Published May 15, 2011



PLUMX
Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Rafael Nieto Navia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

The intention of this article is to comment the Editorial of 16 International Law, Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional, Javeriana University, which proposes the idea that the “recommendations” made by some of the conventional organs of certain human rights treaties in which Colombia is a party State, should be considered by the Colombian Constitutional Court as a “minimum obligatory (or compulsory) standard” within the so-called “constitutional block”. This article considers that this suggestion is wrong.

Keywords

Separación de poderes, buena fe (Derecho), Estados de Excepción, bloque de constitucionalidad, ratificación e interpretación tratados, buena fe, recomendaciones, interpretaciones autorizadasSeparation of powers, Good faith (Law), Emergency legislation, constitutional block, ratification and interpretation of treaties, good faith, suspension of guarantees in case of emergency or public danger, recommendations, authorized interpretations

References
How to Cite
Nieto Navia, R. (2011). The Legal Value of the Recommendations of Human Rights Committees and the Constitutional Block. International Law: Revista Colombiana De Derecho Internacional, 9(18). Retrieved from https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/internationallaw/article/view/13763
Section
Articles