Keywords
Teaching
Disciplines
Reading
Writing
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper reexamines data from three GICEOLEM studies, which focus on how writing and reading are included in different courses in higher education. On one side, a national survey results showed two modes of dealing with reading and writing in different courses: peripheral and intertwined.
On another side, by means of observational studies, in History and Biology, the analysis of teaching situations in which teachers and students talk about what has been read or written allowed to identify, in turn, two variants of the intertwined mode: reading and writing as a means or as an end of instruction.
Class observations transcripts enabled to characterize teaching practices and triangulate them with what was declared by professors in the survey. Our aim is to contribute to the debate on academic literacy instruction, offering a more detailed picture on how, why and what for reading and writing practices are dealt with across the curriculum.
Carlino, P. (2013). Alfabetización académica 10 años después. Revista Mexicana de Investiga- ción Educativa, 18 (57), 355-381. Recuperado de https://www.aacademica.org/paula.car- lino/103.pdf
Carlino, P., Iglesia, P., Bottinelli, L., Cartolari, M., Laxalt, I. y Marucco, M. (2013). Leer y escribir para aprender en las diversas carreras y asignaturas de los IFD que forman a profesores de enseñanza media: concepciones y prácticas declaradas de los formadores de docentes. Recuperado de https://www.aacademica.org/ paula.carlino/141.pdf
Cartolari, M. y Carlino, P. (2011). Leer y tomar apuntes para aprender en la formación docente: un estudio exploratorio. Magis, 3(7), 67-86. https://www.aacademica.org/paula.carlino/225.pdf
Cartolari, M. y Carlino, P. (2016). Hacerle lugar o no a la lectura en aulas del nivel superior: experiencias contrastantes en dos materias de un profesorado en Historia. En G. Bañales Faz, M. Castelló y N. Vega (Eds.), Enseñar a leer y escribir en la educación superior. Pro- puestas educativas basadas en la investigación. Recuperado de https://www.aacademica.org/ paula.carlino/225.pdf
Cordero Carpio, G. y Carlino, P. En prensa. El análisis de la actividad docente: un medio para reflexionar sobre el potencial epistémico de la escritura en una asignatura de Ingeniería. Artículo aceptado en 2017 para publicar en el libro de trabajos seleccionados del Congreso Writing Research Across Borders (WRAB) IV.
De Micheli, A. e Iglesia, P. (2012). Writing to learn biology in the framework of a didactic-curri- cular change in the first year program at an argentine university. En C. Thaiss, G. Bräuer, P. Carlino, L. Ganobcsik-Williams y A. Sinha (Eds.), Writing programs worldwide: Profiles of academic writing in many places (pp. 35-42). Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press.
Deane, M. y Ganobcsik-Williams, L. (2012). Providing a hub for writing development: A profile of the centre for academic writing (CAW), Coventry University, England. En C. Thaiss, G. Bräuer, P. Carlino, L. Ganobcsik- Williams y A. Sinha (Eds.), Writing programs worldwide: Profiles of academic writing in many places (pp. 189-201). Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press.
Dysthe, O. (1996). The multivoiced classroom: Inte- ractions of writing and classroom discourse. Written Communication, 13(3), 385-425.
Fernández Fastuca, L. (2010). La enseñanza de la escritura académica en las universidades del área metropolitana de Buenos Aires (Tesis de maestría inédita). Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires.
Gonzalez, B. Y. (2012). The progression and transformations of the program of academic reading and writing (PLEA) in Colombia’s Universidad Sergio Arboleda. En C. Thaiss, G. Bräuer, P. Carlino, L. Ganobcsik-Williams y A. Sinha (Eds.), Writing programs world- wide: Profiles of academic writing in many places (pp. 157-167). Anderson, South Caro- lina: Parlor Press.
Gottschalk, K. (1997). Putting and keeping the Cornell writing program in its place: Writing in the disciplines. Language and learning across the disciplines, 2 (1), 22-45.
Maimon, E. P. (1997). Time future contained in time past. Conferencia presentada en Third National Writing Across The Curriculum Conference, Charleston, SC.
Maxwell, J. A. y Miller, B. A. (2008). Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. En P. Leavy y S. Hesse-Biber (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 461-477). New York: Guilford Press.
Maxwell, J. A. y Miller, B. A. (2012). Real and virtual relationships in qualitative data analy- sis. En J. Maxwell (Ed.), A realist approach for qualitative research (pp. 109-125). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
McConlogue, T., Mitchell, S. y Peake, K. (2012). Thinking writing at Queen Mary, Univer- sity of London. En C. Thaiss, G. Bräuer, P. Carlino, L. Ganobcsik-Williams y A. Sinha (Eds.), Writing programs worldwide: profiles of academic writing in many places (pp. 203-211). Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press.
Molina, M. E. y Carlino, P. En prensa. Writing as a way of participating in knowledge construc- tion: A case study in two university courses. Artículo aceptado en 2017 para publicar en el libro de trabajos seleccionados del Congreso Writing Research Across Borders (WRAB) IV.
Pérez, M. y Rincón, G. (2013). ¿Para qué se lee y se escribe en la universidad colombiana? Un aporte a la consolidación de la cultura académica del país. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
Rosli, N., y Carlino, P. En prensa. Puestas en común de respuestas escritas a guías de lectura en materias del nivel secundario. Artículo aceptado en 2017 para publicar en el libro de trabajos seleccionados del Congreso Writing Research Across Borders (WRAB) IV.
Salazar-Sierra, A., Sevilla-Rengifo, O., Gonzá- lez-Pinzón, B., Mendoza-Arciniegas, C., Echeverri-Guzmán, A., Quecán-Castellanos, D..., Lozano-Ramírez, M. (2015). Lectura y escritura en la universidad: contribución para reconstruir una historia. Magis, 8 (16), 51-70.
Thaiss, C., Bräuer, G. Carlino, P., Ganobcsik- Williams, L. y Sinha, A. (2012). Writing Programs Worldwide: Profiles of Academic Writing in Many Places. Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press.
Tolchinsky, L. (2008). Usar la lengua en la escuela. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 46, 37-54.
Zadnik, M. y Radloff, A. (1995). A new approach to a communications unit: A student orga- nized conference. En L. Summers (Ed.), A Focus on Learning (pp. 292-296). Perth, Australia.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.