The Nameless Blind and the ἀρχιτελώνης Zacchaeus: An Analysis of the Narrative and Sensory Aesthetic Texture of Luke 18,35-19,10
Published
Aug 12, 2020
Almetrics
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Carlos Olivares
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9019-1231
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9019-1231
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Abstract
Luke’s Golpel presents two events, and Jesus participates in both. In the first one, a blind unnamed beggar asks for help. In the second one, an ἀρχιτελώνης called Zacchaeus intends to see Jesus. There are literary parallels and differences between the two events. These similitudes and contrasts are structured with regard to human senses, spatial contexts and verbal attitudes. An analysis of the narrative and sensory-aesthetic texture allows to pose such concepts, revealing two characters who—in narrative terms—share the fact of meeting the Jesus of Luke..
Keywords
Evangelio de Lucas, criticismo narrativo, criticismo socio-retórico, textura narrativa, textura sensorial-estéticaThe Gospel of Luke, Narrative Criticism, Socio-Rhetorical Criticism, Narrative Texture, Sensory-Aesthetic Texture
References
Barton, George A. “The Use of ἐπιτιμᾶν in Mark 8:30 and 3:12”. Journal of Biblical Literature 41 (1922): 233-236.
Bauer, W.; W. F. Arndt; F. W. Gingrich; y F. W. Danker. A Greek-English of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (3.a ed.). Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Beavis, Mary Ann. “‘Expecting Nothing in Return’: Luke’s Picture of the Marginalized”. Interpretation 48 (1994): 357-368.
Bloomquist, L. Gregory. “The Intertexture of Lukan Apocalyptic Discourse”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament, editado por Duane F. Watson, 45-68. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
Bock, Darrell L. Luke. Vol. 2: 9:51-24:53. Grand Rapids (MI): Baker Books, 1994.
Bovon, François. El Evangelio según San Lucas. Lc 15,1–19, 27. Salamanca: Sígueme, 2004.
Brookins, Timothy A. “Luke’s Use of Mark as Παράφρασισ: Its Effects on Characterization in the ‘Healing of Blind Bartimaeus’ Pericope (Mark 10.46-52/Luke 18.35-43)”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 34 (2011): 70-89.
Brown, Jeannine K. The Disciples in Narrative Perspective: The Portrayal and Function of the Matthean Disciples. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002. Chatman, Seymour Benjamin. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. New York (NY): Cornell University Press, 1980.
Combrink, H. J. B. “Shame on the Hypocritical Leaders in the Church: A SocioRhetorical Interpretation of the Reproaches in Matthew 23”. En Fabrics of Discourse: Essays in Honor of Vernon K. Robbins, editado por David B. Gowler, L. Gregory Bloomquist, y Duante F. Watson, 1-35. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 2003.
Culpepper, R. Alan. “Mapping the Textures of New Testament Criticism: A Response to Socio-Rhetorical Criticism”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 20 (1998): 71-77.
De Silva, David A. “The Rhetorical Functions of Intertexture in Revelation 14: 14-16:21”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament,
editado por Duane F. Watson, 215-241. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
Esler, Philip F. The First Christians in their Social Worlds: Social-Scientific Approaches to New Testament Interpretation. London: Routledge, 1994.
Evans, Craig A. Luke. New International Biblical Commentary, Peabody (MA): Hendrickson, 1990.
Fish, Stanley E. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1980.
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke (X–XXIV). Garden City (NY): Doubleday, 1981.
Geldenhuys, Norval. Commentary on the Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids (MI): W. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1971.
Gérard, Jean-Pierre. “Les riches dans la communauté lucanienne”. Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses 71 (1995): 71-106.
Gowler, David B. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation: Textures of a Text and Its Reception”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 33 (2010): 191-206.
Green, Joel B. The Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids (MI)-Cambridge (U. K.): W. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1997.
_____. The Theology of the Gospel of Luke. Cambridge (U. K.): Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Hamm, Dennis. “Luke 19:8. Once Again: Does Zacchaeus Defend or Resolve”. Journal of Biblical Literature 107/3 (1988): 431-437.
