Abstract
We analyzed the discursive and relational effects of the pilot project ‘Reduction of Emissions due to Deforestation and Forest Degradation’ (REDD+) in domestic units both entitled and not entitled to land access in the common land Felipe Carrillo Puerto, Quintana Roo. Based on semi-structured surveys and interviews, we identified those mechanisms favoring the adoption of preservation practices by the common land owner-residents while restricting the traditional forest management. These dynamics bring about changes in the subsistence strategies of the domestic units and limit the participation and benefit distribution to women, the youth, and settlers who do not own the land.
Agrawal, A. y Gibson, C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629-649.
Aguilar-Støen, M. (2017). Better Safe than Sorry? Indigenous Peoples, Carbon Cowboys and the Governance of REDD in the Amazon. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 91-108.
Anderson, B. y McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124-127.
Antinori, C. y Bray, D. (2005). Community forest enterprises as entrepreneurial firms: economic and institutional perspectives from Mexico. World Development, 33, 1529-1543.
Awono, A., Somorin, O., Eba'a Atyi, R. y Levang, P. (2014). Tenure and participation in local REDD+ projects: Insights from southern Cameroon. Environmental Science and Policy, 35, 76-86.
Benjaminsen, G. (2017). The bricolage of REDD+ in Zanzibar: from global environmental policy framework to community forest management. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 11(3), 506-525.
Blanco, G. y Fuenzalida, M. (2013). La construcción de agendas científicas sobre cambio climático y su influencia en la territorialización de políticas públicas: reflexiones a partir del caso chileno. En J. Postigo (Ed.). Cambio climático, movimientos sociales y políticas públicas. Una vinculación necesaria. Santiago de Chile.
Blanco, G., Arce, A. y Fisher, E. (2015). Becoming a region, becoming global, becoming imperceptible: Territorialising salmon in Chilean Patagonia. Journal of Rural Studies, 42, 179-190.
Borrego, A., Salinas-Melgoza, M. y Skutsch, M. (2015). El valor de las emisiones de carbono asociadas al sistema agrícola de roza, tumba y quema. In F. Paz-Pellat, J. Wong-Gonzalez, y R. Torres-Alamilla (Eds.) (pp. 578-586). Villahermosa, México.
Bray, D., Merino, L. y Barry, D. (Eds). (2007). Los bosques comunitarios de México. Manejo sustentable de paisajes forestales. México: Instituto Nacional de Ecología.
Bruun, T., de Neergaard, A., Lawrence, D. y Ziegler, A. (2009). Environmental consequences of the demise in swidden agriculture in Southeast Asia: carbon storage and soil quality. Human Ecology, 37, 375-388.
Büscher, B. y Dressler, W. Linking neoprotectionism and environmental gobernance: on the rapidly increasing tensions between actors in the environment-development nexus. Conservation and Society, 5(4), 586-611.
Colfer, C., Alcorn, J. y Russell, D. (2015). Swiddens and fallows: reflections on the global and local values of ‘Slash and Burn’. En M. Cairns (Ed.), (pp. 62-86). London: Routledge.
CONAFOR. (2016). Documento de la Iniciativa de Reducción de Emisiones (IRE). Jalisco, México.
CONAFOR. (2017). Estrategia Nacional para REDD+ (ENAREDD+). Jalisco, México.
Corbera, E. y Schroeder, H. (2011). Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(2), 89-99.
Cronkleton, P., Bray, D. y Medina, G. (2011). Community forest management and the emergence of multi-scale governance institutions: Lessons for REDD+ development from Mexico, Brazil and Bolivia. Forests, 2(2), 451-473.
De Landa, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Continuum, 40(5), 142-142.
Di Gregorio, M., Gallemore, C., Brockhaus, M., Fatorelli, L. y Muharrom, E. (2017). How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+. Global Environmental Change, 45, 133-150.
Ellis, E. y Porter-Bolland, L. (2008). Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas? A comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighboring study areas of the Central Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(11), 1971-1983.
Frazier, J. (2006). Biosphere reserves and the "Yucatan" syndrome: another look at the role of NGOs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74(3-4), 313-333.
García-Frapolli, E. (2015). Con y sin el mercado. Diversificación de iniciativas de conservación comunitaria en el ejido de Felipe Carrillo Puerto, México. Otra Economía, 9(17), 151-163.
Granados, D., Florencia, G., Ríos, L. y Murcia, E. (1999). La milpa en la zona maya de Quintana Roo. Revista de Geografía Agrícola, 1-72.
Gupta, A., Lövbrand, E., Turnhout, E. y Vijge, M. (2012). In pursuit of carbon accountability: The politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6), 726-731.
Gurri, F. (2010). Smallholder land use in the southern Yucatan: How culture and history matter. Regional Environmental Change, 10(3), 219-231.
Harris, O. (1986). La unidad doméstica como una unidad natural. Nueva Antropología, 30(8), 199-222.
Holmgren, S. (2013). REDD+ in the making: Orders of knowledge in the climate-deforestation nexus. Environmental Science and Policy, 33, 369-377.
IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (Eds.). Geneva, Switzerland.
