Keywords
gestión ambiental
gobernanza
revisión de literatura
How to Cite
Abstract
La descentralización de la gestión ambiental implica la transferencia de poder y responsabilidades a nivel local. Aunque existen revisiones bibliográficas sobre descentralización y medio ambiente, hay un vacío para el caso específico de Latinoamérica. Utilizando la técnica del Systematic Quantitative Literature Review los patrones en la literatura revelan desequilibrios territoriales y temáticos en el análisis, con una mayoría de estudios centrados en Bolivia y Brasil, concentración de investigaciones en descentralización de la gestión forestal, dominio de los académicos del ámbito anglosajón y valoraciones dispares en los resultados dependiendo del país analizado y el enfoque disciplinar.
Abers, R. (2007). Organizing for governance: building collaboration in Brazilian river basins. World Development , 35 (8), 1450-1463.
Abers, R., & Jorge, K. D. (2005). Descentralização da gestão da água: por que os comitês de bacia estão sendo criados. Ambiente e Sociedade , 8 (2), 99-124.
Abers, R., & Keck, M. (2011). Comitês de Bacia no Brasil: uma abordagem política no estudo da participação social. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais , 6 (1), 55-68.
Agnes, C. C., Calegari, L., Gatto, D. A., & Stangerlin, D. M. (2009). Uma discussão sobre a descentralização da gestão ambiental. Revista Científica Eletrônica de Engenharia Florestal , 8 (14), 53-73.
Andersson, K. (2003). What motivates municipal governments? Uncovering the institutional incentives for municipal governance of forest resources in Bolivia. Journal of Environment and Development , 12 (1), 5-27.
Andersson, K. (2004). Who Talks with Whom? The Role of Repeated Interactions in Decentralized Forest Governance. World Development , 32 (2), 233-249.
Andersson, K. (2013). Local Governance of Forests and the Role of External Organizations: Some Ties Matter More Than Others. World Development , 43, 226-237.
Andersson, K., & Gibson, C. C. (2007). Decentralized governance and environmental change: Local institutional moderation of deforestation in Bolivia. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 26 (1), 99-123.
Andersson, K., & Pacheco, D. (2005). ¿Cómo hacer funcionar la gestión descentralizada de los recursos naturales? . Gestion y Politica Publica , 14 (1), 75-106.
Andersson, K., & Van Laerhoven, F. (2007). From local strongman to facilitator: Institutional incentives for participatory municipal governance in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies , 40 (9), 1085-1111.
Andersson, K., Gibson, C. C., & Lehoucq, F. (2004). The politics of decentralized natural resource governance. Ps-Political Science & Politics , 37 (3), 421-426.
Andersson, K., Gibson, C. C., & Lehoucq, F. (2006). Municipal politics and forest governance: Comparative analysis of decentralization in Bolivia and Guatemala. World Development , 34 (3), 576-595.
Assetto, V. J., Hajba, E., & Mumme, S. P. (2003). Democratization, decentralization, and local environmental policy capacity: Hungary and Mexico. The Social Science Journal , 40 (2), 249-268.
Azevedo, A., Pasquis, R., & Bursztyn, M. (2007). A reforma do Estado, a emergência da descentralização e as políticas ambientais. Revista do Serviço Público , 58 (1), 37-55 .
Bartley, T., Andersson, K., Jagger, P., & Van Laerhoven, F. (2008). The contribution of institutional theories to explaining decentralization of natural resource governance. Society and Natural Resources , 21 (2), 160-174.
Batterbury, S. P., & Fernando, J. L. (2006). Rescaling governance and the impacts of political and environmental decentralization: An introduction. World Development , 34 (11), 1851-1863.
Bebbington, A. (2005). “La ‘glocalización’ de la gobernanza ambiental: relaciones de escala en los movimientos socio-ambientales y sus implicaciones para la gobernanza ambiental en zonas de influencia minera en el Peru´ y el Ecuador”. RIMSIP y IDRC.
Brannstrom, C. (2004). Decentralising water resource management in Brazil. European Journal of Development Research , 16 (1), 214-234.
Cohen, A., & McCarthy, J. (2015). Reviewing rescaling: Strengthening the case for environmental considerations. Progress in Human Geography , 39 (1), 3-25.
Coleman, E. A. (2014). Behavioral Determinants of Citizen Involvement: Evidence from Natural Resource Decentralization Policy. Public Administration Review , 74 (5), 642-654.
Coleman, E. A., & Fleischman, F. D. (2012). Comparing Forest Decentralization and Local Institutional Change in Bolivia, Kenya, Mexico, and Uganda. World Development , 40 (4), 836-849.
De Oliveira, J. A. (2002). mplementing environmental policies in developing countries through decentralization: The case of protected areas in Bahia, Brazil. World Development , 30 (10), 1713-1736.
Evans, K., de Jong, W., Cronkleton, P., & Nghi, T. H. (2010). Participatory methods for planning the future in forest communities. Society and Natural Resources , 23 (7), 604-619.
Ferreira, C. M., & Fonseca, A. (2014). Análise da participação popular nos Conselhos Municipais de Meio Ambiente do Médio Piracicaba (MG). Ambiente & Sociedade , 239-258.
Gabaldón, A. J. (2009). La descentralización de la gestión ambiental en América Latina. Reforma y Democracia , 45, 1-17.
Gibson, C. C., & Lehoucq, F. (2003). The local politics of decentralized environmental policy in Guatemala. Journal of Environment and Development, , 12 (1), 28-49.
Guitart, D., Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2012). Past results and future directions in urban community gardens research. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening , 11 (4), 364-373.
Hirsch, P., N’Guyen, A., Adrian-Kalchhauser, I., & Burkhardt-Holm, P.(2016). What do we really know about the impacts of one of the 100 worst invaders in Europe? A reality check. Ambio , 45 (3), 267-279.
