Publicado Feb 20, 2019



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar
Descargas


David Sirlopú Díaz https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4683-1734

Claudia Paz Pérez-Salas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6940-6514

Verónica Villarroel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3000-2248

Catalina García https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0698-4974

Kiyomi Barrera https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0032-9928

Eugenio Fierro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7578-7245

Isidora Castillo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9941-1437

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Resumen

La Escala de Respeto Incondicional hacia las Personas (ERIP) mide las actitudes positivas hacia la autonomía, la igualdad y la integridad de los seres humanos. Esta investigación validó y analizó algunas propiedades psicométricas de la versión en español de la ERIP, en una muestra de 947 escolares chilenos entre 12 y 19 años (M = 15.47, DE = 1.49). Mediante análisis factoriales, exploratorio y confirmatorio, emergieron dos factores: Desprecio hacia los demás (F1) y Respeto hacia los demás (F2). La consistencia interna (F1: Omega = 0.82; F2: Omega = 0.78) así como la validez convergente y discriminante de la ERIP fueron adecuadas. Estos resultados indican que la ERIP es un instrumento válido y confiable para ser aplicado en adolescentes y jóvenes.

Keywords

respect, psychometric validation, factorial analysisrespeto, validación psicométrica, análisis factorial

References
Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., & Anega, T. (2000). Classical and modern racial prejudice: A study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(4), 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200007/08)30:4<521::AID-EJSP5>3.0.CO;2-N

Blackwood, L., Hopkins, N., & Reicher, S. (2013). Turning the analytic gaze on “us” the role of authorities in the alienation of minorities. European Psychologist, 18(4), 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000151

Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied psychology, 94(2), 445-464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013935

Darwall, S. L. (1977). Two kinds of respect. Ethics, 88(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1086/292054

Darwall, S. L. (2006). The second-person standpoint: Morality, respect, and accountability. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113

De Cremer, D., & Mulder, L. B. (2007). A passion for respect: On understanding the role of human needs and morality. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung [Group Dynamics and Organization Consulting], 38(4), 439-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-007-0036-1

De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Am I respected or not?: Inclusion and reputation as issues in group membership. Social Justice Research, 18(2), 121-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-7366-3

Dillon, R. S. (2007). Respect: A philosophical perspective. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung [Group Dynamics and Organization Consulting], 38(2), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-007-0016-5

Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(2-3), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v02n02_08

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

Janoff-Bulman, R., & Werther, A. (2008). The social psychology of respect: Implications for delegitimization and reconciliation. En A. Nadler, T. Malloy & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), Social psychology of inter-group reconciliation: From violent conflict to peaceful co-existence (pp. 145-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3), 1-13. (N.° de servicio de reproducción de documentos ERIC EJ977577)

Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (8.a ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.

Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. En S. Fiske, D. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 797-832). Hobeken, NJ: Wiley.

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (2005). Análisis multivariante. Madrid: Pearson Educación, S. A.

Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., ... & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003-1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Huo, Y. J., & Molina, L. E. (2006). Is pluralism a viable model of diversity? The benefits and limits of subgroup respect. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(3), 359-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206064639

Janoff-Bulman, R., & Werther, A. (2008). The social psychology of respect: Implications for delegitimization and reconciliation. En A. Nadler, T. Malloy & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), Social psychology of inter-group reconciliation: From violent conflict to peaceful co-existence (pp. 145-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
JASP Team (2018). JASP (Version 0.9) [Computer software]. Amsterdam, NLD: University of Amsterdam.

Kant, I. (1995). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Crítica de la razón práctica. La paz perpetua. México: Porrúa. (Obra originalmente publicada en 1785)

Lægard, S. (2010). Recognition and toleration: Conflicting approaches to diversity in education? En M. Sardoč (Ed.), Toleration, respect and recognition in education (pp. 17-32). Kuala Lumpur, MY: Wiley-Blackwell.

