Palabras clave
cocreación, salud y bienestar inclusivos
cogestión
soluciones basadas en la naturaleza
asociación público-privada-popular
Cómo citar
Resumen
Este artículo describe las herramientas participativas utilizadas en el proyecto IN-HABIT del programa Horizonte 2020, cuyo objetivo es la creación colaborativa de soluciones para la salud y el bienestar inclusivos (IHW) en cuatro pequeñas y medianas ciudades europeas. A diferencia de estudios convencionales, que priorizan intervenciones ecológicas para la salud y el bienestar, IN-HABIT hace hincapié en la inclusión, igualdad de género y una amplia participación social. Cada ciudad estableció un enfoque temático dentro del IHW dando lugar a cuatro proyectos distintos. La metodología de cocreación pretende mejorar la participación pública en estas iniciativas mediante el uso de herramientas basadas en la teoría del cambio, el desarrollo sostenible integrado y la investigación-acción participativa, con el objetivo de implicar a las partes interesadas y permitir a los miembros de IN-HABIT supervisar y autodocumentar sus progresos. La duración del proyecto IN-HABIT ha permitido analizar cómo se han modificado adaptativamente estas metodologías en respuesta a la cambiante dinámica de la participación pública a lo largo de cinco años. El documento concluye con reflexiones sobre las desviaciones, los puntos en común y el aprendizaje transnacional en los cuatro contextos urbanos.
Anguelovski, I., Brand, A. L., Connolly, J. J. T., Corbera, E., Kotsila, P., Steil, J., … Argüelles Ramos, L. (2020). Expanding the Boundaries of Justice in Urban Greening Scholarship: Toward an Emancipatory, Antisubordination, Intersectional, and Relational Approach. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(6), 1743–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1740579
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
Böhme, K., & Redlich, S. (2023). The territorial agenda 2030 for places and a more cohesive European territory? Planning Practice & Research, 38(5), 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2258029
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2013). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems: Quintuple helix and social ecology. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp 1293–1300). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_310
Charland, S. (2024). Public engagement made easy: A guide for planners and policymakers. Taylor & Francis.
Crowley, D., Marat-Mendes, T., Falanga, R., Henfrey, T., & Penha-Lopes, G. (2021). Towards a necessary regenerative urban planning: Insights from community-led initiatives for ecocity transformation. Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios, Spring Special Issue (Apr/2021), 83–104 https://doi.org/10.15847/cct.20505
Domínguez-González, A., & Navarro Yáñez, C. J. (2023). The impact of EU-integrated urban development initiatives: Research strategies beyond ‘good practices’. In EU integrated urban initiatives: Policy learning and quality of life impacts in Spain (pp. 111–130). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20885-0_7
Dushkova, D., & Haase, D. (2023). Resilient cities, healthy communities, and sustainable future: How do nature-based solutions contribute? In Handbook of social sciences and global public health (pp. 1–24). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25110-8_133
Droege, P. (2011). Urban energy transition: From fossil fuels to renewable power. Elsevier.
Faludi, A. (2009). A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union’ and the ‘First Action Programme’. Progress in Planning, 71(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.001
Fioretti, C., Pertoldi, M., Busti, M., & Van Heerden, S. (2020). Handbook of sustainable urban development strategies (No. JRC118841). Joint Research Centre.
Florentin, D. (2018). The challenges of degrowth in cities. Field Actions Science Reports, Special Issue 18, 16–19.
Grossmann, M., & Creamer, E. (2017). Assessing diversity and inclusivity within the Transition movement: An urban case study. Environmental Politics, 26(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1232522
Hofer, K., & Kaufmann, D. (2023). Actors, arenas and aims: A conceptual framework for public participation. Planning Theory, 22(4), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952221139587
Hurtado, S. D. G. (2024). The regeneration of urban vulnerable neighbourhoods: An EU policy that matters? In Urban regeneration in Europe, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64773-4_11
Kiss, B., Sekulova, F., Hörschelmann, K., Salk, C. F., Takahashi, W., & Wamsler, C. (2022). Citizen participation in the governance of nature-based solutions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(3), 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1987
Kronenberg, J., Andersson, E., Elmqvist, T., Łaszkiewicz, E., Xue, J., & Khmara, Y. (2024). Cities, planetary boundaries, and degrowth. The Lancet Planetary Health, 8(4), e234–e241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00025-1
Lane, M. B. (2005). Public participation in planning: An intellectual history. Australian Geographer, 36(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.
