Published Apr 15, 2005



PLUMX
Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Alvaro Franciscco Amaya Villarreal

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

Author explains the diverse tools of interpretation, both special and general, can be applied to the international human rights law. Pro homine principle is elevated as a fundamental tool for the correct application of these norms. Nevertheless, this can not become a wild card to extend the commitments of the states parties in the international treaties. Therefore, and as a particular case, the listings of the rights included in the Articles 4.2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and 27.2 of the American Convention On Human Rights, must be taken in a restricted way. 

Keywords

Principio pro nomine, interpretación de tratados de derechos humanos, indivisibilidad de los derechos humanos, núcleo duro de derechos humanosPro homine principle, human rights treaties interpretation, indivisibility of human rights, hard core of human rights

References
How to Cite
Amaya Villarreal, A. F. (2005). EL PRINCIPIO PRO HOMINE: INTERPRETACIÓN EXTENSIVA VS. EL CONSENTIMIENTO DEL ESTADO. International Law: Revista Colombiana De Derecho Internacional, 3(5). Retrieved from https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/internationallaw/article/view/14087
Section
Articles