Abstract
Corporate scandals in the United States and Europe have drawn attention to
the importance of “gatekeepers” in the market, causing the imminent need to
regulate their activity and responsibility. In cases where there is a contract,
is clear how to manage the responsibility, ambiguity exists in the legal way to
proceed if it does not exist. This article discusses the different positions that
have been held so far, and proposes a unified vision for regulating the activity
and responsibility of the financial analyst as a gatekeeper, in the absence of a
contractual relationship. It is argued, on the basis of comparative law analysis,
that the analyst as a gatekeeper will be liable before third parties when they
are part of the group of persons to whom the information was provided or
that reasonably could obtain it, and the damage is cause in the operation for
which the information was developed. Torts are the most effective instrument for
these cases in civil law systems.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.