El ciego anónimo y el ἀρχιτελώνης Zaqueo: análisis de la textura narrativa y sensorial-estética de Lucas 18,35-19,10
Publicado
ago 12, 2020
Almetrics
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Carlos Olivares
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9019-1231
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9019-1231
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Resumen
En el Evangelio de Lucas acontecen dos eventos en los que Jesús participa. En el primero, un mendigo ciego y anónimo clama por ayuda. En el segundo, un ἀρχιτελώνης llamado Zaqueo tiene la intención de ver a Jesús. Entre los dos eventos existen paralelos y diferencias literarias. Tales similitudes y contrastes están estructurados en relación con los sentidos, contextos espaciales y actitudes verbales. Un análisis de la textura narrativa y sensorial-estética permite establecer dichos conceptos, revelando a dos personajes que en términos narrativos comparten el hecho de encontrarse con el Jesús de Lucas.
Keywords
Evangelio de Lucas, criticismo narrativo, criticismo socio-retórico, textura narrativa, textura sensorial-estéticaThe Gospel of Luke, Narrative Criticism, Socio-Rhetorical Criticism, Narrative Texture, Sensory-Aesthetic Texture
References
Barton, George A. “The Use of ἐπιτιμᾶν in Mark 8:30 and 3:12”. Journal of Biblical Literature 41 (1922): 233-236.
Bauer, W.; W. F. Arndt; F. W. Gingrich; y F. W. Danker. A Greek-English of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (3.a ed.). Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Beavis, Mary Ann. “‘Expecting Nothing in Return’: Luke’s Picture of the Marginalized”. Interpretation 48 (1994): 357-368.
Bloomquist, L. Gregory. “The Intertexture of Lukan Apocalyptic Discourse”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament, editado por Duane F. Watson, 45-68. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
Bock, Darrell L. Luke. Vol. 2: 9:51-24:53. Grand Rapids (MI): Baker Books, 1994.
Bovon, François. El Evangelio según San Lucas. Lc 15,1–19, 27. Salamanca: Sígueme, 2004.
Brookins, Timothy A. “Luke’s Use of Mark as Παράφρασισ: Its Effects on Characterization in the ‘Healing of Blind Bartimaeus’ Pericope (Mark 10.46-52/Luke 18.35-43)”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 34 (2011): 70-89.
Brown, Jeannine K. The Disciples in Narrative Perspective: The Portrayal and Function of the Matthean Disciples. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002. Chatman, Seymour Benjamin. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. New York (NY): Cornell University Press, 1980.
Combrink, H. J. B. “Shame on the Hypocritical Leaders in the Church: A SocioRhetorical Interpretation of the Reproaches in Matthew 23”. En Fabrics of Discourse: Essays in Honor of Vernon K. Robbins, editado por David B. Gowler, L. Gregory Bloomquist, y Duante F. Watson, 1-35. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 2003.
Culpepper, R. Alan. “Mapping the Textures of New Testament Criticism: A Response to Socio-Rhetorical Criticism”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 20 (1998): 71-77.
De Silva, David A. “The Rhetorical Functions of Intertexture in Revelation 14: 14-16:21”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament,
editado por Duane F. Watson, 215-241. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
Esler, Philip F. The First Christians in their Social Worlds: Social-Scientific Approaches to New Testament Interpretation. London: Routledge, 1994.
Evans, Craig A. Luke. New International Biblical Commentary, Peabody (MA): Hendrickson, 1990.
Fish, Stanley E. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1980.
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke (X–XXIV). Garden City (NY): Doubleday, 1981.
Geldenhuys, Norval. Commentary on the Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids (MI): W. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1971.
Gérard, Jean-Pierre. “Les riches dans la communauté lucanienne”. Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses 71 (1995): 71-106.
Gowler, David B. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation: Textures of a Text and Its Reception”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 33 (2010): 191-206.
Green, Joel B. The Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids (MI)-Cambridge (U. K.): W. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1997.
_____. The Theology of the Gospel of Luke. Cambridge (U. K.): Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Hamm, Dennis. “Luke 19:8. Once Again: Does Zacchaeus Defend or Resolve”. Journal of Biblical Literature 107/3 (1988): 431-437.
