Abstract
This paper summarizes the legal arguments held by the
European Court of Justice ruling the IMS-Health case, where
European Competition Law and European Intellectual Property
Law were placed vis-à-vis. The evolution of the Doctrine of
Essential Facilities in the European case law is addressed
in this comment emphasizing that new human creations such
as those protected by copyrights, justify a renewed approach
to the mentioned doctrine and that the rule of law held in the
past years cannot be straightforwardly applied to all modern
inventions and facilities. The sources for the research are
Magill and Bronner’s test on refusal to deal under article 82 of
the Treaty Establishing the European Union (Competition
Law Regulation). The paper concludes that IMS-Health case
opened the discussion for determining how the two legal
frameworks (Competition Law and Intellectual Property Law)
should be balanced.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.