Keywords
Information
Communication
Technology
Social responsibility
How to Cite
Abstract
Techno-ethics (TE) is a field of interdisciplinary research in which the ethical and moral aspects of technology in society are studied (Mitcham, 2005, Luppicini, 2008). The purpose of this article is to promote a reflection around the following questions: What place does technoetics occupy in information and communication societies? What are the challenges of communication in terms of ethics and social responsibility? The article provides a theoretical reflection on the role played by technoethics in information and communication societies. To do this, it analyzes the relationship that exists between technique and ethics in order to better understand the problems and the possibilities of organizations and society in terms of ethics and social responsibility.
Boczkowski, P. (1999). Mutual shaping of users and technologies in a national virtual campus. Journal of Communication, 49, 86-106.
Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1989). Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification.
Hakken, D. (2003). The knowledge landscapes of cyberspace. ny: Routledge.
Internet Architecture Board. (1989). Retrieved June 4, 2007, from http://tools.ietf.org/html/ rfc1087University of Chicago Press.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media converge. ny: nyu Press.
Jenkins, P. (2001) Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the Internet. New York University Press: New York.
Johannesen, R. (2008). Ethics in human communication (6th edition. ny: Waveland Press. Retreived February 1, 2009 from http://www. newsweek.com/id/45548/
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Luppicini, R. (2008). The emerging field of technoethics. In R. Luppicini & R. Adell (Eds.), Handbook of research on technoethics (pp. 1-19). Hershey, pa: Information Science Reference.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The Extensions of Man. Toronto: McGraw Hill.
McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy. Toronto: McGraw Hill.
Merz, M. (2006). Embedding digital infrastructures in epistemic cultures. In C. Hines (ed.), New infrastructures for knowledge production: understanding e-science (pp. 100-115). Hershey, Idea Group.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985) . No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
Meyrowitz, J. (1994). Medium theory. In D. Crowley and D. Mitchell (eds.), Communication theory today (pp. 50-77). Stanford: Stanford University.
Mitcham, C. (2005). Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics (Ed.) Detroit: Macmillan Reference usa.
Mitchell, R., & Thurtle, P. (2004). Data made flesh: Embodying information. ny: Routledge.
Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Science Press.
Palm, E., & Hansson, S. O. (2006). The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 543-558.
Patterson, P., & Wilkins, L. (2004). Media ethics: Issues and cases (5th edition). ny: McGrawHill.
Phillips, R., & Freeman, E. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. Berlin: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Postman, Neil. (1992) Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.
Real, M. (1975). Cultural studies and mediated reality. Journal of Popular Culture 9 (2), 81-5.
Redding, W. C. (1996). Ethics and the study of organizational communication: When will we wake up? In J.A.J.M.S. Pritchard (Ed.), Responsible communication: Ethical issues in business, industry, and the professions (pp. 17-40). Cresskill, nk: Hampton Press.
Regan S. (1996). Is there free speech on the Internet? Censorship in the global Information infrastructure. In R. Shields (ed.) Cultures of Internet virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies. London: Sage.
Ribble, M., & Bailey, G. (2004). Digital citizenship: Focus questions for implementation. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(2), 12-15.
Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2007). Organization Behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Roberts, L. D. (2008). Cyber identity theft. In R. Luppicini & R. Adell (Eds.), Handbook of research on technoethics (pp. 542-557). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Roberts, L. D., & Parks, M. R. (1999). The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the internet. Information, Communication & Society, 2, 521-540.
Sanders, K. (2003). Ethics and journalism. London: Sage Publications.
Schilling, G. (2000). The virtual observatory moves closer to reality. Science, 289, 238-239.
Sterne, J. (2003). The audible past: Cultural origins of sound reproduction. Duham: Duke University Press.
Sutherland, N., Isaacs, P., Graham, P., & McKenna, B. (eds.) (2008). Towards humane technologies: biotechnology, new media, and ethics. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Turtle, P. & Howard, P. (eds). (2002). Semiotic Flesh: information and the human body. Seatle: University of Washington Press.
Vanderburg, W. H. (2005). Living in the labyrinth of technology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Visala, S. (2008). Planning, interests, and argumentation. In R. Luppicini & R. Adell (eds.) (2008). Handbook of research on technoethics (pp 103-110). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
Visser, W., Matten, D., Pohl, M., &. Tolhurst, N. (eds.). (2008). The a to z of corporate social responsibility. New York: Wiley.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, R. (1975). Television: Technology and cultural form. New York: Schocken.
Wilson, C. (2005). Computer attack and cyberterrorism: Vulnerabilities and policy issues for Congress.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.