Abstract
This article discusses the changes to the teaching profession in the context of the new models of professionalism that prevail in the public arena in Chile. As it is developed, models of professionalism made, particularly from the private field, facing the meanings with which it has been historically built the teaching profession. This is illustrated with some data from qualitative research with 60 teachers in the context of the implementation of a policy of performance evaluation and incentives in Chile. These shows how new models of professionalism can radically challenge the references that guide the actual performance
Área de Acreditación y Evaluación Docente MINEDUC (2005), Política de fortalecimiento de la profesión docente, Santiago, MINEDUC, recuperado el 22 de junio de 2009 desde http://www. rmm.cl/index_sub.php?id_contenido=3214&id_ portal=204&id_seccion=1212.
— (2008), Asignación de excelencia pedagógica, Santiago, MINEDUC, recuperado el 22 de junio de 2009 desde http://www.rmm.cl/ index_sub2.php?id_contenido=3210&id_ seccion=1213&id_portal=204. Banco Mundial (1996), Prioridades y estrategias para la educación: examen del Banco Mundial. Washington, Banco Mundial.
Battaglio, P. (2009), “Privatization and its challenges for human resource management in the Public Sector”, Public Personnel Administration, vol. 3, núm. 29, pp. 203-206.
Beca, C. (2005), Acciones de desarrollo profesional en chile: su impacto en las prácticas docentes, Santiago, CPEIP.
Bellei, C. (2001, septiembre), “El talón de Aquiles de la reforma educativa”, en Martinic, S. y Pardo, M. (eds.), Economía política de las reformas educativas en América Latina, Santiago, PREAL-CIDE.
Bellei, C.; Contreras, D. y Valenzuela, J. P. (2008), “Debate sobre la educación chilena y propuesta de cambio”, en Bellei, C.; Contreras, D. y Valenzuela, J. P. (eds.), La agenda pendiente en educación. Profesores, administradores y recursos: propuestas para la nueva arquitectura de la educación chilena, Santiago, Programa de Investigación en Educación Universidad de Chile-UNICEF.
Bellei, C.; Elgueta, S., y Milessi, C. (1997), Percepción y valoración de los profesores sobre el Premio a la Excelencia Docente, Santiago, División de Educación General del Ministerio de Educación.
Brennan, M. (2009), “Working to control the feminized profession of education”, Journal of Sociology, vol. 4, núm. 45, pp. 339-359.
Bruner, J. (1990), Acts of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Callon, M. (1986), “Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay”, en Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, Londres, R. K. P.
Carnoy, M. y McEwan, P. (2003), “Does privatization improve education? The case of Chile’s national voucher plan”, en Plank, D. y Sykes, G. (eds.), Choosing Choice: School Choice in International Perspective, New York, Teachers College Press.
Castells, M. (1997), La era de la información: economía, sociedad y cultura. Vol.1. La sociedad red, Madrid, Alianza.
Chandler, J.; Barry, J., y Clark, H (2002), “Stressing academe: The wear and tear of the new public management”, Human Relations, vol. 9, núm. 55, pp. 1051-1069.
Cornejo, R. (2006), “El experimento educativo chileno 20 años después: una mirada crítica a los logros y falencias del sistema escolar”, Reice. Revista electrónica sobre calidad, y eficacia y cambio en educación [en línea], vol. 1, núm. 4, recuperado el 20 de enero de 2011 desde http:// www.rinace.net/arts/vol4num1/art8.htm.
Court, M. (2004), “Talking back to new public management versions of accountability in education: a co-principalship’s practices of mutual responsibility”, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, vol. 2, núm. 32, pp. 171-194.
Crespo, E.; Revilla, J., y Serrano, A. (2009), “Del gobierno del trabajo al gobierno de las voluntades: el caso de la activación”, Psicoperspectivas, vol. 2, núm. VIII, pp. 82-101.
Dubar, C. (1991), La Socialisation, construction des identités sociales et professionelles, París, Armand Collin.
