Publicado dic 1, 2010



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Ignacio Vélez Pareja

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Resumen

Este documento identifica tres fuentes de riesgo para elescudo fiscal o ahorro fiscal (AI): dos de ellos están asociados con el riesgo de la deuda y un riesgo operativo, relacionado con la operación de la firma. Se presentan, además, unas condiciones para definir la deuda con riesgo asociado al flujo de efectivo y no a las ganancias contables. La realización efectiva de los escudos fiscales para flujos de caja finitos en cualquier período t se correlaciona con la utilidad operativa (UO) más otros ingresos (EBITO) y no con los gastos de interés en t. Con los resultados de una simulación de Montecarlo se examina el comportamiento de los escudos fiscales, de flujo de caja de la deuda y la EBITO. En conclusión, no es razonable definir el riesgo del AI, medido por una sola tasa de descuento, sino como una mezcla de riesgo de la deuda y el riesgo operacional.

Keywords

firm valuation, tax shields, cash flows, Montecarlo Simulation, discount rate for tax shields, risky debt, risky tax shields, weighted average cost of capitalvaloración de la empresa, amparos fiscales, flujos de caja, simulación de Montecarlo, tasa de descuento para amparos fiscales, costo promedio ponderado del capitalcusto médio ponderado do capital, valorização da empresa, incentivos fiscais, fluxo de caixa, simulação de Monte Carlo, taxa de desconto para incentivos fiscais, riscos de alavancagem, riscos dos incentivos fiscais

References
Arzac, E.R. and Glosten, L.R. (2005). A Reconsideration of Tax Shield Valuation. European Financial Management, 11 (4), 453-461.

Bank for International Settlements, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2006). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards A Revised Framework. Retrieved on November 29, 2010, from www.bis.org/publ/bcbs128.pdf

Brealey, R.A. and Myers, S.C. (2003). Principles of Corporate Finance (7th ed.). New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.

Cordes, J.J. and Sheffrin, S.M. (1983). Estimating the Tax Advantage of Corporate Debt. The Journal of Finance, 38 (1), 95-105.

Dammon, R.M. and Senbet, L.W. (1988). The Effect of Taxes and Depreciation on Corporate Investment and Financial Leverage. The Journal of Finance, 43 (2), 357-373.

Damodaran, A. (2002). Investment Valuation (2nd Ed.). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/valn2ed/ch15.pdf

Valuation Approaches and Metrics: A Survey of the Theory and Evidence. (2005). Foundations and Trends in Finance, 1 (8), 693-784. Retrieved from: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/papers/valuesurvey.pdf

Díaz, G. and Vélez-Pareja, I. (2010). Estimating the Appropriate Risk Profile for the Tax Savings: A Contingent Claim Approach. Working paper. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1667621

El Tiempo (2004, August 10). Ley 55: solo 10 empresas salvadas. Retrieved on Nov 2, 2010, from: http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/MAM-1591980

Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1998). Taxes, Financing Decisions, and Firm Value. The Journal of Finance, 53 (3), 819-843.

Grabowski, R.J. (2009). Problems with Cost of Capital Estimation in the Current Environment. Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance (JARAF), 4 (1), 31-40.

Graham, J.R. (2000). How big are the tax benefits of debt? The Journal of Finance, 55 (5), 1901-1941.

Harris, R.S. and Pringle, J.J. (1985). Risk-Adjusted Discount Rates-Extensions from the Average-Risk Case. Journal of Financial Research (8), 237-244.

Kaplan, S.N. and Ruback, R.S. (1995). The Valuation of Cash Flow Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis. The Journal of Finance, 50 (4), 1059-1093.

Kemsley, D. and Nissim, D. (2002). Valuation of the Debt Tax Shield. The Journal of Finance, 57 (5), 2045-2073.
Kolari, J.W. and Vélez-Pareja, I. (2010). Corporation Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Revision. Working paper. Retrieved from: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1715044

Lewellen, W.G. and Emery, D.R. (1986). Corporate Debt Management and the Value of the Firm. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21 (4), 415-426.

Luehrman, T. (1997). Using APV: A Better Tool for Valuating Operations. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 145-154.

Miles, J.A. and Ezzell, J.R. (1985). Reformulating Tax Shield Valuation: A Note. The Journal of Finance, 40 (5), 1485-1492.

Modigliani, F. and Miller, M.H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Taxes and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review. XLVIII, 261-297.

Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. (1963). American Economic Review, 53 (3), 443-453.

Myers, S.C. (1974). Interactions of Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions-Implications for Capital Budgeting. The Journal of Finance, 29 (1), 1-25.

Newbould, G.D.; Chatfield, R.E. and Anderson, R.F. (1992). Leveraged Buyouts and Tax Incentives. Financial Management, 21 (1), 50-57.

Ruback, R.S. (2002). Capital Cash Flows: A Simple Approach to Valuing Risky Cash Flows. Financial Management, 31 (2), 85-103.

Superintendencia de Sociedades (2010). Sirem. Retrieved on June 11, 2010, from: http://sirem.supersociedades.gov.co/SIREM/index.jsp

Taggart, R.A. Jr. (1991). Consistent Valuation and Cost of Capital: Expressions with Corporate and Personal Taxes. Financial Management (Autumn), 8-20.

Talmor, E.; Haugen, R. and Barnea, A. (1985). The Value of the Tax Subsidy on Risky Debt. The Journal of Business, 58 (2), 191-202.

Tham, J. and Vélez-Pareja, I. (2001). The Correct Discount Rate for the Tax Shield: The N-period Case (April). Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=267962 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.267962.

Principles of Cash Flow Valuation: An Integrated Market-based Approach. (2004). Boston: Academic Press.

Cost of Capital with Levered Cost of Equity as the Risk of Tax Shields. (2010, August 9). Working paper. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/ abstract=1655244

U.S. Courts (2010). Table F-2: U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Retrieved on August 7, 2010, from: http://www.rib.uscourts.gov/Docs/Stats/table_f2.pdf

U.S. Small Business Administration (2010). Statistics of U.S. Businesses, Business Dynamics Statistics, Business Employment Dynamics, and Nonemployer Statistics. Retrieved on Nov. 2, 2010, from: http://www.sba.gov/advo/research/data.html

U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy (2010). Private Firms, Establishments, Employment, Annual Payroll and Receipts by Firm Size, 1988-2007 (table).Retrieved on August 7, 2010, from: http://www.sba.gov/advo/research/us88_07.pdf

Vélez-Pareja, I. (2009, July). Return to Basics: Are You Properly Calculating Tax Shields? Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1306043

Calculating Tax Shields from Financial expense with Losses Carried Forward. (2010, May). Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1604082

Viana Rojas, J. (2009, May 11). Más empresas buscaron su salvación en el primer trimestre; crisis empezó a pasar cuenta de cobro. Portafolio. Retrieved on Nov 2, 2010, from: http://www.portafolio.com.co/economia/economiahoy/2009-05-11/ARTICULO-WEB-NOTA_INTERIOR_PORTA-5171194.html

World Bank (2010). Total businesses registered (number). Retrieved on Nov. 2, 2010, from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IC.BUS.TOTL

Wrightsman, D. (1978). Tax Shield Valuation and the Capital Structure Decision. The Journal of Finance, 33 (2), 650-656.
Cómo citar
Vélez Pareja, I. (2010). Estudios fiscales riesgosos y deuda con riesgo: un estudio exploratorio. Cuadernos De Administración, 23(41). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao23-41.efrd
Sección
Artículos