Published Apr 11, 2023



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Patricia Milena Osorno Zuluaga

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

This article tries to demonstrate that Mk 16:1-8 is the effective ending that the author proposes to the reader by taking into account the communicative-pragmatic strategy. The article starts out by outlining the various hypotheses generated by Mk 16:1-8, a text that continues to be a crux interpretum for exegetes and hermeneuts alike. The above is evidenced, from very early on, in the corrections to which it has been victim: mutilations, attempts of harmonization and amplifications that tried to give a “happy ending”, to the Gospel of Jesus Messiah Son of God, a Good Announcement (Good News) with ἀρχή, but seemingly without a proper conclusion.
The hypothesis suggested is that the strategy of the author of the Gospel according to Mark is to leave the ending of his work open, in order to push the reader through the arduous passage from spectator to disciple. On the basis of the above, the questions formulated for the research are directed, as is typical of the communicative-pragmatic approach, to delineate the effects that Mark wants to achieve with his ending in the different types of readers, bearing in mind the fact that when an author sets a written work in motion, he does so by means of strategies that make the message he is trying to communicate feasible, comprehensible and effective. For this reason, when it comes to the end of the work, the moment of climax, it is essential to question and deepen the performative power of the semantic motifs that unite it. Finally, attention is paid to the way in which it is verified in each of the statements that the communication is directed towards reaching its “happy ending”. It is precisely at this point where it is argued that Mark presents, as a result of his strategy, an ending that is as paradoxical as it is paradigmatic.

Keywords

Mark, Final, Discipleship, Exegesis, Semantic-motives, Communicative strategyMarcos, final, discipulado, exégesis, motivos semánticos, estrategia comunicativa

References
Beauchamp, Paul. “Teología bíblica”. En Iniciación a la práctica de la teología. I: Introducción, dirigido por Bernard Lauret, François Refoulé, 189-237. Madrid: Cristiandad, 1984.
Bernabé, Carmen. “Duelo y género en los relatos de la visita a la tumba”. En Reimaginando los orígenes del cristianismo, editado por C. Bernabé y C. Gil, 307-352. Estella (Navarra): Verbo Divino, 2008.
Bertram, Georg. “θάμβος (asombrarse, maravillarse)”. En Grande Lessico del Nuovo Testamento, dirigido por Gerhard Kittel y Gerhard Friedrich IV, 147-156. Brecia: Paideia, 1968.
Boomershine, Thomas, y Gilbert Bartholomew. “The Narrative Technique of Mark 16:8”. Journal of Biblical Literature 100 (1981): 213-223.
Cadwallader, Alan H. “The Hermeneutical Potential of the Multiple Endings of Mark’s Gospel”. Colloquium 43 (2011): 129-146.
Casas, Juan Alberto. Ciegos y sordos. Clave hermenéutica del discipulado pospascual en el Evangelio según Marcos. Bogotá: Editorial Javeriana, 2018.
Collins, Adela. Mark. A Commentary. Minneapolis (MN): Augsburg Fortress, 2007.
Corallo, Ana Maria. Atelier della Bibbia. Dal tessuto della Scrittura al vestito della Parola. Bologna: Edizioni Dehoniane, 2013.
Croy, N. Clayton. The Mutilation of Mark’s Gospel. Nashville (TN): Abingdon Press, 2003.
Culpepper, Aland. Mark. Macon (GA): Smyth & Helwys, 2007.
Enslin, Morton. “εφοβου̂ντο γάρ, Mark 16:8”. Journal of Biblical Literature 46 (1927): 62-68.
Focant, Camile. Il Vangelo secondo Marco. Assisi: Cittadella Editrice, 2015.
Grilli, Massimo. “Paradosso” e “mistero”. Il Vangelo di Marco. Bologna: Edizioni Dehoniane, 2012.
Grilli, Massimo; Mauricio Guidi; y Elzbieta Obara. Comunicación y pragmática en la exégesis bíblica. Estella (Navarra): Verbo Divino, 2018.
Hurtado, Larry W. “The Women, the Tomb, and the Climax of Mark”. En A Wandering Galilean: Essays in Honour of Seán Freyne, editado por Zuleika Rodgers, Margaret Daly-Denton, y Anne Fitzpatrick-McKinley, 427-450. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
Iverson, Kelly. “A Further Word on Final Γάρ (Mark 16:8)”. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 68 (2006): 79-80.
Lane, William. The Gospel of Mark. Grand Rapids (MI): William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1974.
Légasse, Simon. Marco. Roma: Borla, 2000.
Lincoln, Andrew. “The Promise and the Failure: Mark 16:7, 8”. Journal of Biblical Literature 108 (1989): 283-300.
Manicardi, Ermenegildo. Il cammino di Gesù nel Vangelo di Marco. Roma: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico, 2003.
Marcus, Joel. El Evangelio según Marcos (Mc 8-16). Salamanca: Sígueme, 2010.
Miller, Susan. “‘They Said Nothing to Anyone’: The Fear and Silence of the Women at the Empty Tomb (Mk 16.1-8)”. Feminist Theology 13 (2004): 77-90.
Moloney, Francis. The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary. Ada (MI): Baker Academic, 2012.
Obara, Elzbieta. Le strategie di Dio: dinamiche comunicative nei discorsi divini del Trito-Isaia. Roma: Pontificio Instituto Bíblico, 2010.
Oepkel, Albrecht. “ἔκστασις (estupor, consternación)”. En Grande Lessico del Nuovo Testamento, dirigido por Gerhard Kittel y Gerhard Friedrich III, 323-349. Brecia: Paideia, 1967.
Oliver, Kevin Robert. “The Lost Ending of the Gospel According to Mark: A Criticism and a Reconstruction”. Journal of Biblical Literature 45/1-2 (1926): 81-103.
Pasolini, Roberto. Fallire e non mancare il bersaglio. Paradosso del Regno e strategie comunicative nel Vangelo di Marco. Bologna: Edizioni Dehoniane, 2017.
Pesch, Rudolf. Il Vangelo di Marco. Parte seconda. Testo greco e traduzione. Commento ai capp. 8 ,2 7—1 6,20. Brescia: Paideia, 1982.
Schneider, G. “εἰσέρχομαι (entrar, penetrar, ir hacia el interior de un lugar)”. En Grande Lessico del Nuovo Testamento, dirigido por Gerhard Kittel y Gerhard Friedrich III, 940-947. Brecia: Paideia, 1967.
Standaert, Benoît. Marco. Vangelo di una notte, vangelo per la vita. Commentario Mc 11,1–16,20. Bologna: Edizioni Dehoniane, 2011.
Taylor, Vicent. Evangelio según San Marcos. Madrid: Cristiandad, 1979.
Vignolo, Roberto. “Una finale reticente: interpretazione narrativa di Mc 16,8”. Rivista Biblica Italiana XXXVIII (1990): 129-189.
Weren, Wim. Métodos de exégesis de los evangelios. Estella (Navarra): Verbo Divino, 2003.
Williams, Guy J. “Narrative Space, Angelic Revelation, and the End of Mark’s Gospel”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, JSNT 35 (2013): 263-284.
Zerwick, Max. El griego del Nuevo Testamento. Traducido por Alfonso de la Fuente Adánez. Estella (Navarra): Verbo Divino, 1997.
How to Cite
Osorno Zuluaga, P. M. (2023). Mark: A Good Announcement with a Beginning, but without an End. Communicative Strategy of Mk 16:1-8. Theologica Xaveriana, 73. https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.tx73.mbaif
Section
Artículos