_____. “Sight to the Blind: Vision as Metaphor in Luke”. Biblica 67 (1986): 457-477.
_____. “Zacchaeus Revisited Once More: A Story of Vindication or Conversion”. Biblica 72/2 (1991): 248–52.
Hobbie, F. Wellford. “Luke 19:1-10”. Interpretation 31 (1977): 285-290.
Kodell, Jerome. “Luke’s Use of “laos”, “people”, especially in the Jerusalem Narrative (Lk 19,28-24,53)”. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 31 (1969): 327-343.
Krüger, René. “La proclama de una inversión total. La estructuración de Lucas 6,20-26”. Revista de Interpretación Bíblica Latinoamericana 8 (1991): 27-38.
Kvalbein, Hans. “Jesus and the Poor: Two Texts and Tentative Conclusion”. Themelios 12 (1987): 80-87.
Lamb, Gregory E. “Sinfully Stereotyped: Jesus’s Desire to Correct Ancient Physiognomic Assumptions in the Gospel According to Luke”. Word y World 37 (2017): 177-185.
Liddell, Henry George, y Robert Scott. A Greek-English Lexicon (9.a ed.). Oxford (U. K.): The Clarendon Press, 1996.
Loewe, William P. “Towards an Interpretation of Lk 19:1-10”. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 36 (1974): 321-331.
Louw, Johannes P., y Eugene Albert Nida. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains (2.a ed.). New York (NY): United Bible Societies, 1989.
Malina, Bruce J. El mundo social de Jesús y los evangelios. Bilbao: Sal Terrae, 2002.
_____. “The Individual and the Community-Personality in the Social World of Early Christianity”. Biblical Theology Bulletin 9 (1979): 126-138.
_____. The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology. Louisville (KY): Westminster/John Knox Press, 2001.
Marguerat, Daniel e Yvan Bourquin. How to Read Bible Stories: An Introduction to Narrative Criticism. London: SCM Press, 1999.
Marshall, I. Howard. The Gospel of Luke. Exeter (U. K.): Paternoster, 1978.
Meadors, Gary T. “The ‘Poor’ in the Beatitudes of Matthew and Luke”. Grace Theological Journal 6 (1985): 305-314.
Merenlahti, Petri, y Raimo Hakola. “Reconceiving Narrative Criticism”. En Characterization in the Gospels: Reconceiving Narrative Criticism, 13-48. Sheffield (U. K.): Sheffield Academic Press, 2004.
Meynet, Roland. “Au coeur du texte. Analyse rhétorique de l’aveugle de Jéricho selon Saint Luc”. Nouvelle revue théologique 103 (1981): 696-710.
Mitchell, Alan C. “The Use of Συκοφαντεῖν in Luke 19,8: Further Evidence for Zacchaeus’s Defense”. Biblica 72 (1991): 546-547.
Miura, Yuzuru. David in Luke-Acts: His Portrayal in the Light of Early Judaism. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.
Nolland, John. Luke 18:35-24:53. Dallas (TX): Word Books, 1993.
O’Hanlon, John. “The Story of Zacchaeus and the Lukan Ethic”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 4 (1981): 2-26.
O’Toole, Robert F. “The Literary Form of Luke 19:1-10”. Journal of Biblical Literature 110 (1991): 107-116.
Olivares, Carlos. The (Im)polite Jesus: An Analysis of Jesus’ Verbal Rudeness in Matthew’s Gospel. New York (NY): Peter Lang, 2016.
Osborne, Grant R. “Luke: Theologian of Social Concern”. Trinity Journal 7 (1978): 135-148.
Parsons, Mikeal C. Body and Character in Luke and Acts: The Subversion of Physiognomy in Early Christianity. Waco (TX): Baylor University Press, 2011.
_____. “‘Short in Stature’: Luke’s Physical Description of Zacchaeus”. New Testament Studies 47 (2001): 50-57.
Paul, André. “La guérison de l’aveugle (des aveugles) de Jéricho”. Foi et vie (Cahiers Bibliques 9) 69 (1970): 44-69.
