Palabras clave
juego de valores
rentabilidad social de la inversión
salud y bienestar
valoración contingente
Cómo citar
Resumen
Este estudio estima el valor social de las soluciones de huertos comunitarios codiseñados y codesarrollados en Nitra, Eslovaquia, en el marco del proyecto IN-HABIT, centrándose en la salud y el bienestar. Se probó un marco ampliado de rentabilidad social de la inversión (SROI) con usuarios de huertos comunitarios, voluntarios y ejecutores de proyectos. Mediante un proceso en el que participaron las partes interesadas, se desarrolló una teoría de cambio en la que se identificaron los siguientes resultados: la mejora de la salud, el bienestar psicológico y la concienciación medioambiental. Se compararon dos enfoques de valoración: el primero implicó la aportación directa de las partes interesadas a través de la valoración contingente y el Juego del Valor de Scholten, que arrojó un SROI de 2,15 € por euro invertido. El segundo enfoque, basado en aproximaciones financieras, arrojó una ratio superior de 4,27 €, lo que subraya la importancia del contexto local en la valoración. Los resultados sugieren que las inversiones en espacios participativos verdes pueden generar un valor social sustancial y duradero, sobre todo en la mejora de la resiliencia de la comunidad, la salud mental y la concienciación medioambiental. Los resultados ponen de relieve los importantes beneficios sociales, medioambientales y comunitarios de la infraestructura verde participativa, especialmente en zonas urbanas desatendidas
Al-Delaimy, W. K., & Webb, M. (2017). Community Gardens as Environmental Health Interventions: Benefits Versus Potential Risks. Current Environmental Health Reports, 4(2), 252-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0133-4
Alomoto, W., Niñerola, A., & Sánchez-Rebull, M.-V. (2024). Evaluating the social return on investment of a mental health disorders club: A case study. Social Enterprise Journal, 21(2), 294-317. ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-10-2023-0122
Armstrong, D. (2000). A survey of community gardens in upstate New York: Implications for health promotion and community development. Health & Place, 6(4), 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8292(00)00013-7
Austin, G. (2014). Green Infrastructure for Landscape Planning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315856780
Banke-Thomas, A. O., Madaj, B., Charles, A., & Van Den Broek, N. (2015). Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 15(582), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1935-7
Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2018). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235594
Corkery, L. (2019). Urban Green Space. In K. Bishop & N. Marshall (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of People and Place in the 21st-Century City (1st ed., pp. 294-304). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351211543-32
Corvo, L., Pastore, L., Mastrodascio, M., & Cepiku, D. (2022). The Social Return on Investment Model: A Systematic Literature Review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(7), 49-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-05-2021-1307
Dinda, S., & Ghosh, S. (2021). Perceived Benefits, Aesthetic Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Visiting Urban Parks: A Case Study in Kolkata, India. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.12.007
Edwards, R. T., & Lawrence, C. L. (2021). ‘What You See is All There is’: The Importance of Heuristics in Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Social Return on Investment (SROI) in the Evaluation of Public Health Interventions. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 19(5), 653-664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00653-5
Eliaš, L., Ondrejička, V., Ondrejičková, S., & Nič, M. (2021). Mobility as a Crucial Factor of Spatial Development in Function Urban Areas—Case Study of Kosice Region. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1203(2), 022086. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1203/2/022086
Enssle, F., & Kabisch, N. (2020). Urban Green Spaces for the Social Interaction, Health and Well-Being of Older People—An Integrated View of urban Ecosystem Services and Socio-Environmental Justice. Environmental Science & Policy, 109, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.008
Falťan, Ľ. (2019). Socio-priestorové premeny vidieckych sídiel na Slovensku v začiatkoch 21. Storočia – sociologická reflexia. Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review, 51(2), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2019.51.2.5
Ferreira, S., & Marques, R. C. (2015). Contingent Valuation Method Applied to Waste Management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 99, 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.02.013
Frijters, P., Krekel, C., Sanchis, R., & Santini, Z. I. (2024). The WELLBY: A New Measure of Social Value and Progress. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(736), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03229-5
Glover, T. D. (2003). The Story of the Queen Anne Memorial Garden: Resisting a Dominant Cultural Narrative. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(2), 190-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2003.11949990