_____. “Sight to the Blind: Vision as Metaphor in Luke”. Biblica 67 (1986): 457-477.
_____. “Zacchaeus Revisited Once More: A Story of Vindication or Conversion”. Biblica 72/2 (1991): 248–52.
Hobbie, F. Wellford. “Luke 19:1-10”. Interpretation 31 (1977): 285-290.
Kodell, Jerome. “Luke’s Use of “laos”, “people”, especially in the Jerusalem Narrative (Lk 19,28-24,53)”. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 31 (1969): 327-343.
Krüger, René. “La proclama de una inversión total. La estructuración de Lucas 6,20-26”. Revista de Interpretación Bíblica Latinoamericana 8 (1991): 27-38.
Kvalbein, Hans. “Jesus and the Poor: Two Texts and Tentative Conclusion”. Themelios 12 (1987): 80-87.
Lamb, Gregory E. “Sinfully Stereotyped: Jesus’s Desire to Correct Ancient Physiognomic Assumptions in the Gospel According to Luke”. Word y World 37 (2017): 177-185.
Liddell, Henry George, y Robert Scott. A Greek-English Lexicon (9.a ed.). Oxford (U. K.): The Clarendon Press, 1996.
Loewe, William P. “Towards an Interpretation of Lk 19:1-10”. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 36 (1974): 321-331.
Louw, Johannes P., y Eugene Albert Nida. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains (2.a ed.). New York (NY): United Bible Societies, 1989.
Malina, Bruce J. El mundo social de Jesús y los evangelios. Bilbao: Sal Terrae, 2002.
_____. “The Individual and the Community-Personality in the Social World of Early Christianity”. Biblical Theology Bulletin 9 (1979): 126-138.
_____. The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology. Louisville (KY): Westminster/John Knox Press, 2001.
Marguerat, Daniel e Yvan Bourquin. How to Read Bible Stories: An Introduction to Narrative Criticism. London: SCM Press, 1999.
Marshall, I. Howard. The Gospel of Luke. Exeter (U. K.): Paternoster, 1978.
Meadors, Gary T. “The ‘Poor’ in the Beatitudes of Matthew and Luke”. Grace Theological Journal 6 (1985): 305-314.
Merenlahti, Petri, y Raimo Hakola. “Reconceiving Narrative Criticism”. En Characterization in the Gospels: Reconceiving Narrative Criticism, 13-48. Sheffield (U. K.): Sheffield Academic Press, 2004.
Meynet, Roland. “Au coeur du texte. Analyse rhétorique de l’aveugle de Jéricho selon Saint Luc”. Nouvelle revue théologique 103 (1981): 696-710.
Mitchell, Alan C. “The Use of Συκοφαντεῖν in Luke 19,8: Further Evidence for Zacchaeus’s Defense”. Biblica 72 (1991): 546-547.
Miura, Yuzuru. David in Luke-Acts: His Portrayal in the Light of Early Judaism. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.
Nolland, John. Luke 18:35-24:53. Dallas (TX): Word Books, 1993.
O’Hanlon, John. “The Story of Zacchaeus and the Lukan Ethic”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 4 (1981): 2-26.
O’Toole, Robert F. “The Literary Form of Luke 19:1-10”. Journal of Biblical Literature 110 (1991): 107-116.
Olivares, Carlos. The (Im)polite Jesus: An Analysis of Jesus’ Verbal Rudeness in Matthew’s Gospel. New York (NY): Peter Lang, 2016.
Osborne, Grant R. “Luke: Theologian of Social Concern”. Trinity Journal 7 (1978): 135-148.
Parsons, Mikeal C. Body and Character in Luke and Acts: The Subversion of Physiognomy in Early Christianity. Waco (TX): Baylor University Press, 2011.
_____. “‘Short in Stature’: Luke’s Physical Description of Zacchaeus”. New Testament Studies 47 (2001): 50-57.
Paul, André. “La guérison de l’aveugle (des aveugles) de Jéricho”. Foi et vie (Cahiers Bibliques 9) 69 (1970): 44-69.
