Influence of Gratitude and Materialism on Two Different Conceptualizations of Subjective Well-being
HTML Full Text
PDF
XML

Keywords

subjective well-being
gratitude
materialism
second order factor

How to Cite

Influence of Gratitude and Materialism on Two Different Conceptualizations of Subjective Well-being. (2019). Universitas Psychologica, 18(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-3.igmt
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

The present investigation examined the influence of materialism and gratitude on subjective well-being under two different conceptualizations of this construct: subjective well-being as a construct with three independent components and subjective well-being as a second other factor with three first order factors. 386 participants from Mexico completed a battery of questionnaires measuring gratitude, materialism, positive and negative affect and life satisfaction. Results showed a negative influence of materialism on positive affect, life satisfaction and overall sense of subjective well-being and a positive influence on negative affect. Gratitude had a positive influence on positive affect, life satisfaction and overall sense of subjective well-being. Results also showed that gratitude did not influence negative affect directly, but indirectly through its influence on overall sense of subjective well-being. The implications of our findings were discussed.

HTML Full Text
PDF
XML

Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729

Bono, G., & Odudu, C. (2016). Promoting the development of gratitude to build character and improve society. In D. Carr (Ed.), Perspectives on gratitude: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 185-198). London, England: Routledge.

Bridger, E. K., & Wood, A. M. (2017). Gratitude mediates consumer responses to marketing communications. European Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 44-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2015-0810

Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 348-370. https://doi.org/10.1086/344429

Busseri, M. A. (2015). Toward a resolution of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 83(4), 413-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12116

Busseri, M. A. (2018). Examining the structure of subjective well-being through meta-analyzing associations among positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 68-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.003

Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 290-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310391271

David, S. A., Boniwell, I., & Conley-Ayers, A. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Happiness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Diener, E. Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi. D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_12

Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2018). Reflections on positive emotions and upward spirals. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 194-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617692106

Froh, J. J., Yurkewicz, C., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Gratitude and subjective well-being in early adolescence: Examining gender differences. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 633-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.006

Froh, J. J., Kashdan, T. B., Ozimkowski, K. M., & Miller, N. (2009). Who benefits the most from a gratitude intervention in children and adolescents? Examining positive
affect as a moderator. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(5), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902992464

Grant, A. M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motive prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 946-955. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017935

Gruber, J., & Moskowitz, J. T. (Eds.). (2014). Positive emotion: Integrating the light sides and dark sides. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Kasser, T. (2016). Materialistic values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 489-514. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033344

Ku, L. (2015). Development of materialism in adolescence: The longitudinal role of life satisfaction among Chinese youths. Social Indicators Research, 124(1), 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0787-3

Lucas, R., & Diener, E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In O. John, R. Robins, & L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research (pp. 795-814). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Ma, L. K., Tunney, R. J., & Ferguson, E. (2017). Does gratitude enhance prosociality? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 601-635. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000103

McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112

Polak, E. M., & McCullough, M. E. (2006). Is gratitude an alternative to materialism? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 343-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-3649-5

Puente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos, J. (2013). Personality factors, affect, and autonomy
support as predictors of life satisfaction. Universitas Psychologica, 12(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy12-1.pfaa

Puente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2017). Material values: A study of some antecedents and consequences. Accounting & Management, 62, 1214-1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2017.06.008

Puente-Díaz, R., & Meixueiro, G. (2016). An exploration of the relationships between gratitude, life satisfaction, and importance of helping others among a representative sample of the adult population of Mexico. Cogent Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1160558

Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1086/383436

Sirois, F., & Wood, A. M. (2017). Gratitude uniquely predicts lower depression in chronic illness populations: A longitudinal study of inflammatory bowel disease and arthritis. Health Psychology, 36(2), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000436

Wood, A. M., Joseph, S., & Maltby, J. (2008). Gratitude uniquely predicts satisfaction
with life: Incremental validity above the domains and facets of the five factor
model. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 49-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.019

Wood, A. M., Froh, J. L., & Geragthy, A. W. A. (2010). Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 890-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.