Abstract
In this article, the author studies different possibilities an antitrust protection authority has, to recognize within an investigation on that matter the acceptance or not of a black market and pirate products traded together with original goods. The study takes as an initial position the existence of black markets that allow us to identify the criteria to define a relevant market, specially, software market. After carrying out these preliminary studies the article discusses the outlined
problem; that is, whether original and pirate goods are replaceable. This issue starts to be solved with the software piracy study and the relationship between antitrust law and intellectual property. Afterwards, arguments in favor and against pirate goods being included in an antitrust process are sketched. Finally, the author’s conclusion is presented over the relationship of original goods–pirate goods, inside an antitrust process.
JEL: D43; K21; K23
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.