Phillips, Thomas E. Reading Issues of Wealth and Poverty in Luke-Acts. Lewiston (NY): Edwin Mellen Press, 2001.
Pilch, John. “Proverbs in Middle East North Africa (Mena) Cultural Context”. Biblical Theology Bulletin 45 (2015): 202-214.
Pilch, John J. y Bruce J. Malina, eds. Handbook of Biblical Social Values. Peabody (MA): Hendrickson, 1993.
Plummer, Alfred. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to S. Luke. Edinburgh: T.&T. Clark, 1981.
Porter, Stanley E. “‘In the Vicinity of Jericho’: Luke 18:35 in the Light of Its Synoptic Parallels”. Bulletin for Biblical Research 2 (1992): 91-104.
Powell, Mark Allan. “Expected and Unexpected Readings of Matthew: What the Reader Knows”. Asbury Theological Journal 48 (1993): 31-51.
_____. “Literary Approaches and the Gospel of Matthew”. En Methods for Matthew, editado por Mark Allan Powell, 44-82. Cambridge (U. K.): Cambridge University Press, 2009.
_____. What is Narrative Criticism? Minneapolis (MN): Fortress Press, 1990.
Reid, Barbara E. Choosing the Better Part? Women in the Gospel of Luke. Collegeville (MN): Liturgical Press, 1996.
Reiling, J., y J. L. Swellengrebel. A Translator’s Handbook on the Gospel of Luke. Leiden: Brill, 1971.
Resseguie, James L. Narrative Criticism of the New Testament: An Introduction. Grand Rapids (MI): Baker Academic, 2005.
Robbins, Vernon K. “Argumentative Textures in Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation”. En Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference, editado por Anders Eriksson, Thomas H. Olbricht y Walter Übelacker, 27–65. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 2002.
_____. Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 1996.
_____. “Social-Scientific Criticism and Literary Studies”. En Modelling Early Christianity: Social-Scientific Studies of the New Testament in Its Context, editado por P. F. Esler, 274-829. London: Routledge, 1995.
_____. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation”. En The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament, editado por David E. Aune, 192-219. Chichester (U. K.): Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
_____. “The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the Gospel of Mark”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament, editado por Duane F. Watson, 11-44. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
_____. “The Sensory-Aesthetic Texture of the Compassionate Samaritan Parable in Luke 10”. En Literary Encounters with the Reign of God, editado por Sharon H. Ringe y H. C. Paul Kim, 247-64. New York (NY): T. & T. Clark, 2004.
_____. The Tapestry of Early Christian Discourse: Rhetoric, Society and Ideology. London: Routledge, 1996.
Scheffler, Eben. “Luke’s View on Poverty in Its Ancient (Roman) Economic Context: A Challenge for Today: The Decalogue and Human Dignity in Africa”. Scriptura: International Journal of Bible, Religion and Theology in Southern Africa 106 (2011): 115-135.
Steyn, J., y A. Yousaf. “Jesus and the Marginalized: Attaching Pastoral Meaning to Luke 4:14-30”. Acta Theologica 30 (2010): 152-170.
Tannehill, Robert C. The Narrative Unity of Luke-Acts. A Literary Interpretation. Vol. 1: The Gospel According to Luke. Philadelphia (PA): Fortress Press, 1986.
Thompson, Alan J. Luke (Exegetical Guide to the Greek New Testament). Nashville (TN): B&H Academic, 2016.
Tiede, David L. “Luke 6:17–26”. Interpretation 40 (1986): 63-68.
Van Eck, Ernest. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation: Theoretical Points of Departure”. Hervormde Teologiese Studies 57 (2001): 593-611.
Vitório, Jaldemir. “‘E procurava ver quem era Jesus…’ Análise do sentido teológico de ‘ver’ em Lc 19,1-10”. Perspectiva teológica 19 (1987): 9-26.
_____. “Querer ver Jesus e deixar-se ver por Jesus. Quem somos: Zaqueu ou Herodes?” Convergência 451 (2012): 285-304.
Wallace, Daniel B. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Grand Rapids (MI): Zondervan, 1996.