Edwards, D. y Potter, J (1992), Discoursive Psychology, Londres, Sage.
Freire, P. (1970), Pedagogía del oprimido, México, Siglo XXI.
Gleadle, P., Cornelius, N., y Pezet, E. (2008), “Enterprising selves: how governmentality meets agency”, Organization, vol. 15, núm. 3, pp. 307-313.
Gleeson, D. y Knights, D. (2006), “Challenging dualism: Public professionalism in ‘troubled’ times”, Sociology, vol. 2, núm. 40, pp. 277-295.
Goldspink, C. (2007), “Rethinking educational reform. A loosely coupled and complex systems perspective”, International Journal of Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, vol. 1, núm. 35, pp. 27-50.
Grey, Ch. y Sturdy, A. (2010), “A chaos that worked: Organizing bletchley park”, Public Policy and Administration, vol. 1, núm. 25, pp. 47-66.
Gunter, H. (2008), “Policy and workforce reform in England”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 2, núm. 36, pp. 253-270.
Gunter, H. M. y Rayner, S. (2007), “Modernizing the school workforce in england: challenging transformation and leadership?”, Leadership, vol. 1, núm. 3, pp. 47-64.
Íñiguez, L. (2001), “Identidad: de lo personal a lo social. Un recorrido conceptual”, en Crespo, E. (ed.), La constitución social de la subjetividad, Madrid, Catarata.
Kurunmäki, L., Lapsley, L., y Miller, P. (2011), “Accounting within and beyond the state”, Management Accounting Research, vol. 1, núm. 22, pp. 1-5.
Leicht, K. et al. (2009), “New public management and new professionalism across nations and contexts”, Current Sociology, vol. 4, núm. 57, pp. 581-605.
Maingueneau, D. (2009), Análisis de textos de comunicación, Buenos Aires, Nueva Visión.
Martínez Boom, A. (2004), De la escuela expansiva a la escuela competitiva: dos modos de modernización en América Latina, Bogotá, Anthropos, Convenio Andrés Bello.
Maxcy, B. (2009), “New Public management and district reform: managerialism and deflaction of local leadership in a Texas school district”, Urban Education, vol. 5, núm. 44, pp. 489-521.
Escobar, H. y Mantilla, F. (2007), “El yo descentrado y situado en la cultura”, Universitas Psychologica, vol. 1, núm. 6, pp. 39-48.
Núñez, I. (2002), “La formación de docentes. Notas históricas”, en Ávalos, B. (ed.), Profesores para Chile. Historia de un proyecto, Santiago, Ministerio de Educación.
— (2004), La identidad de los docentes: una mirada histórica, Santiago, PIIE. OCDE (2004), Revisión de políticas nacionales de educación, París, OCDE.
Oliva, M. (2008), “Política educativa y profundización de la desigualdad en chile”, Estudios Pedagógicos, vol. 2, núm. 34, pp. 207-226.
Olsen, B. y Sexton, D. (2009), “Threat rigidity: School reform and how teachers view their work inside current education policy context”, American Educational Research Journal, vol. 1, núm. 46, pp. 9-44.
Osborne, D. y Gaebler, T. (1993), Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming The Public Sector, Nueva York, Plume.
Parker, I. (1992), Discourse Dinamics, Londres, Routledge. Potter, J. (1998), La representación de la realidad, Barcelona, Paidós.
Potter, J. y Wetherell, M. (1987), Discourse and Social Psychology, Londres, Sage. Ranson, S. (2008), “The changing governance of education”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 2, núm. 36, pp. 201-219.
Reynolds, J.; Wetherell, M., y Taylor, S. (2007), “Choice and chance: negotiating agency in narratives of singleness”, The Sociological Review, vol. 2, núm. 55, pp. 331-351.
Svensson, L (2006), “New professionalism, trust and competence: Some conceptual remarks and empirical data”, Current Sociology, vol. 4, núm. 54, pp. 579-593.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.