Publicado dic 15, 2021



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Ana Laguía

Juan Antonio Moriano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8332-1314

Fernando Molero https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9789-9822

Cristina García-Ael https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9460-9268

Rolf van Dick https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-9466

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Resumen

Este artículo describe la adaptación y validación del Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) en contextos organizacionales en España. Asimismo, este estudio explora empíricamente la relación positiva entre este estilo de liderazgo y el work engagement de los seguidores, mediada por el afecto positivo y negativo en el trabajo. Un total de 854 empleados (53.6% mujeres, 46.4% hombres; M = 40.7 años, SD = 11.5, 19–74) cumplimentaron un cuestionario online. Se realizaron análisis descriptivos y factoriales confirmatorios. Los resultados indicaron que la versión española del ILI presenta adecuadas propiedades psicométricas. Las cuatro dimensiones obtenidas en otros países (prototipicidad de la identidad, promoción de la identidad, emprendimiento de la identidad y establecimiento de la identidad) fueron replicadas en nuestra muestra. Únicamente el emprendimiento de la identidad se relacionó significativamente con el afecto positivo y negativo en el trabajo de los seguidores, los cuales, a su vez, se relacionaron con el engagement reportado. Concluimos, por tanto, que la versión española del ILI mide adecuadamente el liderazgo en las organizaciones desde la perspectiva de la identidad social. Futuros estudios se pueden apoyar en este instrumento para valorar y promover este estilo de liderazgo.

Keywords

leadership, social identity, positive affect, work engagement, Identity Leadership Inventoryliderazgo, identidad social, afecto positivo, work engagement, Inventario de Liderazgo Identitario

References
Arnold, K. A. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000062

Azanza, G., Gorgievski, M. J., Moriano, J. A., & Molero, F. (2018). Influencing salespeople’s work outcomes through authentic leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(7), 926-944. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2017-0113

Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program manual. Multivariate Software, Inc.

Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. (2015). Supplement to EQS 6.3 for Windows User’s Guide. Multivariate Software, Inc.

Bledow, R., Schmitt, A., Frese, M., & Kühnel, J. (2011). The affective shift model of work engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1246-1257. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024532

Borst, R. T., Kruyen, P. M., Lako, C. J., & de Vries, M. S. (2020). The attitudinal, behavioral, and performance outcomes of work engagement: A comparative meta-analysis across the public, semipublic, and private sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 613-640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19840399

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2ª ed.). Guilford Press.

Castellano, E., Muñoz-Navarro, R., Toledo, M. S., Spontón, C., & Medrano, L. A. (2019). Cognitive processes of emotional regulation, burnout and work engagement. Psicothema, 31(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.228

Epitropaki, O., Kark, R., Mainemelis, C., & Lord, R. G. (2017). Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 104-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.003

Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. The University of Akron Press.

Fornell, C. G., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Haslam, S. A., Steffens, N. K., Peters, K., Boyce, R. A., Mallett, C. J., & Fransen, K. (2017). A social identity approach to leadership development. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 16(3), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000176

Haslam, S. A., & van Dick, R. (2012). A social identity approach to workplace stress. In D. D. Cremer, R. v. Dick & K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and organizations (pp. 325-352). Routledge.

Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. (2004). The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35(3), 246-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496404263424

Laguna, M., Mielniczuk, E., Razmus, W., Moriano, J. A., & Gorgievski, M. J. (2017). Cross‐culture and gender invariance of the Warr (1990) job‐related well‐being measure. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(1), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12166

Molero, F., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Laguía, A., & Moriano, J. A. (2019). The development and validation of the leader as security provider scale. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 35(3), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2019a20

Platow, M. J., Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Steffens, N. K. (2015). There is no leadership if no-one follows: Why leadership is necessarily a group process. International Coaching Psychology Review, 10(1), 20-37.

Robledo, E., Zappalà, S., & Topa, G. (2019). ob crafting as a mediator between work engagement and wellbeing outcomes: A time-lagged study. International Journal of Environmental Research and public Health, 16(8), 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081376

Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M., & De Witte, H. (2017). An ultra-short measure for work engagement: The UWES-3 validation across five countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 577-591. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000430

Skakon, J., Nielsen, K., Borg, V., & Guzman, J. (2010). Are leaders' well-being, behaviours and style associated with the affective well-being of their employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work & Stress, 24(2), 107-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.495262

Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Kerschreiter, R., Schuh, S. C., & van Dick, R. (2014). Leaders enhance group members’ work engagement and reduce their burnout by crafting social identity. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 28(1-2), 173-194. https://doi.org/10.1688/ZfP-2014-01-Steffens

Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Platow, M. J., Fransen, K., Yang, J., Ryan, M. K., Jetten, J., Peters, K., & Boen, F. (2014). Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 1001-1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.002

Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., & Kessler, T. (2013). Leader performance and prototypicality: Their inter-relationship and impact on leaders’ identity entrepreneurship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(7), 606-613. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1985

Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Schuh, S. C., Jetten, J., & van Dick, R. (2017). A meta-analytic review of social identification and health in organizational contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(4), 303-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316656701

Steffens, N. K., Munt, K. A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M. J., & Haslam, S. A. (2020). Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(1), 35-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620962569

Steffens, N. K., Yang, J., Jetten, J., Haslam, S. A., & Lipponen, J. (2018). The unfolding impact of leader identity entrepreneurship on burnout, work engagement, and turnover intentions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(3), 373-387. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000090

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks Cole Publishing.

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.

van Dick, R., & Kerschreiter, R. (2016). The social identity approach to effective leadership: An overview and some ideas on cross-cultural generalizability. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 10(3), 363-384. https://doi.org/10.3868/s070-005-016-0013-3

van Dick, R., Lemoine, J. E., Steffens, N. K., Kerschreiter, R., Akfirat, S. A., Avanzi, L., Avanzi, L., Dumont, K., Epitropaki, O., Fransen, K., Giessner, S., González, R., Kark, R., Lipponen, J., Markovits, Y., Monzani, L., Orosz, G., Pandey, D., Roland‐Lévy, C., . . . Haslam, S. A. (2018). Identity leadership going global: Validation of the Identity Leadership Inventory across 20 countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(4), 697-728. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12223

van Dick, R., & Monzani, L. (2020). Positive leadership in organizations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.

Villajos, A., García-Ael, C., & Topa, G. (2019). Job crafting among labor union representatives: Its impact on work engagement and job satisfaction. Social Sciences, 8(1), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010020

Zhou, J., Ma, Y., Cheng, W., & Xia, B. (2014). Mediating role of employee emotions in the relationship between authentic leadership and employee innovation. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 42(8), 1267-1278. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.8.1267
Cómo citar
Laguía, A., Moriano, J. A., Molero, F., García-Ael, C., & van Dick, R. (2021). Liderazgo basado en la identidad y work engagement en España: Una adaptación transcultural del Inventario de Liderazgo Identitario (ILI). Universitas Psychologica, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy20.ilwe
Sección
Artículos

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a