Legal Psychology, Hindsight Bias, Collegiate Courts, Court Decisionspsicología jurídica, sesgo de retrospectiva, órganos colegiados, decisión judicial

Abimbola A. Olowofoyeku, Bias in Collegiate Courts, 65 International and Comparative Law Quartely 895-926 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589316000300
Aileen Oeberst & Ingke Goeckenjan, When Being Wise after the Event Results in Injustice: Evidence for Hindsight Bias in Judges’ Negligence Assesments, 22 Psychology, Public Policy and Law 3 271-279 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000091
Alexander Lundberg, The Importance of Expertise in Group Decision, 55 Social Choice and Welfare 495-521 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01253-3
Aline Macohin & César Antonio Serbena, Decision Making Model Applied to Collegiate Courts, 26 Jusletter IT 1-16 (2019).
Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, 185 Science 4157 1124-1131 (1974), https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Andrés Páez, Los sesgos cognitivos y la legitimidad racional de las decisiones judiciales, en Federico José Arenas, Pau Luque & Diego José Moreno, Razonamiento jurídico y ciencias cognitivas 189-221 (Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2021).
Andrew J. Wistrich, Chris Guthrie & Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberatley Disregarding, 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1251-1345 (2005), https://doi.org/10.2307/4150614
Aron K. Barbey & Steven A. Sloman, Base-Rate Respect: From Ecological Rationality to Dual Processes, 30 Behavioral Brain Science 3 2241-297 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001653
Arturo Muñoz, La influencia de los sesgos cognitivos en las decisiones jurisdiccionales: el factor humano. Una aproximación, Revista para el Análisis del Derecho 2 1-39 (2011).
Baruch Fischhof, For Those Condemned to Study the Past: Heuristics and Biases in Hindsight, en Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, Eds., Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 335-352 (Cambridge University Press, 1982), https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477.024
Baruch Fischhoff, Debiasing, en Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky & Paul Slovic, Eds., Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 430 422-444 (Cambridge University Press, 1982), https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477.032
Baruch Fischhoff, Hindsight ≠ Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty, 1 Journal of Experimental Psychology 3 288-299 (1975), https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.1.3.288
Benjamin Bricker, Consensus Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Judging and Judicial Deliberation, 42 Justice System Journal 1 25-49 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2020.1856738
Blanca Rosa Olalde, Procesamiento dual y conocimiento social 49 (tesis no publicada, Universidad del País Vasco, 2021).
Caitlyn Pierce, Does Time Together and Collegiality Matter on the U.S, Courts of Appeals, California State Polythechnic University (2023), https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/2j62s9813
Carolina Gutiérrez, Revisión sobre la definición de Psicología Jurídica, 6 Divers.: Perspect. Psicol. 2 221-235 (2010), https://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-9998.2010.0002.02
Cass R. Sustein, Group Judgments: Deliberation, Statistical Means, and Information Markets (Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper 72, 2004), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.578301
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski & Andrew J. Wistrich, Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases, 93 Cornell Law Review 1 1-44 (2007).
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski & Andrew J. Wistrich, Inside the Judicial Mind, 86 Cornell Law Review 4 777-830 (2001), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.257634
Christopher F. Karpowitz & Tali Mendelberg, Groups and Deliberations, 13 Swiss Political Science Review 4 645-662 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00092.x
Craig R. M. McKenzie, Michael J. Liersch & Ilan Yaniv, Overconfidence in Interval Estimates: What Does Expertise Buy You?, 107 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 179-191 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.007
Curt R. Bartol & Anne M. Bartol, History of Forensic Psychology, en Irving B. Weiner & Randy K. Otto, Ed., The Handbook of Forensic Psychology 3-27 (John Wiley & Sons, 2006).
Curt R. Bartol & Anne M. Bartol, Introduction to Forensic Psychology Research and Application, 5 Ed. (Sage Publications, 2019).
Dagmar Stahlberg, Ellen Frank, Maas Anne & Frey Dieter, We Knew it All Along: Hindsight Bias in Groups, 63 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1 46-58 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1060
Daniel Kahneman & Gary Klein, Conditions for Intuitive Expertise A Failure to Disagree, 64 American Psychologist 6 515-526 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016755
Daniel Kahneman, Pensar rápido pensar despacio 20, 1 Ed. (Debate, 2012).
Deborah H. Gruenfeld, Elizabeth A. Mannix, Katherine Y. Williams & Margaret A. Neale , Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance, 67 Organizational, Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1 1-15 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0061
Dennis P. Leyden & Paul S. Goodman, Familiarity and Group Productivity, 76 Journal of Applied Psychology 4 578-586 (1991), https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.76.4.578
Diego Eduardo López, El derecho de los jueces I 266, 2. Ed. (Legis, 2006).