Halkos, G., Leonti, A., & Sardianou, E. (2022). Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Entrance to Urban Parks: A Quantile Regression Analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 74, 421-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.03.013
Hardi, T., Repaská, G., Veselovský, J., & Vilinová, K. (2020). Environmental Consequences of the Urban Sprawl in the Suburban Zone of Nitra: An Analysis Based on Landcover Data. Geographica Pannonica, 24(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.5937/gp24-25543
Hartfiel, N., Gittins, H., Morrison, V., Wynne-Jones, S., Dandy, N., & Edwards, R. T. (2023). Social Return on Investment of Nature-Based Activities for Adults with Mental Wellbeing Challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(15), 6500. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20156500
Hunter, R. F., Cleland, C., Cleary, A., Droomers, M., Wheeler, B. W., Sinnett, D., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., & Braubach, M. (2019). Environmental, Health, Wellbeing, Social and Equity Effects of Urban Green Space Interventions: A Meta-Narrative Evidence Synthesis. Environment International, 130, 104923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923
Irvine, S., Johnson, L., & Peters, M. K. (1999). Community gardens and sustainable land use planning: A case study of the Alex Wilson community garden. Local Environment, 4(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839908725579
Kadel R., Stielke, A., Ashton, K., Masters, R., & Dyakova, M. (2022). Social Return on Investment (SROI) of mental health related interventions—A scoping review. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 965148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.965148
Laycock Pedersen, R., Thomson, G., Friblick, L., Gaubert, C., & Nazarin, S. (2023). Amplifying sustainable commercial urban agriculture in Sweden through the Stadsbruk method. In Urban and Regional Agriculture (pp. 307-340). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820286-9.00020-0
Lettieri, E., Biasin, C., Selva, A., Isella, L., Onofrio, R., & Bertelè, P. (2021). SROI Methods for Impact Assessment in Economy of Wellbeing. In Andreoni, G., & Mambretti, C. (Eds.). Digital Health Technology for Better Aging: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 245-266). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72663-8
Meltzer, H., Bebbington, P., Dennis, M. S., Jenkins, R., McManus, S., & Brugha, T. S. (2013). Feelings of Loneliness among Adults with Mental Disorder. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0515-8
Nicholls, J., Lawlor, E., Neitzert E., & Goodspeed, T. (2012). A guide to Social Return on Investment. SROI Network. https://docs.adaptdev.info/lib/IB6EPT5U
Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200414211
Open Social Value Bank. (2023). Open Social Value Bank. https://en.opensocialvaluebank.com/
Papastergiou, E., Latinopoulos, D., Evdou, M., & Kalogeresis, A. (2023). Exploring Associations between Subjective Well-Being and Non-Market Values When Used in the Evaluation of Urban Green Spaces: A Scoping Review. Land, 12(3), 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030700
Piracha, A., & Chaudhary, M. T. (2022). Urban Air Pollution, Urban Heat Island and Human Health: A Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 14(15), 9234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159234
Rathnayke, S., & Amofah, S. (2023). Health and Wellbeing Implications of Urban Green Exposure on Young Adults in a European City. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences, 6(4), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.33422/jarss.v6i4.1136
Robinson S. (2020). Artists for Mental Health Mindfulness Project: Social Return on Investment Evaluation.
Scholten P. (2019). ValueGame. A Method for Involving Customers in Valuing Outcomes. https://socialvalueuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ValueGame-Document-FINAL.pdf
Social Value UK. (2024). The Principles of Social Value. https://socialvalueuk.org/principles-of-social-value/
Solovey, L. V., & Kovaleva, M. I. (2017). Social and psychological problems of urban space. Historical and social-educational ideas, 9(4/2), 147-152.
Szott, A., & Motamed, M. (2023). Agriculture Sector Cost-Benefit Analysis Guidance. https://www.mcc.gov/resources/doc/agriculture-sector-cost-benefit-analysis-guidance/
Van Oijstaeijen, W., Van Passel, S., Back, P., & Cools, J. (2022). The Politics of Green Infrastructure: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Flemish Local Decision-Makers. Ecological Economics, 199, 107493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107493
Vasiliu, E.-E., Torabi Moghadam, S., Bisello, A., & Lombardi, P. (2024). Visionary Nature-Based Solutions Evaluated through Social Return on Investment: The Case Study of an Italian Urban Green Space. Smart Cities, 7(2), 946-972. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7020040
Victor, C. R., & Yang, K. (2012). The Prevalence of Loneliness Among Adults: A Case Study of the United Kingdom. The Journal of Psychology, 146(1-2), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2011.613875
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2025 Ivana Vačková, Lukáš Varecha, Katarína Melichová