Published Jun 29, 2021



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Freddy Santamaría Velasco

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

This article aims to show the importance of the pragmatic conception of language proposed by Wittgenstein in relation to his philosophy of action, as well as the possibilities it offers to political theory, by explaining the impact and influence that his theory had in some of his readers. This is particularly important for the notion of political representation, which emerges as a linguistic practice of rule-based behavior in terms of giving and asking for reasons. This idea will be reinforced by a reconstruction of Wittgenstein’s arguments applied to a social instance a work that is done by many of his readers and commentators, specifically Searle, Brandom and Mouffe. Such instance would be limited in this text, by making use of Rawls’ idea of public reason through the lens of this socially conceived Wittgenstein’s pragmatism. 


 

Keywords

Political philosophy; philosophy of action; skills; community; praxis.Filosofía política; Filosofía de la acción; Habilidades; Comunidad; Pragmática.

References
Acero, J., Bustos, E., & Quesada, D. (2001). Introducción a la filosofía del lenguaje. Cátedra.

Alexy, R. (2001). Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Suhrkamp.

Apel, K. (1994). The Transcendental Conception of Language, Communication and the Idea of a First Philosophy: Towards a Critical Reconstruction of the History of Philosophy in the Light of Language Philosophy. En K. Apel, Selected Essays, Towards a Transcendental Semiotics (pp.. 83-111) V. 1. Humanities Press.

Bergman, G. (1964). Logic and reality. The University of Wisconsin Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1995). The Rules of Art. The Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. (S. Emanuel, Trad.) Stanford University Press.

Brandom, R. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.

Brandom, R. (2001). Articulating Reasons. An introduction to inferentialism. Harvard University Press.

Dennett, D. C. (1971). Intentional systems. Journal of Philosophy, 68, 87-106. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/2025382.

Fossen, T. (2014). Politicizing Brandom’s Pragmatism: Normativity and the Agonal Character of Social Practice. European Journal of Philosophy, 22(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00504.x

Fossen, T. (2019). Constructivism and the Logic of Political Representation. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 824-837. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000273

Habermas, J. (1999). Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung: Philosophische Aufsätze. Suhrkamp.

Heyes, C. (2003). The Grammar of Politics: Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy. Cornell University Press.

Kant, I. (1991). The Metaphysics of Morals. (M. Gregor, Trad.) Cambridge University Press.

Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Harvard University Press.

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso.

Misak, C. (2016). Cambridge pragmatism. From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press.

Moore, G. E. (1983). Defensa del sentido común y otros ensayos. Orbis.

Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. Verso.

Mouffe, C. (2011). En torno a lo político. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Mouffe, C. (2014). Agonística. Pensar el mundo políticamente. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Pogge, T. (2010). Is Kant's Rechtslehre Comprehensive? The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 36, 161-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1998.tb01786.x

Ramírez-Vallejo, D. A. (2021). La construcción lingüística del Estado moderno: el concepto de democracia como una descripción abreviada de promesas por cumplir. Analecta Política, 11(20), 133 - 151. https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v11n20.a07

Rawls, J. (2001). Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press.

Rodríguez, A., & Ramírez-Vallejo, D. (2021). Wittgenstein y Searle: entre los juegos de lenguaje y los actos de habla. En F. Santamaría, N. Rosanía, & K. Cárdenas, Perspectivas Wittgensteinianas. Lenguaje, significado y acción (pp. 407-449). Tirant lo Blanc.

Rorty, R. (1992). The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. The University of Chicago Press.

Rorty, R. (2007). Philosophy as Cultural Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Rorty, R. (2009). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.

Santamaría, F. (2016). Hacer mundos: el nombrar y la significatividad. Siglo del Hombre.

Santamaría, F., & Ruiz-Martínez, S. (2019). ¿Qué significa pertenecer a una comunidad? Disputatio, 1-27.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. The Free Press.

Searle, J. (2010). Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford University Press.

Sellars, W. (2005). Language, Rules and Behavior. En W. Sellars, & J. Sicha (Ed.), Pure Pragmatics and Possible Worlds (pp. 117-134). Ridgeview.

Skinner, Q. (2001). Vision of Politics (Vol. 1. Regarding the Method). Cambridge University Press.

Tully, J. (1989). Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy. Political Theory, 17(2), 172-204. https://www.jstor.org/stable/191248

Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.

Williams, B. (2009). In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. G. Hawthorn, Ed.- Princeton University Press.

Winch, P. (1958). The Idea of Social Science. Routledge.

Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. (G. Anscombe, G. von Wright, Edits., D. Paul, & G. Anscombe, Trads.) Basil Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. (P. Hacker, J. Schulte, Edits., G. Anscombe, P. Hacker, & J. Schulte, Trads.) Wiley.
How to Cite
Santamaría Velasco, F. . (2021). Pragmatism and Political Practice: Language, Skills and Institutions. Signo Y Pensamiento, 40(78). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.syp40-78.pppl
Section
Reports