Palavras-chave
Internet na administração pública
Instituições Políticas
Tecnologia da informação e comunicação
Engajamento Cívico.
Instituições Políticas
Tecnologia da informação e comunicação
Engajamento Cívico.
Como Citar
Giraldo Luque, S. (2012). Modelo de análise do uso da internet para promover a participação cidadã nos processos de tomada de decisão pública (poderes Executivo e Legislativo). Sinal E Pensamento, 31(61), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.syp31-61.maui
Almetrics
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Resumo
O artigo apresenta metodologia de avaliação, suportada na análise de conteúdo que pode ser aplicada a estudos que procuram avaliar e comparar o uso estratégico da internet feito pelas instituições públicas –poderes legislativo e executivo- com objetivo de envolver a cidadania nos processos de tomada de decisões públicas. A partir da apresentação de dois debates fundamentais que explicam as principais posições teóricas geradas quando a ligação das tecnologias da informação e comunicação (TIC) para os processos políticos, o texto apresenta o que podem ser as principais categorias de análise e como podem se operacionalizar em subcategorias e indicadores. O objetivo do texto remarca a justificativa de cada uma das categorias e subcategorias como elementos necessários para testar empiricamente as perspectivas teóricas que têm maiores sucessos, em comparação com as práticas de envolvimento do público por parte das instituições.
Agre, P. E. (2003). Growing a democratic culture: John Commons on the wiring of civil society. En H. Jenkins & D. Thorburn, Democracy and New Media (pp. 61-68). Londres: MIT Press.
Aichholzer, G. & Kuzeluh, U. (2008). Dimensions and approaches for the evaluation of e-democracy. Estrasburgo: Document CAHDE.
Andréu Abela, J. (2001). Las técnicas de análisis de contenido: una revisión actualizada. Documento de trabajo, S2001/03. Centro de Estudios Andaluces. Recuperado de http:// public.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es
Barber, B. R. (2003). Which technology and which democracy. En H. Jenkins, & D. Thorburn, Democracy and new media (pp. 33-47). Londres: MIT Press.
Bardin, L. (1986). Análisis de contenido. Madrid, España: Ediciones Akal.
Bentivegna, S. (2006). Rethinking politics in the worlds of ICT. European Journal of Communication, 21(3), 331-343.
Bimber, B. (1998). The internet and political transformation: populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1),133-46.
Bimber, B. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: the search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53-67.
Breindl, Y. (2010). Critique of the democratic potentialities of the internet: a review of current theory and practice. Triple C: Cognition, Communication, Co-operation. 8(1), 43-59.
Breindl, Y., Francq, P. (2008). Can Web 2.0 applications save e-democracy? A study of how new internet applications may enhance citizen participation in the political process online. International Journal of Electronic Democracy, 1(1), 14-31.
Cammaerts, B. & Van Audenhove, L. (2005). Online political debate, unbounded citizenship and the problematic nature of a transnational public sphere. Political Communication, 22(2), 179-196 .
Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.
Chadwick, A. (2009). Web 2.0: new challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1), 1-32.
Etzioni, A. (2003). Are virtual and democratci communities feasible? En H. Jenkins & D. Thorburn, Democracy and New Media. Londres: MIT Press.
Flichy, P. (2003). Lo imaginario de internet. Madrid: Tecnos.
Gore, A. (1994). Remarks prepared for deliver at International Telecommunicatios Union. Buenos Aires. Discurso recuperado de: http://www.goelzer.net/telecom/al-gore.html
Habermas, J. (2008). Comunicación política en la sociedad mediática. El impacto de la teoría normativa en la investigación empírica. Revista Libero, 11(21), 9-22.
Hagen, M. (1997). A tipology of electronic democracy. Universidad de Giessen, 1997. Recuperado de http://www.uni-giessen.de
Hagen, M. (2000). Digital democracy and political systems. En K. L. Hacker & J. Van Dijk, Digital Democracy. Londres: Sage.
Häyhtiö, T., Rinne, J. (2008). Introduction: Seeking the citizenry on the internet - Emerging virtual creativity. En Häyhtiö, T., Rinne, J. (eds.), Net working/networking: citizen initiated internet politics. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, R. & Baptista Lucio, P. (1997). Metodología de la investigación. Bogotá, Colombia: McGrawHill.
Hill, K. & Hughes, J. (1998). Cyberpolitics: citizen activism in the age of the internet. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Massachussets: Addison-Wesley.
Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture. La cultura de la convergencia de los medios de comunicación. Barcelona, España: Paidós.
