Coproduction for change: participatory tools for inclusive health and wellbeing in European small and medium size cities

Keywords

citizen participation
co-creation
inclusive health and wellbeing
co-management
nature-based solutions
public private people partnership

How to Cite

Benavides, L. M., Colini, L., & Tripodi, L. (2025). Coproduction for change: participatory tools for inclusive health and wellbeing in European small and medium size cities . Cuadernos De Vivienda Y Urbanismo, 18. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cvu18.ccpt
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

This paper outlines the participatory tools utilised in the IN-HABIT Horizon 2020 project, aimed at co-creating solutions for inclusive health and wellbeing (IHW) in four small to medium-sized European cities. Unlike conventional studies that prioritise greening measures for health and wellbeing, IN-HABIT highlights inclusivity, gender equality, and broad social involvement. Each city established a thematic emphasis within IHW, leading to the creation of four distinct projects. The co-creation methodology aims to improve public participation in these initiatives by including the theory of change, sustainable integrated development, and participatory action research, with the objective of engaging stakeholders and enabling IN-HABIT members to monitor and self-document their progress.  The duration of IN-HABIT has facilitated the analysis of how these methodologies have been adaptively modified in response to changing public engagement dynamics over 5 years´ time. The paper concludes with reflections on deviations, commonalities, and transnational learning across the four urban contexts

Anguelovski, I., Brand, A. L., Connolly, J. J. T., Corbera, E., Kotsila, P., Steil, J., … Argüelles Ramos, L. (2020). Expanding the Boundaries of Justice in Urban Greening Scholarship: Toward an Emancipatory, Antisubordination, Intersectional, and Relational Approach. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(6), 1743–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1740579

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x

Böhme, K., & Redlich, S. (2023). The territorial agenda 2030 for places and a more cohesive European territory? Planning Practice & Research, 38(5), 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2258029

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2013). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems: Quintuple helix and social ecology. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp 1293–1300). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_310

Charland, S. (2024). Public engagement made easy: A guide for planners and policymakers. Taylor & Francis.

Crowley, D., Marat-Mendes, T., Falanga, R., Henfrey, T., & Penha-Lopes, G. (2021). Towards a necessary regenerative urban planning: Insights from community-led initiatives for ecocity transformation. Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios, Spring Special Issue (Apr/2021), 83–104 https://doi.org/10.15847/cct.20505

Domínguez-González, A., & Navarro Yáñez, C. J. (2023). The impact of EU-integrated urban development initiatives: Research strategies beyond ‘good practices’. In EU integrated urban initiatives: Policy learning and quality of life impacts in Spain (pp. 111–130). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20885-0_7

Dushkova, D., & Haase, D. (2023). Resilient cities, healthy communities, and sustainable future: How do nature-based solutions contribute? In Handbook of social sciences and global public health (pp. 1–24). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25110-8_133

Droege, P. (2011). Urban energy transition: From fossil fuels to renewable power. Elsevier.

Faludi, A. (2009). A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union’ and the ‘First Action Programme’. Progress in Planning, 71(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.001

Fioretti, C., Pertoldi, M., Busti, M., & Van Heerden, S. (2020). Handbook of sustainable urban development strategies (No. JRC118841). Joint Research Centre.

Florentin, D. (2018). The challenges of degrowth in cities. Field Actions Science Reports, Special Issue 18, 16–19.

Grossmann, M., & Creamer, E. (2017). Assessing diversity and inclusivity within the Transition movement: An urban case study. Environmental Politics, 26(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1232522

Hofer, K., & Kaufmann, D. (2023). Actors, arenas and aims: A conceptual framework for public participation. Planning Theory, 22(4), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952221139587

Hurtado, S. D. G. (2024). The regeneration of urban vulnerable neighbourhoods: An EU policy that matters? In Urban regeneration in Europe, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64773-4_11

Kiss, B., Sekulova, F., Hörschelmann, K., Salk, C. F., Takahashi, W., & Wamsler, C. (2022). Citizen participation in the governance of nature-based solutions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(3), 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1987

Kronenberg, J., Andersson, E., Elmqvist, T., Łaszkiewicz, E., Xue, J., & Khmara, Y. (2024). Cities, planetary boundaries, and degrowth. The Lancet Planetary Health, 8(4), e234–e241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00025-1

Lane, M. B. (2005). Public participation in planning: An intellectual history. Australian Geographer, 36(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.

