Palavras-chave
orientação normativa
ideologia de ‘corretitude’
etnografia
Como Citar
Resumo
Este artigo foca-se no ‘imaginário’ dominante (Castoriadis, 1987) de pesquisa acerca do escrever e considera, em particular, como os regímenes de avaliação exercem orientações analíticas sobre tal fenômeno.
Utilizando extratos de três projetos de pesquisa diferentes: o escrever académico dos alunos (ej. Lillis, 2001); o escrever dos académicos para publicações (ej. Lillis e Curry, 2010) e o escrever profissional dos assistentes sociais (ej. Lillis, 2017), este artigo tem três objetivos: 1) ilustrar a abordagem avaliativa-normativa sobre o escrever evidente nas práticas de assunção dentro dos regímenes de avaliação, ou seja, pelo professor, o avaliador, o inspetor; 2) indicar que algumas categorias analíticas utilizadas frequentemente na pesquisa sobre o escrever podem refletir características dos regímenes de avaliação e levar a um reconhecimento errado em lugar de iluminar o que está acontecendo 3) ilustrar o valor de uma abordagem de orientação etnográfica, em particular, um que remarca trajetórias (de textos e de pessoas), para abrir os imaginários de pesquisa e para fazer visíveis dimensões chave dos fenômenos que estamos explorando.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Barton, D. [1994] (2007). Literacy. an introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical intro- duction. Cambridge University Press.
Blommaert, J. (2006). Ethnography as counter- hegemony: Remarks on epistemology and method, Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, 34, 1-8.
Bourdieu, P. (2000 [1977]). Pascalian meditataions. Stanford University Press.
Burgess, S. y Martín Martín, P. (2008). English as an additional language in research publication and communication. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Cameron, D. [1995] (2012). Verbal hygiene. Londres. Routledge.
Canagarajah, S. (2002). A geopolitic of academic writing. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Carlino, P. (2005). Escribir, leer y aprender en la uni- versidad. Una introducción a la alfabetización académica. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Castoriadis, C. (1987). The imaginary institution of society. Oxford: Polity Press.
Curry, M. J. y Lillis, T. (2013). A scholars’ guide to getting published in English. Critical choices and practical strategies. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Delcambre, I. y Donahue, C. (2011). University lite- racies: French students at a disciplinary “thres- hold”? Journal of Academic Writing, 1(1), 13-28.
Fischer, A. (2015). “Hidden Features” and “Overt Instruction” in academic literacy practices: A case study in engineering. En T. Lillis, K. Har- rington, M. Lea y S. Mitchell (Eds.), Working with academic literacies: case studies towards transformative practice. [en línea]. Recuperado de http://wac.colostate.edu/books/lillis/
Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.
Horner, B. (2016). Rewriting composition: Terms of exchange. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press. Hymes, D. [1973] (1996). Speech and language: On the origins and foundations of inequality among speakers. En D. Hymes (Ed.), Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality. Towards an understanding of voice (pp. 25-62). Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kapp, R. (2012). Students’ negotiations of english and literacy in a time of social change. Journal of Advanced Composition, 32, 591-614.
Kell, C. (2010). Ethnographic studies and adult literacy policy in South Africa. En C. Cof- fin, T. Lillis y K. O’Halloran (Eds), Applied linguistics methods. A reader (pp. 216-233). Londres: Routledge.
Lather, P. (2010). Engaging science policy: From the side of the messy. Nueva York: Peter Lang. Lea, M. y Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172.
Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. Londres: Routledge.
Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology and ‘deep theorising’: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353-388.
Lillis, T. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing. Edinburgh: EUP.
Lillis, T. (2017). Imagined, prescribed and actual text trajectories: The ‘problem’ with case notes in contemporary social work. Text and Talk, 37(4). Recuperado de https://linguistlist.org/ issues/28/28-3152.html
Lillis, T. y Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context. Londres: Routledge.
Lillis, T. y Curry, M. J. (2015). The politics of English, language and uptake: The case of international academic journal article reviews, AILA Review, 28, 127-150.
Lillis, T. y McKinney, C. (2013). The sociolinguis- tics of writing in a global context: Objects, lenses, consequences. Journal of Sociolinguis- tics, 17(4), 415-439.
Lillis, T, Harrington, K., Lea, M. y Mitchell, S. (2015). Working with academic literacies: Case studies towards transformative practice [en línea]. Recuperado de http://wac.colostate. edu/books/lillis/
Lu, M. Z. (1987). From silence to words: Writing as struggle. College English, 49, 437-448.
Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rai, L., Lillis, T., Harrison, A. y Garcia-Maza, G. (2014). Effective case recording. En L. Rai (Ed.), Effective writing in social work. Making a difference (pp. 165-195). Bristol: Polity Press.
Rampton, B. (2010). Linguistic ethnography, interactional sociolinguistics and the study of identities. En C. Coffin, T. Lillis y K. O’Halloran (Eds.), Applied Linguistics Methods. A Reader (pp. 234-50). Londres: Routledge.
Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 4, 504-554.
Scott, M. (2017). Special Issue: Academic literacies. London Review of Education, 14,1. Recuperado de https://www.ucl-ioe-press.com/journals/ london-review-of-education/
Seargeant, P. y Swann, J. (2011). English in the world: History, diversity, change. Londres: Routledge.
Thesen, L. (2014). Risk as productive: Working with dilemmas in the writing of research. En L. Thesen y L. Cooper (Eds.), Risk in academic writing. Postgraduate students, their teachers and the making of knowledge (pp. 1-27). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Thesen, L. y Van Pletzen, E. (2006). Academic literacy and the languages of change. London: Continuum.
Trimbur, J. (2013). Grassroots literacy and the writ- ten record: Asbestos activism in South Africa. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17,(4), 460-487.
Turner, J. (2011). Language in the academy. Cultural reflexivity and intercultural dynamics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Esta revista científica está registrada sob a licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Portanto, este trabalho pode ser reproduzido, distribuído e comunicado publicamente em formato digital, desde que os nomes dos autores e da Pontificia Universidad Javeriana sejam mencionados. Você pode citar, adaptar, transformar, auto-arquivar, republicar e desenvolver o material, para qualquer finalidade (inclusive comercial), desde que reconheça adequadamente a autoria, forneça um link para o trabalho original e indique se foram feitas alterações. A Pontificia Universidad Javeriana não retém os direitos sobre os trabalhos publicados e o conteúdo é de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores, que mantêm seus direitos morais, intelectuais, de privacidade e publicidade.