D., Kunda, I., Tisenkopfs, T. (2017). Bricolage for Self-Sufficiency: An Analysis of Alternative Food Networks. Sociologia Ruralis, 57(3), 340-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12171

Hazenberg, R., & Paterson-Young, C. (Eds.). (2021). Social Impact Measurement for a Sustainable Future: The Power of Aesthetics and Practical Implications. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83152-3

Koopmans, M. E., Mettepenningen, E., Kunda, I., Keech, D., & Tisenkopfs, T. (2017). Creating Spatial Synergies around Food in Cities. Urban Agriculture & Regional Food Systems, 2(1), 1-9. https//doi.org/10.2134/urbanag2016.06.0003

MacDonald, C. (2012). Understanding Participatory Action Research: A Qualitative Research Methodology Option. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13(2), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v13i2.37

Miller, N. (1994). Participatory action Research: Principles, Politics, and Possibilities. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1994(63), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719946308

Morales, A. (2009). Public Markets as Community Development Tools. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(4), 426-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08329471

Richmond, A. R., Harrell, K. N., Ridgeway, J. R., & M. Ware, A. (2024). Food for Thought: Unveiling Urban Transitions in a Small US City through the Lens of Foodscape Typologies. Landscape Research, 50(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2024.2377163

Roe, J., & McCay, L. (2021). Restorative Cities: Urban Design for Mental Health and Well-being. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Roe, M., Sarlöv Herlin, I., & Speak, S. (2016). Identity, Food and Landscape Character in the Urban Context. Landscape Research, 41(7), 757-772. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1212324

Seale, K. (2016). Markets, Places, Cities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315733234

Vaivadaite, S., & Navickiene, E. (2024). The Potential of Food Markets in the Contemporary City: A Systematic Literature Review. Architecture and Urban Planning, 20(1), 112-123.

Warsaw, P., Archambault, S., He, A., & Miller, S. (2021). The Economic, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Farmers Markets: Recent Evidence from the US. Sustainability, 13(6), 3423. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063423

Woźniczka, A. (2023). The Impact of Policy Initiatives on the Design of Public Spaces on the Example of the New European Bauhaus. Architectus, 3(75), 539-549. https://doi.org/10.37190/arc230308

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2025 Emils Kilis, Ilze Mileiko, Miks Braslins, Talis Tisenkopfs, Una Meiberga, Darja Trizna, Rudolfs Cimdins