v. 15 n. 81 (2018), Artículos Investigación
v. 15 n. 81 (2018)

Analysis of Determining the Leadership Approach and Factors Influencing Managerial Perceptions of the Agricultural Organizations’ President: An Empirical Exploration

Artículos Investigación
Publicado 2018-06-01
Hasan Yilmaz
Çagla Örmeci Kart
Ege University
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-9908
HTML Full Text (Inglês)
PDF (Inglês)
XML (Inglês)

Palavras-chave

presidents' perceptions
leadership approach
the managerial perception
cooperative
the managerial percept

Como Citar

Analysis of Determining the Leadership Approach and Factors Influencing Managerial Perceptions of the Agricultural Organizations’ President: An Empirical Exploration. (2018). Cadernos De Desenvolvimento Rural, 15(81), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cdr15-81.adla
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA

Baixar Citação

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Resumo

The goal of this paper was to identify the leadership approach and dimensions influencing the managerial perceptions of the agricultural organization’s president. This research was carried out with agricultural organization presidents by using questionnaires. For this purpose, 29 items were given to presidents and a Likert scale used for the degree of agreement of each item. Factor analysis, Cronbach alpha coefficient was situated to be 0.933. To specify the dimensions influencing the managerial perception of agricultural organization’s president principle component analysis with varimax rotation was used. Eigenvalue belongs to seven of 29 items was calculated higher than one. As a result of this analysis, seven dimensions were examined. These dimensions clarified 75.75% of the total variance. The main aspects influencing the managerial perception of agricultural organization’s president were constructed to be motivation and team spirit, the power of initiative, put the organization interests over their individual interests, devotion to duty, entrepreneurial spirit, empathy ability and sense of belonging to an organization.

HTML Full Text (Inglês)
PDF (Inglês)
XML (Inglês)

Aizsilnieks, A.P. (1952). Farmer cooperatives and economic welfare: A reply. Journal of Farm Economics, 34: 563-566.

Akın, S., Kara, A., Öcal Kara, F., & Kurt, Ç. (2013). Profiles of leading female farmers in Turkey. Regional and Business Studies, 5(1-2): 19-26.

Anonymous. (1997). Cooperative Management. Business & Cooperative Development Publications.

Aresvik, O. (1955). Comments on economics nature of the cooperatives association. Journal of Farm Economics, 37:140-144.

Aslanalp, Y. (2002). Leadership. (In Turk.) Master thesis. Mugla University.

Azadi, H., Gholamhossein, H., Kiumars, Z., Aligholi, H., & Frank, W. (2010). Factors influencing the success of animal husbandry cooperatives: A case study in Southwest Iran. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, 111(2): 89-99.

Çelik Ateş, H., & Terin, M. (2011). Farmers' perceptions of farmer organizations in rural areas. African Journal of Business Management, 5(1): 179-186.

Çetinkaya, M. (2009). Yöneticilerin yönetsel yetkinlik algilamalarina ilişkin bir araştırma. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 11(2).

Chambo, S., Mwangi, M., &Oloo, O. (2007). An Analysis of the Socio-economic Impact of Cooperatives in Africa and Their Institutional Context. ICA Regional Office for Africa, Nairobi.

Chambo, S.A. (2009). Agricultural co-operatives: role in food security and rural development. Paper Presented to Expert Group Meeting on Co-operatives Held on 28 – 30 April 2009 New York.

Cieślińska, K .(2007). The basic roles of manager in business organization. Ekon, 6: 3-12.

Clark, E. (1952). Farmer cooperatives and economics welfare, Journal of Farm Economics, 34:35-51.

Cook, M.L. (1994). The role of the Management Behaviour in Agricultural Cooperatives. Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, 9.

Costa Pinto, A. (2009). Agricultural cooperatives and farmers organizations: Role in rural development and poverty reduction.

Costello, A.B., & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7): 1-9.

Emelianoff, I.V. (1948). Economic Theory of Co-operation economic structure of cooperative organizations. Washington DC.

Gray, T., Kraenzle, W., & Charles, A. (2002). U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Business-Cooperative Service, 2002.

Hair, J.F., Rolph, E.A., Ronald, L.T., & William, C.B. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis. Newyork: Macmillan Publishing Company.