Phillips, Thomas E. Reading Issues of Wealth and Poverty in Luke-Acts. Lewiston (NY): Edwin Mellen Press, 2001.
Pilch, John. “Proverbs in Middle East North Africa (Mena) Cultural Context”. Biblical Theology Bulletin 45 (2015): 202-214.
Pilch, John J. y Bruce J. Malina, eds. Handbook of Biblical Social Values. Peabody (MA): Hendrickson, 1993.
Plummer, Alfred. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to S. Luke. Edinburgh: T.&T. Clark, 1981.
Porter, Stanley E. “‘In the Vicinity of Jericho’: Luke 18:35 in the Light of Its Synoptic Parallels”. Bulletin for Biblical Research 2 (1992): 91-104.
Powell, Mark Allan. “Expected and Unexpected Readings of Matthew: What the Reader Knows”. Asbury Theological Journal 48 (1993): 31-51.
_____. “Literary Approaches and the Gospel of Matthew”. En Methods for Matthew, editado por Mark Allan Powell, 44-82. Cambridge (U. K.): Cambridge University Press, 2009.
_____. What is Narrative Criticism? Minneapolis (MN): Fortress Press, 1990.
Reid, Barbara E. Choosing the Better Part? Women in the Gospel of Luke. Collegeville (MN): Liturgical Press, 1996.
Reiling, J., y J. L. Swellengrebel. A Translator’s Handbook on the Gospel of Luke. Leiden: Brill, 1971.
Resseguie, James L. Narrative Criticism of the New Testament: An Introduction. Grand Rapids (MI): Baker Academic, 2005.
Robbins, Vernon K. “Argumentative Textures in Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation”. En Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference, editado por Anders Eriksson, Thomas H. Olbricht y Walter Übelacker, 27–65. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 2002.
_____. Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 1996.
_____. “Social-Scientific Criticism and Literary Studies”. En Modelling Early Christianity: Social-Scientific Studies of the New Testament in Its Context, editado por P. F. Esler, 274-829. London: Routledge, 1995.
_____. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation”. En The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament, editado por David E. Aune, 192-219. Chichester (U. K.): Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
_____. “The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the Gospel of Mark”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament, editado por Duane F. Watson, 11-44. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
_____. “The Sensory-Aesthetic Texture of the Compassionate Samaritan Parable in Luke 10”. En Literary Encounters with the Reign of God, editado por Sharon H. Ringe y H. C. Paul Kim, 247-64. New York (NY): T. & T. Clark, 2004.
_____. The Tapestry of Early Christian Discourse: Rhetoric, Society and Ideology. London: Routledge, 1996.
Scheffler, Eben. “Luke’s View on Poverty in Its Ancient (Roman) Economic Context: A Challenge for Today: The Decalogue and Human Dignity in Africa”. Scriptura: International Journal of Bible, Religion and Theology in Southern Africa 106 (2011): 115-135.
Steyn, J., y A. Yousaf. “Jesus and the Marginalized: Attaching Pastoral Meaning to Luke 4:14-30”. Acta Theologica 30 (2010): 152-170.
Tannehill, Robert C. The Narrative Unity of Luke-Acts. A Literary Interpretation. Vol. 1: The Gospel According to Luke. Philadelphia (PA): Fortress Press, 1986.
Thompson, Alan J. Luke (Exegetical Guide to the Greek New Testament). Nashville (TN): B&H Academic, 2016.
Tiede, David L. “Luke 6:17–26”. Interpretation 40 (1986): 63-68.
Van Eck, Ernest. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation: Theoretical Points of Departure”. Hervormde Teologiese Studies 57 (2001): 593-611.
Vitório, Jaldemir. “‘E procurava ver quem era Jesus…’ Análise do sentido teológico de ‘ver’ em Lc 19,1-10”. Perspectiva teológica 19 (1987): 9-26.
_____. “Querer ver Jesus e deixar-se ver por Jesus. Quem somos: Zaqueu ou Herodes?” Convergência 451 (2012): 285-304.
Wallace, Daniel B. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Grand Rapids (MI): Zondervan, 1996.
