Palabras clave
Comunicación y desarrollo
Cambio social
Modelos de comunicación.
Cambio social
Modelos de comunicación.
Cómo citar
Ángel Botero, A., & Obregón, R. (2011). Un análisis crítico de las perspectivas de diálogo en la literatura sobre comunicación para el desarrollo y cambio social: Abordajes y desafíos. Signo Y Pensamiento, 30(58), 162-177. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.syp30-58.acpd
Almetrics
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio fue explorar la literatura producida en el campo de la comunicación para el desarrollo y el cambio social (cdsc), con el fin de: a. comprender la manera como diversos investigadores y profesionales de la comunicación han utilizado la noción de diálogo para definir, entender y apoyar los procesos de desarrollo y cambio social; b. explorar las implicaciones teóricas y prácticas de la utilización de distintos enfoques de diálogo. Concluimos que en el campo de la cdsc la noción de diálogo ha sido abordada, primordialmente, de tres maneras: diálogo como modelo de comunicación, diálogo como evento de comunicación interpersonal y diálogo como proceso de deliberación pública. Una vez explicados dichos escenarios, presentamos los riesgos, consecuencias e implicaciones de cada uno de estos abordajes. Finalmente, exponemos algunos de los desafíos y retos que tiene la cdsc en relación con la aplicación de prácticas dialógicas.
Adams, C. et al. (2007), “Public dialogue as communication activism: lessons learned from enganing community-based action research”, en Frey, L. y Carragee, K. Communication Activism, New Jersey, Hampton Press, pp. 67-108.
Anderson, R. y Cissna, K. (2008), “Fresh perspectives in dialogue theory”, Communication Theory, vol. 1, núm. 18, pp. 1-4.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Esays, Austin, University of Texas Press.
— (2001), “Marxisim and the philosophy of language”, en Bizzell, P. y Herzberg, B. (eds.), The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present, Boston, Bedford/St. Martin’s, pp. 1210-1226.
Barranquero, A. (2006), “From Freire and Habermas to multiplicity”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 920-924.
Beltrán, L. R. (2006a), “Rural development and social communication: relationships and strategies”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 76-87.
— (2006b), “A farewell to Aristotle: ‘horizontal’ communication”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 157-173.
Black, L.W. (2008), “Deliberation, Storytelling, and Dialogic Moments”, Communication Theory, vol. 1, núm. 18, pp. 93-116.
Buber, M. (1958), I and Thou, 2.a ed., Nueva York, Collier Books.
Cisneros, J. (2006), “Constructing an alternative option: Habermas-Pasquali-Paoli”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 591-596.
Cloud, D. (1994), “The materiality of discourse as oxymoron”, Western Journal of Communication, núm. 58, pp. 141-163.
DeTurk, S. (2006), “The Power of Dialogue: Consequences of Intergroup Dialogue and their Implications for Agency and Alliance Building”, Communication Quarterly, vol. 1, núm. 54, pp. 33-51.
Dissanayake, W. (2006), “A buddhist approach to development: a Sri Lankan endeavor”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 243-245.
Downing, J. (2006), “Community, democracy, dialogue and radical media”, en GumucioDagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 828-840.
Escobar, A. (2006), “Cruzando fronteras and the borders of thought”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 654-662.
Fals Borda, O. (2006), “The application of the participatory communication research”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 321-331.
Figueroa, M. et al. (2006), “Communication for social change”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 589-591.
Freire, P. (2006), “Education for critical consciousness”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 39-43.
Frey, L. y Carragee, K. (2007), Communication Activism, New Jersey, Hampton Press.
Gray-Felder, D. y Deane, J. (1998), Communication and Social Change: A Position Paper and Conference Report [en línea], New York, The Rockefeller Foundation, disponible en http:// www.communicationforsocialchange.org/ pdf/positionpaper.pdf
Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.) (2006), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium.
Hamelink. C. (2006), “Social development, information, and knowledge: what happened to communication”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 960-964.
Hartz-Karp, J. y Briand, M. (2009), “Institutionalizing deliberative democracy”, Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 2, núm. 9, pp. 125-141.
Heidlebaugh, N. (2008), “Invention and Public Dialogue: Lessons from Rhetorical Theories”, Communication Theory, vol. 1, núm. 18, pp. 27-50.
