Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The Chinese development model has been shaped to get distanced from the Washington model. It was set out as an alternative view to the American assumptions, but it brought about some convergences and similarities regarding the biased understanding of development. China occupies a prestigious place regarding their GDP but their human indicators do not appear as prosperous a the economic ones. e Beijing Consensus is a listing of tasks intended to attain some economic standards and growth and so it is not a development model. The dehumanization of the development notion in the Chinese model has brought Beijing to a relevant position of macroeconomic growth, but getting distanced from those variables imperative for a comprehensive development. Although the human development index is high in China, the way of measuring this indicator is still mostly based on economic issues. This way they are quite distanced from the essential human development, which should be a consequence of the economic objectives: Improving the standard of living of the whole population is the purpose of development.
Banco Mundial. (2017). Crecimiento del PIB per cápita (% anual) | Data. Recuperado 17 de agosto de 2018, a partir de https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG?end=2017&locations=CN&start=1961&view=chart
Barreda, M. (2011). La calidad de la democracia Un análisis comparado de América Latina. Política y gobierno, 18(2), 265-295.
Baudean, M. (2010). Comentarios a propósito del debate sobre el “Consenso” de Beijing. Letras Internacionales, (116-4).
Bolinaga, L., & Slipak, A. (2015). El Consenso de Beijing y la reprimarizacion productiva de America Latina: El caso argentino. Problemas del Desarrollo, 183(46), 33-58. https://doi.org/10.15446/anpol.v29n86.58041
Boutros-Ghali, & Boutros. (2003). La Interacción entre democracia y desarrollo: informe de síntesis; 2003. (UNESCO, Ed.). París: Organización de las Naciones Unidas. Recuperado a partir de http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001323/132343s.pdf
Brooks, S., & Wohlforth, W. (2016). The Once and Future Superpower. Why China Won’t Overtake the United States. Foreign Affairs, (may/june). Recuperado a partir de https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2016-04-13/once-and-future-superpower
Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Downs, G. W. (2005). Development and Democracy. Foreign Affairs. Recuperado a partir de https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2005-09-01/development-and-democracy
Cao, Q., Liang, Y., & Niu, X. (2017). China’s air quality and respiratory disease mortality based on the spatial panel model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091081
Dahl, R. A. (2009). La poliarquía: participación y oposición (Tecnos). Madrid: Tecnos.
Fanjul, E. (2009). El Consenso de Pekín: ¿un nuevo modelo para los países en desarrollo? Recuperado 13 de agosto de 2018, a partir de http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_es/contenido?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/elcano/elcano_es/zonas_es/cooperacion+y+desarrollo/ari122-2009
Galchu, J. (2018). African Journal of Political Science and International Relations The Beijing consensus versus the Washington consensus: The dilemma of Chinese engagement in Africa, 12(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPSIR2016.0920
Gálvez, A. (2011). Consenso de Beijing: en conexión con Latinoamérica. Bogotá D.C.
Goldman, M. (1994). Sowing the Seeds of Democracy in China: Political Reform in the Deng Xiaoping Era | Foreign Affairs. Recuperado 13 de junio de 2018, a partir de https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/1994-05-01/sowing-seeds-democracy-china-political-reform-deng-xiaoping-era
Halper, S. (2010). The Beijing Consensus: How China’s Authoritarian Model Will Dominate the ... - Stefan Halper - Google Libros. Read How you Want. Recuperado a partir de https://books.google.com.co/books?id=lGpyTbC_rGIC&printsec=frontcover&hl=es&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Hsu, S. (2017). Why China Won’t Replace The U.S. As The World’s Superpower. Recuperado 5 de diciembre de 2018, a partir de https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahsu/2017/02/02/why-china-wont-replace-the-u-s-as-the-worlds-superpower/#12306e7d234d
Kennedy, S. (2010). The Myth of the Beijing Consensus. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 461-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670561003666087
Li, H. (2015). The Chinese Model of Development and Its Implications The Chinese Model of Development and Its Implications. World Journal of Social Science Research World Journal of Social Science Research ISSN, 2(2), 128-138. Recuperado a partir de http://scholarworks.merrimack.edu/pol_facpub
Lijphart, A. (2000). Modelos de democracia : formas de gobierno y resultados en treinta y seis países. Madrid: Editorial Ariel.