Watson, Nigel M. “Was Zacchaeus Really Reforming”. Expository Times 77 (1966): 282-285.
White, Richard C. “Vindication for Zacchaeus”. Expository Times 91 (1979): 21.
Yamasaki, Gary. “Point of View in a Gospel Story: What Difference does it Make? Luke 19:1-10 as a Test Case”. Journal of Biblical Literature 125 (2006): 89-105.
Bauer, W.; W. F. Arndt; F. W. Gingrich; y F. W. Danker. A Greek-English of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (3.a ed.). Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Beavis, Mary Ann. “‘Expecting Nothing in Return’: Luke’s Picture of the Marginalized”. Interpretation 48 (1994): 357-368.
Bloomquist, L. Gregory. “The Intertexture of Lukan Apocalyptic Discourse”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament, editado por Duane F. Watson, 45-68. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
Bock, Darrell L. Luke. Vol. 2: 9:51-24:53. Grand Rapids (MI): Baker Books, 1994.
Bovon, François. El Evangelio según San Lucas. Lc 15,1–19, 27. Salamanca: Sígueme, 2004.
Brookins, Timothy A. “Luke’s Use of Mark as Παράφρασισ: Its Effects on Characterization in the ‘Healing of Blind Bartimaeus’ Pericope (Mark 10.46-52/Luke 18.35-43)”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 34 (2011): 70-89.
Brown, Jeannine K. The Disciples in Narrative Perspective: The Portrayal and Function of the Matthean Disciples. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002. Chatman, Seymour Benjamin. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. New York (NY): Cornell University Press, 1980.
Combrink, H. J. B. “Shame on the Hypocritical Leaders in the Church: A SocioRhetorical Interpretation of the Reproaches in Matthew 23”. En Fabrics of Discourse: Essays in Honor of Vernon K. Robbins, editado por David B. Gowler, L. Gregory Bloomquist, y Duante F. Watson, 1-35. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 2003.
Culpepper, R. Alan. “Mapping the Textures of New Testament Criticism: A Response to Socio-Rhetorical Criticism”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 20 (1998): 71-77.
De Silva, David A. “The Rhetorical Functions of Intertexture in Revelation 14: 14-16:21”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament,
editado por Duane F. Watson, 215-241. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
Esler, Philip F. The First Christians in their Social Worlds: Social-Scientific Approaches to New Testament Interpretation. London: Routledge, 1994.
Evans, Craig A. Luke. New International Biblical Commentary, Peabody (MA): Hendrickson, 1990.
Fish, Stanley E. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1980.
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke (X–XXIV). Garden City (NY): Doubleday, 1981.
Geldenhuys, Norval. Commentary on the Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids (MI): W. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1971.
Gérard, Jean-Pierre. “Les riches dans la communauté lucanienne”. Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses 71 (1995): 71-106.
Gowler, David B. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation: Textures of a Text and Its Reception”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 33 (2010): 191-206.
Green, Joel B. The Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids (MI)-Cambridge (U. K.): W. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1997.
_____. The Theology of the Gospel of Luke. Cambridge (U. K.): Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Hamm, Dennis. “Luke 19:8. Once Again: Does Zacchaeus Defend or Resolve”. Journal of Biblical Literature 107/3 (1988): 431-437.
_____. “Sight to the Blind: Vision as Metaphor in Luke”. Biblica 67 (1986): 457-477.
_____. “Zacchaeus Revisited Once More: A Story of Vindication or Conversion”. Biblica 72/2 (1991): 248–52.
Hobbie, F. Wellford. “Luke 19:1-10”. Interpretation 31 (1977): 285-290.
Kodell, Jerome. “Luke’s Use of “laos”, “people”, especially in the Jerusalem Narrative (Lk 19,28-24,53)”. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 31 (1969): 327-343.
Krüger, René. “La proclama de una inversión total. La estructuración de Lucas 6,20-26”. Revista de Interpretación Bíblica Latinoamericana 8 (1991): 27-38.
