Abstract
This study analyzes the relationship between environmental disclosure practices and the financial performance of companies with high environmental impact listed on the Brazilian stock exchange. A sample of all high-impact companies was selected, according to the 2016 Global Reporting Initiative. 34 environmental indicators were correlated with three financial indicators (sales growth, return on equity and operating cash flow / revenues). While some environmental subcategories showed a positive correlation with the financial indicators, some others do not. Additionally, the results showed that most of indicators do not present significative correlations. That would suggest the necessity of more effective governmental and corporate policies to achieve a more sustainable performance of Brazilian companies.
Adams, C., Hill, W.-Y. & Roberts, C. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: legitimating corporate behaviour? The British Accounting Review, 30(1), 1-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1997.0060
Aggarwal, P. (2013). Relationship between environmental responsibility and financial performance of firm: A literature review. Journal of Business and Management, 13(1), 13-22.
Akbaş, H. & Canikli, S. (2018). Determinants of voluntary greenhouse gas emission disclosure: An empirical investigation on Turkish firms. Sustainability, 11(1), 107. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010107
Alexopoulos, I., Kounetas, K. & Tzelepis, D. (2018). Environmental and financial performance. Is there a win-win or a win-loss situation? Evidence from the Greek manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(1).
Chen, L., Feldmann, A. & Tang, O. (2015). The relationship between disclosures of corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidences from GRI reports in manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, 445-456.
Chen, L., Tang, O. & Feldmann, A. (2015). Applying GRI reports for the investigation of environmental management practices and company performance in Sweden, China and India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98(1), 36-46.
Cho, C., Laine, M., Roberts, R. & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003.
Chung, K. & Pruitt, S. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74.
Deegan, C. & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187-199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1996.9729510.
Deegan, C. & Rankin, M. (1997). The materiality of environmental information to users of annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(4), 562-583. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579710367485
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852.
Dobre, E., Stanila, G. & Brad, L. (2015). The influence of environmental and social performance on financial performance: Evidence from Romania’s listed entities. Sustainability, 7, 2513-2553. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032513.
Dragomir, V. (2010). Environmentally sensitive disclosures and financial performance in a European setting, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 6(3), 359-388.
Ferreira N., J., da Silva G., S., Bruni, A. & Dias F., J. (2017). Do Environmental Disasters Impact on the Volume of Socio-Environmental Investment and Disclosure of Brazilian Companies? Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management: Social and Environmental Accounting in Brazil, 159-187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-359820160000006006
Field, A. (2009). Descobrindo a Estatística usando o SPSS. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2 ed.
Gallego-Alvarez, I., Lozano, M. & Rodríguez-Rosa, M. (2018). An analysis of the environmental information in international companies according to the new GRI standards. Journal of Cleaner Production 182, 57-66.
Gri (2018). Pioneer of Sustainability Reporting. Disponível em: https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/Pages/default.aspx (acesso em 01.09.18).
Guthrie, J. & Parker, L. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 343-352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1989.9728863.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Hart, S. & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30-37.
Hofer, C., Cantor, D. & Dai, J. (2012). The competitive determinants of a firm’s environmental management activities: Evidence from US manufacturing industries. Journal Oper. Manag. 30 (1-2), 69-84.
Hummel, K. & Schlick, C. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure – Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455-476. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.06.001
Itawa, H. & Okada, K. (2011). How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70, 1691-1700.
Klassen, R. & McLaughlin, C. (1996). The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance. Manag. Sci., 42, 1199-1214.
Knebel, S. & Seele, P. (2015). Quo vadis GRI? A (critical) assessment of GRI 3.1 A+ nonfinancial reports and implications for credibility and standardization, Corporate Communications. An International Journal, 20(2), 196-212.
Lo, C., Yeung, A. & Cheng, T. (2012). The impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in fashions and textile industries. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 135, 561-567.
Magness, V. (2006). Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(4), 540-563.
Moneva, J. & Cuellar, B. (2009). The value relevance of financial and non-financial environmental reporting. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(3), 441-456.
Montabon, F., Sroufe, R. & Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. J. Oper. Manag., 25(5), 998-1014.
Patten, D., Ren, Y. & Zhao, N. (2015). Standalone Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: An Exploratory Analysis of its Relation to Legitimation. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 35(1), 17-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160x.2015.1007467
Russo, M. & Fouts, P. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Manag. J., 40, 534-559.
Silva, M. et al. (2015). Determinantes do disclosure ambiental nos relatórios de empresas listadas na Bovespa. Revista Ambiente Contábil., 7(2), jul./dez.
Simionescu, L. & Dumitrescu, D. (2018). Empirical Study towards Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Company Financial Performance. Evidence for Companies Listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Sustainability, 10, 3141.
El aval sobre la intervención de la obra (revisión, corrección de estilo, traducción, diagramación) y su posterior divulgación se otorga mediante una licencia de uso y no a través de una cesión de derechos, lo que representa que la revista y la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana se eximen de cualquier responsabilidad que se pueda derivar de una mala práctica ética por parte de los autores. En consecuencia de la protección brindada por la licencia de uso, la revista no se encuentra en la obligación de publicar retractaciones o modificar la información ya publicada, a no ser que la errata surja del proceso de gestión editorial. La publicación de contenidos en esta revista no representa regalías para los contribuyentes.