Donald Bello, Measuring Popular and Judicial Deliberation: A Critical Comparison, 16 International Journal of Constitutional Law 4 1121-1147 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy085
Dong-Won Choi & Incheol Choi, A Comparison of Hinsight Bias in Groups and Individuals: The Moderating Role of Plausibility, 40 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2 325-343 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00576.x
Doron Teichman, The Hindsight Bias and The Law in Hindsight, en Eyar Zamir & Doron Teichman, Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and The Law 354-377 (Oxford University Press, 2014), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199945474.013.0014
Dustin P. Calvillo & Abraham M. Rutchick, Domain Knowledge and Hindsight Bias Among Poker Players, 27 Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 159-267 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1799
Dustin P. Calvillo, Working Memory and the Memory Distortion Componente of Hindisght Bias, 20 Psychology Press 8 891-898 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.706309
Ed Bukszar & Terry Connolly, Hinsight Bias and Strategic Choice: Some Problems in Learning Experience, 31 Academy of Management Journal 3 628-641 (1988), https://doi.org/10.5465/256462
Edward F. Wright & Gary L. Wells, Does Group Discussion Attenuate the Dispositional Bias?, 15 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 6 531-546 (1985), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00918.x
Edward F. Wright, Elizabeth Lüüs & Scott D. Christie. Does group discussion facilitate the use of consensus information in making causal attributions?, 59 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2 261-269 (1990), https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.261
Edward Munnich, Jennifer Milazzo, Jade Stannard & Katherine Rainford, Can Causal Sense-Making Benefit Foresight, Rather than Biasing Hinsight?, 36 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2669-2674 (2014).
Elena Macías, Las resoluciones judiciales en Francia: tipología y estructura, 19 Anales de Filosofía Francesa 187-211 (2011).
Erin M. Harley, Hindsight Bias in Legal Decision Making, 25 Social Cognition 1 48-6 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.48
Francisca Fariña, Ramón Arce & Mercedes Novo, ¿Qué es la psicología jurídica?, en Ramón Arce, Francisca Fariña & Mercedes Novo, Psicología jurídica 9-20 (Colección Psicología y Ley, 2005).
Francisco Javier Ezquiaga, El voto particular I, 1 Ed. (Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales de Madrid, 1990).
Frank B. Cross & Emerson H. Tiller, Understanding Collegiality on the Court, 10 Journal of Constitutional Law 2 257-271 (2009).
Frederick Schauer, Is there a Psychology of Judging?, en David E. Klein & Gregory Mitchell, Eds., The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making 103-120 (Oxford University Press, 2010), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0007
Garold Stasser, Norbert L. Kerr & James H. Davis, Influence Models and Consensus Processes in Decision Making Groups, en Paul B. Paulus, Ed., Psychology of Group Influence 279-326, (Erlbaum, 1990).
Gary Charness, Uri Gneezy & Michael A. Kuhn, Experimental Methods: Between-Subjects and Within-Subjects Design, 81 Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1-8 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
Gerd Gigerenzer, Heuristics, en Gerd Gigerenzer & Christoph Engel, Eds., Heuristics and the law 17-44 (MIT Press, 2006), https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3488.003.0005
Gideon Falk, Unanimity vs Majority Rule in Problem-Solving Groups: A Challenge to the Superiority Unanimity, 12 Sage Journal 4 379-399 (1981), https://doi.org/10.1177/104649648101200401
Gregory N. Mandel, Patently Non-Obvious: Empirical Demonstration that the Hindsight Bias Renders Patent Decisions Irrational, 67 Ohio State Law Journal 6 1392-1464 (2006), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.871684
Gwen M. Wittenbaum, Hillary C. Shulman & Mary E. Braz, Social Ostracism in Task Groups. The Effects of Group Composition, 41 Sage Journals 3 331-353 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410363914
Harry T. Edwards, Collegial Decision Making in the US Court of Appeals (Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper 17-47, 2017), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3071857
Harry T. Edwards, The Effects of Collegiality on Judicial Decision Making, 151 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 5 1639-1690 (2003), https://doi.org/10.2307/3313001
Hartmut Blank, Steffen Nestler, Gernot von Collani & Volkhard Fischer, How many Hinsight Biases are There?, 106 Cognition 1408-1440 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.007
Heider Fritz, The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, 1 Ed. (Psychology Press, 1958), https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000
Hernán Escobedo, Psicología cognitiva, 6 Informática Educativa 2 167-173 (1993).
