Keywords
restorative justice
punitivism
women's rights
How to Cite
Abstract
This study examines how actors promoting restorative justice agendas and punitive agendas have competed for defining measures to deal with domestic violence in the context of the 2004 Criminal Procedure Code. In recent years, punitive agendas have won in the competition to affect legal reform. Criminal sanction and crime control measures have been offered in response to the subordination of women and to violence against women within the family. This article assesses some of the consequences of the enactment of crime control measures to face domestic violence. Providing quantitative and qualitative data, I conclude that the effectiveness of the punitive approach to this form of violence is debatable. Although imprisonment for domestic violence has increased, it remains quite low in relation to other offenses. The punitive approach may have also had the unintended result of alienating some victims from the criminal process and discouraging others from cooperating with prosecutors. These mixed results indicate that women’s advocates should be cautious about promoting punitive strategies to deal with domestic violence.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.