Jenkins, H. & Thorburn, D. (2003). Democracy and New Media. Londres: MIT Press.
Kahn, R., Kellner, D. (2004). New media and internet activism: From the battle of Seattle to blogging. New Media and Society, 6(1), 87-95.
Katz, J. (Abril, 1997). Birth of a digital nation. Wired Magazine, 5.
Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K. & Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online: Collective use of the internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Communication & Society, 9(5), 582-611.
Lévy, P. (2002). Ciberdemocracia. Ensayo sobre filosofía política. Barcelona, España: Editorial UOC.
Lévy, P. (2004). Inteligencia colectiva. Por una antropología del ciberespacio. Washington: Organización Panamericana de la Salud.
Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5, 5-8.
Margolis, M. & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: the cyberspace “revolution”, London: Sage.
Mejía Quintana, O. & Tobar Quiñónez, J. P. (2003). La filosofía como sujeto político. El papel de la filosofía en la configuración de la opinión pública. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad de Los Andes.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital Citizenship: The internet society, and participation. Massachussets: The MIT Press.
Niesyto, J. (2007). Comparative study of transnational anti-corporate campaigns-research design and preliminary results. Workshop Campaign Analysis in a Globalizing World. GeschwisterScholl-Institute of Political Science, LMU Munich, 27-28 de abril de 2007.
Norris, P. (2001). ¿Un círculo virtuoso? El impacto de las comunicaciones políticas en las democracias post-industriales. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 3(4), 7-33.
O’Donnell, Dave (Ed). (2010). Proceedings of the 10TH European Conference on eGovernment. National Centre for Taxation Studies, University of Limerick, Irlanda (pp. 320-328). Copyrigth 2010 a nombre de The Authors.
OCDE. (2003). Promises and problems of e-democracy: Challenges of Citizen on-line Engagement. París: OCDE.
ONU. (2003). UN E-Government Survey 2003. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas.
ONU. (2004). 2004 Global e-Government Readiness Report. Towards Access for Opportunity. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas.
ONU. (2005). 2005 Global e-Government Readiness Report. From E-Government to E-Inclusion. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas.
ONU. (2008). UN e-government suvey 2008. From e-government to connected governance. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas.
ONU. (2010). UN e-government survey 2010. Leveraging E-government at a time of financial and economic crisis. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas.
Pérez Tornero, J. M., Fernández, N., Cervi, L. & Giraldo Luque, S. (2010). E Parliament in Catalonia: fostering “active” or “Catalan” citizenship? Networking Democracy: New Media Innovations in Participatory Politics’ Symposium, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj, Rumania. 25-27 de junio de 2010.
Pérez Tornero, J. M., Fernández, N., Cervi, L. & Giraldo Luque, S. (2010a). Legislative assemblies in Spain: the application of information and communication technologies. En O’Donnell, D. (Ed). (2010). Proceedings of the 10TH European Conference on eGovernment. National Centre for Taxation Studies, University of Limerick, Irlanda.
Poster, M. (1993). The net as a public sphere? Wired Magazine, 3, 11.
Putman, R. D. (2002). Solo en la bolera: colapso y resurgimiento de la comunidad norteamericana. Barcelona, España: Galaxia Gutemberg, Círculo de Lectores.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rheingold, H. (1991). The great equalizer. Whole Earth Review 71, 5-11.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: homestesteading on the electronic frontier. Massachusetts: Adisson-Wesley.
Salter, L. (2003). Democracy, new social movement, and the internet: A Habermasian analysis. En McCaughey, M. & Ayers, M. D. (eds.). Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 117-144). Nueva York: Routledge.
Sánchez i Picanyol, J. (2005). La democràcia electrònica. Barcelona, España: UOC.
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S. & Brady, H. (1995). Participation’s not a paradox: The view from American activists. British Journal of Political Science 25, 1-36.
Schudson, M. (2003). Click here for democracy: a history and critique of an informationbased model of citizenship. En H. Jenkins y D. Thorburn, Democracy and new media. Londres: MIT Press.
Schuler, D. (2003). Reports of the close relationship between democracy and internet may have been exaggerated. En H. Jenkins & D.Thorburn, Democracy and new media. Londres: MIT Press.
Van de Donk, W., Snellen, I. & Tops, P. (Eds). (1995). Orwell in Athens. A perspective on informatization and democracy. Nueva York: IOS Press.
Vedel, T. (2003). L’idée de démocratie électronique. Origines, visions, questions, Perrineau, Pascal (Dir.). Le désenchantement démocratique. La Tour d’Aigues: Editions de l’Aube.