Laham, S. M., Tam, T., Lalljee, M., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2010). Respect for persons in the intergroup context: Self-other overlap and intergroup emotions as mediators of the impact of respect on action tendencies. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(3), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209344606

Lalljee, M., Laham, S., & Tam, T. (2007). Unconditional respect for persons: A social psychological analysis. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung [Group Dynamics and Organization Consulting], 38(4), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-007-0037-0

Lalljee, M., Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Laham, S. M., & Lee, J. (2009). Unconditional respect for persons and the prediction of intergroup action tendencies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 666-683. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.564

Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (2000). Respect: An exploration. Cambridge: Perseus.

Leary, J. D., Brennan, E. M., & Briggs, H. E. (2005). The African American Adolescent Respect Scale: A measure of a prosocial attitude. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(6), 462-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731505277717

Licata, L., Sánchez-Masas, M., & Green E. G. T. (2011). Identity, immigration, and prejudice in Europe: A recognition approach. En S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (Vol. 1., pp. 895-916). Nueva York: Springer.

Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., & Nagengast, B. (2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 366-381. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019225

McDonald, R. P. (1978). Generalizability in factorable domains: “Domain validity and generalizability”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(1), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447803800111

McFarland, S. (2010). Personality and support for universal human rights: A review and test of a structural model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1735-1763. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00668.x

Mestre Escrivá, V., Frías Navarro, M. D., & Samper García, P. (2004). La medida de la empatía: Análisis del Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Psicothema, 16(2), 255-260. Recuperado de http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/1191.pdf

Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24

Renger, D., Mommert, A., Renger, S., & Simon, B. (2016). When less equal is less human: Intragroup (dis)respect and the experience of being human. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156(5), 553-563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1135865

Renger, D., & Simon, B. (2011). Social recognition as an equal: The role of equality-based respect in group life. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 501-507. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.814

Schirmer, W., Weidenstedt, L., & Reich, W. (2012). From tolerance to respect in inter-ethnic contexts. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(7), 1049-1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.681448

Sidanius, J., Mitchell, M., Haley, H., & Navarrete, C. D. (2006). Support for harsh criminal sanctions and criminal justice beliefs: A social dominance perspective. Social Justice Research, 19, 433-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0026-4

Simon, B. (2007). Respect, equality, and power: A social psychological perspective. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung [Group Dynamics and Organization Consulting], 38(3), 309-326.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-007-0027-2

Simon, B., & Grabow, H. (2014). To be respected and to respect: The challenge of mutual respect in intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12019

Simon, B., Mommert, A., & Renger, D. (2015). Reaching across group boundaries: Respect from outgroup members facilitates re-categorization as a common group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 616-628. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12112

Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017

Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X

Van Quaquebeke, N., Henrich, D. C., & Eckloff, T. (2007). “It’s not tolerance I’m asking for, it’s respect!” A conceptual framework to differentiate between tolerance, acceptance and (two types of) respect. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung [Group Dynamics and Organization Consulting], 38(2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-007-0015-6

Van Sorenden, E., Sanderman, R., & Coyne, J. C. (2013). Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let’s learn from cows in the rain. PLoS One, 8(7), e68967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068967

van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2012). On conviction's collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.x

Weijters, B., Baumgartner, H., & Schillewaert, N. (2013). Reversed item bias: An integrative model. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 320-324. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032121

Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (2003). Do reverse-worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer research? The case of the material values scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 72-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/374697

Zhang, X., Noor, R., & Savalei, V. (2016). Examining the effect of reverse worded items on the factor structure of the need for cognition scale. PloS one, 11(6), e0157795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157795

Zhang, X., & Savalei, V. (2016). Improving the factor structure of psychological scales: The Expanded format as an alternative to the Likert scale format. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(3), 357-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415596421
Cómo citar
Sirlopú Díaz, D., Pérez-Salas, C. P., Villarroel, V., García, C., Barrera, K., Fierro, E., & Castillo, I. (2019). Adaptación y validación de la versión en español de la Escala de Respeto Incondicional hacia las personas en una muestra de escolares chilenos. Universitas Psychologica, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-1.avve
Sección
Artículos

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a