Publicado Feb 20, 2019



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar
Descargas


Alberto Ferrer http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6125-5512

Nora Helena Londoño https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6016-1955

Esther Calvete https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6928-9557

Robert F. Krueger https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9127-5509

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Resumen

Objetivo: validar el Inventario de Personalidad para el DSM-5 en una población clínica colombiana e identificar diferencias de género. Participantes: 341 pacientes entre 18 y 60 años, 60% mujeres. Método: AFC en varios modelos de organización, y validez concurrente con el PBQ-SF. Resultados: el AFC respaldó la existencia de los 25 factores de primer orden. En términos de dominios (análisis de segundo orden), se plantearon varios modelos de organización, y se respaldó el modelo propuesto por Krueger et al. (2012): c2(2661, n = 341) = 3350, RMSEA = 0.028 (90% CI:.025; 0.030), CFI = 0.99, NNFI = 0.99. Los hombres obtuvieron puntajes significativamente más altos que las mujeres en grandiosidad, irresponsabilidad, manipulación, toma de riesgos, antagonismo y desinhibición. Las mujeres puntuaron significativamente más alto que los hombres en labilidad emocional y la evitación de la intimidad. La validez concurrente del PID con el PBQ-SF reportó índices de correlación altas.

Keywords

Personality disorders, theory of traits, PID-5, PBQ-SF, confirmatory factor analysistrastornos de personalidad, teoría de rasgos, PID-5, PBQ-SF, análisis factorial confirmatorio

References
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Stadistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV-TR (4th ed.). Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013a). Diagnostic and Stadistical Manual of Mental Disorders. DSM-5 (5th ed.). Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013b). Online Assessment Measures. Retrieved from https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm/educational-resources/assessment-measures

Anderson, J., Sellbom, M., Bagby, R. M., Quilty, L. C., Vewltri, C. O., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: Implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20(3), 286-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112471141

Bastiaens, T., Claes, L., Smits, D., De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., Rossi, G., . . . De Hert, M. (2015). The construct validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (PID-5) in a clinical simple. Assessment, 23(1), 42-51. http://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115575069

Beck, A. T., & Beck, J. S. (1991). The personality belief questionnaire. Unpublished assessment instrument. The Beck Institute for Cognitive Therapy and Research, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania.

Beck, A. T., Freeman, A., Pretzer, J., Davis, D. D., Fleming, B., Ottaviani, R., … Trexler, L. (1995). Terapia cognitiva de los trastornos de la personalidad. Barcelona: Editorial Paidós.

Beck, A. T., Freeman, A., Pretzer, J., Fleming, B., Arntz, A., Butler, A., … Padesky, C. A. (2005). Terapia Cognitiva de los trastornos de personalidad (2nd ed.). Barcelona: Editorial Paidós

Bo, S., Bach, B., Mortensen, E. L., & Simonsen, E. (2016). Reliability and Hierarchical Structure of DSM-5 Pathological Traits in a Danish Mixed Sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(1), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2015_29_187

Butler, A. C., Beck, A. T., & Cohen, L. H. (2007). The Personality Belief Questionnaire-Short Form: Development and preliminary findings. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31(3), 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9041-x

Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Clark, L. A. (1999). Dimensional approaches to personality disorder assessment and diagnosis. In C. R. Cloninger (Ed.), Personality and Psychopathology (pp. 219-244). Washington: American Psychiatric Press.

Clark, L. A., Simms, L. J., Wu, K. D., & Casillas, A. (2008). Manual for the Schedule for Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (2nd ed.) (SNAP-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory NEO-PI-R and NEO Five-Factor Inventory NEO-FFI Professional Manual. Odessa, FL.: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Costa, P. T., & Widiger, T. A. (2009). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Washington: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10140-000

De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., Van Hiel, A., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). The hierarchical structure and construct validity of the PID-5 trait measure in adolescence. Journal of Personality, 82(2), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12042

De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., Van Leeuwen, K., & Mervielde, I. (2006). The structure of maladaptive personality traits in childhood: A step toward an integrative developmental perspective for DSM-5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(4), 639-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.4.639

Fossati, A., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Borroni, S., & Maffei, C. (2013). Reliability and Validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Predicting DSM-IV Personality Disorders and Psychopathy in Community-Dwelling Italian Adults. Assessment, 20(6), 689-708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113504984

Gutiérrez, F., Aluja, A., Peri, J. M., Calvo, N., Ferrer, M., Baillés, E., … Krueger, R. F. (2017). Psychometric Properties of the Spanish PID-5 in a Clinical and a Community Sample. Assessment, 24(3), 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115606518

Harkness, A. R. (1992). Fundamental topics in the personality disorders: Candidate trait dimensions from lower regions of the hierarchy. Psychological Assessment, 4(2), 251-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.2.251

Harkness, A. R., Finn, J. A., McNulty, J. L., & Shields, S. M. (2012). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Recent Constructive Replication and Assessment Literature Review. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 432-443. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025830

Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (1994). The personality psychopathology five (PSY-5): issue from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 291-315). New York, NY: Springer.

Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., & Ben-Porath, J. S. (1995). The personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): constructs and MMPI-2 Scales. Psychological Assessment, 7(1), 104-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.1.104

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2013). LISREL. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879-1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674

Krueger, R. F., Eaton, N. R., Clark, L. A., Watson, D., Markon, K. E., Derringer, J., … Livesley, W. J. (2011). Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(2), 170-191. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.170

Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1

Livesley, W. J. (2001). Conceptual and taxonomics issues. In W. J. Livesley (Ed.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, rearch, and treatment (pp. 3-38). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Londoño, N. H., Calvete, E., & Palacio, J. (2012). Validación del “Cuestionario de Creencias de Personalidad-Versión Breve” (PBQ-SF) en población no clínica Colombiana. Psicología Conductual, 20(2), 305-321.

Markon, K. E. (2010). Modeling psychopathology structure: A symptom-level analysis of Axis I and II disorders. Psychological Medicine, 40(2), 273-288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709990183

Markon, K. E., Quilty, L. C., Bagby, R. M., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment, 20(3), 370-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113486513

Millon, T., Millon, C., Davies, R., & Grossman, S. (2009). MICI-III: Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–III: Manual. Bloomington, MN: PsychCorp.

Morey, L. C., Krueger, R. F., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). The hierarchical structure of clinician ratings of proposed DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(3), 836-841. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034003

O´Connor, B. P. (2005). A search for consensus on the dimensional structure of personality disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 323-345. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20017

Quilty, L. C., Ayearst, L., Chmielewski, M., Pollock, B. G., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample. Assessment, 20(3), 362-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113486183

Roskam, I., Galdiolo, S., Hansenne, M., Massoudi, K., Rossier, J., Gicquel, L., & Rolland, J.-P. (2015). The Psychometric Properties of the French Version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133413

Ruiz, A., Gómez, C., & Londoño, D. (2001). Investigación clínica: Epidemiología clínica aplicada. Bogotá: Centro Editorial Javeriano, CEJA.

Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relatioships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(8), 1326-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002

Sheehan, D., Janavs, J., Baker, R., Harnett-Sheehan, K., Knapp, E., Sheehan, M., . . . Soto, O. (2000). MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Versión en Español 5.0.0 DSM-IV. Retrieved from http://www.academia.cat/files/425-7297-DOCUMENT/MinientrevistaNeuropsiquatribaInternacional.pdf

Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Harnett-Sheehan, K., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., … Dunbar, G. C. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview [M.I.N.I]: The Development and Validation of a Structured Diagnostic Psychiatric Interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(20), 22-33. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9881538

Thomas, K. M., Yalch, M. M., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G., Markon, K. E., & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment, 20(3), 308-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112457589

Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (2007). Personality diagnosis with the Shedler-Westen assessment procedure (SWAP): integrating clinical and statistical measurement and prediction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116(4), 810-822. url http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.4.810

Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(2), 110-130. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.19.2.110.62628

Wright, A. G. C., & Simms, L. J. (2014). On the Structure of Personality Disorder Traits: Conjoint Analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 Trait Models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research and Treatment, 5(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000037

Wright, A. G. C., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., Pinkus, A. L., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological peronality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(4), 951-957. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027669

Zimmermann, J., Altenstein, D., Krieger, T., Holtforth, M. G., Pretsh, J., Alexopoulus, J., . . . Leising, D. (2014). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 Maladaptive Personality Traits: finding from two german-speaking sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(4), 518-540. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_130
Cómo citar
Ferrer, A., Londoño, N. H., Calvete, E., & Krueger, R. F. (2019). Las propiedades Psicométricas del Inventario de Personalidad para el DSM-5 (PID-5) en población clínica colombiana. Universitas Psychologica, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-1.ppoi
Sección
Artículos

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a