Abstract
The international private law requires that states must have a tribunal system with the disposition to apply the rules of international law when a party in litigation is not a national of the country. One component of the international private law is the proof of the foreign law, which is analyzed from a compara- tive perspective between the state of the art in Colombia with countries that have a Common Law legal system and nations of the continental Europe. The critical review is made under three topics: the proof of foreign law as a matter of fact or law, the burden of proof and methods of proof. The pros- pects for Colombia in these areas will be confronted with the most recent developments in other jurisdictions. The conclusion is that the question of the proof of foreign law in Colombia does not keeps correspondence with the civil law system international standard, suggesting that is necessary to incept comprehensive legislation on private international law.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.