Watson, Nigel M. “Was Zacchaeus Really Reforming”. Expository Times 77 (1966): 282-285.
White, Richard C. “Vindication for Zacchaeus”. Expository Times 91 (1979): 21.
Yamasaki, Gary. “Point of View in a Gospel Story: What Difference does it Make? Luke 19:1-10 as a Test Case”. Journal of Biblical Literature 125 (2006): 89-105.
Bauer, W.; W. F. Arndt; F. W. Gingrich; y F. W. Danker. A Greek-English of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (3.a ed.). Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Beavis, Mary Ann. “‘Expecting Nothing in Return’: Luke’s Picture of the Marginalized”. Interpretation 48 (1994): 357-368.
Bloomquist, L. Gregory. “The Intertexture of Lukan Apocalyptic Discourse”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament, editado por Duane F. Watson, 45-68. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
Bock, Darrell L. Luke. Vol. 2: 9:51-24:53. Grand Rapids (MI): Baker Books, 1994.
Bovon, François. El Evangelio según San Lucas. Lc 15,1–19, 27. Salamanca: Sígueme, 2004.
Brookins, Timothy A. “Luke’s Use of Mark as Παράφρασισ: Its Effects on Characterization in the ‘Healing of Blind Bartimaeus’ Pericope (Mark 10.46-52/Luke 18.35-43)”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 34 (2011): 70-89.
Brown, Jeannine K. The Disciples in Narrative Perspective: The Portrayal and Function of the Matthean Disciples. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002. Chatman, Seymour Benjamin. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. New York (NY): Cornell University Press, 1980.
Combrink, H. J. B. “Shame on the Hypocritical Leaders in the Church: A SocioRhetorical Interpretation of the Reproaches in Matthew 23”. En Fabrics of Discourse: Essays in Honor of Vernon K. Robbins, editado por David B. Gowler, L. Gregory Bloomquist, y Duante F. Watson, 1-35. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 2003.
Culpepper, R. Alan. “Mapping the Textures of New Testament Criticism: A Response to Socio-Rhetorical Criticism”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 20 (1998): 71-77.
De Silva, David A. “The Rhetorical Functions of Intertexture in Revelation 14: 14-16:21”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament,
editado por Duane F. Watson, 215-241. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
Esler, Philip F. The First Christians in their Social Worlds: Social-Scientific Approaches to New Testament Interpretation. London: Routledge, 1994.
Evans, Craig A. Luke. New International Biblical Commentary, Peabody (MA): Hendrickson, 1990.
Fish, Stanley E. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1980.
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke (X–XXIV). Garden City (NY): Doubleday, 1981.
Geldenhuys, Norval. Commentary on the Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids (MI): W. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1971.
Gérard, Jean-Pierre. “Les riches dans la communauté lucanienne”. Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses 71 (1995): 71-106.
Gowler, David B. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation: Textures of a Text and Its Reception”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 33 (2010): 191-206.
Green, Joel B. The Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids (MI)-Cambridge (U. K.): W. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1997.
_____. The Theology of the Gospel of Luke. Cambridge (U. K.): Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Hamm, Dennis. “Luke 19:8. Once Again: Does Zacchaeus Defend or Resolve”. Journal of Biblical Literature 107/3 (1988): 431-437.
_____. “Sight to the Blind: Vision as Metaphor in Luke”. Biblica 67 (1986): 457-477.
_____. “Zacchaeus Revisited Once More: A Story of Vindication or Conversion”. Biblica 72/2 (1991): 248–52.
Hobbie, F. Wellford. “Luke 19:1-10”. Interpretation 31 (1977): 285-290.
Kodell, Jerome. “Luke’s Use of “laos”, “people”, especially in the Jerusalem Narrative (Lk 19,28-24,53)”. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 31 (1969): 327-343.
Krüger, René. “La proclama de una inversión total. La estructuración de Lucas 6,20-26”. Revista de Interpretación Bíblica Latinoamericana 8 (1991): 27-38.
Kvalbein, Hans. “Jesus and the Poor: Two Texts and Tentative Conclusion”. Themelios 12 (1987): 80-87.