Holly Anne Sindelar, Elimination of the Hindsight Bias in Individual Versus Group Decision Making, Open Acces Dissetartions, Paper 999 (University of Rhode Island, 2000).
James Shanteau, Competence in Experts: The Role of Task Characteristics, 53 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 252-266 (1992), https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90064-E
Janet A. Sniezek & Rebecca A. Henry, Accuracy and Confidence in Group Judgment, 43 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1 1-28 (1989), https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90055-1
Jay J. J. Christensen-Szalanski & Cynthia Fobian, The Hindsight Bias: A Meta-analysis, 48 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1 147-168 (1991), https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90010-Q
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, A Positive Psychological Theory of Judging in Hindsight, 65 University of Chicago Law Review 2 571-626 (1998), https://doi.org/10.2307/1600229
Jennifer K. Robbenolt & Valery Hans, The Psychology of Tort Law, 1 ed. (Nueva York University Press, 2019).
Jeroen Janssen, Gijsbert Erkens, Paul A. Kirschner & Gellof Kanselaar, Influence of Group Member Familiarity on Online Collaborative Learning, 25 Computer in Human Behavior 161-170 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.010
Jerome Frank, Are Judges Human? Part 1: The Effect on Legal Thinking of the Assumption That Judges Behave like Human Beings, 80 U. Pa. Law Review 17-53 (1931). https://doi.org/10.2307/3308020
Jerry A. Frodor, The Modularity of Mind, 1 Ed. (The MIT Press, 1983), https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001
Jochen Musch & Thomas Wagner, Did Everyone Know It All Along? A Review of Individual Differences in Hindsight Bias, 25 Social Cognition 1 64-82 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.64
John C. Anderson, Marianne M. Jennings, David Lowe & Philip Reckers, The Mitigation of Hinsight Bias in Judges’ Evaluation of Auditor Decisions, 16 Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20-39 (1997).
John M. Levine & Richard L. Moreland, Small Groups I, 1 Ed. (Psychology Press, 2006).
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans & Keith E. Stanovich, Dual Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate, 8 Perspect. Psychology Sci. 3 223-241 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
Josafat Cortez, ¿Qué es la decisión judicial? Notas sobre los estudios judiciales en América Latina, 4 Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho 129-145 (2020), https://doi.org/10.29263/lar04.2020.06
José López, El formalismo en la teoría jurídica estadounidense, XVIII Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho 267-299 (2001).
Juan Montero & José Flors, Contestación al Programa de Derecho Procesal Civil para Acceso a las Carreras Judicial y Fiscal, 7 Ed. (Tirant lo Blanc, 2012).
Kim A. Kamin & Jeffrey J. Rachlinsky, Ex Post ≠ Ex Ante Determining Liability in Hindsight, 19 Law and Human Behavior 1 89-104 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499075
Lawrence J. Sanna & Norbert Schwarz, Debiasing the Hindsight Bias: The Role of Accessibility Experience and (Mis) Attribution, 39 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 3 287-295 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00528-0
Lee Epstein, Richard A. Posner & William M. Landes, Why (And When) Judges Dissent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, 3 Journal of Legal Analysis 1 101-137 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/3.1.101
Linda Argote, Mark A. Seabright & Linda Dyer, Individual Versus Group Use of Base-Rate and Individuating Information, 38 Organizational, Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65-75 (1986), https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(86)90026-9
Linda Argote, Rukmini Devadas & Nancy Melone, The Base-rate Fallacy: Contrasting Processes and Outcomes of Groups and Individual Judgment, 46 Organizational, Behavior and Human Decision Processes 196-310 (1990), https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90034-7
Linda J. Demaine, Preface, en Jennifer K. Robbenolt & Valery Hans, Eds., The Psychology of Tort Law ix-xi (New York University Press, 2016).
Luz A. Morales & Eric García, Psicología jurídica: quehacer y desarrollo, 6 Divers.: Perspect. Psicol. 2 237-256 (2010), https://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-9998.2010.0002.03
Marcelo Remy Rodríguez, Los interrogantes que suscita la coexistencia de las instituciones de la doctrina probable y el precedente el Colombia, Revista Estudiantil de Derecho Privado (2023), https://red.uexternado.edu.co/los-interrogantes-que-suscita-la-coexistencia-de-las-instituciones-de-la-doctrina-probable-y-el-precedente-en-colombia.
Margarita Cárdenas Poveda, Estructura de la rama judicial en Latinoamérica, 3 Novum Jus. 1 99-132 (2009).
