Abstract
This article addresses the debate regarding indirect expropriation in the US Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). Departing from NAFTA, this study presents the main arguments that provoked a change in the usual US FTAs takings provision in order to assure that foreign investors are not granted “greater rights” than those available to US local investors. This change, achieved through a set of guidelines contained in the US Trade Act of 2002, has been applied in subsequent negotiations of FTAs between the USA and eleven countries or regional groups. Although the adjustment to US domestic standards appears as an imposition over other alternatives, it seems to offer a sound approach to a topic that lacks coherence and symmetry at the international level.
The study presents a further analytical review of the relevant provisions of the U.S.-Chile and U.S.-Singapore FTAs, the first two treaties containing the new approach. It concludes that the problems of the expropriation provision of NAFTA have been confronted but only partly solved. This conclusion is reached after comparing the new provisions with the principles and standards of the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution and its jurisprudential developments. Finally, this article advocates the process of enhancement of the norm in future negotiations while it presents a non-exhaustive list of domestic policies that might be considered by host states to strengthen their own institutions and legal systems before the entry into force of an FTA containing indirect expropriation protections.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.