Kauneckis, D., & Andersson, K. (2009). Making decentralization work: A cross-national examination of local governments and natural resource governance in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development , 44 (1), 23-46.
Larsen, P. B. (2011). Municipal environmental governance in the Peruvian Amazon: A case study in local matters of (in) significance. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal , 22 (3), 374-385.
Larson, A. M. (2002). Natural Resources and Decentralization in Nicaragua: Are Local Governments Up to the Job? World Development , 30 (1), 17-31.
Larson, A. M. (2003a). Decentralisation and forest management in Latin America: Towards a working model. Public Administration and Development , 23 (3), 211-226.
Larson, A. M. (2003b). Gestión forestal municipal de Nicaragua: ¿ Descentralización de cargas, centralización de beneficios? In L. Ferroukhi (Ed.), La Gestion Forestal Municipal en America Latina. Costa Rica: CIFOR, IDRC.
Larson, A. M. (2004). Formal decentralisation and the imperative of decentralisation ‘from below’: a case study of natural resource management in Nicaragua. The European Journal of Development Research , 16 (1), 55-70.
Larson, A., & Ferroukhi, L. (2003). Conclusiones. En L.Ferroukhi (Ed.), Gestión Forestal Municipal en América. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR/IDRC.
Larson, A. M., & Lewis-Mendoza, J. (2012). Decentralisation and devolution in Nicaragua's North Atlantic autonomous region: Natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights. International Journal of the Commons , 6 (2), 179-199.
Larson, A. M., & Ribot, J. C. (2004). Democratic decentralisation through a natural resource lens: an introduction. The European Journal of Development Research , 16 (1), 1-25.
Larson, A. M., & Soto, F. (2008). Decentralization of Natural Resource Governance Regimes. Annual review of environment and resources , 33, 213-239.
Larson, A. M., Pacheco, P., Toni, F., & Vallejo, M. (2007a). The effects of forestry decentralization on access to livelihood assets. Journal of Environment and Development , 16 (3), 251-268.
Larson, A. M., Pacheco, P., Toni, F., & Vallejo, M. (2007b). Trends in Latin American forestry decentralisations: Legal frameworks, municipal governments and forest dependent groups. International Forestry Review , 9 (3), 734-747.
Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual review of environment and resources , 31, 297-325.
Lemos, M. C., & Farias De Oliveira, J. L. (2004). Can water reform survive politics? Institutional change and river basin management in Ceará, Northeast Brazil. World Development , 32 (12), 2121-2137.
Nascimento, D. T., & Bursztyn, M. A. (2011). Descentralização da gestão ambiental: análise do processo de criação de organizações municipais de meio ambiente no sul catarinense. Revista do Serviço Público , 62 (2), 185-208.
Neves, E. M. (2012). Política ambiental, municípios e cooperação intergovernamental no Brasil. estudos avançados , 26 (74), 137-150.
Pacheco, P. (2004). What lies behind decentralisation? Forest, powers and actors in Lowland Bolivia. European Journal of Development Research , 16 (1), 90-109.
Paulson Priebe, M. E., Evans, T., Andersson, K., & Castellanos, E. (2014). Decentralization, forest management, and forest conditions in Guatemala. Journal of Land Use Science , 10 (4), 425-441.
Perreault, T. (2005). State restructuring and the scale politics of rural water governance in Bolivia. Environment and Planning A , 37 (2), 263-284.
Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research and Development , 33 (3), 534-548.
Poats, S. V., & Suárez, D. (2007). Descentralización y gobernanza ambiental en áreas protegidas de Carchi, Ecuador: Lecciones de la Reserva Ecológica El Ángel y el Bosque Protector Golondrinas. Revista Virtual REDESMA , 1, 87-98.
Ravikumar, A., Andersson, K., & Larson, A. M. (2013). Decentralization and forest-related conflicts in Latin America. Forest Policy and Economics , 33, 80-86.
Ribot, J. C. (2004). Waiting for democracy. The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization. (M. Schultz, & E. Yaghmour, Eds.) Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
Ribot, J. C., Agrawal, A., & Larson, A. M. (2006). Recentralizing While Decentralizing: How National Governments Reappropriate Forest Resources. World Development , 34 (11), 1864-1886.
Rodríguez-Becerra, M., & Espinoza, G. (2002). Gestión ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe. Evolución, tendencias y principales prácticas. (D. Wilk, Ed.) Washington D.C: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
Rupprecht, C. D., & Byrne, J. A. (2014). Informal urban greenspace: A typology and trilingual systematic review of its role for urban residents and trends in the literature. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening , 13 (4), 597-611.
Thompson, D. (2016). Community adaptations to environmental challenges under decentralized governance in southwestern Uruguay. Journal of Rural Studies , 43, 71-82.
Ticona, R. P., Vázquez, M. R., Cal y Mayor, A. B., & Meza, A. L. (2005). Participación social y toma de decisiones en los consejos municipales de desarrollo rural sustentable de Los Altos de Chiapas . Gestion y Politica Publica , 14 (2), 341-402.
Uberhuaga, P., Larsen, H. O., & Treue, T. (2011). Indigenous forest management in Bolivia: Potentials for livelihood improvement. International Forestry Review , 13 (1), 80-95.
Wilder, M., & Romero Lankao, P. (2006). Paradoxes of Decentralization: Water Reform and Social Implications in Mexico. World Development , 34 (11), 1977-1995.
Wittman, H., & Geisler, C. (2005). Negotiating locality: Decentralization and communal forest management in the Guatemalan highlands. Human Organization , 64 (1), 62-74.
Cuadernos de Desarrollo Ruralis registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.