Abstract
The author presents a reflection from the Constitutional Procedural Law and the International Law of Human Rights, referring to the substantial change in the conditions of possibility of the constitutional procedures in Peru, starting from the validity of the Constitutional Procedures Code, the first in Ibero-America (with out taking into account the Argentinean estadual code). Following this line, the author analyses such statue from the International Law of Human Rights. Starts establishing the importance of the rights of the human being in the Estado Constitucional y Democrático de Derecho, then presents the evolution of the International Law of Human Rights, where are diluted the distinctions between fundamental rights, human and constitutional, reviewing its principal characters. Next, presents the principal international instruments in human rights and the central problems that its implementation and validity present. The author also makes a brief reference to the treatment of 1979 the Peruvian constitution, in contrast with the Fujimorist of 1993. The author finishes proposing the restitution of the alternate procedures or the congressional establishment of mechanisms to avoid that the validity of the causal derives in defenselessness.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.