Heimann, D. (2006), “Supporting communication for development with horizontal dialogue and a level playing field: The Communication Initiative”, Development in Practice, vol. 6, núm. 16, pp. 603-610.
Hemingway, P. y Bereton, N. (2009), What is a Systematic Review?, Londres, Haywood Medical Communications.
Huesca. R. (2006), “Studying new social movements: to renew development communication research”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 750-762.
Jacobson, T. y Kolluri, S. (2006), “Participatory communication as communicative action”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 806-814.
Jovanovic, S. et al. (2007), “Promoting deliberative democracy through dialogue: communication contributions to grassroots movement for truth, justice, and reconciliation”, en Frey, L. y Carragee, K., Communication Activism, New Jersey, Hampton Press, pp. 67-108.
Kaplún, M. (2006), “Why educate?”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 147-156.
Kim, J. y Kim, E. J. (2008), “Theorizing dialogic deliberation: everyday political talk as communicative action and dialogue”, Communication Theory, vol. 1, núm. 18, pp. 51-70.
Kivikuru, U. (2006), “Top-Down or BottomUp? Radio in the service of democracy: Experiences from South Africa and Namibia”, Gazette, vol. 1, núm. 68, pp. 5-31.
LaFever, M. (2004), “Increasing the participation of non-dominant cultural groups in public dialogue: Development communication experiences in North America”, Conference Papers. International Communication Association, núm. 1, Communication & Mass Media Complete database.
Mattelart, A. y Mattelart, M. (1997), Historia de las teorías de la comunicación, Barcelona, Paidós.
Melkote, S. y Steeves, L. (2001), Communication for Development in the World: Theory and practice for empowerment, 2.a ed., Nueva Delhi, Sage.
Mignolo, W. (2005), The idea of Latin America, Malden, MA, Blackwell Publications.
Morris, N. (2003), “A comparative analysis of the diffusion and participatory models in development communication”, Communication Theory, vol. 13, núm. 2, pp. 225-248.
Obregón, R. et al. (2011), “Edu-entretenimiento y movilización social para el ejercicio de los derechos humanos sexuales y reproductivos de adolescentes y jóvenes en Colombia: resultados y lecciones aprendidas de una experiencia piloto”, Bogotá, Fondo de Población de Naciones unidas (unfpa).
Obregón, R. y Mosquera, M. (2005), “Methodological challenges in health communication research”, en Hemer, O. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Media and Glocal Change: Rethinking Communication for Development, Nordicom Review, pp. 233-246.
Papa, M. y Singhal, A. (2008), “How entertainment-education programs promote dialogue in support of social change”, Conference, International Communication Association, pp. 1-33.
Papa, M.; Singhal, A., y Papa, W. (2006), Organizing for Social Change: A Dialectic Journey for Social Change, Nueva Delhi, Sage.
Parks, W. et al. (2006), “Who measures change?”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 817-824.
Pietilä, V. (2005), On the Highway of Mass Communication Studies, Cresskill, New Jersey, Hampton Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2006), “Communication and development: the passing of the dominant paradigm”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 110-126.
Rogers, E. M. y Kincaid, L. (1980), Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research, Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. y Shoemaker, F. F. (1971), Communication of Innovations, 2.a ed., New York, The Free Press.
Schramm, W. (2006), “What mass communication can do, and what it can ‘help’ to do in national development”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 26-35.
Slim, H. y Thomson, P. (2006), “Words from the heart: the power of oral testimony”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 454-458.
Smith, A. (2008), “Dialogue in agony: the problem of communication in authoritarian regimes”, Communication Theory, vol. 1, núm. 18, pp. 160-185.
Sonderling, S. (2006), “Development support communication: a change agent in support of popular participation or a double agent of deception?”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 545-556.
Vega, J. y Bayuelo, S. (2008), “Ganándole terreno al miedo: cine y comunicación en Montes de María”, Lo que le vamos quitando a la guerra [medios ciudadanos en contextos de conflicto armado en Colombia], Bogotá, Centro de Competencia en Comunicación para América Latina Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Waisbord, S. (2001), “Family tree of theories, methodologies and strategies in development communication” [en línea], disponible en http:// www.comminit.com/socialchange/stsilviocomm/sld-1774.html.