Kvalbein, Hans. “Jesus and the Poor: Two Texts and Tentative Conclusion”. Themelios 12 (1987): 80-87.
Lamb, Gregory E. “Sinfully Stereotyped: Jesus’s Desire to Correct Ancient Physiognomic Assumptions in the Gospel According to Luke”. Word y World 37 (2017): 177-185.
Liddell, Henry George, y Robert Scott. A Greek-English Lexicon (9.a ed.). Oxford (U. K.): The Clarendon Press, 1996.
Loewe, William P. “Towards an Interpretation of Lk 19:1-10”. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 36 (1974): 321-331.
Louw, Johannes P., y Eugene Albert Nida. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains (2.a ed.). New York (NY): United Bible Societies, 1989.
Malina, Bruce J. El mundo social de Jesús y los evangelios. Bilbao: Sal Terrae, 2002.
_____. “The Individual and the Community-Personality in the Social World of Early Christianity”. Biblical Theology Bulletin 9 (1979): 126-138.
_____. The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology. Louisville (KY): Westminster/John Knox Press, 2001.
Marguerat, Daniel e Yvan Bourquin. How to Read Bible Stories: An Introduction to Narrative Criticism. London: SCM Press, 1999.
Marshall, I. Howard. The Gospel of Luke. Exeter (U. K.): Paternoster, 1978.
Meadors, Gary T. “The ‘Poor’ in the Beatitudes of Matthew and Luke”. Grace Theological Journal 6 (1985): 305-314.
Merenlahti, Petri, y Raimo Hakola. “Reconceiving Narrative Criticism”. En Characterization in the Gospels: Reconceiving Narrative Criticism, 13-48. Sheffield (U. K.): Sheffield Academic Press, 2004.
Meynet, Roland. “Au coeur du texte. Analyse rhétorique de l’aveugle de Jéricho selon Saint Luc”. Nouvelle revue théologique 103 (1981): 696-710.
Mitchell, Alan C. “The Use of Συκοφαντεῖν in Luke 19,8: Further Evidence for Zacchaeus’s Defense”. Biblica 72 (1991): 546-547.
Miura, Yuzuru. David in Luke-Acts: His Portrayal in the Light of Early Judaism. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.
Nolland, John. Luke 18:35-24:53. Dallas (TX): Word Books, 1993.
O’Hanlon, John. “The Story of Zacchaeus and the Lukan Ethic”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 4 (1981): 2-26.
O’Toole, Robert F. “The Literary Form of Luke 19:1-10”. Journal of Biblical Literature 110 (1991): 107-116.
Olivares, Carlos. The (Im)polite Jesus: An Analysis of Jesus’ Verbal Rudeness in Matthew’s Gospel. New York (NY): Peter Lang, 2016.
Osborne, Grant R. “Luke: Theologian of Social Concern”. Trinity Journal 7 (1978): 135-148.
Parsons, Mikeal C. Body and Character in Luke and Acts: The Subversion of Physiognomy in Early Christianity. Waco (TX): Baylor University Press, 2011.
_____. “‘Short in Stature’: Luke’s Physical Description of Zacchaeus”. New Testament Studies 47 (2001): 50-57.
Paul, André. “La guérison de l’aveugle (des aveugles) de Jéricho”. Foi et vie (Cahiers Bibliques 9) 69 (1970): 44-69.
Phillips, Thomas E. Reading Issues of Wealth and Poverty in Luke-Acts. Lewiston (NY): Edwin Mellen Press, 2001.
Pilch, John. “Proverbs in Middle East North Africa (Mena) Cultural Context”. Biblical Theology Bulletin 45 (2015): 202-214.
Pilch, John J. y Bruce J. Malina, eds. Handbook of Biblical Social Values. Peabody (MA): Hendrickson, 1993.
Plummer, Alfred. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to S. Luke. Edinburgh: T.&T. Clark, 1981.
Porter, Stanley E. “‘In the Vicinity of Jericho’: Luke 18:35 in the Light of Its Synoptic Parallels”. Bulletin for Biblical Research 2 (1992): 91-104.
