Publicado dic 26, 2016



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Daniel Bartholomeu

José Maria Montiel

Afonso Antonio Machado

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Resumen

Personality is one of the main psychological aspects that influence athletes performance in competition and one of the most studied subjects in sport psychology. We aimed to optimize item scales in a socialization test based on the big-five model, assessed by means of adjectives and administered to a sample of 225 athletes of both sexes, with 56.9% male. Age ranged from 14-45 years with a mean of 20 (SD = 5,21). Participants attended to basketball (11%), Football (21.8%), Handball (17.3%), Jiu-jitsu (10.2%), tennis (5.60) and Volleyball (16 %) sport modalities. The results indicated that the four point scale were the best item scale structure regarding validity evidences. Hence, this structure could be adopted in this scale aiming better socialization assessment in athletes.

Keywords

evaluación psicológica, rendimiento humano, personalidadPsychological Assessment, Human Performance, Personality.

References
Bartholomeu, D., Montiel, J. M., & Machado, A. A. (2013). Avaliação da Escala Likert dos itens do CSAI-2 em atletas. Interação em Psicologia, 17 (1), 79-89.

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rash Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences . London: Erlbaum.

Brandão, M. R. F. (2007). A psicologia do exercício e do esporte e seus desafios para o milênio. In M. R. F. Brandão & A. A. Machado. Coleção psicologia do esporte e do exercício: teoria e aplicação (Vol. 1, Cap. 7, pp. 12-24). São Paulo: Atheneu.

Butcher, J. N., Williams, C. L., Graham, J. R., Archer, R. P., Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Kaemmer, B. (1992). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory – A (MMPI-A): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, H. E. P. (1995). Personality structure and the new fifth edition of the 16PF. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55 , 926-937.

Cratty, B. J. (1984). Psychology in contemporary sport . Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Draba, R. E. (1977). The identification and interpretation of item bias. Rasch Measurement Transactions , MESA Memorandum, 25. Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt122m.htm

Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 203-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hutz, C. S., Nunes, C. H. S. S., Silveira, A. D., Serra, J., Anton, M., & Wieczorek, L. S. (1998). O desenvolvimento de marcadores para a avaliação da personalidade nomodelos dos Cinco Grandes Fatores. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica , 11 , 395-409.

Linacre, J. M. (1997). Guidelines for rating scales . Retrieved from http://mesa.spc.uchicago.edu/rn2.htm

Linacre, J. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement , 2 , 103-122.

Linacre, J. M. (2002). What do infit and outfit, mean-squared and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16 (2), 878. Retrieved from http://209.238.26.90/rmt/rmt82a.htm

McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Piedmont, R. L. (1993). Folk concepts, natural language, and psychological constructs: The California Psychological Inventory and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 61 , 1-26.

Moraes, L. C. C. A. (2007). Emoções no Esporte e na Atividade Física. In M. R. F. Brandão & A. A. Machado. Coleção Psicologia do esporte e do exercício: Teoria e aplicação (Vol. 1, Cap. 4, pp. 57-65). São Paulo: Atheneu.

Muñiz, J. (1990). Teoría de respuesta a los ítens: Un nuevo enfoque en la evolución psicológica y educativa . Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide, S. A.

Sinn, D. L., & Moltschaniwskyj, N. A. (2005). Personality traits in dumpling squid (Euprymna tasmanica): Context-specific traits and their correlation with biological characteristics. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119 (1), 99-110.

Smith, E. V., Wakely, M. B., de Kruif, R. E. L., & Swartz, C. W. (2003). Optimizing rating scales for self-efficacy (and other) research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63 (3), 369-391.

Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement . Chicago: MESA Press.

Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1988). Validity in Rasch measurement: Research memorandum 54 . Chicago: MESA Press.

Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1992). IRT in the 1990s: Wich models work best? Rasch measurement, 6, 196-200.
Cómo citar
Bartholomeu, D., Montiel, J. M., & Machado, A. A. (2016). Optimizing rating scales of the big five socialization scale in athletes by Rasch model. Universitas Psychologica, 15(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-4.orsa
Sección
Artículos