Abstract
This article presents the main objective of research meet current regulations in
victim-offender mediation of the countries belonging to the European Union, to study and compare the characteristics of those rules across European countries. For this purpose we used a qualitative research methodology based on document analysis by categories through a MaxQDA software selected to compare the various laws. The countries studied were German, Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Hungary, Italy, Luxemburg, Poland, Portugal and Czech Republic. The results found were that specific legislation in this area (which are mainly in Criminal and Procedural laws more than autonomous law) has very little development time, which is founded for less serious crimes and that there is little theoretical basis of victim-offender mediation law. Through the systematization by categories through a computer program of legislation it has been able to build an overview of victim-offender mediation in Europe very useful for the development of it, and especially to give visibility to this restorative practice.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.