Wierzbicka, A. (2006), “The concept of ‘dialogue’ in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective”, Discourse Studies, vol. 5, núm. 8, pp. 675-703.
Anderson, R. y Cissna, K. (2008), “Fresh perspectives in dialogue theory”, Communication Theory, vol. 1, núm. 18, pp. 1-4.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Esays, Austin, University of Texas Press.
— (2001), “Marxisim and the philosophy of language”, en Bizzell, P. y Herzberg, B. (eds.), The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present, Boston, Bedford/St. Martin’s, pp. 1210-1226.
Barranquero, A. (2006), “From Freire and Habermas to multiplicity”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 920-924.
Beltrán, L. R. (2006a), “Rural development and social communication: relationships and strategies”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 76-87.
— (2006b), “A farewell to Aristotle: ‘horizontal’ communication”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 157-173.
Black, L.W. (2008), “Deliberation, Storytelling, and Dialogic Moments”, Communication Theory, vol. 1, núm. 18, pp. 93-116.
Buber, M. (1958), I and Thou, 2.a ed., Nueva York, Collier Books.
Cisneros, J. (2006), “Constructing an alternative option: Habermas-Pasquali-Paoli”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 591-596.
Cloud, D. (1994), “The materiality of discourse as oxymoron”, Western Journal of Communication, núm. 58, pp. 141-163.
DeTurk, S. (2006), “The Power of Dialogue: Consequences of Intergroup Dialogue and their Implications for Agency and Alliance Building”, Communication Quarterly, vol. 1, núm. 54, pp. 33-51.
Dissanayake, W. (2006), “A buddhist approach to development: a Sri Lankan endeavor”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 243-245.
Downing, J. (2006), “Community, democracy, dialogue and radical media”, en GumucioDagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 828-840.
Escobar, A. (2006), “Cruzando fronteras and the borders of thought”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 654-662.
Fals Borda, O. (2006), “The application of the participatory communication research”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 321-331.
Figueroa, M. et al. (2006), “Communication for social change”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 589-591.
Freire, P. (2006), “Education for critical consciousness”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 39-43.
Frey, L. y Carragee, K. (2007), Communication Activism, New Jersey, Hampton Press.
Gray-Felder, D. y Deane, J. (1998), Communication and Social Change: A Position Paper and Conference Report [en línea], New York, The Rockefeller Foundation, disponible en http:// www.communicationforsocialchange.org/ pdf/positionpaper.pdf
Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.) (2006), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium.
Hamelink. C. (2006), “Social development, information, and knowledge: what happened to communication”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 960-964.
Hartz-Karp, J. y Briand, M. (2009), “Institutionalizing deliberative democracy”, Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 2, núm. 9, pp. 125-141.
Heidlebaugh, N. (2008), “Invention and Public Dialogue: Lessons from Rhetorical Theories”, Communication Theory, vol. 1, núm. 18, pp. 27-50.
Heimann, D. (2006), “Supporting communication for development with horizontal dialogue and a level playing field: The Communication Initiative”, Development in Practice, vol. 6, núm. 16, pp. 603-610.
Hemingway, P. y Bereton, N. (2009), What is a Systematic Review?, Londres, Haywood Medical Communications.
Huesca. R. (2006), “Studying new social movements: to renew development communication research”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 750-762.
Jacobson, T. y Kolluri, S. (2006), “Participatory communication as communicative action”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 806-814.
Jovanovic, S. et al. (2007), “Promoting deliberative democracy through dialogue: communication contributions to grassroots movement for truth, justice, and reconciliation”, en Frey, L. y Carragee, K., Communication Activism, New Jersey, Hampton Press, pp. 67-108.
Kaplún, M. (2006), “Why educate?”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 147-156.
Kim, J. y Kim, E. J. (2008), “Theorizing dialogic deliberation: everyday political talk as communicative action and dialogue”, Communication Theory, vol. 1, núm. 18, pp. 51-70.
Kivikuru, U. (2006), “Top-Down or BottomUp? Radio in the service of democracy: Experiences from South Africa and Namibia”, Gazette, vol. 1, núm. 68, pp. 5-31.
LaFever, M. (2004), “Increasing the participation of non-dominant cultural groups in public dialogue: Development communication experiences in North America”, Conference Papers. International Communication Association, núm. 1, Communication & Mass Media Complete database.