Vedel, T. (2007). Les usages politiques d’internet, La démocratie électronique. Paris: La Documentation Française.
Ward, S., Gibson, R. & Lusoli, W. (2005). Old politics, new media: parliament, the public and the internet. Political Studies Association Conference, 4-7.
Winston, D. (2003). Digital democracy and the new age of reason. En H. Jenkins & D. Thorburn, Democracy and New Media. Londres: MIT Press.
Aichholzer, G. & Kuzeluh, U. (2008). Dimensions and approaches for the evaluation of e-democracy. Estrasburgo: Document CAHDE.
Andréu Abela, J. (2001). Las técnicas de análisis de contenido: una revisión actualizada. Documento de trabajo, S2001/03. Centro de Estudios Andaluces. Recuperado de http:// public.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es
Barber, B. R. (2003). Which technology and which democracy. En H. Jenkins, & D. Thorburn, Democracy and new media (pp. 33-47). Londres: MIT Press.
Bardin, L. (1986). Análisis de contenido. Madrid, España: Ediciones Akal.
Bentivegna, S. (2006). Rethinking politics in the worlds of ICT. European Journal of Communication, 21(3), 331-343.
Bimber, B. (1998). The internet and political transformation: populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1),133-46.
Bimber, B. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: the search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53-67.
Breindl, Y. (2010). Critique of the democratic potentialities of the internet: a review of current theory and practice. Triple C: Cognition, Communication, Co-operation. 8(1), 43-59.
Breindl, Y., Francq, P. (2008). Can Web 2.0 applications save e-democracy? A study of how new internet applications may enhance citizen participation in the political process online. International Journal of Electronic Democracy, 1(1), 14-31.
Cammaerts, B. & Van Audenhove, L. (2005). Online political debate, unbounded citizenship and the problematic nature of a transnational public sphere. Political Communication, 22(2), 179-196 .
Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.
Chadwick, A. (2009). Web 2.0: new challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1), 1-32.
Etzioni, A. (2003). Are virtual and democratci communities feasible? En H. Jenkins & D. Thorburn, Democracy and New Media. Londres: MIT Press.
Flichy, P. (2003). Lo imaginario de internet. Madrid: Tecnos.
Gore, A. (1994). Remarks prepared for deliver at International Telecommunicatios Union. Buenos Aires. Discurso recuperado de: http://www.goelzer.net/telecom/al-gore.html
Habermas, J. (2008). Comunicación política en la sociedad mediática. El impacto de la teoría normativa en la investigación empírica. Revista Libero, 11(21), 9-22.
Hagen, M. (1997). A tipology of electronic democracy. Universidad de Giessen, 1997. Recuperado de http://www.uni-giessen.de
Hagen, M. (2000). Digital democracy and political systems. En K. L. Hacker & J. Van Dijk, Digital Democracy. Londres: Sage.
Häyhtiö, T., Rinne, J. (2008). Introduction: Seeking the citizenry on the internet - Emerging virtual creativity. En Häyhtiö, T., Rinne, J. (eds.), Net working/networking: citizen initiated internet politics. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, R. & Baptista Lucio, P. (1997). Metodología de la investigación. Bogotá, Colombia: McGrawHill.
Hill, K. & Hughes, J. (1998). Cyberpolitics: citizen activism in the age of the internet. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Massachussets: Addison-Wesley.
Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture. La cultura de la convergencia de los medios de comunicación. Barcelona, España: Paidós.
Jenkins, H. & Thorburn, D. (2003). Democracy and New Media. Londres: MIT Press.
Kahn, R., Kellner, D. (2004). New media and internet activism: From the battle of Seattle to blogging. New Media and Society, 6(1), 87-95.
Katz, J. (Abril, 1997). Birth of a digital nation. Wired Magazine, 5.
Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K. & Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online: Collective use of the internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Communication & Society, 9(5), 582-611.
Lévy, P. (2002). Ciberdemocracia. Ensayo sobre filosofía política. Barcelona, España: Editorial UOC.
Lévy, P. (2004). Inteligencia colectiva. Por una antropología del ciberespacio. Washington: Organización Panamericana de la Salud.
Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5, 5-8.
Margolis, M. & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: the cyberspace “revolution”, London: Sage.
Mejía Quintana, O. & Tobar Quiñónez, J. P. (2003). La filosofía como sujeto político. El papel de la filosofía en la configuración de la opinión pública. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad de Los Andes.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital Citizenship: The internet society, and participation. Massachussets: The MIT Press.
Niesyto, J. (2007). Comparative study of transnational anti-corporate campaigns-research design and preliminary results. Workshop Campaign Analysis in a Globalizing World. GeschwisterScholl-Institute of Political Science, LMU Munich, 27-28 de abril de 2007.