Powell, Mark Allan. “Expected and Unexpected Readings of Matthew: What the Reader Knows”. Asbury Theological Journal 48 (1993): 31-51.
_____. “Literary Approaches and the Gospel of Matthew”. En Methods for Matthew, editado por Mark Allan Powell, 44-82. Cambridge (U. K.): Cambridge University Press, 2009.
_____. What is Narrative Criticism? Minneapolis (MN): Fortress Press, 1990.
Reid, Barbara E. Choosing the Better Part? Women in the Gospel of Luke. Collegeville (MN): Liturgical Press, 1996.
Reiling, J., y J. L. Swellengrebel. A Translator’s Handbook on the Gospel of Luke. Leiden: Brill, 1971.
Resseguie, James L. Narrative Criticism of the New Testament: An Introduction. Grand Rapids (MI): Baker Academic, 2005.
Robbins, Vernon K. “Argumentative Textures in Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation”. En Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference, editado por Anders Eriksson, Thomas H. Olbricht y Walter Übelacker, 27–65. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 2002.
_____. Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 1996.
_____. “Social-Scientific Criticism and Literary Studies”. En Modelling Early Christianity: Social-Scientific Studies of the New Testament in Its Context, editado por P. F. Esler, 274-829. London: Routledge, 1995.
_____. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation”. En The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament, editado por David E. Aune, 192-219. Chichester (U. K.): Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
_____. “The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the Gospel of Mark”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament, editado por Duane F. Watson, 11-44. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
_____. “The Sensory-Aesthetic Texture of the Compassionate Samaritan Parable in Luke 10”. En Literary Encounters with the Reign of God, editado por Sharon H. Ringe y H. C. Paul Kim, 247-64. New York (NY): T. & T. Clark, 2004.
_____. The Tapestry of Early Christian Discourse: Rhetoric, Society and Ideology. London: Routledge, 1996.
Scheffler, Eben. “Luke’s View on Poverty in Its Ancient (Roman) Economic Context: A Challenge for Today: The Decalogue and Human Dignity in Africa”. Scriptura: International Journal of Bible, Religion and Theology in Southern Africa 106 (2011): 115-135.
Steyn, J., y A. Yousaf. “Jesus and the Marginalized: Attaching Pastoral Meaning to Luke 4:14-30”. Acta Theologica 30 (2010): 152-170.
Tannehill, Robert C. The Narrative Unity of Luke-Acts. A Literary Interpretation. Vol. 1: The Gospel According to Luke. Philadelphia (PA): Fortress Press, 1986.
Thompson, Alan J. Luke (Exegetical Guide to the Greek New Testament). Nashville (TN): B&H Academic, 2016.
Tiede, David L. “Luke 6:17–26”. Interpretation 40 (1986): 63-68.
Van Eck, Ernest. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation: Theoretical Points of Departure”. Hervormde Teologiese Studies 57 (2001): 593-611.
Vitório, Jaldemir. “‘E procurava ver quem era Jesus…’ Análise do sentido teológico de ‘ver’ em Lc 19,1-10”. Perspectiva teológica 19 (1987): 9-26.
_____. “Querer ver Jesus e deixar-se ver por Jesus. Quem somos: Zaqueu ou Herodes?” Convergência 451 (2012): 285-304.
Wallace, Daniel B. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Grand Rapids (MI): Zondervan, 1996.
Watson, Nigel M. “Was Zacchaeus Really Reforming”. Expository Times 77 (1966): 282-285.
White, Richard C. “Vindication for Zacchaeus”. Expository Times 91 (1979): 21.
Yamasaki, Gary. “Point of View in a Gospel Story: What Difference does it Make? Luke 19:1-10 as a Test Case”. Journal of Biblical Literature 125 (2006): 89-105.
Cómo citar
Olivares, C. (2020). El ciego anónimo y el ἀρχιτελώνης Zaqueo: análisis de la textura narrativa y sensorial-estética de Lucas 18,35-19,10. Theologica Xaveriana, 70. https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.tx70.cazat
Número
Sección
Artículos
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.