Published Sep 13, 2021



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Mauricio Andres Arango Ossa

Claudia Patricia Henao López

Luis Mauricio Rivera Gallego

Juliana Piedrahita Maya

Andrea Agudelo Gómez

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

Introduction: Nursing professionals are the caregivers who provide most of the direct care that patients receive. Understanding what patients perceive as caring behaviors is essential to tailor nursing complications to meet the patient's needs. Objective: To describe the perception of nursing care behaviors that nursing professionals have in a highly complex university clinic in the city of Medellín (Colombia). Method: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. Nursing professionals who work at the institution in 2018 are included. This is an instrument that measures the perception of care provided, which is called: Assessment of care behaviors provided by nursing (ECCOE). Results: Of the 81 nursing professionals who participated in the study, the perception of care provided by nursing had an overall assessment of 89.4%. In the relation of the calculated means obtained in each subscales, higher averages were found for Support / protection / environment 92.3%, assistance in human needs 92.0%, humanism / Faith / hope / sensitivity 91.8%, and lower averages in Existential / Phenomenological / Spiritual Forces 88.6% Help / Confidence 86.5%, Expression of positive / negative feelings 85.5%, Teaching / Learning 84.7%. Conclusion: Professionals perceive care behaviors in a positive way; It was possible to establish aspects such as helping the patient set goals for his health, configure how to achieve them and not abandon or walk away when he is sad. The findings help guide care behaviors to adapt nursing complications and meet the needs of the patient. Descriptors: perception, nursing care, care behaviors, patients.

Keywords
References
1. Guerrero Ramírez R, Meneses La Riva ME, De la Cruz Ruiz M. Cuidado humanizado de enfermería según la teoría de Jean Watson, servicio de medicina del Hospital Daniel Alcides Carrión. Lima-Callao, 2015. RENH. 2016;9(2):133-42. https://doi.org/10.20453/renh.v9i2.3017

2. Beltrán Salazar OA. The meaning of humanized nursing care for those participating in it: Importance of efforts of nurses and healthcare institutions. Invest. educ. enferm. 2016;34(1):18-28. https://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v34n1a03

3. Arredondo-González CP, Siles-González J. Tecnología y humanización de los cuidados. Una mirada desde la teoría de las relaciones interpersonales. Index Enferm. 2009;18(1):32-36.

4. Amezcua Martínez M. La humanización del cuidado y la atención personalizada en enfermería. En: Sacristán del Castillo JA, Núñez Cortés JM, Gutiérrez Fuentes JA, coordinadores. Medicina centrada en el paciente: reflexiones a la carta. Madrid: Fundación Lilly; 2018. p. 63-69.

5. Escobar Castellanos B, Cid Henriquez P. El cuidado de enfermería y la ética derivados del avance tecnológico en salud. Acta bioeth. 2018;24(1).

6. Rodríguez Á. Hacia la humanización en salud. ARS med. 2016;34(1):130-4. https://doi.org/10.11565/arsmed.v34i1.233

7. Turkel MC, Watson J, Giovannoni J. Caring science or science of caring. Nurs Sci Q. 2018;31(1):66-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318417741116

8. Watson J. Assessing and measuring caring in nursing and health science. 2ª ed. Nueva York: Springer Publishing; 2009.

9. Brown C, Holcomb L, Maloney J, Naranjo J, Russell P. Caring in action: the patient care facilitator role. Int J Hum Caring. 2005;9:1-13.

10. Sierra Herrera MT, Cardona Cardona LP, Bernal Segura MF, Rozo AE. Percepción del cuidado de enfermería en diferentes instituciones hospitalarias de la ciudad de Bogotá. Av. enferm. 2006;24(1):68-72.

11. Poblete Troncoso M, Valenzuela Suazo S. Cuidado humanizado: un desafío para las enfermeras en los servicios hospitalarios. Acta Paul Enferm. 2007;20(4):499-503.

12. González-Ortega Y. Instrumento cuidado de comportamiento profesional: validez y confiabilidad. Aquichan. 2008;8(2):170-182.

13. Ayala-Valenzuela R, Calvo-Gil MJ, Torres-Andrade MC, Koch-Ewertz T. Evidencias para la filosofía de Watson: versión preliminar del caring behaviors assessment en Chile*. Rev Cubana Enfermer. 2010;26(1):42-51.

14. Morales-Castillo FA, Hernández-Cruz MC, Morales Rodríguez MC, Landeros Olvera EA. Validación y estandarización del instrumento: evaluación de los comportamientos de cuidado otorgado en enfermeras mexicanas. Enfermería Universitaria. 2016;13(1):3-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reu.2015.11.005

15. Heydari N, Torkaman M, Torabizadeh C. The relationship between nurses’ perceptions of caring behaviors based on Watson’s theory and of professional ethics: a cross-sectional study. Research Square. 2020; https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-31487/v1

16. Morales Castillejos L, Gracia Verónica Y, Landeros Olvera E. Relación de la inteligencia emocional con el cuidado otorgado por enfermeras/os. Rev Cuid. 2020;11(3). https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.989

17. Cifuentes JE, Manrique Abril FG. Satisfacción laboral en enfermería en una institución de salud de cuarto nivel de atención, Bogotá, Colombia. av.enferm. 2014;32(2):217-27.

18. Vujanić J, Prlić N, Lovrić R. Nurses’ self-assessment of caring behaviors in nurse-patient interactions: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;17(14):5255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145255. PMID: 32708178; PMCID: PMC7400290.

19. Alligood MR. Nursing theorists and their work. 9ª ed. Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2017.

20. Rocha Rodrigues MG, Séchaud L. Caring models in geriatric rehabilitation: an integrative review. Holist Nurs Pract. 2019 Jul/Aug;33(4):237-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000336. PMID: 31192836.

21. Delmas P, Antonini M, Berthoud L, O’Reilly L, Cara C, Brousseau S, Bellier-Teichmann T, Weidmann J, Roulet-Schwab D, Ledoux I, Pasquier J, Boillat E, Brandalesi V, Konishi M. A comparative descriptive analysis of perceived quality of caring attitudes and behaviours between haemodialysis patients and their nurses. Nurs Open. 2019 Nov 26;7(2):563-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.421. PMID: 32089853; PMCID: PMC7024631.

22. Monje-V P, Miranda-C P, Oyarzün-G J, Seguel-P F, Flores-G E. Percepción de cuidado humanizado de enfermería desde la perspectiva de usuarios hospitalizados. Cienc. enferm. 2018;24:5. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95532018000100205

23. Landman Navarro C, Cruz Osorio M, García García E, Pérez Meza P, Sandoval Barrera P, Serey Burgos K, et al. Satisfacción usuaria respecto a competencia de comunicación del profesional de enfermería. Cienc. enferm. 2015;21(1):91-102.

24. Góes MGO, Crossetti MGO. Developing a spiritual care model for patients and their relatives in illness. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2020;41(esp):e20190150. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2020.20190150
How to Cite
Arango Ossa, M. A., Henao López, C. P. ., Rivera Gallego, L. M., Piedrahita Maya, J. ., & Agudelo Gómez, A. . (2021). Evaluación de los comportamientos de cuidado otorgados a partir de la percepción del profesional de enfermería. Investigación En Enfermería Imagen Y Desarrollo, 23. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.ie23.ecco
Section
Original Research Articles