İnan, İ.H., Direk, M., Başaran, B., Birinci, S., & Erkmen, E. (2005). Organizing in Agriculture. Technical Congress of Agricultural Engineers. January 37, Ankara, pp 1133-1154.

Inceoglu, M. (2000). Attitude-Perception-Communication. Ankara: İmaj Publishing, 3nd Edition.

Johnson, D.R., Alvarez, P., Longerbeam, S., Soldner, M., Kurotsuchi, K., Brown, J., & Rowan-Kenyon, H. (2007). Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups. Journal of College Student Development, 48: 525–542.

Kaiser, H.F. (1957). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23: 187–200.

Kaiser, H.F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20:141-151.

Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrica, 39:31–96.

Kline, P. (2014). An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. Oxon: Routledge.

Machete, C.L. (1990). Factors contributing to poor performance of agricultural cooperatives in less developed areas. Agrekon, 29(4): 305–309.

Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Medicine & Health Science Books.

Molaie, M. (2014). The relationship between various aspects of the electricity distribution company's performance and customers' satisfaction as well as their perceived justice. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 3 (1): 8-13.

Mülayim, Z.G. (2003). Kooperatifçilik, Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları.

Özçatalbaş, O., Gürgen, Y. (1998). Agricultural Extension and Communication. Adana: Baki Kitap ve Yayınevi.

Özdemir, G. (2005). Cooperative–shareholder relations in agricultural cooperatives in Turkey. Journal of Asian Economics, 16: 315-325.

Penc, J. (2000). Menedżer w uczącej się organizacji. Menedżer Łódź, 107-108.

Phillips, R, (1953). Economic nature of the cooperative association. Journal of Farm Economics, 35:74-87.

Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T., & Boulian, P.V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59: 603–609.

Robotka, F. (1957). A theory of cooperation. Minneapolis: Springer Link.

Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn &Bacon.

Tosun, K. (1978). İşletme Yönetimi. İstanbul: Fakülte matbaası.

Williamson, L. (1998). Role of the Co-op Manager, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture AEC-51, pp 1-3.

Yelkikalan, N., Sumer, B., & Temel, S. (2006). Students’ perceptions on faculty evaluations: a research on students of faculty of economics and business. Selcuk University Karaman Journal Faculty Of Economic And Administrative Science 10: 144-160.

Yercan, M., & Kınıklı, F. (2016). The Evaluation of agricultural cooperative movement in the world and Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University, 30: 106-112.

Zielnicki, K., (1997). Przywódcy i menedżerowie. Personel, 11(44): 29-32.

Propriedade intelectual:

Instituto de Estudios Rurales, Facultad de Estudios Ambientales y Rurales, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.

O envio de um artigo para a revista Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, indica que o(s) autor(es) certifica(m) e aceita(m):

  1. Que ele não tem sido publicado, nem aceito para publicação em outra revista.
  2. Que, no caso de sua publicação for aceita, se o artigo ter uma versão previa como working paper (literatura cinza) ou aparecer numa site da internet, deverá ser retirado dele, ficando somente o título, resumo, palavras-chave e hipervinculo à revista.
  3. Que uma vez publicado em Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural não será publicado em outra revista.

Ao enviar artigos para avaliação, o(s) autor(es) aceita(m) transferir(em) os direitos de autor à revista Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, para os efeitos da sua publicação na versão impressa ou eletrônica, mesmo firmará a licença de uso parcial anexa. 

Responsabilidade de conteúdos:

O conteúdo dos artigos publicados por Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural é de exclusiva responsabilidade do(s) autor(es)  e não necessariamente reflete o pensamento do comitê editorial e científico da revista Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural. Os textos podem se reproduzir total ou parcialmente, mas citando a fonte.

A publicação opera de acordo com a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC), "Alguns direitos reservados". Para as licenças CC, o princípio é o da liberdade criativa. Este sistema não se opõe aos direitos autorais, mas complementa-se com eles. Somos conscientes da importância dos direitos de autor na nossa cultura.

Creative Commons oferece um sistema que automatiza a pesquisa de conteúdos "comuns" ou sob licença CC. Assim, ao licenciar o seu trabalho, o criador estabelece as condições gerais que são digitalmente incorporadas nele, para que um motor de busca possa identificá-las e escolher a mais conveniente.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.