Constitutional Hierarchy and Preferential Application. The Potential Conflict Between Rights and Integration in the Integration Law
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

hierarchy
implementation
integration
precedence
rights
democratic Constitution

How to Cite

Tremolada Álvarez, E. and Martínez Dalmau, R. (2014) “Constitutional Hierarchy and Preferential Application. The Potential Conflict Between Rights and Integration in the Integration Law”, Vniversitas, 63(128), pp. 383–409. doi:10.11144/Javeriana.VJ128.jcap.
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

The troubled relation between integration and Constitution comes
early with the emergence of the European Communities as a result of
the integration dynamic, based on a limit to the states sovereignty, and
the constitutional dynamic, aimed to the organizational control and
the determination of the rights. The opening constitutional clauses provided the framework for the cession of competences within integration processes without being understood that it was a blank check in favor of supranational institutions. The solution to the tension is resolved with the distinction between hierarchy and implementation, the reduction of the supranational sphere to the competences explicitly assigned within the constitutional framework, and the maintenance of the Constitution as supreme law. Thus the Community Law may have precedence over the Constitution in its application, but the legitimacy of the Community Law, ultimately resides in the Constitution itself. That corrects the potential conflict between constitutionally protected right sand integration. 

PDF (Spanish)

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.

Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.