Published Dec 2, 2013



PLUMX
Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Carlos Mario Molina-Betancur

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract
Today we cannot ignore that the first and most important contribution of the 1991 Colombian Constitution was the creation of a new, strong and independent judicial jurisdiction to counterbalance the traditional State power established. Progressively, it has consolidated itself as an example of institutional framework, a circumstance that has led to some integration difficulties. With its controversial case law regarding social rights protection, such a judicial institution has gradually become a true social jurisdiction, which is an unprecedented attitude transformation regarding the importance of fundamental rights in a democratic society. However, doubts about its institutional legitimacy -economy-wise- are being addressed, particularly when sentences establish actual public policies involving large expenditures from the State budget, which economists and a wide number of doctrines don’t seem to necessarily agree with.
Keywords

Constitutional Justice, Social Jurisdiction, Economics, Mínimum Subsistence, Judicial Activism, Fundamental Social Rightsjustice constitutionnelle, juridiction sociale, économie, minimum vital, activisme judiciaire, droits sociaux fondamentaux.justicia constitucional, jurisdicción social, economía, mínimo vital, activismo judicial, derechos sociales fundamentales

References
How to Cite
Molina-Betancur, C. M. (2013). Social Rights Protection and Economic. Revista De La Maestría En Derecho Económico, 6(6), 387–424. Retrieved from https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revmaescom/article/view/7177
Section
Artículos