María Vázquez, Crónicas sobre el encuentro virtual: “El precedente judicial en América Latina”, 10 Forum 203-206 (2020).
Mark K. Pezzo, Surprise, defence, or making sense: What Removes Hindsight Bias?, en Rüdiger F. Pohl & Ulrich Hoffrage, Eds., Memory 421-441 (Psychology Press, 2003), https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000603
Melissa A. Z. Knoll & Hal Richard Arkes, The Effect of Expertise in the Hindsight Bias, 30 Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 389-399 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1950
Mercedes Novo & Ramón Arce, Jueces: formación de juicios y sentencias 2, 1 Ed. (Grupo Editorial Universitario, 2003).
Michael J. Saks & Robert F. Kidd, Human Information Processing and Adjudication: Trial by Heuristics, 15 Law & Society Review 1 123-160 (1980), https://doi.org/10.2307/3053225
Michael S. Moore, The Semantics of Judging, 54 Southern California Law Review 2 151-294 (1981).
Michelle R. Nario & Nyla R. Branscombe, Comparison Processes in Hindsight and Causal Attribution, 21 Personality and Social Psychology 12 1244-1255 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952112001
Neal J. Roese & Kathleen D. Vohs, Hindsight Bias, 7 Perspective on Psychological Science 5 411-426 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612454303
Niek Strohmaier, Helen Pluut, Kees van den Bos, Jan Adriaanse & Reinout Vriesendorp, Hindsight Bias and Outcome Bias in Judging Directors’ Liability and the Role of Free Will Beliefs, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1-18 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12722
Norbert Kerr, Robert J. MacCoun & Geoffrey P. Kramer, Bias in Judgment: Comparing Individuals and Groups, 103 Psychological Review 4 687-719 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.103.4.687
Nuno Garoupa & Catarina Santos Botelho, Judicial Dissent in Collegial Courts: Theory and Evidence, Politics (2023), https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1990
Nuria Cortada de Kohan & Guillermo Macbeth, Los sesgos cognitivos en la toma de decisiones, 2 Revista de Psicología 3 55-67 (2006).
Omer Y. Pelled, Tort Liability, Court Errors and Rational Hindsight Bias (The Buchmann Faculty of Law, 2023).
Paola de la Rosa & Víctor David Sandoval Navarro, Los sesgos cognitivos y su influjo en la decisión judicial. Aportes de la psicología jurídica a los procesos penales de corte acusatorio, 37 Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología 141-164 (2016), https://doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v37n102.08
Patrick R. Laughlin & Alan L. Ellis, Demonstrability and Social Combination Processes on Mathematical Intellective Tasks, 22 Psychology, 3 177-189, (1986), https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-3
Patrick R. Laughlin, Bryan L. Bonner & William Altermatt, Collective Versus Individual Induction with Single Versus Multiple Hypotheses, 75 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6 1481-1489 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.6.1481
Patrick R. Laughlin, Scott W. VanderStoep & Andrea B. Hollingshead, Collective Versus Individual Induction: Recognition of Truth, Rejection of Error, and Collective Information Processing, 61 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1 50-67 (1991), https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.1.50
Paul E. Pfeifer & Robert L. Burpee, Dissenting, 43 Litigation 4 20-28 (2017).
Philip G. Peters Jr., Hindsight Bias and Tort Liability: Avoiding Premature Conclusions, 31 Arizona St. L. J. 1277-1314 (1999).
Randy K. Otto & James R. P. Ogloff, Defining Forensic Psychology, en Irving B. Weiner & Randy K. Otto Eds., The Handbook of Forensic Psychology 35-55 (Wiley, Hoboken, 2014), https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260591.ch2
Rebecca L. Guilbault, Fred B. Bryant, Jennifer Howard Brockway & Emil J. Posavac, A Meta-analysis of Research on Hindsight Bias, 26 Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2-3 103-117 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2004.9646399
Reid Hastie & Tatsuya Kameda, The Robust Beauty of Majority Rules in Group Decisions, 112 Psychological Review 2 494-508 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.494
Reid Hastie & W. Kip Viscusi, What Juries Can’t Do Well:The Jury’s Performance as a Risk Manager, 40 Arizona Law Review 901-921 (1998).
Reid Hastie, Review Essay: Experimental Evidence on Group Accuracy, en Guillermo Owen & Bernard Grofman, Eds., Information Pooling and Group Accurancy 129-157 (JAI Press, 1986).
Richard A. Posner, Cómo deciden los jueces I, 1 Ed. (Marcial Pons, 2011).
Richard Nisbett & Lee Ross, Human Inferences: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, 1 Ed. (Prentice Hall, 1980).