Leino, H., & Puumala, E. (2021). What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(4), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420957337
Mahmoud, I., & Morello, E. (2021). Co-creation pathway for urban nature-based solutions: Testing a shared-governance approach in three cities and nine action labs. In Smart and sustainable planning for cities and regions: Results of SSPCR 2019—Open access contributions 3 (pp. 259–276). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57764-3_17
Marat-Mendes, T., d’Almeida, P. B., & Borges, J. C. (2022). Concepts and definitions for a sustainable planning transition: Lessons from moments of change. European Planning Studies, 30(8), 1421–1443. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1894095
McNally, J. (2021, January 29). What is a Pathway? A conceptual overview of transition pathways. Energy Futures Lab. https://energyfutureslab.com/what-is-a-pathway-a-conceptual-overview-of-transition-pathways/
Medeiros, E., & van der Zwet, A. (2020). Sustainable and integrated urban planning and governance in metropolitan and medium-sized cities. Sustainability, 12(15), 5976. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155976
Milojevic, B. (2018). Integrated urban planning in theory and practice. САВРЕМЕНА ТЕОРИЈА И ПРАКСА У ГРАДИТЕЉСТВУ, 13. https://doi.org/10.7251/STP1813323M
Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., & Loorbach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
Nunes, N., Hilding-Hamann, K. E., & Ferreira, I. (2024). Co-creation of nature-based solutions: Guidelines for citizen engagement. In Social work and social innovation: Emerging trends and challenges for practice, policy and education in Europe (p. 208). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313378
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x
Pertoldi, M., Fioretti, C., Guzzo, F., Testori, G., De Bruijn, M., Ferry, M., Kah, S., Servillo, L. A., & Windisch, S. (2020). Handbook of territorial and local development strategies. Joint Research Centre.
Sekulova, F., Anguelovski, I., Kiss, B., Kotsila, P., Baró, F., Palgan, Y. V., & Connolly, J. (2021). The governance of nature-based solutions in the city at the intersection of justice and equity. Cities, 112, 103136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103136
Shokry, G., Connolly, J., Anguelovski, I. (2020). Understanding climate gentrification and shifting landscapes of protection and vulnerability in green resilient Philadelphia. Urban Climate, 31, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100539
Siirilä, J., & Salonen, A. O. (2024). Towards a sustainable future in the age of polycrisis. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5, 1436740.
Taplin, D., & Clark, H. (2012). Theory of change basics: A primer on theory of change. ActKnowledge.
Van Eijk, C., Van der Vlegel-Brouwer, W., & Bussemaker, J. (2023). Healthy and happy citizens: The opportunities and challenges of co-producing citizens’ health and well-being in vulnerable neighborhoods. Administrative Sciences, 13(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020046
Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333-1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
Wamsler, C., Alkan-Olsson, J., Björn, H., Falck, H., Hanson, H., Oskarsson, T., Simonsson, E., & Zelmerlow, F. (2020). Beyond participation: When citizen engagement leads to undesirable outcomes for nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation. Climatic Change, 158(2), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02557-9
Yigitcanlar, T., & Teriman, S. (2014). Rethinking sustainable urban development: Towards an integrated planning and development process. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12(1), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0491-x
Zaucha, J., Komornicki, T., Böhme, K., Świątek, D., & Żuber, P. (2012). Territorial keys for bringing closer the territorial agenda of the EU and Europe 2020. European Planning Studies, 22(2), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722976
Zhang, X., Bayulken, B., Skitmore, M., Lu, W., & Huisingh, D. (2018). Sustainable urban transformations towards smarter, healthier cities: Theories, agendas and pathways. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.345
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2025 Luis Miguel Benavides, Laura Colini, Lorenzo Tripodi