Keywords
Colombia
equity
readjustment
land
How to Cite
Abstract
Land Readjustment 2 (LR) or real estate assembling carried out in Colombia since 1997 has had some difficulties in the implementation process, which has not ensured the expected equity. This article examines the involved actor’s abilities to share the land appreciation due to the partial plans developed with this tool in Colombia. It is concluded that there is a significant difference between burdens and benefits in each actor group. Evidence indicates that the LR projects in Colombia differ from the theoretical definition and go against its essential characteristics: the merging method that displaces the original landowners and affects the equitable distribution and promotes the leadership of private companies that get more benefits than they should.
n American Real Estate Society (Lares).
Alterman, R. (2007). Much More than Land Assembly: Land Readjustment for the Supply of Urban Public Services. En Y. Hong y B. Needham (eds.), Analyzing Land Readjustment: Economics, Law, and Collective Action (pp. 57-86). Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Alterman, R. (2012). Land Use Regulations and Property Values: The “Windfalls Capture” Idea Revisited. En N. Brooks, K. Donaghy y G. Knaap (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Urban Economics and Planning (pp. 755-786). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Balakrishnan, S. (2018). Land Cooperatives in India: New Challenges of 21st Century Land Readjustment. En UN-Habitat, Global Experiences in Land Readjustment (pp. 119-139). Kenya: UN-Habitat.
Borrero, Ó. (2007). The Effects of Land Policy on Urban Land Prices in Bogota. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Centro de Memoria Histórica. (2012). ¡Basta ya! Colombia: memorias de guerra y dignidad. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional.
Colombia, Congreso de la República. (1989). Ley 9 de 1989, “Por la cual se dictan normas sobre planes de desarrollo municipal, compraventa y expropiación de bienes y se dictan otras disposiciones”. Bogotá: Diario Oficial, núm. 38.650, 11 de enero de 1989.
Colombia, Congreso de la República. (1997). Ley 388 de 1997, “Por la cual se modifica la Ley 9ª de 1989 y la Ley 3ª de 1991 y se dictan otras disposiciones”. Bogotá: Diario Oficial, núm. 43.127, 24 de julio de 1997.
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística [DANE]. (2010). Proyecciones nacionales y departamentales de población 2005-2020. Recuperado de http://www.dane.gov.co
Doebele, W. A. (1982a). Introduction. En W. A. Doebele (ed.), Land Readjustment: A Different Approach to Financing Urbanization (pp. 1-10). Lexington: Lexington Books.
Doebele, W. A. (1982b). Synopsis. En W. A. Doebele (ed.), Land Readjustment: A Different Approach to Financing Urbanization (pp. 11-28). Lexington: Lexington Books.
Doebele, W. A. (2007). Foreword. En Y. Hong y B. Needham (eds.), Analyzing Land Readjustment: Economics, Law, and Collective Action (pp. vii-xiv). Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Grimes Jr., O. F. (1982). Financing Urban Infrastructure in Developing Countries. En W. A. Doebele (ed.), Land Readjustment: A Different Approach to Financing Urbanization (pp. 207-212). Lexington: Lexington Books.
Hagman, D. G., y Misczynski, D. J. (1977). Windfalls for Wipeouts: Land Value Recapture and Compensation. Chicago: American Planning Association.
Hong, Y. (2007). Assembling Land for Development: Issues and Opportunities. En Y. Hong y B. Needham (eds.), Analyzing Land Readjustment: Economics, Law, and Collective Action (pp. 3-34). Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Hong, Y., y Brain, I. (2012). Land Readjustment for Urban Development and Post-Disaster Reconstruction. Land Lines, 24(1), 2-9.
