Palavras-chave
educación
ética
práctica docente
investigación
Como Citar
Resumo
Se proponen, desde una perspectiva ética y práctica, tres reflexiones sobre el uso de la inteligencia artificial en educación. Estos debates son iteraciones actualizadas de discusiones antiquísimas, revitalizadas por esta disrupción. La primera reflexión procura proteger a los usuarios de la inteligencia artificial generativa (IAG), en especial a individuos en formación; se inspira en la máxima hipocrática primum non nocere (‘lo primero es no hacer daño’).
Bartlett, L., Dowd, A. J. y Jonason, C. (2015). Problematizing Early Grade Reading: Should the Post-2015 Agenda Treasure what is Measured? International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 308-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.10.002
Bell, S., Cardoso, M., Giraldo, J. P., El Makkouk, N., Nasir, B., Mizunoya, S. y Dreesen, T. (2020). Can Broadcast Media Foster Equitable Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Unicef Connect.
Butler, A. (2025). Fingerprints of Injustice: The Truth Behind Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic-Driven Evidence. Chapman Law Review, 28(2), 419.
Cardoso, M. E. (2020). Policy Evidence by Design: International Large-Scale Assessments and Grade Repetition. Comparative Education Review, 64(4), 598-618.
Cardoso, M. E. (2022). Policy Evidence by Design: How International Large-Scale Assessments Influence Repetition Rates. Columbia University.
Cardoso, M. E. (2024). Policymaking to the Test? How International Large-Scale Assessments (Ilsas) Influence Repetition Rates. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 33(3), 275-300.
Chan, K. W., Ali, F., Park, J., Sham, K. S. B., Tan, E. Y. T., Chong, F. W. C., Qian, K. y Sze, G. K. (2025). Automatic Item Generation in Various STEM Subjects Using Large Language Model Prompting. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100344.
Chugunova, M., Harhoff, D., Hölzle, K., Kaschub, V., Malagimani, S., Morgalla, U. y Rose, R. (2025). Who Uses AI in Research, and for What? Large-scale Survey Evidence from Germany. Large-scale Survey Evidence from Germany (May 19, 2025). Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, 55(2), 1-39. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5259847
Cobo, C. (2016). La innovación pendiente. Reflexiones (y provocaciones) sobre educación, tecnología y conocimiento. Debate.
Dowd, A. J. y Bartlett, L. (2019). The Need for Speed: Interrogating the Dominance of oral Reading Fluency in International Reading Efforts. Comparative Education Review, 63(2), 189-212.
Eco, U. (1994). Apocalyptic and Integrated Intellectuals: Mass Communications and Theories of Mass Culture. Apocalypse Postponed, 17-35.
Farangi, M. R., Nejadghanbar, H. y Hu, G. (2024). Use of Generative AI in Research: Ethical Considerations and Emotional Experiences. Ethics & Behavior, 1-17.
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6.
Gómez Vera, G. (2013). Los efectos de la repitencia en tanto que politica pública en cuatro países del cono sur: Argentina, Brasil, Chile y Uruguay: un análisis en base a PISA 2009. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Comparada: RELEC, 4(4), 59-70.
Guadalupe Mendizabal, C. A., Tay-Lim, B., Cardoso, M. E. y Girardi, L. (2009). The Next Generation of Literacy Statistics: Implementing the Literacy Assessment and Monitoring Programme (LAMP) (Technical paper n.. 1). Unesco Institute for Statistics. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/the-next-generation-of-literacy-statistics-implementing-the-literacy-assessment-and-monitoring-programme-lamp-en_0.pdf
Hannigan, T. R., McCarthy, I. P. y Spicer, A. (2024). Beware of Botshit: How to Manage the Epistemic Risks of Generative Chatbots. Business Horizons, 67(5), 471-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4678265
Hill, K. (2025). They Asked an AI Chatbot Questions. The Answers Sent Them Spiraling. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/13/technology/chatgpt-ai-chatbots-conspiracies.html
Hwang, Y. y Jeong, S. H. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Misinformation Acceptance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 28(4), 284-289. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1089/cyber.2024.0407
Ikeda, M. y García, E. (2013). Grade Repetition: A Comparative Study of Academic and Non-Academic Consequences. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 1, 269-315.
Jesson, A., Beltrán-Vélez, N., Chu, Q., Karlekar, S., Kossen, J., Gal, Y., Cunningham, J. P. y Blei, D. (2024). Estimating the Hallucination Rate of Generative AI. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37, 31154-31201.
Jung, J. Y., Tyack, L. y Von Davier, M. (2025). Towards the Implementation of Automated Scoring in International Large-scale Assessments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100375
Kirsch, I. y Lennon, M. L. (2017). PIAAC: A New Design for a New Era. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-017-0046-6
Kovari, A. (2025). Ethical Use of ChatGPT in Education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1465703.
Kundu, A. y Bej, T. (2025). Transforming ELF Teaching with AI: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-34. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5240610
Leconte, P. (1996). Ridicule [Película]. Polygram.
Lee, H. P. H., Sarkar, A., Tankelevitch, L., Drosos, I., Rintel, S., Bakns, R. y Wilson, N. (2025). The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects from a Survey of Knowledge Workers. CHI’25: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1121), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713778
Logan, C. (2024). Learning about and against Generative AI. En Lindgren, R., Asino, T. I., Kyza, E. A., Looi, C. K., Keifert, D. T. y Suárez, E. (eds.),Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2024 (pp. 362-369). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Morgan, H. (2024). Implementing ChatGPT to Support Teachers. The Clearing House, 97(5), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2024.2404859
Mullis, I. V. y Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2019). PIRLS 2021 Assessment Frameworks. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Nichols, T. P., Logan, C. y Garcia, A. (2025). Generative AI and the (Re) turn to Luddism. Learning, Media and Technology, 50(3). 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2025.2452199
Okubo, T., Houlden, W., Montuoro, P., Reinertsen, N., Tse, Ch. S. y Bastianic, T. (2023). AI Scoring for International Large-Scale Assessments using a Deep Learning Model and Multilingual Data. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Pasec. (2020). PASEC 2019. Confemen.
Puah, S. (2021). Predicting Students’ Academic Performance: A Comparison between Traditional MLR and Machine Learning Methods with PISA 2015 [Tesis de maestría]. Universidad de Múnich, Alemania.
Schleicher, A., Zimmer, K., Evans, J. y Clements, N. (2009). PISA 2009 Assessment Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264062658-en
Spaull, N. (2011). A preliminary analysis of SACMEQ III South Africa. Stellenbosch University.
Torres-Peña, R. C., Peña-González, D., Chacuto-López, E., Ariza, E. A. y Vergara, D. (2024). Updating Calculus Teaching with AI: A Classroom Experience. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091019
Ugwu, N. F., Igbinlade, A. S., Ochiaka, R. E., Ezeani, U. D., Okorie, N. C., Opele, J. K., Onayinka, T. S., Iroegbu, O., Onyekwere, O. K., Adams, A. B., Aigbona, P y Ojobola, F. B. (2024). Clarifying Ethical Dilemmas in Using Artificial Intelligence in Research Writing: A Rapid Review. Higher Learning Research Communications, 14(2), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.5590/hlrc.2024.14.2.03
Unesco. (1958). Recommendation Concerning the International Standardization of Educational. Statistics in Records of the General Conference. Tenth session. Autor.
Unesco. (2021). Los aprendizajes fundamentales en América Latina y el Caribe. Autor.
Unicef. (2017). Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metrics (SEA-PLM) Assessment Framework. Autor.
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Manuel Enrique Cardoso