Ulysses in the New World and the Belief in Manifest Destiny: Dialectics of a Two-fold Continent:Latin America and North America
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

Modernity
Plurality
Latin America
North America
Anthropology
Culture.

How to Cite

Von Barloewen, C. (2010). Ulysses in the New World and the Belief in Manifest Destiny: Dialectics of a Two-fold Continent:Latin America and North America. Signo Y Pensamiento, 29(56), 408-418. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.syp29-56.ucdm
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

On the eve of the 21st century, it is not possible to continue understanding the concept of “modernity” as a single monolithic development model clearly following Western patterns. Acknowledging extended cultural diversity and plurality of thought in the modern world makes us think of not only one but multiple ‘modernities’, each one of them being a response to different yet specific traditions and cultures. This article explores the intellectual and academic production in the three Americas throughout their history. By examining anthropological and other intellectual lines of thought, two radically different concepts of modernity and development are compared: one in Latin America, which still today can be called teocentric, and another in North America, that influenced by European models, is anthropocentric.

PDF (Spanish)

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.

Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.