Keywords
efficiency
effectiveness
public problems
rules of the game
artificial intelligence
How to Cite
Abstract
This journal article theoretically examines the thesis of whether a government organization envisaged to, directly and indirectly, regulate the “market process” manages to fulfill its “macro functions” from a “long-run performance” perspective. Also, the proposed exercise is characterized as a public issue and therefore, for its analysis, a hypothetical-deductive exercise and formulation of conjectures is proposed in the sense of Noveck —2022—. That is, in addition to the implementation of ideas from the economic psychology of Richard Thaler —1986—, an analysis matrix is created to explore whether the actions of an entity such as the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce of Colombia (SIC), randomly selected as an example, can contribute to the “market process” by automating the implementation of its strategic plan through the introduction and/or deepening of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and other advanced analysis tools that add value.
Alberto Ruiz Ojeda et al., Regulation and Competition in Services of General Economic Interest (SGEI) (Editorial Universidad de Málaga, 2015).
Beth Simone Noveck, How to solve public problems. A practical guide to fixing the government and changing the world (Galaxia Gutenberg, 2022).
Israel Kirzner, The meaning of market process, in Mario Rizzo, ed., Essays in the development of modern Austrian Economics (Routledge, 1992).
Juan Castellanos Díaz, Rubén Méndez Reátegui & María Camila Paladines, Study on the regulatory process of ultra-processed food labeling: Colombian case, 6(1) Revista Justicia & Derecho 1-9 (2023). https://revistas.uautonoma.cl/index.php/rjyd/article/view/2033
José Roldán Xopa & Drik Zavala, Virtual conference Behaving badly costs: behaving well costs. Behavioral sciences, economics, and law, Intel-Iuris Special Series: Frontier Issues in Administrative Law (2023).
Kenneth J. Arrow, Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System, 59(4) The Journal of Business S385-S399 (1986). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2352770.
Karina Montes & Luis Ferney Moreno, Regulatory Improvement. Regulatory impact analysis (Editorial Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2021).
Karl Polanyi, The great transformation of sociology (1st ed. - Córdoba: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, 1944-2007).
María Lourdes Torrado Ramírez & Nelson Meza Hernández, Analysis of the administrative and jurisdictional functions of the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce in matters of free competition, (41) Revista Derecho del Estado 317-350 (2018). https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/5323
MINCIT, Strategic Planning 2019-2022 (2019). https://www.mincit.gov.co/getattachment/ministerio/planeacion/planeacion-estrategica-sectorial/marco-estrategico-sector-comercio-industria-y-turi/marco-estrategico-sector-cit-2019-2022-03092019publicadooct2019.pdf.aspx
Peter Boettke, Living Economics, Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow (The Independent Institute, 2012).
Richard H. Thaler, Everything I’ve learned with economic psychology (Editorial Planeta, 2016).
Tanya Sammut-Bonnici, Complexity Theory, in eds Cary L. Cooper, John McGee & Tanya Sammut-Bonnici, Wiley Encyclopedia of Management (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom120210
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.