Hong, Y., y Cheng, A. (2014). The Symmetry between Land Value Creation and Sharing: How Land Value Sharing could Help Finance New City Development. Recuperado de https://www.dropbox.com/s/33utgzomkzaxp4g/Hong_Cheng-2014.pdf?dl=0
Hong, Y., y Tierney, J. (2014). Making Land Readjustment Participatory and Inclusive. Recuperado de https://www.dropbox.com/s/cfyxca43c0syg6r/HongTierney2013.pdf?dl=0
Leeruttanawisut, K., y Rabé, P. (2018). Revisiting Land Sharing in Bangkok, Thailand: The Sengki Case. En UN-Habitat, Global Experiences in Land Readjustment (pp. 84-97). Kenya: UN-Habitat.
Lungo, M. (ed.). (2004). Grandes proyectos urbanos. San Salvador: Universidad Centroamericana José Simeón Cañas.
Maldonado, M. M., Pinilla, J. F., Rodríguez, J. F., y Valencia, N. (2006). Planes parciales, gestión asociada y mecanismos de distribución equitativa de cargas y beneficios en el sistema urbanístico colombiano: marco jurídico, conceptos básicos y alternativas de aplicación. Bogotá: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Needham, B. (2007). The Search for Greater Efficiency: Land Readjustment in the Netherlands. En Y. Hong y B. Needham (eds.), Analyzing Land Readjustment: Economics, Law, and Collective Action (pp. 115-132). Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Norbu, G. (2018). Land Pooling in Thimphu, Bhutan. En UN-Habitat, Global Experiences in Land Readjustment (pp. 112-128). Kenya: UN-Habitat.
Payne, G. K. (2002). Introduction. En G. K. Payne (ed.), Land, Rights and Innovation: Improving Tenure Security for the Urban Poor (pp. 3-22). Londres: ITDG publishing.
Pinilla, J. (2018). A New Approach to Urban Renewal in Bogotá: The Fenicia Project. En UN-Habitat, Global Experiences in Land Readjustment (pp. 36-55). Kenya: UN-Habitat.
Pinto, A. C. (2005). La distribución equitativa de cargas y beneficios en Colombia y algunas referencias sobre la experiencia de Japón. Ciudad y territorio: estudios territoriales (143), 89-104.
Rodríguez, J. F. (2012). Land Readjustment (LR/P) Experience in Colombia. Final Report. Bogotá: UN Habitat.
Rojas, M. C., y Rave, B. (2013). Reajuste de tierras en Medellín-Colombia. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Smolka, M. O. (2013a). International and Latin American Experiences. En M. O. Smolka (ed.), Implementing Value Capture in Latin America: Policies and Tools for Urban Development (pp. 13-20). Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Smolka, M. O. (2013b). Latin American Urbanization and the Case for Value Capture. En M. O. Smolka (ed.), Implementing Value Capture in Latin America: Policies and Tools for Urban Development (pp. 4-12). Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Smolka, M. O. e Iracheta, A. (2000). Mobilizing Land Value Increments to Provide Service Land for the Poor. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Smolka, M. O., y Amborski, D. (2000). Value Capture for Urban Development: An Inter-American Comparison. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Sorensen, A. (2007). Consensus, Persuasion and Opposition: Organizing Land Readjustment in Japan. En Y. Hong y B. Needham (eds.), Analyzing Land Readjustment: Economics, Law, and Collective Action (pp. 89-114). Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Turk, S. S. (2008). An Examination for Efficient Applicability of the Land Readjustment Method at the International Context. Journal of Planning Literature, 22(3), 229-242.
Van Thiel, S. (2014). Research Methods in Public Administration and Public Management: An Introduction. En Routledge Masters in Public Management Series: 11. Londres: Routledge Ltd.
Yilmaz, A., Çağdaş, V., y Demir, H. (2015). An Evaluation Framework for Land Readjustment Practices. Land Use Policy, 44, 153-168.
Zeluel, A., y Hong, Y-H. (2014). Urban Redevelopment. Experience in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Recuperado de https://www.dropbox.com/s/k316lh2a8red67p/Zeluel-2014.pdf?dl=0
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.