In this article it is analyzed the possibility of performance of the agreement on jurisdiction respect of the rule of international jurisdiction regulated in the art. 22.1 b) of the Council Regulation 44/2001 regarding to the contracts which have as
their object tenancies of immovable property concluded for temporary private use for a maximum period of six consecutive months. This rule has a singularity that it is not possible to find in the rest of exclusive forums, provided that in it is established the concurrence of two courts that can know in exclusive jurisdiction. The action of the agreement on jurisdiction might undo this concurrence and act as a clause of clarification of the international jurisdiction.