This article is a reflection of notions like sex, gender and moral over many
philosophical ways of thinking: from John Dewey’s pragmatism through
Rorty’s contemporary, passing by the theory of moral sense, the poststructuralism, among others. This also is an attempt to give judge elements
in order to coordinate the constitutional interpretation of the equality right
around sexual diversity made for the Constitutional Colombian Court with
the enquiries advances succeeded in the national and international academic
scope. First of all, there will be a conceptual tour down many philosophical
slopes, and after that It will be a critic of the substantiated notions of the truth
of sex and an exemplification of the latent possibility of sexual subversion in
the case of transgender. Second chapter rescues elements of the moral sense
and pragmatist’s ethics, face to the way of the direction gave to the gender
problematic. The last one it will be a parallel between conceptual frameworks
treated and the interpretive debate raised inside the colombian legal system.
In the last reflection it will be a nesting of all the inputs across the Dewey’s
theoric shaft, and provide some tools to deal with the theoric conflicts which
emerge from the fights for the recognition of the sexual diversity.