Lamb, Gregory E. “Sinfully Stereotyped: Jesus’s Desire to Correct Ancient Physiognomic Assumptions in the Gospel According to Luke”. Word y World 37 (2017): 177-185.
Liddell, Henry George, y Robert Scott. A Greek-English Lexicon (9.a ed.). Oxford (U. K.): The Clarendon Press, 1996.
Loewe, William P. “Towards an Interpretation of Lk 19:1-10”. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 36 (1974): 321-331.
Louw, Johannes P., y Eugene Albert Nida. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains (2.a ed.). New York (NY): United Bible Societies, 1989.
Malina, Bruce J. El mundo social de Jesús y los evangelios. Bilbao: Sal Terrae, 2002.
_____. “The Individual and the Community-Personality in the Social World of Early Christianity”. Biblical Theology Bulletin 9 (1979): 126-138.
_____. The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology. Louisville (KY): Westminster/John Knox Press, 2001.
Marguerat, Daniel e Yvan Bourquin. How to Read Bible Stories: An Introduction to Narrative Criticism. London: SCM Press, 1999.
Marshall, I. Howard. The Gospel of Luke. Exeter (U. K.): Paternoster, 1978.
Meadors, Gary T. “The ‘Poor’ in the Beatitudes of Matthew and Luke”. Grace Theological Journal 6 (1985): 305-314.
Merenlahti, Petri, y Raimo Hakola. “Reconceiving Narrative Criticism”. En Characterization in the Gospels: Reconceiving Narrative Criticism, 13-48. Sheffield (U. K.): Sheffield Academic Press, 2004.
Meynet, Roland. “Au coeur du texte. Analyse rhétorique de l’aveugle de Jéricho selon Saint Luc”. Nouvelle revue théologique 103 (1981): 696-710.
Mitchell, Alan C. “The Use of Συκοφαντεῖν in Luke 19,8: Further Evidence for Zacchaeus’s Defense”. Biblica 72 (1991): 546-547.
Miura, Yuzuru. David in Luke-Acts: His Portrayal in the Light of Early Judaism. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.
Nolland, John. Luke 18:35-24:53. Dallas (TX): Word Books, 1993.
O’Hanlon, John. “The Story of Zacchaeus and the Lukan Ethic”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 4 (1981): 2-26.
O’Toole, Robert F. “The Literary Form of Luke 19:1-10”. Journal of Biblical Literature 110 (1991): 107-116.
Olivares, Carlos. The (Im)polite Jesus: An Analysis of Jesus’ Verbal Rudeness in Matthew’s Gospel. New York (NY): Peter Lang, 2016.
Osborne, Grant R. “Luke: Theologian of Social Concern”. Trinity Journal 7 (1978): 135-148.
Parsons, Mikeal C. Body and Character in Luke and Acts: The Subversion of Physiognomy in Early Christianity. Waco (TX): Baylor University Press, 2011.
_____. “‘Short in Stature’: Luke’s Physical Description of Zacchaeus”. New Testament Studies 47 (2001): 50-57.
Paul, André. “La guérison de l’aveugle (des aveugles) de Jéricho”. Foi et vie (Cahiers Bibliques 9) 69 (1970): 44-69.
Phillips, Thomas E. Reading Issues of Wealth and Poverty in Luke-Acts. Lewiston (NY): Edwin Mellen Press, 2001.
Pilch, John. “Proverbs in Middle East North Africa (Mena) Cultural Context”. Biblical Theology Bulletin 45 (2015): 202-214.
Pilch, John J. y Bruce J. Malina, eds. Handbook of Biblical Social Values. Peabody (MA): Hendrickson, 1993.
Plummer, Alfred. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to S. Luke. Edinburgh: T.&T. Clark, 1981.
Porter, Stanley E. “‘In the Vicinity of Jericho’: Luke 18:35 in the Light of Its Synoptic Parallels”. Bulletin for Biblical Research 2 (1992): 91-104.