Keller, R. (2011). The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD). Human Studies, 34(1), 43-65.
Keller, R. (2012). Entering discourses: A new agenda for qualitative research and sociology of knowledge. Qualitative Sociology Review, 8(2), 46-75.
Larson, A. (2011). Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: Lessons for REDD+. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 540-549.
Larson, A., Dokken, T., Duchelle, A., Atmadja, S., Resosudarmo. I., Cronkleton, P., Cromberg, M. y Selaya, G. (2015). The role of women in early REDD+ implementation: lessons for future engagement. International Forestry Review, 17(1), 43-65.
Ley Agraria, Cámara de diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión (2012).
Lund, J., Sungusia, E., Bukhi-Mabele, M. y Scheba, A. (2017). Promising Change, Delivering Continuity: REDD+ as conservation fad. World Development, 89, 124-139.
McNetting, R., Wilk, R. y Arnauld, E. (1984). Households: comparative and historical studies of the domestic group: University of California Press.
Méndez-López, M., García-Frapolli, E., Ruiz-Mallén, I., Porter-Bolland, L. y Reyes-Garcia, V. (2015). From Paper to Forest: Local Motives for Participation in Different Conservation Initiatives. Case Studies in Southeastern Mexico. Environmental Management, 56(3), 695-708.
Merino, L., Rodríguez, J., Ortiz, G. y García, A. (2008). Estudio estratégico sobre el sector forestal mexicano. México: Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible A.C.
Morett-Sánchez, J. y Cosío, C. (2017). Panorama de los ejidos y comunidades agrarias en México. Agricultura, Sociedad y Desarrollo, 14(1), 125-152.
Moure-Peña, M. (2013). Desarrollo sustentable ante el cambio climático ¿qué papel puede tener REDD+ en las comunidades locales? México: El Colegio de la Frontera Sur.
Navarro-Olmedo, S., Haenn, N., Schmook, B. y Radel, C. (2015). The legacy of Mexico's agrarian counter-reforms: reinforcing social hierarchies in Calakmul, Campeche. Journal of Agrarian Change, 3-23.
Newton, P., Miller, D., Byenkya, M., y Agrawal, A. (2016). Who are forest-dependent people? A taxonomy to aid livelihood and land use decision-making in forested regions. Land Use Policy, 57, 388-395.
Pasgaard, M. (2015). Lost in translation? How project actors shape REDD+ policy and outcomes in Cambodia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 56(1), 111-127.
Pimienta-Lastra, R. (2000). Encuestas probabilísticas vs. no probabilísticas. Política y Cultura, 263-276.
Poudyal, M., Ramamonjisoa, B., Hockley, N., Rakotonarivo, O., Gibbons, J., Mandimbiniaina, R., y Jones, J. (2016). Can REDD+ social safeguards reach the 'right' people? Lessons from Madagascar. Global Environmental Change, 37, 31-42.
Rocheleau, D., y Edmunds, D. (1997). Women, men and trees: Gender, power and property in forest and agrarian landscapes. World Development, 25(8), 1351-1371.
Rodríguez-Canto, A., González, P., Flores, J., Nava, R., Dzib, L., Pérez, J., Thüerbeck, N. y González, A. (2016). Milpas de las comunidades mayas y dinámica de uso del suelo en la Península de Yucatán. México: Universidad Autonoma de Chapingo.
Rossbach, L. (2011). Del monólogo científico a las pluralidades culturales: dimensiones y contextos del cambio climático desde una perspectiva antropológica. En A. Ulloa (Ed.), (pp. 55-84). Bogotá: ILSA, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Sánchez-Santos, G., Arreola, J., López-Merlín, D., Maldonado, V., Olguín, A., Wayson, C., Carrillo, O. y Puc, R. (2015). Sitio de Monitoreo Intensivo del Carbono en Quintana Roo. México.
SESM. (2011). Plan Vivo Project Design Document: Much Kanan K’aax. Quintana Roo, México.
Shepherd, G., y Ludlow-Paz, L. (2015). Análisis de dependencia forestal y sus implicaciones en la distribución equitativa de beneficios REDD+ en la Península de Yucatán, México. Gobernanza Forestal y Economía. Costa Rica.
Sunderlin, W., Larson, A., Duchelle, A., Resosudarmo, I., Huynh, T., Awono, A. y Dokken, T. (2014). How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. World Development, 55, 37-52.
Ulloa, A. (2013). Controlando la naturaleza: ambientalismo transnacional y negociaciones locales en torno al cambio climático en territorios indígenas en Colombia. Iberoamericana, XIII(49), 117-133.
U’yo’olché A.C. (2005). Estudio de ordenamiento territorial del Ejido Felipe Carrillo Puerto. Quintana Roo, México.
Wilk, R. (1997). Household ecology, Economic change and domestic life among the Kekchi Maya in Belize. Northern Illinois University Pres.
Woods, M. (2015). Territorialisation and the assemblage of rural place. In: Dessein, J., Battaglini, E., & Horlings, L. (Eds.). Routledge: New York. pp:29-42
Cuadernos de Desarrollo Ruralis registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.