Experiencing God’s Passage: A Dialogue between Exegesis, Theology and Tradition in Exodus 33,12-23
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work investigates the results obtained from the diachronic exegesis applied in the pericope of Ex 33,12– 23, and highlights the theological contribution of the redactional criticism in the context of the literary unity of the Pentateuch; this, as a methodological proposal that favors the pericope understanding from the holistic view of ancient sources and other different pre-exilic materials that make up this literary block. These results are also considered the basis or foundation to obtain the theological keys of the pericope from the conceptual categories of Law and worship, which consider the two editorial units of the same, located as follows: first, v. 12 to v. 17; second, v. 18 to v. 23. This is how the theologies emerging from worship and the Law are key to reading in the theological framework of the covenant. In this way, their analysis and interpretation contribute to the understanding of the narrative and thematic core of the Pentateuch. In turn, the contributions that the interpretative traditions of Halakite and Haggadite origin, typical of the rabbinic midras and its middot, are theological references that allow new categories of study, analysis and updating of the biblical contents, present in the study pericope and throughout the Pentateuch. This process of exegesis, theology and biblical interpretation is proposed as an investigative and pedagogical alternative for a greater and better approach to integral study, and the comprehensive study and broader understanding of the first five books of the biblical canon, which provides and incorporates tools for updating the revealed message, both in the ethical, legal, and liturgical perspectives of the Jewish faith and the Christian faith experience.
Exodus, Exegesis, Theology, Dialogue, Tradition, Interpretation, PentateuchÉxodo, exégesis, teología, diálogo, tradición, interpretación, Pentateuco
Bauks, Michaela y Christophe Nihan. Manuel d’exégèse de l’Ancien Testament. Genève: Labor et Fides, 2008.
Blum, Erhard. Studien zur Komposition des Pentateuch. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1990.
Brien, Jacques. “Sinaí, Horeb: où esta la ‘montagne de Dieu’?” Le Monde de la Bible 82 (1993): 30-31.
Buss, Martin J. “Bundestheologie im Alten Testament by Lothar Perlitt” [recension]. Journal of Biblical Literature 90/2 (1971): 210-212. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/3263763
Childs, Brevard. Teología bíblica del Antiguo y del Nuevo Testamento. Salamanca: Sígueme, 2010.
Cortese, Enzo. “Pentateuco: la strada nuova e la vecchia”. Liber Annus 43 (1993): 71-87.
Costa, José. La Bible racontée par le Midrash. Paris: Bayard, 2004.
Elliger, Karl, y Rudolph, Wilhelm (eds.). Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1997.
Emerton, John A. Studies in the Pentateuch. Leiden: Brill, 1990.
Ferrada Moreira, Andrés. “Teología e historia en el Antiguo Testamento”. Teología y vida 52/3 (2011): 369-389.
Fornara, Roberto. La visione contradetta. La dialettica fra visibilità e non-visibilità divina nella bibbia ebraica. Roma: Pontificia Universitá Gregoriana, 2004.
García López, Félix. La Torá. Escritos sobre el Pentateuco. Estella (Navarra): Verbo Divino, 2012.
Houtman, Cornelis. Historical Commentary of the Old Testament. III. Exodus. Leuven: Peeters, 2000.
Law, Timothy. Cuando Dios habló en griego. La Septuaginta y la formación de la Biblia Cristiana. Salamanca: Sígueme, 2014.
Liverani, Mario. Más allá de la Biblia. Historia antigua de Israel. Barcelona: Crítica, 2005.
Manns, Frédéric. Le Midrash, approche et commentaire de l’Ecriture. Jerusalem: Franciscan Printing Press, 2001.
Mekilta de Rabbí, Ismael. Comentario rabínico al libro del Éxodo. Estella (Navarra): Verbo Divino, 1995.
Muñoz León, Domingo. “Principios básicos de la exégesis rabínica”. Revista bíblica 60/2 (1998): 117-122.
Neudecker, Reinhard. The Voice of God on Mount Sinai. Rabbinic Commentaries on Exodus 20:1 in the Light of Sufi and Zen-Buddhist Texts. Roma: Gregorian & Biblical Press, 2012.
Neusner, Jacaob. The Theology of the Oral Torah. Québec: McGill-Queen’s University Press,1999.
Rendtorff, Rolf. “Das überlieferungsgeschichtliche. Problem des Pentateuch”. Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft / Beihefte 147 (1977).
Römer, Thomas. La llamada historia deuteronomista. Una introducción sociológica, histórica y literaria. Bogotá: San Pablo, 2014.
Römer, Thomas; Jean-Daniel Macchi; y Christophe Nihan (eds.). Introduction à L’Ancien Testament. Genève: Labor et Fides, 2004.
Rose, Martin. Deuteronomist und Jawist. Untersuchungen zu den Berührungspunkten beider Literaturwerke. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1981.
Sanz Giménez-Rico, Enrique. Cercanía del Dios distante. Imagen de Dios en el libro del Éxodo. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia Comillas, 2002.
Schmid, Hans Heinrich. Der Sogenannte Jawist: Beobachtungen und Fragen zur Pentateuchforschung. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1976.
Ska, Jean-Louis. El Pentateuco: un filón inagotable. Problemas de composición y de interpretación. Aspectos literarios y teológicos. Estella (Navarra): Verbo Divino, 2015.
_____. Introduction à la lecture du Pentateuque. Clés pour l’interprétation des cinq premiers livres de la Bible. Bruxelles: Lessius, 2000.
Van Seters, John. “Abraham in History and Tradition”. En The So-called Deuteronomistic Redaction of the Pentateuch, editado por John A. Emerton, 58-77. Leuven: International Organization for the Study of the Old Testament, 1989.
Vermeylen, Jacques. El Dios de la promesa y el Dios de la alianza. Santander: Sal Terrae, 1990.
_____. “L’affaire du veau d’or (Ex 32-34). Une clé pour la ‘question deuteronomiste’?” ZAW 97 (1985): 1-23
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.