Mattelart, A. y Mattelart, M. (1997), Historia de las teorías de la comunicación, Barcelona, Paidós.
Melkote, S. y Steeves, L. (2001), Communication for Development in the World: Theory and practice for empowerment, 2.a ed., Nueva Delhi, Sage.
Mignolo, W. (2005), The idea of Latin America, Malden, MA, Blackwell Publications.
Morris, N. (2003), “A comparative analysis of the diffusion and participatory models in development communication”, Communication Theory, vol. 13, núm. 2, pp. 225-248.
Obregón, R. et al. (2011), “Edu-entretenimiento y movilización social para el ejercicio de los derechos humanos sexuales y reproductivos de adolescentes y jóvenes en Colombia: resultados y lecciones aprendidas de una experiencia piloto”, Bogotá, Fondo de Población de Naciones unidas (unfpa).
Obregón, R. y Mosquera, M. (2005), “Methodological challenges in health communication research”, en Hemer, O. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Media and Glocal Change: Rethinking Communication for Development, Nordicom Review, pp. 233-246.
Papa, M. y Singhal, A. (2008), “How entertainment-education programs promote dialogue in support of social change”, Conference, International Communication Association, pp. 1-33.
Papa, M.; Singhal, A., y Papa, W. (2006), Organizing for Social Change: A Dialectic Journey for Social Change, Nueva Delhi, Sage.
Parks, W. et al. (2006), “Who measures change?”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 817-824.
Pietilä, V. (2005), On the Highway of Mass Communication Studies, Cresskill, New Jersey, Hampton Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2006), “Communication and development: the passing of the dominant paradigm”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 110-126.
Rogers, E. M. y Kincaid, L. (1980), Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research, Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. y Shoemaker, F. F. (1971), Communication of Innovations, 2.a ed., New York, The Free Press.
Schramm, W. (2006), “What mass communication can do, and what it can ‘help’ to do in national development”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 26-35.
Slim, H. y Thomson, P. (2006), “Words from the heart: the power of oral testimony”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 454-458.
Smith, A. (2008), “Dialogue in agony: the problem of communication in authoritarian regimes”, Communication Theory, vol. 1, núm. 18, pp. 160-185.
Sonderling, S. (2006), “Development support communication: a change agent in support of popular participation or a double agent of deception?”, en Gumucio-Dagron, A. y Tufte, T. (eds.), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, New Jersey, Communication for Social Change Consortium, pp. 545-556.
Vega, J. y Bayuelo, S. (2008), “Ganándole terreno al miedo: cine y comunicación en Montes de María”, Lo que le vamos quitando a la guerra [medios ciudadanos en contextos de conflicto armado en Colombia], Bogotá, Centro de Competencia en Comunicación para América Latina Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Waisbord, S. (2001), “Family tree of theories, methodologies and strategies in development communication” [en línea], disponible en http:// www.comminit.com/socialchange/stsilviocomm/sld-1774.html.
Wierzbicka, A. (2006), “The concept of ‘dialogue’ in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective”, Discourse Studies, vol. 5, núm. 8, pp. 675-703.
Esta revista científica se encuentra registrada bajo la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional. Por lo tanto, esta obra se puede reproducir, distribuir y comunicar públicamente en formato digital, siempre que se reconozca el nombre de los autores y a la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Se permite citar, adaptar, transformar, autoarchivar, republicar y crear a partir del material, para cualquier finalidad (incluso comercial), siempre que se reconozca adecuadamente la autoría, se proporcione un enlace a la obra original y se indique si se han realizado cambios. La Pontificia Universidad Javeriana no retiene los derechos sobre las obras publicadas y los contenidos son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores, quienes conservan sus derechos morales, intelectuales, de privacidad y publicidad.
El aval sobre la intervención de la obra (revisión, corrección de estilo, traducción, diagramación) y su posterior divulgación se otorga mediante una licencia de uso y no a través de una cesión de derechos, lo que representa que la revista y la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana se eximen de cualquier responsabilidad que se pueda derivar de una mala práctica ética por parte de los autores. En consecuencia de la protección brindada por la licencia de uso, la revista no se encuentra en la obligación de publicar retractaciones o modificar la información ya publicada, a no ser que la errata surja del proceso de gestión editorial. La publicación de contenidos en esta revista no representa regalías para los contribuyentes.