Powell, Mark Allan. “Expected and Unexpected Readings of Matthew: What the Reader Knows”. Asbury Theological Journal 48 (1993): 31-51.
_____. “Literary Approaches and the Gospel of Matthew”. En Methods for Matthew, editado por Mark Allan Powell, 44-82. Cambridge (U. K.): Cambridge University Press, 2009.
_____. What is Narrative Criticism? Minneapolis (MN): Fortress Press, 1990.
Reid, Barbara E. Choosing the Better Part? Women in the Gospel of Luke. Collegeville (MN): Liturgical Press, 1996.
Reiling, J., y J. L. Swellengrebel. A Translator’s Handbook on the Gospel of Luke. Leiden: Brill, 1971.
Resseguie, James L. Narrative Criticism of the New Testament: An Introduction. Grand Rapids (MI): Baker Academic, 2005.
Robbins, Vernon K. “Argumentative Textures in Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation”. En Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference, editado por Anders Eriksson, Thomas H. Olbricht y Walter Übelacker, 27–65. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 2002.
_____. Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation. Harrisburg (PA): Trinity Press International, 1996.
_____. “Social-Scientific Criticism and Literary Studies”. En Modelling Early Christianity: Social-Scientific Studies of the New Testament in Its Context, editado por P. F. Esler, 274-829. London: Routledge, 1995.
_____. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation”. En The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament, editado por David E. Aune, 192-219. Chichester (U. K.): Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
_____. “The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the Gospel of Mark”. En The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament, editado por Duane F. Watson, 11-44. Atlanta (GA): Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
_____. “The Sensory-Aesthetic Texture of the Compassionate Samaritan Parable in Luke 10”. En Literary Encounters with the Reign of God, editado por Sharon H. Ringe y H. C. Paul Kim, 247-64. New York (NY): T. & T. Clark, 2004.
_____. The Tapestry of Early Christian Discourse: Rhetoric, Society and Ideology. London: Routledge, 1996.
Scheffler, Eben. “Luke’s View on Poverty in Its Ancient (Roman) Economic Context: A Challenge for Today: The Decalogue and Human Dignity in Africa”. Scriptura: International Journal of Bible, Religion and Theology in Southern Africa 106 (2011): 115-135.
Steyn, J., y A. Yousaf. “Jesus and the Marginalized: Attaching Pastoral Meaning to Luke 4:14-30”. Acta Theologica 30 (2010): 152-170.
Tannehill, Robert C. The Narrative Unity of Luke-Acts. A Literary Interpretation. Vol. 1: The Gospel According to Luke. Philadelphia (PA): Fortress Press, 1986.
Thompson, Alan J. Luke (Exegetical Guide to the Greek New Testament). Nashville (TN): B&H Academic, 2016.
Tiede, David L. “Luke 6:17–26”. Interpretation 40 (1986): 63-68.
Van Eck, Ernest. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation: Theoretical Points of Departure”. Hervormde Teologiese Studies 57 (2001): 593-611.
Vitório, Jaldemir. “‘E procurava ver quem era Jesus…’ Análise do sentido teológico de ‘ver’ em Lc 19,1-10”. Perspectiva teológica 19 (1987): 9-26.
_____. “Querer ver Jesus e deixar-se ver por Jesus. Quem somos: Zaqueu ou Herodes?” Convergência 451 (2012): 285-304.
Wallace, Daniel B. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Grand Rapids (MI): Zondervan, 1996.
Watson, Nigel M. “Was Zacchaeus Really Reforming”. Expository Times 77 (1966): 282-285.
White, Richard C. “Vindication for Zacchaeus”. Expository Times 91 (1979): 21.
Yamasaki, Gary. “Point of View in a Gospel Story: What Difference does it Make? Luke 19:1-10 as a Test Case”. Journal of Biblical Literature 125 (2006): 89-105.
How to Cite
Olivares, C. (2020). The Nameless Blind and the ἀρχιτελώνης Zacchaeus: An Analysis of the Narrative and Sensory Aesthetic Texture of Luke 18,35-19,10. Theologica Xaveriana, 70. https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.tx70.cazat
Issue
Section
Artículos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.