Richard P. Larrick & Daniel C. Feiler, Expertise in Decision Making, en The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, 696-721, Gideon Keren & George Wu, Eds., John Wiley & Sons, Nueva York, (2015), https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468333.ch24
Rob Gray, Sian L. Beilock & Thomas H. Carr, “As Soon as the Bat Met the Ball, I Knew it Was Gone”: Outcome Prediction, Hindsight Bias, and the Representation and Control of Action in Expert and Novice Baseball Players, 14 Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4 669-675 (2007), https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196819
Robert S. Baron & Norbert L. Kerr, Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action I, 1 Ed. (Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, 1992).
Roberto Alfonso Jiménez Olivares, Los salvamentos de voto como fuentes de la renovación de la jurisprudencia, IX Prolegómenos 18 335-356 (2006), https://doi.org/10.18359/prole.2579
Rüdiger F. Pohl & Edgar Erdfelder, Hindsight Bias, en Rüdiger F. Pohl, Ed., Cognitive Illusions Intriguing Phenomena in Thinking, Judgment and Memory 424-446 (Routledge, 2017).
Samantha Bielen, Peter Grajzl, Valentina Dimitrova-Grajzl & Wim Marneffe, The Duration of Judicial Deliberation: Evidence from Belgium, 174 Journal of Institutional and Theorical Economics 2 303-333 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1628/093245617X14926792029174
Scott A. Hawkins & Reid Hastie, Hinsight: Biased Jusgments of Past Events after the Outcome are Known 311, 107 Psychological Bulletin 3 311-327 (1990), https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.107.3.311
Scott Tindale & Verlin B. Hinsz, Group Decision Making, en Michael A. Hogg & Joel Cooper, Eds., SAGE Handbook of Social Psychology 381-403 (Sage Publications, 2003).
Sergio Londoño, Administrador blindado, juez amordazado: ¿se justifica la Business Judgment Rule en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano?, 55 Revista de Derecho Privado 1-37 (2016), https://doi.org/10.15425/redepriv.55.2016.06
Seymour Epstein, Integration of the Cognitive and the Psychodynamics Unconscious, 49 American Psychologist 8 709-724 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.49.8.709
Stefan Schulz-Hardt, Félix C. Brodbeck, Andreas Mojzisch, Rudolf Kerschreiter & Dieter Frey, Group Decision Making in Hidden Profile Situations: Dissent as a Facilitator for Decision Quality, 91 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6 10180-1093 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1080
Steffen Nestler & Boris Egloff, Increased or Reveared? The Effect of Surprise on Hindsight Bias Depends on the Hindsight Component, 35 Journal of Experimental Psychology 6 1539-1544 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017006
Susan J. LaBine & Gary LaBine, Determination of Negligence and the Hindsight Bias, 20 Law and Human Behavior 5 501-516 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499038
Tilko Swalve, Does Group Familiarity Improve Deliberations in Judicial Teams? Evidence from the German Federal Court of Justicie, 19 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 223-249 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12308
Tim R. W. de Wilde, Femke S. Ten Velden & Carsten K. W. de Dreu, The anchoring-bias in groups, 76 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 116-126 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.001
Tony D. Crespi & Lauren O’ Leary, Forensic Psychology in Contemporary Society en V.S. Ramachandran, Encyclopedia of Human Behavior 194-198 (Academic Press, 2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00172-5
Torsten Reimer, Andrea Reimer & Uwe Czienskowski, Decision-Making Group Attenuate the Discussion Bias in Favor of Shared Information: A Meta-Analysis, 77 Communication Monographs 1 121-142 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903514318
Tracey E. George, Developing a Positive Theory of Decisionmaking on U.S. Courts of Appeals, 58 Ohio State Law Journal 1635-1696 (1998).
Walter F. Murphy, Courts as Small Groups, 79 Harvard Law Review 1551-1572 (1966), https://doi.org/10.2307/1339008
Wendy L. Martinek, Judges as Members of Small Groups, en D. E. Klein & G. Mitchell, Eds., The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making 73, 73-84 (Oxford University Press, 2010), https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0005
William R. Wetmore III, Joshua David Summers & Joel S. Greenstein, Experimental Study of Influence of Group Familiarity and Information Sharing on Design Review Effectiveness, 21 Journal of Engineering Design 1 111-126 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820802238217
Wim De Neys, Conflict Detection, Dual Processes, and Logical Intuitions: Some Clarifications, 20 Thinking & Reasoning 2 169-187 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.854725

Vol. 73 (2024): Publicación continua