Liu, Y. (2004). China’s public health-care system: facing the challenges. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82, 532-538.
Miller, L. (2005). China an Emerging Superpower? Recuperado 5 de diciembre de 2018, a partir de https://web.stanford.edu/group/sjir/6.1.03_miller.html
Moreno, B., & Ximénez, C. (1996). Manual de evaluación en Psicología Clínica y de la Salud. Madrid: Siglo XXI. Madrid.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2012). Crear capacidades : propuesta para el desarrollo humano. Madrid: Paidós.
OECD. (2016). Education in China - A Snapshot. Oecd , 14-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013
Okuda, H. (2016). China’s “peaceful rise/peaceful development”: A case study of media frames of the rise of China. Global Media and China, 1(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436416646275
Peng, Y. (2013). El camino del desarrollo de China en el contexto de la transformación de poderes en el mundo. Recuperado a partir de https://www.uv.mx/chinaveracruz/files/2013/02/3-7-Articulo-de-Yuan-Peng.pdf
Pierson, P., & Skocpol, T. (2008). Revista uruguaya de ciencia política. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 17(1), 7-38. Recuperado a partir de http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-499X2008000100001
Preciado, J. (2011). Entre el Consenso de Washington 1 y el Consenso de Beijing Las brechas del desarrollo social. Guadalajara.
Programa de Las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). (2016). Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2016. Washington. Recuperado a partir de http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/HDR2016_SP_Overview_Web.pdf
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work : civic traditions in modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Ramesh, M., Wu, X., & He, A. (2013). Health governance and healthcare reforms in China. Health Policy and Planning, 4, 1-10.
Ramo, J. C. (2004). The Beijing Consensus. London: The Foreign Policy Centre.
Rühlig, T. (2018). China’s international relations in the new era of Xi Jinping – implications for Europe. Recuperado a partir de http://www.eias.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/EU_Asia_at_a_Glance_Ruhlig_2018.pdf
San Martín, R., & Pomeraniec, H. (2016). ¿Dónde queda el Primer Mundo? : El nuevo mapa del desarrollo y el bienestar. Buenos Aires: Aguilar.
Serbin, A. (2017). China y América Latina y el Caribe frente a un cambio de ciclo: narrativas y estrategias. En E. Pastrana Buelvas & H. Gehring (Eds.), La proyección de China en América Latina y el Caribe (pp. 73-98). Bogotá D.C.: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
The Economist. (2017). China goes to Africa - A thousand golden stars. Recuperado 11 de junio de 2018, a partir de https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2017/07/20/china-goes-to-africa
Turin, D. (2010). The Beijing Consensus: China’s Alternative Development Model. Recuperado 11 de junio de 2018, a partir de http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/134/the-beijing-consensus-chinas-alternative-development-model
United Nations Development Programme. (s. f.). Human Development Index (HDI) | Human Development Reports. Recuperado 17 de agosto de 2018, a partir de http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
Urzúa, A., & Caqueo, A. (2012). Calidad de vida: Una revisión teórica del concepto. Terapia Psicológica, 30(1), 61-71.
Vadell, J., Ramos, L., Neves, P., Vadell, J., Ramos, L., & Neves, P. (2014). The international implications of the Chinese model of development in the Global South: Asian Consensus as a network power. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 57(spe), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201400206
Woo, W. (2007). The Macroeconomic Consequences of China ’ s Partially-Reformed Economy. China Perspectives, 50(december 2003), 1-17.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.