Leino, H., & Puumala, E. (2021). What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(4), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420957337

Mahmoud, I., & Morello, E. (2021). Co-creation pathway for urban nature-based solutions: Testing a shared-governance approach in three cities and nine action labs. In Smart and sustainable planning for cities and regions: Results of SSPCR 2019—Open access contributions 3 (pp. 259–276). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57764-3_17

Marat-Mendes, T., d’Almeida, P. B., & Borges, J. C. (2022). Concepts and definitions for a sustainable planning transition: Lessons from moments of change. European Planning Studies, 30(8), 1421–1443. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1894095

McNally, J. (2021, January 29). What is a Pathway? A conceptual overview of transition pathways. Energy Futures Lab. https://energyfutureslab.com/what-is-a-pathway-a-conceptual-overview-of-transition-pathways/

Medeiros, E., & van der Zwet, A. (2020). Sustainable and integrated urban planning and governance in metropolitan and medium-sized cities. Sustainability, 12(15), 5976. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155976

Milojevic, B. (2018). Integrated urban planning in theory and practice. САВРЕМЕНА ТЕОРИЈА И ПРАКСА У ГРАДИТЕЉСТВУ, 13. https://doi.org/10.7251/STP1813323M

Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., & Loorbach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001

Nunes, N., Hilding-Hamann, K. E., & Ferreira, I. (2024). Co-creation of nature-based solutions: Guidelines for citizen engagement. In Social work and social innovation: Emerging trends and challenges for practice, policy and education in Europe (p. 208). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313378

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.

Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x

Pertoldi, M., Fioretti, C., Guzzo, F., Testori, G., De Bruijn, M., Ferry, M., Kah, S., Servillo, L. A., & Windisch, S. (2020). Handbook of territorial and local development strategies. Joint Research Centre.

Sekulova, F., Anguelovski, I., Kiss, B., Kotsila, P., Baró, F., Palgan, Y. V., & Connolly, J. (2021). The governance of nature-based solutions in the city at the intersection of justice and equity. Cities, 112, 103136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103136

Shokry, G., Connolly, J., Anguelovski, I. (2020). Understanding climate gentrification and shifting landscapes of protection and vulnerability in green resilient Philadelphia. Urban Climate, 31, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100539

Siirilä, J., & Salonen, A. O. (2024). Towards a sustainable future in the age of polycrisis. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5, 1436740.

Taplin, D., & Clark, H. (2012). Theory of change basics: A primer on theory of change. ActKnowledge.

Van Eijk, C., Van der Vlegel-Brouwer, W., & Bussemaker, J. (2023). Healthy and happy citizens: The opportunities and challenges of co-producing citizens’ health and well-being in vulnerable neighborhoods. Administrative Sciences, 13(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020046

Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333-1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505

Wamsler, C., Alkan-Olsson, J., Björn, H., Falck, H., Hanson, H., Oskarsson, T., Simonsson, E., & Zelmerlow, F. (2020). Beyond participation: When citizen engagement leads to undesirable outcomes for nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation. Climatic Change, 158(2), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02557-9

Yigitcanlar, T., & Teriman, S. (2014). Rethinking sustainable urban development: Towards an integrated planning and development process. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12(1), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0491-x

Zaucha, J., Komornicki, T., Böhme, K., Świątek, D., & Żuber, P. (2012). Territorial keys for bringing closer the territorial agenda of the EU and Europe 2020. European Planning Studies, 22(2), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722976

Zhang, X., Bayulken, B., Skitmore, M., Lu, W., & Huisingh, D. (2018). Sustainable urban transformations towards smarter, healthier cities: Theories, agendas and pathways. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.345

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Luis Miguel Benavides, Laura Colini, Lorenzo Tripodi