HISTORIC UNIVERSALISM OF ARBITRATION
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

History of Arbitration
Commercial Arbitration
Globalization
Lex Mercatoria

How to Cite

Zappalà, F. (2010) “HISTORIC UNIVERSALISM OF ARBITRATION”, Vniversitas, 59(121), pp. 193–216. doi:10.11144/Javeriana.vj59-121.uhar.
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

Arbitration is earlier than state administration of justice. The practices to
submitting a dispute to another person, with a prior acceptance of mandatory sentencing, existed before state court. Subsequently, improving the organization of society allows the creation of the judicial institution. Although the modern state, the judiciary not supplanted the arbitration, which has remained in full force and action in the current legal system, given the quality of the legal institution, which in some cases is the only one who can settle disputes legal, as in the field
of international trade actors in the field of globalization. The document is a product of theoretical reflection in the context of an investigation
into the principles of uniformity of international commercial arbitration,
with its historical approach to the legal institution of arbitration. The  ain deduction is a historical constant belief in the need of arbitration as a mechanism to settle disputes between merchants, accompanied by the fluctuation of the distance-historic rapprochement between arbitration and the state jurisdiction. The methodology is documentary. 

PDF (Spanish)

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.

Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.