Norris, P. (2001). ¿Un círculo virtuoso? El impacto de las comunicaciones políticas en las democracias post-industriales. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 3(4), 7-33.
O’Donnell, Dave (Ed). (2010). Proceedings of the 10TH European Conference on eGovernment. National Centre for Taxation Studies, University of Limerick, Irlanda (pp. 320-328). Copyrigth 2010 a nombre de The Authors.
OCDE. (2003). Promises and problems of e-democracy: Challenges of Citizen on-line Engagement. París: OCDE.
ONU. (2003). UN E-Government Survey 2003. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas.
ONU. (2004). 2004 Global e-Government Readiness Report. Towards Access for Opportunity. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas.
ONU. (2005). 2005 Global e-Government Readiness Report. From E-Government to E-Inclusion. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas.
ONU. (2008). UN e-government suvey 2008. From e-government to connected governance. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas.
ONU. (2010). UN e-government survey 2010. Leveraging E-government at a time of financial and economic crisis. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas.
Pérez Tornero, J. M., Fernández, N., Cervi, L. & Giraldo Luque, S. (2010). E Parliament in Catalonia: fostering “active” or “Catalan” citizenship? Networking Democracy: New Media Innovations in Participatory Politics’ Symposium, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj, Rumania. 25-27 de junio de 2010.
Pérez Tornero, J. M., Fernández, N., Cervi, L. & Giraldo Luque, S. (2010a). Legislative assemblies in Spain: the application of information and communication technologies. En O’Donnell, D. (Ed). (2010). Proceedings of the 10TH European Conference on eGovernment. National Centre for Taxation Studies, University of Limerick, Irlanda.
Poster, M. (1993). The net as a public sphere? Wired Magazine, 3, 11.
Putman, R. D. (2002). Solo en la bolera: colapso y resurgimiento de la comunidad norteamericana. Barcelona, España: Galaxia Gutemberg, Círculo de Lectores.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rheingold, H. (1991). The great equalizer. Whole Earth Review 71, 5-11.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: homestesteading on the electronic frontier. Massachusetts: Adisson-Wesley.
Salter, L. (2003). Democracy, new social movement, and the internet: A Habermasian analysis. En McCaughey, M. & Ayers, M. D. (eds.). Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 117-144). Nueva York: Routledge.
Sánchez i Picanyol, J. (2005). La democràcia electrònica. Barcelona, España: UOC.
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S. & Brady, H. (1995). Participation’s not a paradox: The view from American activists. British Journal of Political Science 25, 1-36.
Schudson, M. (2003). Click here for democracy: a history and critique of an informationbased model of citizenship. En H. Jenkins y D. Thorburn, Democracy and new media. Londres: MIT Press.
Schuler, D. (2003). Reports of the close relationship between democracy and internet may have been exaggerated. En H. Jenkins & D.Thorburn, Democracy and new media. Londres: MIT Press.
Van de Donk, W., Snellen, I. & Tops, P. (Eds). (1995). Orwell in Athens. A perspective on informatization and democracy. Nueva York: IOS Press.
Vedel, T. (2003). L’idée de démocratie électronique. Origines, visions, questions, Perrineau, Pascal (Dir.). Le désenchantement démocratique. La Tour d’Aigues: Editions de l’Aube.
Vedel, T. (2007). Les usages politiques d’internet, La démocratie électronique. Paris: La Documentation Française.
Ward, S., Gibson, R. & Lusoli, W. (2005). Old politics, new media: parliament, the public and the internet. Political Studies Association Conference, 4-7.
Winston, D. (2003). Digital democracy and the new age of reason. En H. Jenkins & D. Thorburn, Democracy and New Media. Londres: MIT Press.
Esta revista científica está registrada sob a licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Portanto, este trabalho pode ser reproduzido, distribuído e comunicado publicamente em formato digital, desde que os nomes dos autores e da Pontificia Universidad Javeriana sejam mencionados. Você pode citar, adaptar, transformar, auto-arquivar, republicar e desenvolver o material, para qualquer finalidade (inclusive comercial), desde que reconheça adequadamente a autoria, forneça um link para o trabalho original e indique se foram feitas alterações. A Pontificia Universidad Javeriana não retém os direitos sobre os trabalhos publicados e o conteúdo é de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores, que mantêm seus direitos morais, intelectuais, de privacidade e publicidade.
##plugins.themes.healthSciences.displayStats.downloads##
##plugins.themes.healthSciences.displayStats.noStats##